CEOS Land Product Validation Overview and Goals

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Future Directions and Initiatives in the Use of Remote Sensing for Water Quality.
Advertisements

Beyond Spectral and Spatial data: Exploring other domains of information GEOG3010 Remote Sensing and Image Processing Lewis RSU.
Objective: ●harmonized data sets on snow cover extent (SE), snow water equivalent (SWE), soil freeze and vegetation status from satellite information,
WMO Space Programme Discussion with IPY-SPG Barbara J. Ryan Director, WMO Space Programme 4 February 2009 WMO Headquarters Geneva, Switzerland.
Extension and application of an AMSR global land parameter data record for ecosystem studies Jinyang Du, John S. Kimball, Lucas A. Jones, Youngwook Kim,
MODIS Collection 6 BRDF/Albedo: Status and Updates Zhuosen Wang 1, Crysal Schaaf 1, Miguel Román 2 1 University of Massachusetts-Boston 2 NASA Goddard.
Committee on Earth Observing Satellites Land Product Validation subgroup LBA Fire and Deforestation Accuracy Assessment 26 July 2004 Jeff Morisette
MODIS Science Team Meeting - 18 – 20 May Routine Mapping of Land-surface Carbon, Water and Energy Fluxes at Field to Regional Scales by Fusing Multi-scale.
Validation of Satellite-Derived Land Products on a Global Scale Joanne Nightingale, Jaime Nickeson Sigma Space Corporation Robert Wolfe NASA GSFC Terrestrial.
VENUS (Vegetation and Environment New µ-Spacecraft) A demonstration space mission dedicated to land surface environment (Vegetation and Environment New.
Global Climate Change Monitoring Ron Birk Director, Mission Integration, Northrop Grumman Member, Alliance for Earth Observations Responding to Emerging.
Centre for Geo-information Fieldwork: the role of validation in geo- information science RS&GIS Integration Course (GRS ) Lammert Kooistra Contact:
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Charge to workshop: Develop an international protocol to quantify the accuracy of remote sensing.
Spatially Complete Global Surface Albedos Derived from MODIS Data
MODIS Land and HDF-EOS HDF-EOS Workshop Presentation September 20, 2000 Robert Wolfe NASA GSFC Code 922, Raytheon ITSS MODIS Land Science Team Support.
LAND PRODUCT VALIDATION update F. Baret, J. Nightingale, S. Garrigues, J. Nickeson Missoula, 17 June /29.
15-18 October 2002 Greenville, North Carolina Global Terrestrial Observing System GTOS Jeff Tschirley Programme director.
MODIS Workshop An Introduction to NASA’s Earth Observing System (EOS), Terra, and the MODIS Instrument Michele Thornton
Translation to the New TCO Panel Beverly Law Prof. Global Change Forest Science Science Chair, AmeriFlux Network Oregon State University.
CEOS WGCV Land Product Validation Sub-Group Overview Joanne Nightingale, Jaime Nickeson (Sigma Space Corp / NASA GSFC) With input from LPV Focus Group.
© geoland2 consortium European Commission Fast Track Service Land within the GMES initiative in FP-7 Approach for validation of geoland2 products: phenological.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey International Satellites – Supporting Global Earth Observation ASPRS Meeting - 17 November 2011.
VIIRS-Land Validation Overview Miguel O. Román, Ph.D. Terrestrial Information Systems Branch NASA Goddard Space Flight Center.
Flux observation: Integrating fluxes derived from ground station and satellite remote sensing 王鹤松 Hesong Wang Institute of atmospheric physics, Chinese.
Terrestrial Carbon Observations TCO Previous Strategy 1- better identify the potential end users, and their requirements 2- organize and coordinate reliable.
Global Terrestrial Observing System linking the world’s terrestrial monitoring systems to provide a global vision of the Earth we share.
Systematic Terrestrial Observations: a Case for Carbon René Gommes with C. He, J. Hielkema, P. Reichert and J. Tschirley FAO/SDRN.
Committee on Earth Observation Satellites Plenary Agenda Item #3 29 th CEOS Plenary Kyoto International Conference Center Kyoto, Japan 5 – 6 November 2015.
Goal: to understand carbon dynamics in montane forest regions by developing new methods for estimating carbon exchange at local to regional scales. Activities:
CEOS WGCV Land Product Validation Sub-Group (2009 – 2010 Update) Joanne Nightingale, Jaime Nickeson (Sigma Space Corp / NASA GSFC) With input from LPV.
LAI Intercomparison workshop III Missoula Montana 16 August 2004 Jeff Morisette (301)
References: 1)Ganguly, S., Samanta, A., Schull, M. A., Shabanov, N. V., Milesi, C., Nemani, R. R., Knyazikhin, Y., and Myneni, R. B., Generating vegetation.
CEOS Working Group on Information System and Services (WGISS) Data Access Infrastructure and Interoperability Standards Andrew Mitchell - NASA Goddard.
The International Ocean Colour Coordinating Group International Network for Sensor Inter- comparison and Uncertainty assessment for Ocean Color Radiometry.
Incoming Themes for 2017 Frank Kelly, USGS
IMAGE PIXELS OF RFI<0.2 ONLY
Future directions of CEOS WGCV: Incoming chair perspective
Preparing for the Production of Essential Climate Variables (ECVs) for Biomass from Future Spaceborne Remote Sensing Missions: Is There A Role for CEOS-Carbon?
TOPC Report Wolfgang Wagner.
Global Terrestrial Observing System
WMO Space Programme Update
Terrestrial ECVs for Canada
NPOESS Airborne Sounder Testbed (NAST)
WGCV Work Plan Actions K. . Thome NASA WGCV Plenary # 43
Status of Carbon Action Items
WGCV Overview K. Thome WGISS#45 / WGCV#43
Atmospheric Correction Inter-comparison eXercise
Capacity Building for WGCV
The Terrestrial Observation Panel for Climate
NASA alert as Russian and US satellites crash in space
Carbon Actions for WGCV
Carbon Actions for WGCV
National REMOTE SENSING Validation Workshop
Committee on Earth Observation Satellites
The Global Observing System for Climate Carolin Richter, Director
Recent activities of OCR-VC
Committee on Earth Observation Satellites
WGCV Work Plan Actions K. Thome NASA WGCV Plenary # 44
WGCapD Perspectives of Work Plan –
Igor Appel Alexander Kokhanovsky
Uncertainties for Analysis Ready Data
Recent activities of the OSVW-VC
Recent activities of the OSVW-VC
CEOS Working Group on Climate (WGClimate)
WG Calibration and Validation
Atmospheric Composition Virtual Constellation (AC-VC)
VALIDATION OF FINE RESOLUTION LAND-SURFACE ENERGY FLUXES DERIVED WITH COMBINED SENTINEL-2 AND SENTINEL-3 OBSERVATIONS IGARSS 2018 – Radoslaw.
45th WGCV Plenary Perth, July 2019
WGCV Chair’s Report C. Ong CSIRO WGCV Plenary # 45
45th WGCV Plenary Perth, July 2019
Presentation transcript:

CEOS Land Product Validation Overview and Goals Committee on Earth Observation Satellites CEOS Working Group on Calibration and Validation WGCV Land Product Validation Subgroup LPV CEOS Land Product Validation Overview and Goals Pierre Guillevic, Miguel Román, Fernando Camacho de Coca, Jaime Nickeson, Zhuosen Wang, & Christopher Justice LPV established as subgroup in 2000. And LPV Focus Area leads ESIP Winter Conference– January 11-13, 2017

Working Group on Calibration and Validation CEOS > WGCV > LPV CEOS - Committee on Earth Observation Satellites 31 CEOS Members (e.g. space agencies, research centers) 24 Associate Members (e.g. UNEP, WMO, GCOS) CEOS coordinates civil space-based EO to benefit society The Working Group on Calibration and Validation (WGCV) is one of 5 CEOS working groups Land Product Validation (LPV) is one of 6 WGCV subgroups Current LPV Officers: Chair Miguel Román NASA GFSC Vice-Chair Fernando Camacho EOLAB/U. of Valencia Secretariat Jaime Nickeson SSAI/NASA GSFC Protocol Dev. Pierre Guillevic UMD/NASA GSFC Zhuosen Wang UMD/NASA GSFC + 11 Focus Areas with 2 co-leads each International associates include intergovernmental groups like GCOS, GEO, UN systems WGCV subgroups Terrain Mapping, IR Visible Optical Sensors, SAR, Microwave, Atmospheric Composition

An international framework Working Group on Calibration and Validation An international framework www.ceos.org

LPV Focus Areas and Co-leaders Working Group on Calibration and Validation LPV Focus Areas and Co-leaders Snow Cover*, Sea Ice Thomas Nagler (ENVEO, Austria) Candidates identified Surface Radiation (Reflectance, BRDF, Albedo*) Zhuosen Wang (NASA GSFC) Alessio Lattanzio (EUMETSAT) Land Cover and Land Use Change* Pontus Olofsson (Boston University) FAPAR* Arturo Sanchez-Azofeifa (University of Alberta) Nadine Gobron (JRC, IT) Leaf Area Index* Oliver Sonnentag (University of Montreal) Hongliang Fang (Chinese Academy of Science) Fire* (Active Fire, Burned Area) Luigi Boschetti (University of Idaho) Gareth Roberts (U. Southampton, UK) Andrew Edwards (Charles Darwin U.) Land Surface Temperature* (LST and Emissivity) Pierre Guillevic Frank Goettsche (KIT, Germany) Soil Moisture* Michael Cosh (USDA ARS) Land Surface Phenology Matt Jones (University of Montana) Jadu Dash (University of Southampton, UK) Vegetation Index Tomoaki Miura (University of Hawaii) Above Ground Biomass* Laura Duncanson (GSFC) John Armston (UMD/UQ, Australia) Mat Disney (U. College London, UK) Restructured a few years ago, now following essential climate variables. Several focus area co-leads presenting variable-specific results. *Essential Climate Variable (ECV) as defined by GCOS Co-lead: sitting, recently accepted, vacant, ex-officio

LPV Subgroup Objectives Working Group on Calibration and Validation LPV Subgroup Objectives To foster and coordinate quantitative validation of higher level global land products derived from remotely sensed data, in a traceable way, and to relay results to users. To increase the quality and efficiency of global satellite product validation by developing and promoting international standards and protocols for: Field sampling Scaling techniques Accuracy report and use Data and information exchange To provide feedback to international structures for: Requirements on product accuracy and quality assurance Terrestrial biophysical measurement standards Definitions for future missions Formed in 2000 as part of NASA’s EOS validation program – validating MODIS land products

The LPV Validation Framework Lead coordinating Agency: NASA Working Group on Calibration and Validation The LPV Validation Framework Lead coordinating Agency: NASA Lead Agency: NASA Lead Agencies: Various Lead Agencies: USGS/NOAA Lead Agencies: ESA/NASA/USGS

Leaf Area Index Validation Protocol Working Group on Calibration and Validation Leaf Area Index Validation Protocol Location of reference LAI sites available for direct validation and inter-comparison studies. Formed in 2000 as part of NASA’s EOS validation program – validating MODIS land products https://lpvs.gsfc.nasa.gov Depiction of spatial footprint of a LAI-2000 instrument as a function of zenithal view ring (left) and the TRAC instrument (right) for a given solar illumination condition.

LPV validation requirements Working Group on Calibration and Validation LPV validation requirements (From Guillevic et al., RSE, 2012) Characterize in situ measurements and validation datasets at satellite product resolution including uncertainty estimates Characterize product uncertainties and identify issues with algorithm, ancillary data, geometric considerations, temporal drift

LPV validation challenges Example: Spatial vs. temporal variability Working Group on Calibration and Validation LPV validation challenges Example: Spatial vs. temporal variability Station 1 Station 2 Before the harvest 1 km After the harvest Station 1 Station 2 Before the harvest After the harvest Bondville, IL: Temporal variations of the contribution of the surrounding area to coarse radiometric measurements over croplands

LPV validation challenges Critical need for ground truth Working Group on Calibration and Validation LPV validation challenges Critical need for ground truth (From Guillevic et al., RSE, 2014) VIIRS vs. MOD11 algorithms: similar poor performance over arid areas

LPV validation challenges Example: Comparison with heritage products Working Group on Calibration and Validation LPV validation challenges Example: Comparison with heritage products Differences between VIIRS and MODIS LST Aug. 11, 2012 Differences between VIIRS and MODIS LST Oct. 14, 2012 (From Guillevic et al., RSE, 2014)

LPV Web Site https://lpvs.gsfc.nasa.gov Working Group on Calibration and Validation LPV Web Site https://lpvs.gsfc.nasa.gov Established in 2000 Subscribed member list has grown to nearly 600 members. Over 500 visits/month For each focus area: Variable home page Peer-reviewed papers Community Collaboration Operational Product database list Protocols & best practice 12

CEOS-LPV 5-Year Roadmap Working Group on Calibration and Validation CEOS-LPV 5-Year Roadmap <2016 2017 2018 2019 >2020 Vision All missions support validation & validation is on-going Uncertainty information determined through standard practices & protocols Algorithms are iteratively improved based on validation results Operational Validation Framework: Land Product Characterization System (Lead Agencies: USGS/NOAA) Albedo, Burned Area, & LST Protocols Phenology, ET, & Soil Moisture Protocols (Lead Agency: NASA) CEOS Carbon Actions 7/8 (NASA CMS Program) Biomass Protocol (Lead Agencies: NASA/ESA) ECV protocols and procedures for Snow ECV (Lead Agency: ESA) WGCV ACIX (Lead Agency: ESA) Atmospheric Correction and VI Protocols (Lead Agencies: ESA/NOAA) Field Campaigns and IOPs New Missions Biomass Sustained Missions a/b a b c Morning Landsat 9 Afternoon Terra/Aqua/S-NPP JPSS-1 JPSS-2

MALIBU Multi AngLe Imaging BRDF Unmanned aerial system Working Group on Calibration and Validation MALIBU Multi AngLe Imaging BRDF Unmanned aerial system Objective Multi-angular reference datasets for the assessment of ECVs, including satellite-derived BRF, albedo, VI, PRI, LAI/fAPAR, snow cover, and phenology metrics Pawnee National Grasslands in June 2016 Table Mountain, Colorado in Nov. 2016 Benefits A cost effective ($300 × Flight Hour), fully-exempted (FAA-S.333 & TCAN) platform, that follows CEOS WGCVprotocols https://viirsland.gsfc.nasa.gov/Campaigns.html B31B-0471 MALIBU: A High Spatial Resolution Multi-Angle Imaging Unmanned Airborne System to Validate Satellite-derived BRDF/Albedo Products. Wed, 14 Dec 2016 (8:00 - 12:20)

Conclusion Role of CEOS-LPV Working Group on Calibration and Validation Conclusion Role of CEOS-LPV Coordinate validation efforts internationally Foster collaboration and sharing information and data Develop protocols and good practices for validation efforts Recommendations for reporting and use of accuracy information Need to develop and better represent the ground component to: Improve current validation stages Prepare evaluation of higher level products

https://lpvs.gsfc.nasa.gov