FACTS Devices for Dynamic Reactive Power Compensation in Wind Farms

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
“Power Factor” In Transmission System
Advertisements

Study Committee Representatives Annual Report December, 2012
New Energy Horizons Opportunities and Challenges Fault Current Contributions from Wind Plants Dean Miller PacifiCorp July 25,
Sistan & Balouchestan Electric Power Distribution Company
Updated 1/28/2011. Technical Requirements & Regulatory Issues In Interconnection Agreements March 9, 2011 Jay Caspary ·
Connection of Wind Farms to Weak AC networks – ERCOT Experience and Challenges Shun-Hsien (Fred) Huang ERCOT System Planning CIGRE WG B4.62 Meeting June.
Arrowhead  Weston Transmission Line Project Dave Van House Minnesota Power.
Dynamic VAR’s [D-VAR] What are D-VAR Devices? Dynamic VARs… Fully integrated modular STATCOM with proprietary 3X overload Instantaneously injects precise.
Technical Advisory Committee December 6, 2010 Summary of the CREZ Reactive Study Warren Lasher Manager, Long-Term Planning and Policy.
Presented by: Bikram Choudhury Regd. No. : Department of Electrical And Electronics Engineering FACTS Devices For Smart Grid 2 July 2015.
A Presentation On….. 1.
Presentation to WECC TSS May 8, 2015
Power Engineering Society Chicago Chapter Reactive Power: Sources and Solutions 12 February 2003 David E. Mertz, PE Burns & McDonnell Engineers, Inc.
Chapter 8 Inverters AC Power • Inverters • Power Conditioning Units • Inverter Features and Specifications.
High Voltage Power Electronics Technologies for Integrating Renewable Resources into the Grid RenewElec Workshop Carnegie Mellon University October 22,
STATCOM The STATCOM (or SSC) is a shunt-connected reactive-power compensation device that is capable of generating and/ or absorbing reactive power and.
Flexible AC Transmission System Overview
Year 2006 Report “Better” Managed and Controlled Transmission Grids using Advanced Technological Concepts Aty Edris EPRI Power Delivery & Markets
POWER FACTOR CORRECTION
Houston Area Dynamic Reactive Project March 11,
Overview What is a weak system? Useful metric to identify weak systems: SCR What could possibly go wrong? Is a weak system so bad? What can you do? Risk.
THYRISTOR BASED FACTS CONTROLLER
Black Sea Regional Transmission Planning Project By Predrag Mikša EKC - Electricity Coordinating Center Istanbul, March 2011.
Sommerville Power Engineering Ltd. Introduction & Overview Company Number , registered in England & Wales. SPE August 2015.
K E M A T & D C O N S U L T I N G Power System Conference, Clemson, South Carolina, March 8-11, 2005 Principles and Issues Relating to the Interconnection.
Vestas.com Wind Power Plant Dynamic Reactive Power “Hybrid” Solutions to meet ERCOT Reactive Power Capability Requirements Presented at ERCOT ROS Meeting,
UNIT-VII Static Series Compensators
Oncor Transmission Service Provider Kenneth A. Donohoo Director – System Planning, Distribution and Transmission Oncor Electric Delivery Co LLC
Voltage Control Brad Calhoun Consultant, Sr. Trainer Spring 2016.
TECHNICAL PAPER ON SIMULTANEOUS AC-DC POWER TRANSMISSION
Power Quality By Using FACTS. CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHAT IS FACTS? FOR WHAT PURPOSE FACTS ARE USED? BASIC TYPES OF FACTS CONTROLLERS BENEFITS OF UTILISING.
EMERGING FACTS CONTROLLERS
© ABB Group October 1, 2016 | Slide 1 DynaPeaQ ® SVC Light ® with Energy Storage FACTS.
 The common type of wind power generators are squirrel cage induction generator (SCIG),doubly fed induction generator (DFIG)  For more secure and.
FACTS Devices for Dynamic Reactive Power Compensation in Wind Farms
Agenda TSOG 8th November
A Project Review On POWER QUALITY IMPROVEMENT IN GRID USING STATECOM
FACTS BY SVC, FLEXIBLE AC TRANSMISSION
Overview of Flexible AC Transmission Systems
SIMULATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF FC-TCR
IG BASED WINDFARMS USING STATCOM
PSCAD models.
Study Committee Representatives Annual Meeting October 18, 2010 Winnipeg SC B4 “HVDC and Power Electronics” Activity Report Presented by: John McNichol.
Analysis of the Amplitude and Frequencies of the Voltage Magnification Transients in Distribution Networks due to Capacitor Switching Mohamed Saied Electrical.
Series Connected Controllers
EE6501 POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS
Combined operation of different power plants PREPARED BY : Priyanka Grover Btech (EE) SBSSTC,FZR.
Wind turbine technology
Transmission Solutions
Dr. Unnikrishnan P.C. Professor, EEE
Introduction To Reactive Power
Five level diode clapmed inverter
Offshore Wind Farm Training.
Offshore Wind Farm Training
Power and Energy An Introduction to Electric Regulatory NERC,FERC,CARB CAISO,CEC & DoE
Electricity Distribution Network Design Training & Courses
Reactive Power Compensation And Voltage Control Training
POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS INTRODUCTION.
Design of Electric Power Systems and Utilities
EU-IPA12/CS02 Development of the Renewable Energy Sector
DEC System Voltage Planning - June 2018
A Symmetrical Hybrid Power Flow Controller
Connection of Large – Scale Renewables to the Energy Queensland Network 1st May 2018 Presented by Chris Barker.
Mid-Continent Area Power Pool
PV Solar Projects.
HVDC Transmission Systems:
EE362G Smart Grids: Architecture
FACTS BY SVC, FLEXIBLE AC TRANSMISSION
National Institute of Wind Energy(NIWE)
Presentation transcript:

FACTS Devices for Dynamic Reactive Power Compensation in Wind Farms Piotr Wiczkowski Sargent & Lundy LLC Electrical Analytical Division Abstract Federal Regulatory Energy Commission (FERC) Order No. 827, which was issued in June 2016 and became effective in September 2016, requires wind farms to provide dynamic reactive power compensation. The ruling was initiated and justified based on the advancements in Type III and Type IV inverter-based wind turbine generator (WTG) dynamic reactive power supply capabilities. In addition to the WTG’s inherent reactive power capabilities, Flexible AC Transmission Systems (FACTS) devices such as Static VAR Compensators (SVCs) and Static Compensators (STATCOMs) can be utilized to supplement the wind farms to be in full compliance with the dynamic reactive power compensation requirements. Today, about 5 % of the FACTS market segment is for renewable projects, and the share is expected to increase in the near future with the FERC ruling. This poster explains key design considerations and performance requirements for the FACTS devices. Additionally it overviews prudent approaches for project developers and in preparing specifications, performing bid evaluations and executing procurement of Facts Devices. Methodology As part of our extensive electric power industry experience, Sargent & Lundy has significant wind energy experience. We have provided a full range of services to the wind energy industry, including site screenings, project feasibility studies, wind resource assessments, independent engineering, collector interconnection planning, conceptual engineering, contract development, detailed engineering, design reviews, construction monitoring, commissioning, and operations and maintenance (O&M) support. Sargent & Lundy has worked on wind farm projects for over 15 years. We participate in the AWEA Offshore Wind Working Group and the AWEA Wind Power O&M Working Group. We also actively participate in the IEEE Wind Plant Collector Design Working Group as well as the High Voltage Power Electronics Working Group. FERC Order No. 827 New wind power generation must maintain a composite power delivery, at continuous rated power output, at the high-side of the generator substation at a power factor within the range of 0.95 leading to 0.95 lagging. The power factor range standard shall be dynamic and can be met using, for example, power electronics designed to supply this level of reactive capability (taking into account any limitations due to voltage level, real power output, etc.) or fixed and switched capacitors, or a combination of the two Regional entities, such as ERCOT, may have stricter requirements. Requiring 0.95 power factor, calculated at a units maximum power output, available at all MW output levels What is a FACTS A flexible alternating current transmission system (FACTS) is a system composed of static equipment used for the AC transmission of electrical energy. It is meant to enhance controllability and increase power transfer capability of the network. It is generally a power electronics-based system. These devices, in conjunction with turbine capabilities, enhance dynamic VAR support FACTs devices offer advantages outside required VAR support including fault recovery, voltage support, phase balancing, etc. FACTS Devices Static VAR Compensators (SVC) A continuously adjustable (dynamic) admittance, capacitive through inductive. SCVs can respond quickly to network changes to counterbalance the variations of the load flow or occurrence of faults SVCs are thyristor controlled shunt capacitors and/or reactors More typically for higher voltage transmission applications Produces Low Order Harmonics Historically lower cost than STATCOMs Static Synchronous compensator (STATCOM) Voltage source convertor (VSC). Compromised of a voltage source (DC Capacitor) behind a reactor. Advantages over SVCs include greater performance at low operating voltages, faster response time, and small form factor Expensive at higher voltage levels, typically installed on the collector system Historically more expensive than SVCs but reaching price parity Can be designed with almost no harmonics Most common for wind farms Analysis Requirements Typical Support Studies Reactive Compensation / Sizing Study Assess VAR support need to meet regulatory requirements Load Flow / Voltage Drop Confirm network load flow conditions are with acceptable limits across all operating conditions Harmonics FACTS devices can be a significant source of harmonics. This study is necessary to determine if the wind farm is operating within IEEE limits and if mitigation is required Transient Stability FACTs devices can provide voltage support during transient events such as system faults System Protection Protection must be coordinated to protect FACTS device while also ensuring security through range of operation Software Packages ETAP, SKM, or PSS/E packages for reactive compensation, load flow, and protection studies EMTP, PSCAD, and PSS/E for Harmonics and transient stability Contact with equipment vendors vital to obtain critical model input parameters Specification and Procurement Functional vs. Detailed Functional vs. Detailed Specification IEEE recommends the Detailed Functional route. IEEE 1031 can be used, even though it is designed for transmission class SVCs. IEEE is working on a STATCOM functional specification guide. Manufacturers are familiar with the IEEE guides and it touches on all the key aspects of specifying an SVC, but it will still give the manufacturer the flexibility to choose what they want. Will give the best in terms of pricing. Smaller pre-engineered devices exist (S&C Purewave, ABB PCS6000) and these can be easier to work with. Tend to come in blocks of VAR capability (up to 15MVAR/35kV). Bid Evaluation Important to include cost categories within the specification to help judge manufacturers. Bids received, especially for transmission class devices, may be specialized and highly customizable. Manufacturers will spend a decent amount of engineering time to prepare a proposal. For a wind farm, depending on the dynamic range and response time needed, the best solution might include a dynamic device (containerized STATCOM) along with an external cap bank Loss evaluation is critical. This will force manufacturers to make certain design choices. Need to balance upfront cost savings versus long term operating costs S&L can provide support over the lifecycle of the project Takeaways FERC Rule 827 as well as recent ISO rule changes created stricter VAR support requirements for new wind generation projects increasing the need for FACTS devices Two common types of FACTs devices available, SVCs and STATCOMs, with STATCOMs being the most common FACTs devices require an array of analyses to support their deployment Recommend a detailed functional specification FACTS devices can be engineered to the specification and highly customizable Piotr R. Wiczkowski is a Project Associate with Sargent & Lundy’s Electrical Analytical Division. His experience in the wind industry focuses on electrical analysis. These analyses include reactive power compensation, voltage drop/regulation, short circuit, transients, insulation coordination, and harmonics. Piotr holds B.S. and M.S. degrees in electrical engineering from the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Piotr is a Licensed professional engineer in the State of Illinois.