SPU Day of Common Learning 2012 Zhiguo Ye, History Department

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Write the term and the description.
Advertisements

There is only one good, knowledge, and one evil, ignorance. - Socrates
Language of Meetings PPTX What needs to be said?.
Pictures When you look at this picture, what do you think is happening? If you were here, what noises and sounds would you hear? How do you think.
HDF 190: FIRST YEAR LEADERS INSPIRED TO EXCELLENCE LEADERSHIP PORTFOLIO Kerry Holmes SPRING 2012
Communicating Effectively (1:46) Click here to launch video Click here to download print activity.
Research Paper Workshop. Research Topics in Development and Writing By this point in the class, your research paper topics should be selected and should.
Elements of an Argument. How can I change the ways that other people think?
 Think about the Hartman Personality test, was it accurate?  What did you learn about yourself?
Communication Techniques. Constructive Communication Meaningful Exchange of ideas Leads to understanding Constructive Communication.
The Argumentative Speech
Week 1 Agenda Lesson 1-Introduction Social Skills Overview
Communicating Clearly
Level 1 group discussions
Guidelines of Session PROCESS articipate espect pen communication
Effective communication
Ch. 5 LISTENING SKILLS.
PRESENTATION SKILLS Le Thi Giao Chi, M.A., M.Ed..
I-Messages and Conflict Resolution
Healthy Relationships
Warm up What do you think you could do to improve communication with the person you struggle to get along with?
Thinking like a Scientist
Communication.
Writing for History Class
Conflict Resolution.
Introduction to Socratic Seminars
Today I would like to talk to you about conversations
Theme.
Editing Our Evolution: Rewriting the Human Genome
Argumentative writing
Elements of an Argument
Adapted from opheliaproject.org by S. Ventresca
Today’s Lesson 2/13/17: Overview
Section 6.1 Skills for Healthy Relationships Objectives
Practical tools for conflict resolution
The main idea or underlying meaning of a literary work
Unit 1 Lesson 11 Practice: Listening and Responding to the Emotions of Others.
Persuasive writing structure
Introduction of the Research Paper
June HR Lunch & Learn: Introduction to Learning Circles
Habit 1 Be Proactive.
Training for Service Users for Participation in Interview Panels
Coaching and Giving Feedback
Take out your essays. Prepare for conversation.
Today I would like to talk to you about conversations
Developing Communication Styles & Refusal Skills
Our goal is to help 5th and 6th grade students
COMMUNICATION FOCUS: How is practicing effective communication an important living skill?
6 Steps for Resolving Conflicts
MISC MISC MISC MISC MISC MISC
D5 – Bellringer Let’s take one last look and see if you can find any persuasive writing contests that we might participate in as a class (or perhaps.
The Mental Capacity Act
*Helping each other in school
Importance of Dissent Law and Ethics.
The way in which we send and receive messages.
Barriers to Communication
Participation 15 points Participates in every class session
Theme.
Developing Your Decision Making Skills
Today I would like to talk to you about conversations
Warm up What do you think you could do to improve communication with the person you struggle to get along with?
Communicating Effectively
Communicating Effectively
Unit 1 Lesson 11 Practice: Listening and Responding to the Emotions of Others.
Persuasive writing structure
Class Rules [class name here] Developed by Orchard Hill College.
Learning Disability Awareness and Communication
Getting Started…. What’s First? Student Homework Assignment
1.
What is bullying? The ABA (Anti-Bullying Alliance) defines bullying as: The repetitive, intentional hurting of one person or group by another person.
Presentation transcript:

How to talk about controversial subjects without making enemies of your friends SPU Day of Common Learning 2012 Zhiguo Ye, History Department Laura Sweat, School of Theology Mikyung Kim, Sociology Department Ruth Ediger, Poli Sci & Geography Department

Overview Preliminaries, Introductions Controversial and Taboo Subjects Some quick guidelines for having a sane conversation on controversial subjects Conclusions

Orderly institutions aren’t always so orderly library2.nalis.gov.tt green.autoblog.com zombiegamer.co.za

First, let’s start with the most controversial issues in our society. Get into groups to discuss: What are some of today’s “hot button” issues? What is the most controversial conversation you have had in the last couple of years? What was the subject? http://butchbellah.com/home/2012/07/18/whats-your-hot-button/ Describe a recent conversation where the discussion ended in an argument. What was the subject?

Share the subject of the very controversial conversation with the group

Some Of the Many Contentious Issues Political Controversies -Should someone who is here in the US illegally be allowed to get federal aid for college? -Should marriage be legal for all couples no matter what their sexual orientation? Religious Controversies -Is Scripture authoritative for our lives and in what way? -Are individuals responsible for societal sins? Sociological Controversies -Do you think our society is color blind? -Is someone of a different race threatening to you? Historical Controversies For example who should apologize for World War II atrocities? Germany for the holocaust? Japan for their brutal occupation? US for the atomic bombings and firebombing of civilians?

Some guidelines or ground rules for sanely talking about very controversial subjects Use “I” statements Encourages conversation: “I feel…”, “I think…”, “In my opinion…”, “My experience is…” Shuts down conversation: “I think that you…”, “Everybody knows that…”, “All right thinking people…” No interrupting Confidentiality and Grace We need to be able to say things that are hard to say Need to be able to ask difficult questions and perhaps even word things in an unintentionally hurtful way It’s ok to say “I am hurt by what you said because I hear it this way…” Assume that all participants are reasonable people.. with valid points of view even if those views are diametrically opposed to your views Be present in mind, body, and spirit Side comments can be easily misinterpreted Be mindful of what you feel and how you think Be mindful how you speak to others and the manner that you do it

An Illustration from the “real world” http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/mon-october-17-2011/indecision-2012--hardcore-sects-edition---mormonism

Some guidelines or ground rules for sanely talking about very controversial subjects Use “I” statements Encourages conversation: “I feel…”, “I think…”, “In my opinion…”, “My experience is…” Shuts down conversation: “I think that you…”, “Everybody knows that…”, “All right thinking people…” No interrupting Confidentiality and Grace We need to be able to say things that are hard to say Need to be able to ask difficult questions and perhaps even word things in an unintentionally hurtful way It’s ok to say “I am hurt by what you said because I hear it this way…” Assume that all participants are reasonable people.. with valid points of view even if those views are diametrically opposed to your views Be present in mind, body, and spirit Side comments can be easily misinterpreted Be mindful of what you feel and how you think Be mindful how you speak to others and the manner that you do it

Now practice using the guidelines Option 1: Get into groups of 2-4, choose a controversial topic (one we discussed here or choose your own), and practice talking about it using the guidelines presented. What happened when you did this? Now practice using the guidelines Option 2: Get into groups of 2-4, choose a non-controversial, and practice talking about it violating all the guidelines provided. What happened when you did this? Potential non-controversial topics: -Godzilla vs. T-Rex: who is more dangerous? -Fruit vs. Vegetables: which is better for you? -Grass vs. Astroturf -The Atlantic Ocean vs. the Pacific Ocean -etc.

Now Switch!

So, what happened? Option 1: When you followed the guidelines with the controversial subject how did this affect the conversation? How did you feel about the subject and the people you were talking to? Option 2: When you violated the guidelines with the non-controversial subject how did this affect the conversation? How did you feel about the subject and the other people?