J. Bauer, V. Bharadwaj, H. Brogonia, A. Fasso, M. Kerimbaev, J. Liu, S

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stefan Roesler SC-RP/CERN on behalf of the CERN-SLAC RP Collaboration
Advertisements

EDMS November th LHC Radiation Day RAMSES Induced Activity Monitors 5 th LHC Radiation Day CERN - 29 November 2005 RAMSES Induced Activity.
TLEP3 How radiation issues could be studied through FLUKA simulations. Possible approaches/mitigation schemes Alberto Fassò.
1 Activation problems S.Agosteo (1), M.Magistris (1,2), Th.Otto (2), M.Silari (2) (1) Politecnico di Milano; (2) CERN.
13 Oct 2005 ICALEPCS RAMSES: The LHC RAdiation Monitoring System for the Environment and Safety G. Segura CERN on behalf of the RAMSES team.
MARS15 Simulations of the MERIT Mercury Target Experiment Fermilab March 18, Neutrino Factory and Muon Collider Collaboration meeting Sergei.
Radiation Physics Beam Tests J. Bauer, J. Liu, L. Nicolas, S. Rokni, M. Santana ESTB Workshop 2011 March 17, 2011.
Shielding Studies using MARS Monte Carlo code Noriaki Nakao (SLAC) Jan. 6, 2005, WORKSHOP Machine-Detector Interface at ILC, SLAC.
Induced Activity Calculations in Support of D&D Activities at SLAC Joachim Vollaire, Radiation Protection Department.
Mid Term Review Meeting, 26 September 2012S. GIRON1 * The research project has been supported by a Marie Curie Early Initial Training Network Fellowship.
ECFA Preparatory Group "Shutdown constraints and radiation and activation effects”. W. Zeuner, W. Riegler, R. Lindner, B. Di Girolamo, G. Corti, C. Schaeffer,
1 Induced radioactivity in the target station and in the decay tunnel from a 4 MW proton beam S.Agosteo (1), M.Magistris (1,2), Th.Otto (2), M.Silari (2)
1 Radiation Safety Aspects of the Linear Collider B. Racky, A. Leuschner, N. Tesch Radiation Protection Group TeV Superconducting Linear Accelerator.
Radiological Aspects of ILC Hee-Seock Lee Pohang Accelerator Laboratory 2 nd Workshop of Korean ILC at PAL.
Handling Electronics from Radiation Areas N. Conan, D. Forkel-Wirth, T. Otto, S. Roesler, C. Theis, C. Tromel, V. Tromel, Heinz Vincke, L. Ulrici R2E,
Radiation Protection considerations concerning a future SPS dump design Helmut Vincke DGS-RP.
First AWAKE dump calculations Helmut Vincke. Beam on dump Muon axis inside and outside CERN Distances: Beam impact point to end of West hall: ~300 m Beam.
Tungsten Calorimeter Model Calculations and Radiation Issues Pavel Degtiarenko Radiation Control Group, Jefferson Lab.
Radiation safety evaluation for “KAMABOKO” Main Linac Tunnel KEK-APL : T.Sanami, S.Ban KEK-ACC : A.Enomoto, M.Miyahara ILC Mechanical & Electrical Review.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Residual Does Rate Analyses for the SNS Accelerator Facility I. Popova, J. Galambos HB2008 August 25-29,
1 Target Station Design for Neutrino Superbeams Dan Wilcox High Power Targets Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory NBI 2012, CERN.
Beam loads & dump concepts T. Kramer, B. Goddard, M. Benedikt, Hel. Vincke.
First radiological estimates for the HIRADMAT project H. Vincke and N. Conan 1.
Radiation Protection aspects for SHIP Doris Forkel-Wirth, Stefan Roesler, Helmut Vincke, Heinz Vincke CERN Radiation Protection Group 1 st SHIP workshop,
Estimates of Radiation Levels in the Main Linac Tunnel and Beam Dump Caverns for the CLIC Design Study Sophie Mallows, Thomas Otto SATIF 10, S.
M.Moll, M.Silari, H.Vincke – 3.April Feedback  In total 134 forms filled:
Neutron measurement with nuclear emulsion Mitsu KIMURA 27th Feb 2013.
11/15/20051 Radiation Protection Issues for ILC (not exhaustive) A. Fassò, N. Noriaki, H. Vincke Radiation Physics.
Considerations for an SPL-Beamdump Thomas Otto CERN in collaboration with Elias Lebbos, Vasilis Vlachoudis (CERN) and Ekaterina Kozlova (GSI) Partly supported.
1 ES&H Dept Head Meeting, July 9, 2003 S. Rokni “Synching up with VIWG” “Each Department Head will present the programs under their purview, regulations.
CERF Benchmark Study of Radionuclide Production with FLUKA M. Brugger on behalf of the CERN-SLAC RP Collaboration.
Radiation Protection at the LHC Lessons Learned D. Forkel-Wirth, D. Perrin, S. Roesler, C. Theis, Heinz Vincke, Helmut Vincke, J. Vollaire CERN-SC-RP-SL.
Application of FLUKA to fixed- target programs at CERN: a short, not exhaustive selection M. Calviani (CERN) With contributions from: M. Brugger, F. Cerutti,
HL-LHC Standards and Best Practices Workshop CERN, June 13, 2014 Best Practices for ALARA C. Adorisio and S. Roesler on behalf of DGS-RP.
New SPS scraping system: preliminary RP remarks Helmut Vincke DGS-RP.
M.Moll, M.Silari, H.Vincke – 3.April Mixed field irradiation -- Who answered ?  In total 36 forms filled / 34 persons answered: 38% 62% CERN:
Chamonix 2006, B.Dehning 1 Commissioning of Beam Loss Monitors B. Dehning CERN AB/BDI.
Radiation Protection and Radiation Safety for Particle Accelerator Facilities J. Vollaire, Radiation Protection Group CERN Compact Accelerators for Isotope.
Radiation Protection Considerations for the CDR Helmut Vincke DGS-RP.
Mixed field irradiation -- Who answered ?  In total 36 forms filled / 34 persons answered: 38% 62% CERN: mainly LHC related topics CERF: beside LHC topics.
Proton-Driven Plasma Wakefield Acceleration CERN Project Structure Edda Gschwendtner, CERN Lisbon Meeting, 22 June 2012Edda Gschwendtner, CERN2.
1 July 2004 Radiation Protection Issues 1 M.Brugger, D.Forkel-Wirth, S.Roesler, H.Vincke SC/RP Review of the LHC Collimation Project 30 June – 2 July 2004.
Proposal for the End Station Test Beam (ESTB) at SLAC John Jaros ALCPG09 Albuquerque September 30, 2009.
Thanks to all members of organisation committee for the preparation of this event Thanks to all participants for their interest R.Schmidt Introduction.
EURISOL DS Task meeting Orsay, 07 Janvier Preliminary shielding assessment of EURISOL Post Accelerator D. Ene, D. Ridikas. B. Rapp.
Radiological Safety for Experiment T-489 Irradiation Experiment in Endstation A Spring 2007 ITEMS: Experimental Setup Long-Term Radiation inside ESA Short-Term.
EURISOL, TASK#5, Bucuresti, November 1 Preliminary shielding assessment of EURISOL Post Accelerator D. Ene, D. Ridikas. B. Rapp.
Procedure for Removal of Material and Waste from LHC P. Bonnal, N. Conan, I. Brunner, D. Forkel-Wirth, H. Menzel, S. Roesler, C. Tromel, L. Ulrici, with.
GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH Status of the FAIR Antiproton Target K. Knie.
VALIDATION OF THE FLUKA MONTE CARLO CODE FOR RESIDUAL PRODUCTION WITH 500 MeV/u AND 950 MeV/u URANIUM BEAM ON COPPER AND STAINLESS STEEL TARGET E. Kozlova.
V. Raginel, D. Kleiven, D. Wollmann CERN TE-MPE 2HiRadMat Technical Board - 30 March 2016.
CALIFES 2015 run preliminary results
Shielding Design for LCLS Injector Operation – Phase one
Induced-activity experiment:
The BLAIRR Irradiation Facility Hybrid Spallation Target Optimization
“hot spots” SIS100 internal beam dump Super-FRS production target
Measurements and FLUKA Simulations of Bismuth and Aluminum Activation at the CERN Shielding Benchmark Facility(CSBF) E. Iliopoulou, R. Froeschl, M. Brugger,
CATIA users meeting 07/06/2012 Material guidelines project – radiological hazard classification Helmut Vincke, Chris Theis on behalf of DGS/RP RSO committee.
Radiation protection of Linac4 M. Silari Radiation Protection Group
Beam Dump outline work plan (UK perspective)
Radiation Physics requirements for the IR
A summary of world-wide test beam facilities
End Station Test Beam (ESTB) at SLAC
Preliminary Study – Radiation induced activity in a SB Target
Fassò, N. Nakao, H. Vincke Aug. 2, 2005
CFS consideration on the Main Dump and around
LCLS Radiological Considerations Sayed H. Rokni, SLAC April 24, 2002
FACET Accelerator Overview
T-489: Induced Activity and Residual Dose Rates
IPBI-TN R. Arnold (with help from T. Fieguth)
Presentation transcript:

Test Beam Experiment T-489 Measurements of Induced Activities and Residual Dose Rates J. Bauer, V. Bharadwaj, H. Brogonia, A. Fasso, M. Kerimbaev, J. Liu, S. Rokni, T. Sanami, J. Sheppard, H. Tran (SLAC) M. Brugger, S. Mallows, S. Roesler, H. Vincke (CERN)

Motivation Strong activation of beamline components and surrounding environment at LCLS (e.g., dump) and future Linear Colliders (e.g., beam delivery system, positron target, and beam dumps) elevated residual dose rates – dose to personnel activation of environment (groundwater, soil, air) – dose to population activation of material – production of radioactive waste structural damage of materials – degraded machine performance, repair Optimization of design is essential to keep impact on personnel, facility operations and decommissioning, and environment (and associated costs) ALARA Monte Carlo codes are used to predict induced activity but: lack of experimental data for benchmarks (FLUKA, MARS, GEANT)

Goal Provide experimental data to benchmark activation predictions for electron accelerators by Monte Carlo codes First benchmark of a new method to calculate residual dose rates with FLUKA at an electron accelerator Combined benchmark of induced radioactivity and residual dose rates Benefit from similar, limited experiments performed at SLAC and a hadron accelerator (CERN)

Monte-Carlo calculation: LCLS 13.64 GeV, 5 kW electron line Elevation view Elevation view NEH NEH FEE FEE 13.64GeV, 5kW 1 mrem/h 10 mrem/h 100 mrem/h 0.1 mrem/h 0.01 mrem/h 1 rem/h Prompt dose rate 13.64GeV, 5kW 1 mrem/h 10 mrem/h 100 mrem/h 0.1 mrem/h 0.01 mrem/h 1 rem/h Prompt dose rate By MARS15 Geometry plotter By MARS15 Geometry plotter concrete Elevation view iron Residual dose rate concrete Elevation view iron Residual dose rate 13.64GeV, 5kW ± Ground water activity System failure Analysis

ILC Positron Target Activation J.Sheppard, V.Bharadwaj Preliminary calculations using FLUKA shows activation levels in range of 100 R/hr inside tunnel Remote handling needed Need good estimation of the activation field of the target hall * too high leads to over-design and increases construction costs * too low lead to operational risk and loss of performance Can use FLUKA to design shielding to reduce activation fields in the target hall, reducing construction costs, operational costs and operating risk Experimental benchmarking of FLUKA (and other codes) critical for believable estimation of activation Schematic for Remote Handling Concept for ILC Positron Source Target Station

Hadron Accelerator Activation Study One experiment was conducted at ESA by SLAC-RP and results were published in NIM (2002), which identified several improvements needed in measurements and Monte Carlo codes. Several benchmark studies were performed at hadron accelerators (CERN) during the past five years (collaboration between SLAC and CERN RP-groups) Results have triggered model developments with impressive improvements for hadron machines (from factors of 2-5 in the past to ~20% at present) Wide and successful application of these models for Large Hadron Collider studies, proof of model performances was requested by supervising authorities This SLAC benchmark study will be performed in complete analogy !

Accelerator Activation Study - References SLAC: S.Rokni, A.Fasso, T.Gwise, J.Liu, S.Roesler Induced radioactivity of materials by stray radiation fields at an electron accelerator Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 484 (2002) 680-689 CERN: M.Brugger, A.Ferrari, S.Roesler, L.Ulrici Validation of the FLUKA Monte Carlo code for predicting induced radioactivity at high-energy accelerators Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 562 (2006) 814-818 M.Brugger, H.Khater, S.Mayer, A.Prinz, S.Roesler, L.Ulrici, H.Vincke Benchmark studies of induced radioactivity produced in LHC materials, Part I: Specific activities Radiation Protection Dosimetry 116 (2005) 6-11 Benchmark studies of induced radioactivity produced in LHC materials, Part II: Remanent dose rates Radiation Protection Dosimetry 116 (2005) 12-15 J.Vollaire, M.Brugger, D.Forkel-Wirth, S.Roesler, P.Vojtyla Calculation of water activation for the LHC Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 562 (2006) 976-980

Hadron Accelerator Activation Study – Specific Activities Ratio FLUKA/Exp 0.8 < R < 1.2 0.8 < R ± Error < 1.2 Exp/MDA < 1 R + Error < 0.8 or R – Error > 1.2

Hadron Accelerator Activation Study – Residual Dose Rates

Machine Requirements for T489 Momentum: 28.5 GeV/c Intensity: > 109 / pulse (approximately 100 W at 10 Hz) Space: approximately 1 meter along beamline Beam monitoring: accurate record (<10%) of integrated intensity and history profile Beam alignment: relative alignment to target within about 1 mm Duration: 16 shifts, 3 shifts per day (5 1/3 days)

Resources Equipment: Manpower: beam dump (SLAC, available) supports for dump and samples (SLAC) material samples (CERN) beam intensity monitoring (SLAC, available) dose rate instruments (CERN / SLAC, available) gamma spectrometry (SLAC, available) Manpower: 1 CERN student, Marie-Curie Fellowship Programme 3 CERN RP staff physicists 3 SLAC RP+ILC staff physicists 2 SLAC RP technicians