ILD status report Yasuhiro Sugimoto KEK for the ILD concept group

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CO2 cooling for FPCCD Vertex Detector Yasuhiro Sugimoto KEK 1.
Advertisements

Experimental hall in Japanese mountain site Y. Sugimoto ILD MDI/Integration 1.
The SLHC and the Challenges of the CMS Upgrade William Ferguson First year seminar March 2 nd
Silicon Detector: Simulation & Reconstruction Norman Graf SiD Advisory Meeting September 14, 2009.
 k0k0 ++ -- -- p ILC Technical Design Report Physics and Detectors – Detailed Baseline Design Juan A. Fuster Verdú, IFIC-Valencia PAC Meeting, KEK.
David Attié Club ‘ILC Physics Case’ CEA Saclay June 23, 2013 ILD & SiD concepts and R&D.
ILD meeting Welcome/Introduction 2015/4/23 Y. 1.
Software Common Task Group Report Akiya Miyamoto KEK ALCPG09 30 September 2009.
Charge to the SiD Workshop Andy White University of Texas at Arlington.
SID Engineering Marco Oriunno (SLAC), Jan CLIC Workshop, CERN Toward the TDR.
Experimental hall in Japanese mountain site Y. Sugimoto 1.
Summary of Calorimetry/Muon Sessions Burak Bilki University of Iowa Argonne National Laboratory.
SiD R&D on PFA and Calorimetry -> IDAG guidance. -> Present PFA situation. -> Developing a timeline for PFA development. -> Calorimetry aspects.
ACFA Summary Akiya Miyamoto, KEK KILC12 26 April, 2012.
Preparing for the SiD LoI SiD Parallel Session TILC08 March 5, 2008 John Jaros.
RD’s Report on Detector Activity General Overview Project Advisory Sakue Yamada December 14, 2012 Sakue Yamada.
CALICE Referees’ Review Andy White, Junji Haba DESY – PRC 71 April 2011.
GLD Calorimetry 2005/Mar/03 K. Kawagoe / Kobe-U. Introduction Current design –To be optimized for Particle Flow Algorithm (PFA) aiming at 30%/sqrt(E)
ILD Optimization Why – when – what Ties Behnke, DESY Henri Videau, LLR.
SiD R&D tasks for the LOI - Subsystem R&D tasks - Summary of SiD R&D - Prioritization of R&D tasks -> Document for DoE/NSF ~Feb 2009 (Mainly based on Marty’s.
CLICdp achievements in 2014 and goals for 2015 Lucie Linssen, CERN on behalf of the CLICdp collaboration CLIC workshop, January 30 th
1 ILC Detector Activities in Japan Hitoshi Yamamoto Tohoku University IRFU Linear Collider Days, Sacley November 29, 2013.
February, INP PAN FCAL Workshop in Cracow W. Lohmann, DESY The BCD (Baseline Configuration Document) The next calendar dates Where we are with FCAL.
ILC Calorimetry Test Beam Status Lei Xia ANL HEP.
SiD R&D Priorities Andy White University of Texas at Arlington SiD Workshop at SLAC March 2009.
1 ILD meeting LAL M. Joré – Integration status Matthieu Joré – 25 th of May ILD integration status and open issues.
J-C Brient-DESY meeting -Jan/ The 2 detector options today …. SiD vs TDR [ * ] [ * ] J.Jaros at ALCPG-SLAC04 ECAL ECAL tungsten-silicon both optionsHCAL.
1 ILD Workshop purpose and scope Yasuhiro Sugimoto May 23,
1 Design Activity of Large Detector for ILC July 18, 2007 Yasuhiro Sugimoto KEK.
ILD Vertex Detector Y. Sugimoto 2012/5/24 ILD
WORKSHOP CHARGE ACFA Physics and Detector Workshop Tsukuba, Apr 17, 2009 Hitoshi Yamamoto Tohoku University.
Assembly scenario of ILD Si trackers 2015/4/21 Yasuhiro 1.
ILD meeting Thursday May 30, 2013 Ties Behnke, Yasuhiro Sugimoto.
ECFA Workshop, Warsaw, June G. Eckerlin Data Acquisition for the ILD G. Eckerlin ILD Meeting ILC ECFA Workshop, Warsaw, June 11 th 2008 DAQ Concept.
The ILD ECAL Jan th 2010 Paris Satoru Uozumi (Kyungpook Natl. Univ.) for the ILD ECAL group.
Detector R&D at Fermilab Some Perspectives Marcel Demarteau For the Fermilab Detector & Physics R&D Group SiD Workshop SLAC January 28-30, 2008.
The ILD ECAL Jan th Paris Satoru Uozumi (Kyungpook Natl. Univ.) for the ILD ECAL group Contents :
Vincent Boudry LLR, École polytechnique LCTW'09 Orsay 2-5 November 2009 Calorimetry Hot spots.
Roman Pöschl LAL Orsay Testbeam plans 2012/13 CALICE Collaboration Meeting Heidelberg September 2011.
Towards Snowmass Jul. 13, 2005 Y.Sugimoto. Charge for Detector WGs Charge for Concept Groups: work towards a baseline design define performance criteria.
Relations with concept groups
ILD & Test Beam DAQs session
SiD R&D Plan and Opportunities for New Collaborators
Final CALICE OsC meeting: Status and summary of project
Test Beam Request for the Semi-Digital Hadronic Calorimeter
Electroweak Physics Towards the CDR
ILD Technical Coordination
A Detector for the ILC Ties Behnke, DESY.
100th meeting Ties Behnke, DESY
SiD Calorimeter R&D Collaboration
A Silicon Detector for the ILC for the ILC – What is needed…
Status of Ecal(s) for ILD
CLIC detector at SiD meeting 28/3/2010
ECAL project in the future 2-3 years
Sub-Detector Assembly Area Summary of discussion at ALCW2015
Computing in ILC Contents: ILC Project Software for ILC
Sakue Yamada March 19, 2011 RD’s Report Sakue Yamada March 19, /03/19 Sakue
Calorimetry for a CLIC experiment
ILC Detector R&D in Japan
Toward the final design of a TPC for the ILD detector
State-of-the-art in Hadronic Calorimetry for the Lepton Collider
The DBD: Outline and Scope
Detectors for Linear Colliders - ILC and CLIC -
Why do we want a TPC? P. Colas, CEA Saclay
ILD Optimisation: towards 2012 University of Cambridge
CLIC Detector CERN Status + plans
Yasuhiro Okada, Executive Director, KEK
ILC Detector Technology
Detector Optimization using Particle Flow Algorithm
Why do we want a TPC? P. Colas, CEA Saclay
Presentation transcript:

ILD status report Yasuhiro Sugimoto KEK for the ILD concept group @ILC PAC Meeting Taipei

Outline ILD detector and group Recent ILD-related events Progress towards DBD RD’s guideline and ILD’s line Software baseline Benchmark processes and analysis status Hardware baseline Report to IDAG: Detector R&D status and plan Detector integration Site-dependent design Resource issue Summary May 19, 2011 ILC PAC Taipei

ILD Detector International Large Detector General-purpose large detector optimized for particle flow algorithm of jet energy reconstruction Si-based vertex detector and inner/forward trackers Gas-based central tracker: TPC Ultra high granularity imaging calorimetry at large radius High B field of 3.5 T Hermetic coverage by forward calorimeters May 19, 2011 ILC PAC Taipei

ILD group May 19, 2011 ILC PAC Taipei

Recent ILD-related events 2011/1/18-21: BAW-2 @SLAC New beam parameters agreed by detector groups We are still waiting for official parameters for 1 TeV 2011/3/11: Earthquake in east Japan No human damage for ILD collaborators Some impact on ILD activity in Japan Limitation of electric power (recovered to some extent now)  delay of software work using KEK computers  delay of detector R&D work at KEK and Tohoku University Some engineering people are occupied with repairing work at KEK and J-PARC, and have very limited time to spend on ILC (until autumn?) May 19, 2011 ILC PAC Taipei

Recent ILD-related events 2011/3/19-23: ALCPG11 @Eugene Many Japanese colleagues cancelled participation due to the earthquake Interview with IDAG We reported on the ILD status and plan for DBD to IDAG (homework given at the IWLC2010) MDI session ILD and SiD agreed on the push-pull scheme to use “platforms” ILD session Progress reports of the working groups May 19, 2011 ILC PAC Taipei

Recent ILD-related events 2011/4/19-20: ILD regional (EU) Integration meeting @LAL-Orsay Review of the progress and discussion on the ILD detector integration issues 2011/5/9-10: Linear collider power distribution and pulsing workshop @LAL-Orsay Power Pulsing (turn on the detector electronics only during the bunch train) is the key technology to suppress power consumption and minimize the material budget (and space) of cooling devices and cables of LC detectors The experts of ILD, SiD, and CLIC (+LHC) detectors get together and discussed on this issue May 19, 2011 ILC PAC Taipei

Recent ILD-related events 2011/5/19-20: ILC PAC @Taipei 2011/5/23-25: ILD Workshop @LAL Originally planned to be held at KEK Fukushima NPP accident made it difficult for many collaborators to visit Japan Main purpose of this workshop Review the status and plan toward DBD Define the ILD “software baseline” for mass production of simulation data Pre-meetings on Sunday Software meeting MDI/Integration meeting Participants from SiD and GDE-CFS to discuss about push-pull issues May 19, 2011 ILC PAC Taipei

Progress toward DBD Main goal of the DBD Strengthen the physics case for ILC/ILD Physics analysis extended to 1TeV  New benchmark processes Cover missing physics scenario Improve existing (LOI) analysis Some input from LHC? Present a realistic integrated detector Improve designs of sub-detectors beyond the conceptual state Present a fully integrated ILD detector May 19, 2011 ILC PAC Taipei

RD’s guideline for DBD Demonstrate proof of principle on critical components When there are options, at least one option for each subsystem will reach a level of maturity which verifies feasibility Define a feasible baseline design While a baseline will be specified, options may also be considered Complete basic mechanical integration of the baseline design accounting for insensitive zones such as the beam holes, support structure, cables, gaps, or inner detector material Develop a realistic simulation model of the baseline design, including the identified faults and limitations Develop a push-pull mechanism, working out the movement procedure, time scale, alignment and calibration schemes in corporation with relevant groups Develop a realistic concept of integration with the accelerator including the IR design Simulate and analyze updated benchmark reactions with the realistic detector model, including the impact of detector dead zones and updated background conditions Simulate and study some reactions at 1TeV, including realistic higher energy backgrounds, demonstrating the detector performance Develop an improved cost estimate May 19, 2011 ILC PAC Taipei

ILD’s line towards DBD For mass production of simulation data, we will define “one” baseline detector Software baseline For sub-detector options which were not included in the software baseline but desired to be included in hardware options, simulation study to demonstrate the performance should be done with less amount of data samples In 2012, hardware review will be done, and certification as one of the “options” for the baseline design or “alternatives” will be made for each sub-detector candidate Hardware baseline May 19, 2011 ILC PAC Taipei

options/alternatives Tentative ILD roadmap Detector R&D has to be continued beyond 2012 towards construction-ready design (TDR) PAC@Oregon Finalize procedure Define software baseline Define options/alternatives May 19, 2011 ILC PAC Taipei

Software baseline Guideline for sub-detector options to be the “software baseline” Debugged model in MOKKA (GEANT-4 based simulator for ILD) exists Reconstruction code with demonstrated performance exists ILD Workshop Major goal of the ILD Workshop next week is to define the software baseline as far as we can get the consensus However, progress of the software tools might be slow (we will review them also) due to lack of manpower and it might be difficult to define the software baseline completely at this ILD workshop May 19, 2011 ILC PAC Taipei

Benchmark processes New benchmark processes for DBD have been selected by Physics Common Task Group e+ e-  n n H : Higgs branching ratio @1TeV Test detector performance for simplest context e+ e-  t t H : Top Yukawa coupling @1TeV Detector performance for complex (8 jet) events e+ e-  W+ W- : In-situ polarization measurement @1TeV Detector performance for high energy jet Capability of forward detector elements Beside these reactions, ILD wishes to analyze more reactions with a new (realistic) detector model Processes studied in LOI New processes Available CPU power is one concern (LHC is using a lot of CPU) Human resource is also an issue May 19, 2011 ILC PAC Taipei

Analysis in ILD for DBD Analysis Ecm Z H  l+ l- X 250 GeV LOI Z H : Br(Hbb/cc/gg) 250, 350 GeV LOI, SB2009 n n H : Br(Hbb/cc/gg) 1 TeV New benchmark Little Higgs with T-parity Top physics 500 GeV W e n, Z Z, Z n n Z H H (LOI) May 19, 2011 ILC PAC Taipei

Analysis in ILD for DBD Analysis Ecm t t H 500 GeV, 1 TeV New benchmark Long lived stau 500 GeV New WIMP search in ng+invisible LOI Bi-linear R-parity violating SUSY 500 GeV (?) SUSY point 5 SUSY SPS1a’ LOI, SB2009 W+ W- May 19, 2011 ILC PAC Taipei

Hardware baseline Baseline, options, and alternatives ILD will not attempt to exclude sub-detector technologies (as long as they are applicable to ILD) or make a down-selection If a sub-detector technology satisfies certain criteria, it will be considered as one of the sub-detector “options” of ILD Sub-detector technologies which are not demonstrated to satisfy the criteria but still seems promising will be categorized as “alternatives” The hardware review process will start late 2011 or early 2012 Detector “hardware baseline” which includes several sub-detector options will be defined in Q3 of 2012 May 19, 2011 ILC PAC Taipei

Possible hardware options Sub-det. Possible technologies Vertex det. CMOS FPCCD DEPFET Others? Si tracker Single sided strip Pixel Double sided strip TPC GEM MicroMegas ECAL W-Silicon W-Scinti Hybrid HCAL Analog Digital Muon Fe-Scinti Fe-RPC FCAL W-Diamond May 19, 2011 ILC PAC Taipei

R&D plan R&D status & plan of each sub-detector was reported at the IDAG interview in ALCPG11 http://ilcagenda.linearcollider.org/getFile.py/access?contribId=301&sessionId=32&resId=0&materialId=slides&confId=4572 R&D Plan Group VTX Full scale ladder prototype (mechanics) including cooling concept R&D for several chip technologies CMOS, DEPFET, FPCCD, PLUME Si Test of single-sided strip sensors and edgeless sensors Readout chip prototype SiLC TPC GEM and mMEGAS readout with multi-module large prototype Pixel readout demonstration under realistic conditions Model for advanced end-plate demonstration LC-TPC ECAL Extensive test beam data Demonstration of system integration Second generation prototype CALICE May 19, 2011 ILC PAC Taipei

R&D plan Sub-det. R&D Plan Group A-HCAL CALICE D-HCAL Muon (DESY) FCAL Extensive test beam results Second generation readout design and test Second generation prototype CALICE D-HCAL Establish feasibility including readout concept Muon Extensive simulation and optimization Scintillator readout with SiPM prototype Mechanical design (DESY) FCAL Tests of sensors and readout chain Power-pulsing capability has to be demonstrated for most of the sub-detector technologies May 19, 2011 ILC PAC Taipei

Detector integration Realistic detector integration plan with realistic sub-detector design is required for DBD Detector integration design of ILD is gradually getting its shape Assembly scheme of inner detectors AHCAL CAD model FTD design with elec/cables May 19, 2011 ILC PAC Taipei

Site dependent design Mountain site study by GDE CFS group ILD modification for the mountain site No vertical shaft CMS style assembly impossible ~1 km access tunnel instead of vertical shaft Detector assembly On surface  Underground ILD barrel part 3 slices  Single barrel Location of cryogenic system for solenoid Helium compressor on surface would be difficult  Underground These studies started in ILD May 19, 2011 ILC PAC Taipei

Resource issue Asia Europe North America Very limited support from KEK 5 year JSPS funding program has expired at the end of March We are applying a new 5 year program, and the result will become clear at the end of May Europe AIDA project has been started 3M€ out of 8M€ in total for LC Substantial decrease compared to EUDET era North America Situation for ILD remains difficult No explicit support for ILD from national labs NSF based grant for TPC and PFA study through Aug 2012 Inter-concept collaboration to mitigate the resource crisis PLUME collaboration: Low mass ladder R&D for vertex detectors Combined Si-W ECAL and DHCAL test beam at FNAL (Apr. 2011) within CALICE collab. FY2011 ILC support from KEK May 19, 2011 ILC PAC Taipei

Summary ILD is steadily progressing towards the DBD Software baseline with more realistic detector model than LOI will be defined soon and we will get ready to mass production of simulation data ILD would like to analyze many physics processes for DBD in addition to the newly defined three benchmark processes in order to strengthen the physics case for ILC/ILD Hardware baseline of ILD will contain several sub-detector options which are evaluated through internal hardware review process Realistic design of sub-detectors which is necessary for the mechanical integration design of ILD is in progress Situation of resources for ILD study is still insufficient May 19, 2011 ILC PAC Taipei