<month year> doc.: IEEE <04-106> March 2004

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
<month year> doc.: IEEE /271r0 September, 2000
Advertisements

May 2003 doc.: IEEE /141r3 January 2004
Submission Title: [Add name of submission]
Name - WirelessHD doc.: IEEE g July 2010
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
June 2006 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Proposed Scenarios for Usage Model Document.
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Submission Title: [Multi-band OFDM Proposal References]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
<month year> doc.: IEEE <030158r0> March 2004
July 2005 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [FCC-UWB-certifications-below-1-GHz] Date Submitted:
Submission Title: Effects of O-QPSK Modulation on a CAZAC Preamble
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
May 2010 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Proposed Resolution To The FCC Part
<month year> doc.: IEEE /244r0 May 2001
March 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Toumaz response to TG6 Call for Applications]
Submission Title: [TX Requirements for MPSK PHY]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE g-Trends-in-SUN-capacity
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Submission Title: [Harmonizing-TG3a-PHY-Proposals-for-CSM]
doc.: IEEE g-Trends-in-SUN-capacity
July Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [On unifying PPDU formats] Date Submitted:
May 2007 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: OFDM PHY Proposal Date Submitted: 7 May 07.
May 2007 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: OFDM PHY Proposal Date Submitted: 7 May 07.
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
February 19 doc.: IEEE /424r1 February 2007
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
May 2010 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Proposed Resolution To The FCC Part
November 2018 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [ w Fraunhofer IIS proposal performance.
<month year> doc.: IEEE <030158r0> September 2003
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
February 19 doc.: IEEE /424r1 November 2006
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE /XXXr0 Sep 19, 2007 June 2009
<month year> doc.: IEEE <04-106> March 2004
Submission Title: [Frame and packet structure in ]
<month year>20 Jan 2006
November, 2003 doc.: IEEE November 2003
September 2009doc.: IEEE wng0
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Submission Title: [Preamble structures for 4a]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> March 2015
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [OFDM extension to lower data rates] Date.
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
May 19 doc.: IEEE /424r1 November 2006
<month year> doc.: IEEE <030158r0> <March 2003>
<author>, <company>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
September 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Suggested TG3c PAR Changes] Date Submitted:
May 2010 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Proposed Resolution To The FCC Part
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Mar 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Resolution for Comment 70 ] Date Submitted:
<author>, <company>
Mar 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Resolution for Comment 70 ] Date Submitted:
July 2009 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Flexible DSSS Merging Effort] Date Submitted:
July 2003 doc.: IEEE <03/242> July 2003
August 2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: CID 422 Proposal Date Submitted: 14 August,
May 2015 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Source identification Date Submitted: May, 2015.
Presentation transcript:

<month year> doc.: IEEE 802.15-<04-106> March 2004 Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [WiQuest Proposal for Reduced PAR Channel Estimation Sequence for MB-OFDM] Date Submitted: [ 13 March, 2004] Source: [Matthew B. Shoemake and Sridhar Rajagopal] Company [WiQuest Communications, Inc.] Address [8 Prestige Circle, Suite 100, Allen, Texas, 75013, USA] Voice:[+1 214-547-1600], FAX: [+1 214-547-1606], E-Mail:[matthew.shoemake@wiquest.com] Re: [N/A] Abstract: [The channel estimation (CE) sequence of the current MultiBand OFDM proposal to Task Group 3a has been found to have a very large peak to average ratio (PAR) of 8.86 dB. This high PAR increases the probability of clipping the CE sequence on transmit and on receive thereby increasing the probability of packet decode failure. An improved CE sequence is proposed herein that provides a 5.43 dB improvement in PAR for the CE sequence. This improved CE sequence has been identified via an extensive computer search. The proposed improvement does not increase computational complexity at the transmitter or the receiver.] Purpose: [The authors would like the MultiBand OFDM proposal to be updated to include the channel estimation sequence described herein. The authors believe that such action will increase the level of support for the MultiBand OFDM proposal to Task Group 3a.] Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P802.15. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P802.15. Shoemake and Rajagopal, WiQuest <author>, <company>

Outline Overview of current packet preamble March 2004 Outline Overview of current packet preamble Desired properties in packet preamble Peak to Average Ratios for MB-OFDM and IEEE 802.11a/g The problem of high PAR Improved Channel Estimation Sequence with PAR reduction of 5.42 dB Conclusions and Proposal Shoemake and Rajagopal, WiQuest

Current PLCP Preamble (268r3) March 2004 Current PLCP Preamble (268r3) Symbols of Packet Sync Sequence Packet Detection AGC Frequency Estimation 3 Symbols of Frame Sync Sequence Boundary Detection/FFT Placement 6 Symbols of Channel Estimation Sequence Channel Estimation Shoemake and Rajagopal, WiQuest

Desired Properties of Preambles March 2004 Desired Properties of Preambles Packet Detection Good Correlation Properties Low Cross-Correlation (SOP) Frequency Estimation Multiple repeats Frame Sync Low correlation with packet sync Channel Estimation/AGC Low PAR Should have significantly lower clip probability than payload Shoemake and Rajagopal, WiQuest

March 2004 Why low PAR? Why is low PAR more important for the channel estimation sequence than it is for the data portion of the packet? Channel estimation errors increase the probability of error on all data bits A clip in the payload affects the probability to decode a small number of bits The interleaver helps prevent payload clipping from causing errors FFT Channel Inversion Deinter- leaver FEC Decode Data CE Sequence Channel Estimator Shoemake and Rajagopal, WiQuest

March 2004 Peak to Average Ratio PAR Calculation Possible for a given set of tones Difficult in general PAR is usually calculated numerically PAR is dependent on the sampling phase Must oversample the signal to cover different phases and find the true PAR Shoemake and Rajagopal, WiQuest

Legacy Channel Estimation Sequence (1 of 2) March 2004 Legacy Channel Estimation Sequence (1 of 2) Legacy sequence PAR: - 7.09 dB at NyQuist - 8.86 dB oversampled Oversampling approaches: - Use larger FFT - Interpolate in the time domain Results here use larger FFT Average energy: 122 Can see visually that signal must be oversampled to obtain accurate PAR Shoemake and Rajagopal, WiQuest

Legacy Channel Estimation Sequence (2 of 2) March 2004 Legacy Channel Estimation Sequence (2 of 2) The current sequence has a spike at the end of the sequence The spike at the end of the sequence causes variation in PAR measurements under various interpolation methods The spike generates a transient that is a function of design decisions and may affect performance The spike at the end of the sequence should and can be avoided MBOA PAR SRRC 7.31 dB SRRC (repeat) 8.35 dB SRRC (zero pad) 7.36 dB IFFT (4x upsample) 8.85 dB Sinc (zero pad) 7.29 dB There is 1.49 dB difference in spike between two reasonable but different implementations. Shoemake and Rajagopal, WiQuest

PAR Properties for MB-OFDM and 802.11a/g March 2004 PAR Properties for MB-OFDM and 802.11a/g Oversample Factor CE r2 CE r3 LS 11a 1 5.44 7.09 3.17 2 8.0 8.85 4 1024 8.01 8.86 3.18 MB-OFDM CE r2: Channel Estimation Seq in rev 2 (112 tones) MB-OFDM CE r3: Channel Estimation Seq in rev 3 (122 tones) LS 802.11a/g: Long (CE) Sequence of 802.11a/g (48 tones) Current CE PAR is too high thereby reducing probability of good channel estimate and increasing packet error probability Shoemake and Rajagopal, WiQuest

PAR and Conjugation (1 of 2) March 2004 PAR and Conjugation (1 of 2) Plot shows that the constraint of conjugate symmetry tends to increase the PAR on average by 1.7 - 2.0 dB Result of unnecessarily forcing the time domain signal to be real valued 1.7 – 2.0 dB Shoemake and Rajagopal, WiQuest

PAR and Conjugation (2 of 2) March 2004 PAR and Conjugation (2 of 2) In addition to increasing the PAR Conjugation does not help channel estimation Conjugation does not reduce complexity or cost Mandatory rates of 110 and 200 Mbps do not use conjugation Conjugation should be removed from the MB-OFDM channel estimation sequence Shoemake and Rajagopal, WiQuest

Improved Channel Estimation Sequence March 2004 Improved Channel Estimation Sequence Tones(-61:-1 1:61) = {-1 -1 -1  1 -1  1  1  1 -1  1  1 -1  1  1 -1 -1  1 -1 -1 -1  1 -1  1  1  1 -1 -1 -1  1  1  1  1  1  1 -1  1  1  1 -1 -1 -1 -1  1 -1 -1  1  1  1  1  1 -1 -1 -1  1 -1  1 -1  1 -1 -1  1  1 -1  1  1  1  1 -1  1  1  1 -1  1 -1  1  1  1  1 -1  1  1 -1  1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1  1 -1  1  1 -1 -1 -1 -1  1  1  1 -1 -1 -1  1 -1 -1 -1 -1  1 -1 -1  1  1  1 -1 -1 -1 -1  1 -1  1 -1 -1 } New sequence without conjugate symmetry has PAR of 3.437 dB measured with oversampling Shoemake and Rajagopal, WiQuest

Non-Conjugate Symmetric March 2004 Reduced PAR Sequences 5.42 dB Oversample Factor CE r3 WiQuest Non-Conjugate Symmetric Improvement 1024 8.86 dB 3.44 dB 5.42 dB Shoemake and Rajagopal, WiQuest

March 2004 Receive PAR The PAR at the receiver depends on the multipath channel To confirm that a PAR reduction is maintained at the receiver, cumulative distribution functions were generated for the PAR at the receiver The reduced PAR CE sequence was compared to the CE sequence in the current draft in AWGN, CM1 and CM2 A PAR reduction of 0.7 to 3.0 dB exists at the receiver ~3 dB ~ 1 dB ~ 0.7 dB Shoemake and Rajagopal, WiQuest

Reuse of the Constellation Mapper March 2004 Reuse of the Constellation Mapper Rotation of the CE sequence does not change the PAR The proposed non-conjugate symmetric sequence is specified over {+1, -1} Rotating the proposed non-conjugate symmetric sequence by 45 degrees would cause the sequence to be over {+1+j, -1-j}/sqrt(2) If the sequence is rotated by 45 degrees, the current QPSK mapper can be used without modification The authors are open to either approach Shoemake and Rajagopal, WiQuest

Conclusions and Proposal March 2004 Conclusions and Proposal Current MB-OFDM channel estimation (CE) sequence has: A very high PAR of 7.36 to 8.86 dB An undesirable spike near the end of the sequence A higher probability of clipping on TX and RX Sequences exist that provide dramatic reductions in the PAR A 5.42 dB decrease Provides reduced DAC and ADC resolution The authors propose to replace the channel estimation sequence in the current MB-OFDM proposal with the non-conjugate symmetric sequence on slide 11 Shoemake and Rajagopal, WiQuest