Healthier Washington Transforming Health Care in Washington State

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DSRIP AND PHIP Overview
Advertisements

DSRIP & Bronx Partners for Healthy Communities: An Overview
RHP 14 Learning Collaborative Midland Memorial Hospital July 18, 2014 Maureen Milligan THOT 1.
External Quality Review Quarterly Meeting Tuesday, September 26, p.m. – 3:30 p.m.
Section 1115 Medicaid Waiver Renewal Plan/Provider Incentive Programs Expert Stakeholder Workgroup Framing Our Discussion Wendy Soe and Sarah Brooks Department.
MassHealth Demonstration to Integrate Care for Dual Eligibles One Care: MassHealth plus Medicare Implementation Council Meeting January 9, :00 PM.
Hospital Metrics Advisory Committee July 7,
Texas Healthcare Transformation and Quality Improvement Program Medicaid 1115 Waiver Katrina Lambrecht, JD, MBA VP and Chief of Staff January 9, 2012.
REVIEW OF CMS “INITIAL APPROVAL” OF RHP PLAN AND FOLLOW-UP REQUIREMENTS May 8, 2013 REGION 10.
CCO Quality Pool Methodology February 7, 2014 Lori Coyner, Accountability and Quality Director 1.
“Reaching across Arizona to provide comprehensive quality health care for those in need” Our first care is your health care Arizona Health Care Cost Containment.
Overview of CY 2007 HealthChoice Rates Medicaid Advisory Committee Meeting October 26, 2006.
RHP 12 Learning Collaborative.  2016 Learning Collaborative Activities ◦ Monthly Status Calls & Project Highlights ◦ DSRIP In Action ◦ Regional LC Events.
UPCOMING STATE INITIATIVES WHAT IS ON THE HORIZON? MERCED COUNTY HEALTH CARE CONSORTIUM Thursday, October 23, 2014 Pacific Health Consulting Group.
Distribution of New York’s 1115 Waiver Funds Exhibit 1 Note: The federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and the state allocated an additional.
DSRIP OVERVIEW. What is DSRIP? 2  DSRIP = Delivery System Reform Incentive Payment  An effort between the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH)
1 PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL – © 2014 PREMIER, INC. NYHQ DSRIP Finance Committee Kick-Off Meeting March 2015.
Managed Care Nursing Facility Quality Initiatives February 2, 2015.
RHP 12 Regional Update Jeff Dane Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer.
Region 15 Regional Healthcare Partnership 12th Public Meeting
Clinical Project Meeting
Region 15 Regional Healthcare Partnership 4th Public Meeting
DY7 PFM & Bundle Protocol
Region 15 Regional Healthcare Partnership 15th Public Meeting
Region 15 Regional Healthcare Partnership 48TH Public Meeting
Washington State Hospital Association
Region 15 Regional Healthcare Partnership 47TH Public Meeting
Region 15 Regional Healthcare Partnership 6th Public Meeting
Jessie Dean Administrator, Tribal Affairs and Analysis
Region 15 Regional Healthcare Partnership 32nd Public Meeting
DY7 and beyond A new DSRIP structure …..
MLTSS Delivery System SubMAAC
Region 15 Regional Healthcare Partnership 15th Public Meeting
NYHQ DSRIP Primary Care & Behavioral Health Committee Kick-Off Meeting
Region 15 Regional Healthcare Partnership 14th Public Meeting
Region 15 Regional Healthcare Partnership 23rd Public Meeting
THE COLORADO MODEL PROVIDER’S AT-RISK.
Region 15 Regional Healthcare Partnership 29th Public Meeting
Potentially Preventable readmissions policy
Region 15 Regional Healthcare Partnership 38th Public Meeting
PRACTICE MANAGER MEETING Wednesday Jan. 10th 2018 Noon – 1:00PM
Cascade Pacific Action Alliance
RHP 12 DY 7-8 Planning Session
Washington Coalition on Medicaid Outreach
Coalitions for Health Improvement
Bi-Directional care integration Work Group Meeting
Region 15 Regional Healthcare Partnership 21st Public Meeting
NYHQ DSRIP Cultural Competency & Health Literacy Committee Kick-Off Meeting March 2015.
DY6 – The “Transition” Year
Greater Columbia ACH Board of Directors 4/19/17
Cascade Pacific Action Alliance
Region 15 Regional Healthcare Partnership 44TH Public Meeting
NYP/Q PPS PAC Meeting NYP/Q PPS December 5, 2016.
Update on Integration: HCA’s Vision
PRACTICE MANAGER MEETING Thursday June 15th 2017 Noon – 1:00PM
1115 Transformation Waiver
December 12, :00pm – 3:00pm UMC – El Convento at Loretto
1115 Demonstration Waiver Extension Summary
HOME HEALTH CARE Pre-bid Meeting
1115 Demonstration Waiver Extension Summary
BLHC Funds Flow Plan Steering Committee
Medicaid Transformation Funding Overview
Value Based Contracting Office Hours
Coalitions for Health Improvement
Data & Learning Team February 1, 2018.
Region 15 Regional Healthcare Partnership 20th Public Meeting
MARYLAND HEALTH SERVICES COST REVIEW COMMISSION
Region 15 Regional Healthcare Partnership 18th Public Meeting
Virginia Department of Education’s Update on Special Education Regional Program Funding
Debbie Henderson, Program Administrator
Presentation transcript:

Healthier Washington Transforming Health Care in Washington State Delivery System Reform Incentive Payment (DSRIP) Program “Funds Flow 103” Technical Assistance Resource August 2017

Presentation Goals Clarifications from Previous TA Sessions This presentation provides updates on DSRIP Funds Flow, including: Clarifications from Previous TA Sessions Project Incentives: Measurement and Payment Timing P4R & P4P Achievement Value Calculation Note: The Funds Flow TA series disseminates DSRIP funds flow details as they are available. Material in this presentation supersedes material from earlier Funds Flow decks, where relevant.

Clarifications from Previous TA

Review Updated Project Plan Supplemental Data Workbook Based on discussion on the July 31 Development Council call, the Healthier Washington team reviewed the data workbook and made the following changes: Changed “Reinvestment Funds” to “VBP Incentive Funds” for clarity Dropped the “Estimated Project Funds” row under the “VBP Incentive Funds,” as ACHs will not likely have that information at the time of Project Plan submission The updated Supplemental Workbook was distributed by Healthier Washington on Thursday, August 3, 2017.

DSRIP Program Structure: Transformation Incentives Total Initiative 1 DSRIP Transformation Incentives ($1.12 billion*) State Administration Funding ($52M) VBP Incentives ($169M Max) Design Funds (Y1 Only) ($54M Max) Project Incentives ($847M Max) Integration Incentives ($75M Max) Un-earned Project Incentive funding available as DSRIP High Performance Incentives Reinvestment Pool (Partnering Providers) ($113M Max** + Un-earned Funds) * NOTE: Any statewide DSRIP funding cuts would be applied to Project Incentive P4P payments, proportionally across recipients. Challenge Pool (MCOs) ($56M Max**) Subject to Change ** Max only applicable if no regions secure Integration Incentives for integrated managed care; otherwise VBP Incentives remaining after Integration Incentives will be distributed 1/3 to the Challenge Pool (for MCOs) and 2/3 to Reinvestment Pool (for “Participating Providers”); Source: 1115 Waiver Special Terms and Conditions; DSRIP Funding and Mechanics Protocol; Discussion with HCA

Statewide Accountability Approach A set percentage of authorized DSRIP funds is at risk for statewide performance on select measures, starting in Year 3: The Funding & Mechanics Protocol indicates that statewide accountability performance will be measured using an adjusted Quality Improvement Score (QIS) methodology, similar to the approach planned for DSRIP High Performance Incentives Total DSRIP funding available to be earned for the year may be reduced based on the statewide accountability QIS performance Given that statewide performance is in large part based on ACH Project outcome performance, and given that the measurement, reporting and review timing are aligned, any statewide DSRIP reductions will be applied to the portion of DSRIP funds associated with Project Incentive P4P DY 3 DY 4 DY 5 Share of DSRIP at Risk 5% 10% 20% Note: 100% of Y4 & 5 funds at risk based on achievement of Integrated Managed Care by Jan 2020 Statewide Accountability Metrics VBP Target Achievement Performance on Statewide Accountability Quality Metrics: Mental Health Treatment Penetration Antidepressant Medication Management Substance Use Disorder Treatment Penetration Medication Management for People with Asthma (5 – 64 Years) Psychiatric Hospital Readmission Rate Outpatient Emergency Department Visits per 1000 Member Months Controlling High Blood Pressure Comprehensive Diabetes Care - Blood Pressure Control Plan All-Cause Readmission Rate (30 days) Comprehensive Diabetes Care: Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Poor Control Well-Child Visits in the 3rd, 4th, 5th, and 6th Years of Life

Integration Incentives Eligibility Integration Incentives eligibility requires that regions meet both Phase 1 LOI and Phase 2 implementation deadlines. Phase 1: Regions with all counties submitting a binding letter of intent (LOI) to integrate physical and behavioral health managed care submitted to the state Medicaid director by September 15, 2017 Eligible to receive 40% of total Integration Incentives available to the region upon receipt of LOIs Phase 2: Regions that received Phase 1 funds and which implement integrated managed care by January 1, 2019 Eligible to receive remaining 60% of total Integration Incentives available to the region 1 2 Note: Regions that have already passed Phase 1 or 2 milestones are eligible for enhanced DY1 Project 2A valuations, as reflected in the Project Plan scoring methodology, a separate process from the Integration Incentives.

Project Incentives: Measurement & Payment Timing

Project Incentive P4R and P4P Payment Approach P4P / P4R annual split applied to each Project P4R: Because P4R is based on the ACH’s semi- annual reports, P4R-based payments may be earned twice a year, with P4R amount in a given year evenly split across each 6-month reporting period P4P: Because P4P is based on annual HCA data compilation, P4P-based payments may only be earned 1x per year and will be paid once the data are calculated Project Payment Accountability by Year 25% Example: ACH eligible to earn $8 million total in Y4 Project Incentives, of which $2 million is accountable to Project X performance 50% ($1m) tied to P4R and 50% ($1m) tied to P4P $500k may be earned for the project based on P4R- based AVs at mid-year and another $500k at year-end $1m may be earned based on P4P-based AVs, with payment timing based on measurement / data timing

Project Incentives: Measurement and Payment Timing DY 1 2017 DY 2 2018 DY 3 2019 DY 4 2020 DY 5 2021 Post Demo. Y1 2022 PD Y2 2023 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 ACH Semi-Annual Reports DY3 P4P Baseline DY4 P4P Baseline DY5 P4P Baseline P4P measurement conducted during relevant demonstration year to allow time for Project implementation to take effect. DY3 P4P Meas. Year DY4 P4P Meas. Year DY5 P4P Meas. Year Annual P4R potential funds evenly split across 2 reporting & payment cycles Project Incentive Payments to FE Y1 100% Y2 50% Y2 50% Y3 37.5% Y3 37.5% Y4 25% Y4 25% Y5 12.5% Y5 12.5% Y1 funds paid in 1 installment, adjusted based on Project Plan score Y3 25% Y4 50% Y5 75% Each P4P payment includes: P4P performance-adjusted ACH payments Adjustments based on statewide accountability DSRIP High Performance Incentive earnings P4R P4P As of August 2017

P4R Measurement and Payment Timing DY 2 2018 DY 3 2019 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 P4R Reporting Period P4R Reporting Period ACH Semi-Annual Report: Due July 31 ACH Semi-Annual Report: Due January 31 IA Scoring IA Scoring Review: HCA has up to 30 days to review and request additional information if needed Review Clarification: ACH has 15 days to respond to request and HCA has additional 15 days to review Clarification Adjusted Payment to FE: Within 30 days of report approval Adjusted Payment to FE As of August 2017

P4P Measurement and Payment Timing DY 3 2019 DY 4 2020 DY 5 2021 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 10 11 12 Up to 2 months for processing / verification P4P Measurement Year 3 6 mo. Data Lag 1 month to: (1) run QIS on statewide measures; (2) draft CMS report P4P measurement conducted during relevant demonstration year to allow time for Project implementation to take effect. Y3 P4P Results Known Year 3 State QIS Report to CMS CMS 90-day Review Y3 P4P Total Funds Known IA: (1) Scores P4P Achievement Values; (2) calculates ACH QIS for High Performance funds Y3 ACH P4P AV Results Known Up to 4 mo. to: (1) adjust total Project Incentives based on statewide performance; (2) apply AVs to adjust ACH funds; (3) identify total unearned funds; (4) apply ACH QIS to identify ACH-level DSRIP High Performance Incentives; and (5) align payment timing with 2nd DY4 P4R payment Y3 As of August 2017

Project Incentives: P4R and P4P Achievement Values

P4R DSRIP Project Incentives Process PROVIDERS ACH FINANCIAL EXECUTOR HCA Implement demonstration Projects and related VBP and workforce initiatives with ACH Collaboratively design demonstration Projects and submit Project Plan Receive incentive funds Prepare and submit semi-annual reports on Project progress Provide direction on Project Incentive distribution to Financial Executor Receive funds for administrative expenses Distributes funds to recipients as and when instructed by ACHs Approves Project Plan Independent Assessor provides ACH Achievement Value score Releases achievement-adjusted funds to Financial Executor

P4R Achievement Value Calculation ACHs provide a semi-annual report every 6 months reporting on P4R metrics P4R metrics include progress milestones and P4R “project metrics” in Toolkit Each P4R metric is assigned an AV of either 1.0 or 0.0, with an AV of 1.0 provided based on: Providing evidence of completion of Project milestones by the quarter indicated in the ACH’s Project Plan Reporting on the P4R project metrics for the year in each semi-annual period “Report against QIP measures” is worth one AV in aggregate Milestone AVs will be applied based on the quarter indicated in the Project Plan. This determines the timing of the AV for that milestone, but does not shift funding timing, which is fixed and based on annual funds available for the Project as a whole If needed, an ACH may request to shift a milestone from the time reflected in their Project Plan, as long as the new timing is still before the quarter required in the Toolkit

Example: P4R Achievement Value Calculation Example: $500k tied to P4R for Project X each 6 months in Year 4 First 6 months Second 6 months Milestones Project Metrics # Metrics 1 (due Q2) 3 3 (each due Q4) P4R Status Incomplete Reported 2 complete; 1 incomplete AV 0.0 (1) 1.0 (3) 1.0 (2); 0.0 (1) Total AV 3.0 5.0 Percent AV 3.0 / 4.0 = 75% 5.0 / 6.0 = 83.3% Earned P4R Funds $500k * 75% = $375k $500k * 83.3% = $416.5k Unearned $208.5k cumulative unearned P4R in DY4  DY4 DSRIP High Performance Incentives

P4P DSRIP Project Incentives Process PROVIDERS ACH FINANCIAL EXECUTOR HCA Implement demonstration Projects and related VBP and workforce initiatives with ACH Collaboratively design demonstration Projects and submit Project Plan Receive incentive funds Provide direction on Project Incentive distribution to Financial Executor Receive funds for administrative expenses Distributes funds to recipients as and when instructed by ACHs Approves Project Plan Compiles outcome measure data Independent Assessor provides ACH Achievement Value score Releases achievement-adjusted funds to Financial Executor

P4P Achievement Value Calculation There are two types of P4P metrics in the Project Toolkit: Gap-to-Goal and Improvement-Over-Self. For each metric, an ACH-specific P4P Improvement Target will be identified annually. P4P Components Anticipated Timing Gap-to-Goal Measures Improvement-Over-Self Measures For ACH Reference: Historical ACH Performance* Early September 2017* Absolute Benchmark Selection n/a Early September 2017 Determination of % Gap Closure by Metric Determination of % Improvement Over Self by Metric Mid-September 2017 For ACH Reference: 2016 Benchmark Value 2017 Benchmark Value October 2017 Final Measure Specifications December 2017 Measurement Manual: Draft for Public Comment January 2018 Final Measurement Manual March 2018 P4P Year 3 Baseline Year (2017) Measurement October 2018 ACH-Specific DY3 P4P Improvement Target Components in italics do not directly determine the ACH-Specific P4P Improvement Target *Depending on the metric, will include separate rates for up to 3 years of data (2014-2016). Refresh of metrics already provided to include Calendar Year 2016 (where possible). Remaining metrics not yet provided to date (primarily related to oral health, maternal/child and reproductive health projects) will be delivered December 2017. As of August 2017

P4P Achievement Value Calculation Once a year, HCA will compile P4P metric performance, which the IA will use to calculate P4P Achievement Values (AVs) Each metric is then assigned an AV based on ACH performance against their ACH-Specific Improvement Target AVs for each Project are summed to determine the P4P Total Achievement Value (TAV) for the year for the Project TAV is then divided by the # of metrics (total possible Project AVs), to calculate the Project’s Percentage Achievement Value (PAV) for the year The PAV is multiplied by the potential P4P value for the project for the year to determine the P4P portion of the year-end performance-adjusted payment % of Improvement Target Attained 100% 75 – 99% 50 – 75% 25 – 50% < 25% Threshold AV 1.0 0.75 0.5 0.25

Example: P4P Achievement Value Calculation Example: $1 million tied to P4P for Project X in DY 4; Project X has 10 P4P outcome metrics in DY4 AVs Earned 100% of Improvement Target attained on 2 metrics 1.0 AV (2) Between 75 and 99% of Improvement Target attained on 6 metrics 0.75 AV (6) Between 50 and 75% of Improvement Target attained on 1 metric 0.5 AV (1) Below 25% of Improvement Target attained on 1 metric 0.0 AV (1) Total AV 7.0 Percent AV 7.0 / 10.0 = 70% Earned P4P Funds $1m * 70% = $700k Unearned Funds $300k  DY4 DSRIP High Performance Incentives

Q&A

Upcoming Funds Flow TA Topics Additional Funds Flow TA Sessions Will Cover: VBP Incentives Methodology DSRIP High Performance Incentives: Additional details on QIS methodology Final list of High Performance metrics

Thank You!