Don’t Recreate the Wheel: Integrate Existing Library Resources into Your Course to Enhance Your Research Assignments Donna Ziegenfuss, Ed.D. Associate.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1. Creativity and Innovation 2. Communication and Collaboration
Advertisements

NETS Meets Common Core Teresa Knapp Gordon, NBCT
From Standards to the Framework: Using Threshold Concepts to Rethink Instruction Ericka Raber, University of Iowa Libraries Leslie Ross, St. Ambrose University.
Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment
Rationale for CI 2300 Teaching and Learning in the Digital Age.
INACOL National Standards for Quality Online Teaching, Version 2.
USING STUDENT OUTCOMES WHEN INTEGRATING INFORMATION LITERACY SKILLS INTO COURSES Information Literacy Department Asa H. Gordon Library Savannah State University.
Creating Effective Inquiry-Based Learning Activities that Increase Student Achievement.
Spring 2012 Pilot Project Module Nine A New Texas Core Curriculum 1.
Developing a programme of information literacy. Strategy Will you work at an institutional level? Will you work at a course level? Will you work at a.
Confluence in Information Literacy Lisa Baures Randall McClure Georgia Conference on Information Literacy Coastal Georgia Center Savannah, GA 6 October.
CETL Workshop September 29, 2009 Eleonora Dubicki
21 st Century Skills and the NC Test of Computer Skills Martha Campbell, Information Skills/Computer Skills Scott Ragsdale Project Manager for Online Test,
* Research suggests that technology used in classrooms can be especially advantageous to at-risk, EL, and special ed students. (Means, Blando, Olson,
Dr. Lesley Farmer California State University Long Beach
Assignment Design I Katy Sullivan, Reference & Instruction Librarian Albin O. Kuhn Library & Gallery Spring 2004.
K-12 Technology Literacy Curriculum and Assessment.
Skills and Content Standards: Let’s Mash ‘Em Up!.
Tackling the Complexities of Source Evaluation: Active Learning Exercises That Foster Students’ Critical Thinking Juliet Rumble & Toni Carter Auburn University.
Assessment of Information Literacy Presented by Touro College Libraries Sara Tabaei, Information Literacy Director Bashe Simon, Director of Touro Libraries.
Put Your Classroom On A 21 st Century DI-IT Create Engaging Technology Rich Differentiated Classroom Environments Create Engaging Technology Rich Differentiated.
April 25 th Classrooms for the Future Facts 08’  358 High Schools in PA  12,100 Teachers  83,000 Laptops  101 Million Statewide Spent  3.75.
Information Literacy Module for FYI Available to any FYI Tony Penny, Research Librarian – Goddard Library Research & Library Instruction Services We support.
Information Literacy Module for Majors Available to support any department Tony Penny, Research Librarian – Goddard Library Supporting the Architecture.
A Portfolio by: Mary S. Weinaug Enter.  As a teacher it is critical for me to demonstrate mastery of teacher standards  ISTE-NETS Teacher Standards.
Google Earth INTEGRATING GLOBAL THINKING. Why Use Virtual Tours? Flexible Tool: History, Science, Math, English, etc. An Interactive Way to Explore Supports.
 “I have to teach the same information skills each year because students do not learn them.”  “I don’t have time to give tests so I do not assess student.
Research Assignment Design Kerri Carter – ext Diane VanderPol
AAC&U Members on Trends in Learning Outcomes Assessment Key findings from a survey among 325 chief academic officers or designated representatives at AAC&U.
Using the Framework for Success in Postsecondary Writing Cristyn Elder, Purdue University Margaret Munson, Arizona State University Sherry Rankins-Robertson,
Using AAC&U’s Learning Tools to Address Core Revision Terrel L. Rhodes Vice President Association of American Colleges and Universities Texas Coordinating.
D RAFT OF F RAMEWORK OF C OLLABORATION A CTIVITIES “SEAEDUNET 2.0: D IGITAL -A GE T EACHING AND L EARNING M ODEL ”
Jerry Falwell Library A Tale of Two Students Presented by: Barbara Potts and Jessica Daly.
National Educational Technology Standards For Students.
TERESA GRETTANO, PHD ASSISTANT PROFESSOR & DIRECTOR OF FIRST-YEAR WRITING THE UNIVERSITY OF SCRANTON 1.33: OPENING THE WPA.
8/23/ th ACS National Meeting, Boston, MA POGIL as a model for general education in chemistry Scott E. Van Bramer Widener University.
Library Research in the Digital Age: Expanding Beyond Information Literacy Donna Ziegenfuss, Ed.D. Associate Librarian Graduate & Undergraduate Services.
Critical Information Literacy
Enhancing the Quality of Research through
Sarah Gilchrist, MLS Research and Instruction Librarian Albert S. Cook Library.
Multiple literacy Standards for the 21st-Century learner
Report from Curriculum Committee 4/3/2017
DPI 10 Teaching Standards
Information literacy instruction and assessment : a collaborate design
Donna Ziegenfuss, Ed.D. Associate Librarian
CRITICAL CORE: Straight Talk.
Donna Ziegenfuss, Ed.D. Associate Librarian
Grade 12 Expository Reading and Writing(ERWC) Essential Outcomes
Meeting Your Class At The Crossroads
Assessment is Collaborative
Donna Harp Ziegenfuss, Ed.D.
Library Research in the Digital Age: Expanding Beyond Information Literacy Donna Ziegenfuss, Ed.D. Associate Librarian Graduate.
EUROPEAN DIGITAL PORTFOLIO FOR UNIVERSITY STUDENTS
First-Stage Draft Plans for Gen Ed Revision
Your Inquiry Project
Reading Apprenticeship Routines for Librarians
Kat Phillips, Nursing & Allied Health Liaison Librarian at Penn State University
Teaching habits of mind
Annie Bélanger September 2016
Patricia Hall Hurley Assistant Professor of Information Literacy
Taking a Giant Leap Using the Taxonomy of Significant Learning to Inform Instructional Design Ashlynn Kogut Texas A&M University.
A new “pre-graduation expectation” for graduating seniors
AAC&U Members on Trends in Learning Outcomes Assessment
Prepared by the SLMS Role in Reading Task Force July 2009
ACRL Framework: Theory & Applications
Paul Jude Beauvais August 31, 2009
We VALUE HIPs Utilizing VALUE Rubrics and HIP QA Tools in Course Revitalization Presented by Melynda Conner, TBR OSS HIP Specialist 2019.
Walden University Academic Residencies:
Building Toward the Literature Review Anne Rojas, Walden Library
No Zombies Here! Kristi Castleberry​
Presentation transcript:

Don’t Recreate the Wheel: Integrate Existing Library Resources into Your Course to Enhance Your Research Assignments Donna Ziegenfuss, Ed.D. Associate Librarian Interim Head of Graduate & Undergraduate Services https://www.flickr.com/photos/75279887@N05/6886478111

During this session you will: Reflect on your own information seeking behaviors and/or those of your students Compile ideas, strategies, resources, and models for empowering learners to conduct research in the digital age Discuss assessment strategies for research projects and learned about AACU rubrics and library learning outcomes

How do you or your students begin research? Where do you believe your students begin their research? Where do they go to get information when researching? What do you think your students find most difficult during the research process?

Why is research difficult for students? The research states that the research process: Is a daunting and frustrating experience Is too difficult (information overload) and they just try to get through it as quickly as possible – see research as related to a particular course, not something they will do over and over again in the future Involves the use of overwhelming tools McClure & Purdy, Eds., 2013

Why is research difficult for students? (cont.) Student Expectations about Research: Students expect the library databases to work like Google Students have an unclear understanding of the recursive nature of the research process Students do not understand how electronic information is organized McClure & Purdy, Eds., 2013

4 Different Approaches to Research Writing (Nelson, 1994) Compiling information Approach just collecting and presenting information (75%) Premature Thesis Approach predetermined ideas – no discovery (10%) Linear Research Approach students access information once and write based on what they find (10%) Recursive Research Approach Includes prelim research, more than one visit to the library, production of a tentative viewpoint, then conducting research to refine the viewpoint (5%)

What the literature says about students’ needs for research/writing They need help with generating search keywords Understanding the limitations of databases Good criteria for source evaluation of disciplinary resources, not just generic resources Nurturing of their ‘scholarliness’ to become active participants in research Getting beyond basic digital skills, to useful academic skills To stop thinking of writing and research as two separate processes and the library as an add on

Information Behaviors / Process Researching Process Writing Process Information Behaviors / Process

To prepare students for 21st century research Why is it important to help developing scholars acquire digital skills for research? To prepare students for 21st century research Engage students in the ‘process’ of conducting research Improve information organizational skills Develop skills needed to collect, and understand data that can be transferable to other problems Improve analytical and snthesis skills

Why is it important to help developing scholars acquire digital skills for research? To prepare students for changing research models, strategies, and tools Adjust to new emerging research models Tools are continually changing and students need to understand how tools work so they can transfer skills They won’t have access to research tools they use in college; the process is the most important thing

Resources Are Available For You Support for your Students (library homepage) Chat, Email, Disciplinary Librarian Liaisons Outcomes for Writing and Information Literacy Links for How-to and Subject Guides to add to your Canvas course Online information literacy modules, library guide and Canvas Commons Resources to help design library assignments Rubrics for assessment Template worksheets and tip sheets to help your students work through the research process and communicate their research

Marriott Library Instruction Outcomes Engage in the research process and construct knowledge by: Defining a research topic/questions Articulating information needs and research purpose Implementing effective search strategies Developing an awareness of disciplinary signature pedagogies and research traditions Demonstrate effective information seeking skills for locating, selecting, retrieving and evaluating information by: Utilizing a variety of sources and tools both print and electronic Discerning between scholarly and non-scholarly sources; as well as primary and secondary resources Compiling, categorizing and managing citations during the information seeking process Employing ethical and legal standards when using sources and information Critically evaluating information sources and resources Synthesize and communicate information and sources in a variety of formats both written and oral by: Compiling and organizing information for presentation planning Using a variety of textual, visual and media for presentation Presenting information/research in an effective manner Exhibit dispositions of a researcher and confidence to apply research knowledge to new problems and situations by: Developing transferable skills for comfortably use technology to find and use information Demonstrating confidence and patience when doing research (problem solving attitude) Valuing the concepts of student directed learning and life long learning

ACRL Information Literacy Framework: Threshold Concepts ACRL Website for the Framework with Examples Authority Is Constructed and Contextual Information Creation as a Process Information Has Value Research as Inquiry Scholarship as Conversation Searching as Strategic Exploration Additional Resources University of Washington Library Guide ACRL Framework Toolbox

Writing Program Administration WPA Outcomes Statement for First-Year Composition Use electronic environments for drafting, reviewing, revising, editing, and sharing texts Locate, evaluate, organize, and use research material collected from electronic sources, including scholarly library databases; other official databases (e.g., federal government databases); and informal electronic networks and internet sources Understand and exploit the differences in the rhetorical strategies and in the affordances available for both print and electronic composing processes and texts Engage in the electronic research and composing processes common in their fields Disseminate texts in both print and electronic forms in their fields 

Framework for Success in Postsecondary Writing 8 Habits of Mind Curiosity Openness Engagement Creativity Persistence Responsibility Flexibility Metacognition Endorsed by the Council of Writing Program Administrators, the National Council of Teachers of English, and the National Writing Project.

Online Library Materials Main Subject Guide Search (find on library homepage) Contains guides by discipline Contains how-to guides on using software and tools (ex. Endnote) Contains guides for research process tasks (ex. creating an annotated bibliography) Online Library Modules A 4-module set of introductory modules Online Library Help Page you can link to Equella Resources for sharing (http://eq.utah.edu )

AACU Rubrics AACU VALUE Rubrics already created for a variety of general education competencies: Intellectual and Practical Skills Personal and Social Responsibility Integrative and Applied Learning Inquiry and analysis Critical thinking Creative thinking Written communication Oral communication Reading Quantitative literacy Information literacy Teamwork Problem solving Civic engagement—local and global Intercultural knowledge and competence Ethical reasoning Foundations and skills for lifelong learning Global learning Integrative learning

Resources for Designing Library Instruction

Final Recommendations Pedagogy first – then Technology Consider context and student motivation issues when designing any research/writing learning activity Integrate clear communicated expectations of learning activities Ensure learning activities are aligned with assessment and learning outcomes for the module and/or course