An Active TARget for MEG-II, a status report

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Status of DHCAL Slice Test Data Analysis Lei Xia ANL-HEP All results preliminary.
Advertisements

Jin Huang Los Alamos National Lab.  Cited from March collaboration Meeting EC group Internal Communication Jin Huang 2 Preshower ID power drop significantly.
Pair Spectrometer Design Optimization Pair Spectrometer Design Optimization A. Somov, Jefferson Lab GlueX Collaboration Meeting September
Mar 31, 2005Steve Kahn -- Ckov and Tof Detector Simulation 1 Ckov1, Ckov2, Tof2 MICE Pid Tele-Meeting Steve Kahn 31 March 2005.
Tagger Electronics Part 1: tagger focal plane microscope Part 2: tagger fixed array Part 3: trigger and digitization Richard Jones, University of Connecticut.
Luminosity Monitor Commissioning MICE Collaboration Meeting March 2010 Paul Soler, David Forrest Danielle MacLennan.
GlueX Simulations Status Report on CD3 geometry Richard Jones GlueX Collaboration Meeting, Newport News, January 10-12, 2008.
GEANT4 simulations for the Lund R 3 B prototype Douglas Di Julio Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
The Tagger Microscope Richard Jones, University of Connecticut Hall D Tagger - Photon Beamline ReviewJan , 2005, Newport News presented by GlueX.
Jun 27, 2005S. Kahn -- Ckov1 Simulation 1 Ckov1 Simulation and Performance Steve Kahn June 27, 2005 MICE Collaboration PID Meeting.
Genova/Pavia/Roma Flavio Gatti, PSI, July 1st, Timing Counter july 2004.
LBNE R&D Briefing May 12, 2014 LBNE R&D Briefing May 12, 2014 LArIAT and LBNE Jim Stewart LArIAT EPAG Chair BNL LBNE LARIAT-EPAG J. Stewart BNL T. Junk.
The Transverse detector is made of an array of 256 scintillating fibers coupled to Avalanche PhotoDiodes (APD). The small size of the fibers (5X5mm) results.
Characterization of Silicon Photomultipliers for beam loss monitors Lee Liverpool University weekly meeting.
HPS Test Run Setup Takashi Maruyama SLAC Heavy Photon Search Collaboration Meeting Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, May 26-27,
The PEPPo e - & e + polarization measurements E. Fanchini On behalf of the PEPPo collaboration POSIPOL 2012 Zeuthen 4-6 September E. Fanchini -Posipol.
Study of response uniformity of LHCb ECAL Mikhail Prokudin, ITEP.
CALICE Meeting DESY ITEP&MEPhI status report on tile production and R&D activities Michael Danilov ITEP.
Status of the Beamline Simulation A.Somov Jefferson Lab Collaboration Meeting, May 11, 2010.
MEG positron spectrometer Oleg Kiselev, PSI on behalf of MEG collaboration.
Stopped Muon/Pion Measurements Jim Miller, BU May 2012 UW Test Beam Meeting.
Start Counter Collaboration Meeting September 2004 W. Boeglin FIU.
PSI July 2002MuEGamma Review Meeting1 Beam Line Status update 1.  E5 Test Beam Overview : Aims + RequirementsAims + Requirements Zone Layout + Measurement.
1 Report on analysis of PoGO Beam Test at Spring-8 Tsunefumi Mizuno July 15, 2003 July 21, 2003 revised August 1, 2003 updated.
The NA62 rare kaon decay experiment Photon Veto System Vito Palladino for NA62 Coll.
BES-III Workshop Oct.2001,Beijing The BESIII Luminosity Monitor High Energy Physics Group Dept. of Modern Physics,USTC P.O.Box 4 Hefei,
Start and Vertex Detector W. Boeglin, A.Klein Current Design: 3300 scintillating fibers 1mm diameter 3 double layers (1 axial, 2 stereo) cylindrical geometry.
UPDATE ON THE FORWARD PROTON DETECTOR Gilvan Alves Lafex/CBPF Introduction Accelerator Roman Pots Detector Future Plans April 1, 1998 (no kidding)
Working group on photon vetoes Meeting on June 7 th : 1.Status of Geant4 simulations 2.Discussion on LAV structure 3.Discussion on readout 4.News on Spaghetti.
Genova/Pavia/Roma Flavio Gatti, PSI, 11 February, Timing Counter: january 2004.
GSI 9Feb09 NMI3 – Integrated Infrastructure Initiative for Neutron Scattering and Muon Spectroscopy, Joint Research Activity (JRA8): MUON-S. Contract:
Tracker Neutron Detector: INFN plans CLAS12 Central Detector Meeting - Saclay 2-3 December 2009 Patrizia Rossi for the INFN groups: Genova, Laboratori.
Overview of the MEG * CDCH * one of the following ( MEG UP MEG2 MEG + ) Marco Grassi on behalf of the CDCH Group.
FARICH status E.A.Kravchenko Budker INP, Novosibirsk, Russia.
 13 Readout Electronics A First Look 28-Jan-2004.
COMPASS calorimeters S. Platchkov IRFU, CEA-Saclay GDR, 8-9 avril 2008
IFR Detector R&D status
Activities and Results from PNPI GATCHINA
Roberto Calabrese Ferrara University and INFN
K+e+γ using OKA detector
Status of MEG-I physics analysis
An active target for MEG2, a status report
Scintillation Detectors in High Energy Physics
FCAL R&D towards a prototype of very compact calorimeter
Forward Tagger Simulations
Ultra fast SF57 based SAC M. Raggi Sapienza Università di Roma
New idea for the target detector: SuperFGD
Simulation for DayaBay Detectors
The Beam Test at Fermilab:
superB Detector Workshop I University of Perugia and INFN
Cecilia Voena INFN Roma on behalf of the MEG collaboration
KM2A Electron Detector Optimization
IFR detector mechanics
大強度
Jin Huang Los Alamos National Lab
A First Look J. Pilcher 12-Mar-2004
K. Sedlak, A. Stoykov, R. Scheuermann
5% The CMS all silicon tracker simulation
Upgrade of LXe gamma-ray detector in MEG experiment
Timing Counter Sept CSN I, Assisi 2004 Giorgio Cecchet.
OPERETTE TEST BEAM EXPERIMENT :
Upgrade of LXe gamma-ray detector in MEG experiment
MEG実験アップグレードに向けたSiPMを用いた ポジトロン時間測定器の研究開発
Backgrounds using v7 Mask in 9 Si Layers at a Muon Higgs Factory
Background rejection in P326 (NA48/3)
Dual readout calorimeter for CepC
Update on Ecal simulation
A Neutron Counter for the CLAS12 Central Detector
IR/MDI requirements for the EIC
Status of the cross section analysis in e! e
Presentation transcript:

An Active TARget for MEG-II, a status report G.Cavoto INFN Roma Riunione referee INFN Pisa, 14 gennaio 2014

MEG target geometry Emerging positrons into MEG DCH t volume z Muon depth Muon beam ~20 deg Current MEG target total thickness (t) is 205 microm polyethilene photon XEC Muon are stopped along z [effective thickness t/sin(20deg)] Some spill-out in downstream region Positron affected by multiple scattering and energy loss (proportional to t) Positron can annihilate and produce background photons (proportional to t) Spill-out [endplate] 14/1/2014

Active TARget concept Light collection y Only one end of the fiber instrumented! 14/1/2014

Performance comparison MEG Upgrade ATAR made of 250 mm thick square scintillating fibers. Fully efficient ATAR is considered Use cylindrical all stereo DCH with full efficiency and best R resolution (100 mm) WITH A PERFECT SPECTROMETER ATAR gives slightly better performances 14/1/2014

Use both positron (28 MeV) and muon beams PSI PiE5 test beam May 13 Housing for target and ext. trigger Alignment Ext trigger BTS Beam Collimator Beam Ext. trigger with small scint +SiPM (BC400 2x2x2 mm3 coupled to 3x3 mm2 SiPM) Use both positron (28 MeV) and muon beams for prototype v2 14/1/2014

Results with positrons 28 MeV positron beam (change Separator HV) Use downstream external trigger (in synch with RF) Fiber Ext trigger Prot. V2: Electron (Sr90) and positrons seen with reduced efficiency (~35%) 14/1/2014

Results with muons Surface muon stopped in target Trigger on emerging Michel positron Signal on fiber from emerging positron (muon is microsec away) Ext trigger Fiber Very little time, 10 days forseen in 2014. Start a new prototype (V3) to recover missing efficiency 14/1/2014

Update since last september New full-scale prototype (V3) tested in lab (PSI) Double readout fiber (with/without Al coating): estimate maximal total collected light and detection efficiency Single readout fiber with reflector at the end (sputtered Al and painted Al) Array with coated Al around fiber and sputtered Al on the free end of the fiber (to measure the optical cross-talk) Study of the induced background coming from support (passive/active) into the experiment. First design of the mechanical integration of an active (or passive) target within the new DCH. A collaboration PSI (P.R.Kettle, A.Papa,G.Rutar) and INFN Roma (G.Cavoto, E.Ripiccini) Support from PSI technical services. 14/1/2014

90Sr lab test 14/1/2014

The double-readout prototype Measure the total detected light 14/1/2014

Signal charge spectrum Doubly readout fibers, one SiPM at each end Calibrated spectrum One SIPM only Sum of two SiPM signal Expected 5 p.e. Measured 4.3 14/1/2014

Efficiency estimate At least one p.e. in presence of external trigger Collimator size known with relatively large error. A conservative error of 10% relative on efficiency must be used. A lesson learned: use of optical cement worsens efficiency There is still about 20% efficiency missing (SiPM/fiber mechanical coupling? ) 14/1/2014

Single readout fiber results ATAR MEG-II configuration Test of different Al mirror on not-instrumented end 14/1/2014

Results for single readout fiber Al mirror on one end gives on the other instrumented end 1.5 more light than no mirror (as expected) 14/1/2014

Optical cross-talk Array of 4 fibers: new prototype (V3): fibers with 30 nm sputtered Al coating Prot V2 Prot V3 14/1/2014

XEC background More material (thicker target, service fibers, support) might induced a larger background in XEC (positron Bremsstrahlung, annihilation in flight) AIF + Br. (dotted) AIF background from target itself scales with target thickness Radiative (dashed) What about the other material ? 14/1/2014

MEG-II Geant4 material simulation CDCH with 2pi coverage + passive target 140 mum thickness, 15 deg angle, no holes R[cm] All the photons emitted from Michel positron (no cut on their energy) XEC COBRA endcap CDCH endplate Support Passive target z [cm] 14/1/2014

Different support and service fibers Baseline passive target ATAR with service fibers 14/1/2014

Energy deposited in XEC Number of events with detected photon in XEC per positron Baseline-2pi Baseline (CDCH with missing sector) ATAR-2pi Ee>51MeV only Full EXEC [MeV] EXEC: energy deposited in XEC by photons and converted in scintillation No striking difference between different layouts 14/1/2014

Mechanical integration of an ATAR Discussion started Incoming Muon beam SiPM located on the first endplate All inside DCH inner radius (168 mm) Upstream sector (DCH extension, within COBRA volume) Service fibers (A)TAR need be moved (CEX and CW calibration targets) 14/1/2014

Multiple uses of ATAR Continuous beam monitoring (detecting light from muons) MEG “normalization”: counting muons Y- beam spot measurement If ATAR can be 90deg rotated: X- and Y-beam spot available Muon beam centering (done now with auxiliary device and time consuming) 14/1/2014

Conclusion and plans We have a fiber+SiPM assembly with a 75% efficiency to detector electrons ATAR services not expected to worsen XEC background (besides target material itself does) Discussions of possible solution to integrate ATAR in MEG-II going-on Aim to experimentally detect positrons from stopped muons in the target. Produce a new (V4) version of ATAR prototype Test it in lab (Sr90 setup) (beginning 2014) INFN LNF BTF single tagged electrons and positron in Mar/Apr and later in 2014 PSI PiE5 (positron and MUON): 10days in Fall 2014 Hopefully this device will be considered for the MEG-II detector 14/1/2014

Back up 14/1/2014

Constraint at the target A point on ATAR can help in reducing such effect k is proportional to the momentum resolution (this effect tends to vanish if momentum resolution improves) 14/1/2014

Beam and target Thin Passive Target need REDUCED Range Straggling Use of SUBSURFACE MUONS PROBLEM is RATE REDUCTION from P3.5 ➪ Longer Measuring Times 14/1/2014

SiPM specs 14/1/2014

mip signal (0.5mm) Prot V1 14/1/2014

mip signals on single 0.25mm fiber SiPM Hamamatsu S10362-11-100C Prot V1 Prot V1 With Al x1.8 more light! No Al Detection efficiency ~80% (ext. scint trigger) Similar results with sputtering 14/1/2014

Measurements of collimator 14/1/2014

Distribution of Max E emitted photons ATAR-2pi-service EXEC>40 MeV Ee > 51 MeV generated only Target + CDCH XEC ATAR DCH DCH Outer cylinder 14/1/2014