The Dred Scott Decision 1857

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ch 18 sec 3-4 I. Dred Scott decision Biggest Supreme Court ruling before the Civil War. Chief Justice Roger Taney ruled that Scott was –Was not a citizen,
Advertisements

Slavery Dominates Politics
Continued Increase in Tension Over Slavery. Do Now: Read the brief background info below on Dred Scott. Then read Chief Justice Taney’s Court Decision.
Section 3 - Slavery Dominates Politics
Road to Civil War Challenges to Slavery p
TEKS 8C: Calculate percent composition and empirical and molecular formulas. Conflict over Slavery 1850s 2.
The Missouri Compromise was an agreement passed in 1820 between the pro- slavery and anti-slavery factions in the United States Congress. 1.) Missouri.
15-03 Road to Civil War Challenges to Slavery Road to Civil War Secession and War.
Chapter 15, Section 3 Challenges to Slavery.
Section 4 Slavery and Secession Why did the South secede?
Slavery and Secession Section 10-4 pp Slavery Dominates Politics The Dred Scott Decision – Decided by Chief Justice Roger B. Taney – Court ruled.
Slavery in the 1850s: Changing National Politics Chapter 10 Section 3.
Issues Leading to the Civil War Southerners threaten secession to get what they want!!!
Ch. 15, Section 3: Challenges to Slavery pg. 445  Main Idea: Social, economic, and political differences divided the North and South.  Key Terms:  Arsenal.
People = 3 points per 36point total. Lawyer from Illinois who debated Douglas for the Illinois Senate seat in 1858 and lost; he ran for President on the.
DRED SCOTT – an African American who had been a slave and moved by his master to a state where slavery was illegal.
DRED SCOTT DECISION  Dred Scott was a slave  Owner had taken him north of Missouri Compromise Line  Sued for freedom  Court Ruled  Slaves did not.
15-03 Road to Civil War Challenges to Slavery.
Slavery Divides the Nation. The Dred Scott Case Dred Scott was a slave who traveled with his master from Missouri (slave state) to Illinois & Wisconsin.
The Crisis Deepens: Civil War is Inevitable Dred Scott Decision (1857) Lincoln-Douglas Debates (1858) John Brown’s Raid on Harpers Ferry (1859) Election.
DRED SCOTT – an African American who had been a slave and moved by his master to a state where slavery was illegal.
Ch:14 The Nation Divided :3 The Crisis Deepens.
Factors Leading to Sectional Division. Compromise of 1850 Proposed by Senator Henry Clay of Kentucky California admitted to the Union as a free state.
Civil War Notes Prelude To War: Part I D. Slavery and Secession Buchanan’s Presidency is plagued with controversies over slavery Dred Scott Decision Lecompton.
James Buchanan - Democrat 15 th President
October 21,  Congress attempts to keep a balance of power between slave and free states  Missouri Compromise  Henry Clay proposed this plan.
Jump Start Explain how popular sovereignty was involved in the Kansas-Nebraska Act How did the Kansas-Nebraska Act lead to increased division between the.
Political Divisions cause the Nations to Divide
Slavery Dominates Politics
Secession.
Chapter 14 The Nation Divided Section 3: The Crisis Deepens
Republican Party.
Slavery Dominates Politics
STUDY GUIDE for CAUSES OF THE CIVIL WAR!
Ch:14 The Nation Divided
10.4 Slavery and Secession Controversy brings the nation to the brink of Civil War NEXT.
UNIT 8.3 SLAVERY & POLITICS.
Objectives Explain why the Republican Party came into existence in the 1850s. Summarize the issues involved in the Dred Scott decision. Identify Abraham.
CALL TO FREEDOM--Beginnnings to 1877
UNIT 13.3 SLAVERY & POLITICS MR dickerson.
CH 15 ROAD TO CIVIL WAR.
Challenges to Slavery Section Two.
What was Abraham Lincoln’s position regarding slavery?
Quote The best way to predict the future, is to create it.
DO NOW – US HISTORY What problems would you experience if you had no rights?
Section 3 – pg 368 The Crisis Deepens
Chapter 14 Section 3 Objectives
Chapter 14 Section 3 Objectives
Chapter 14 section 3 The Crisis Deepens.
The Road to the American Civil War- Day 3
To do this, Congress repealed (ended) the Missouri Compromise line at 36˚30’ in the western territories.
Review from last week Kansas-Nebraska Act: Kansas is almost ready to be a state- To slave or not? Stephan Douglas looked to avoid more issues so he proposes.
What causes of sectional conflict led to the Civil War?
UNIT 8.3 SLAVERY & POLITICS MR LANGHORST.
Slavery Dominates Politics
Causes of the Civil War Mr. Dickson U.S. History.
Pre-Civil War compromises and events
DRED SCOTT – an African American who had been a slave and moved by his master to a state where slavery was illegal.
STUDY GUIDE for CAUSES OF THE CIVIL WAR!
Challenges to Slavery & Seccession
Conflict over Slavery 1850s 2
CH 15 ROAD TO CIVIL WAR.
Warm up: Review Previous Lessons
Ch. 15 Sec. 3, 4 “Political Divisions & Nation Divides” P
We are going to start with 10 minutes to finish up Document Based Questions Organize yourself into groups of 3 One Southerner One Westerner (or would.
Road to Civil War: “Challenges to Slavery”
Challenges to Slavery Section Two.
U.S. History and Government 11th Grade / Br. Siraj Date: July 13, 2019
CH 10 Section 4 Debates Over Slavery..
Chapter 14: The Nation Divided
Presentation transcript:

The Dred Scott Decision 1857

Chief Justice Roger B. Taney made the following ruling: Dred Scott was a slave who had lived for a time in free territory and filed suit to gain his freedom from his new “owners.” In 1857, his case reached the U.S. Supreme Court. Chief Justice Roger B. Taney made the following ruling: Scott had no right to sue in a federal court because he was not a U.S. citizen. Scott had no right to freedom because he had filed his suit in Missouri, a slave state. Furthermore, living in a free state did not make him free. Slaves are “property” and under the 5th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, Congress had no authority to prohibit a citizen taking their property into any U.S. territory. Therefore, the Missouri Compromise line of 1820 was UNCONSTITUTIONAL! This meant that Congress could NOT limit the spread of slavery into any of the western territories. Did this also mean that states could not ban slavery?

The Lincoln-Douglas Debates 1858

In 1858, Senator Stephen A. Douglas of Illinois, the author of the K-N Act and one of the most popular politicians in the U.S., ran for re-election. His challenger was Abraham Lincoln, an attorney and former Congressman who was largely unknown outside of his home state. Their series of debates captured the attention of the whole country. Douglas was a Democrat who planned to run for president in 1860. He supported popular sovereignty in the territories and believed that slavery would die out naturally over time. Lincoln was a largely unknown Republican who opposed the spread of slavery in the territories. Lincoln personally hated slavery and felt that it was immoral. He considered it a threat to free labor. Both Douglas and Lincoln opposed the spread of slavery but disagreed over how to stop it. At one their debates, Lincoln “trapped” Douglas by asking him if the people of a territory could exclude slavery. Douglas responded with the so-called “Freeport Doctrine” which stated that voters could block slavery in a new territory by simply refusing to legally enforce it.

The RESULTS of the Lincoln-Douglas Debates Douglas narrowly won the Illinois Senate election, but… He had damaged his chances for winning the Democratic nomination for president in 1860. Southerners dominated the Democratic party and they did not like the “Freeport Doctrine.” Lincoln lost but he received a lot of positive coverage in national magazines and newspapers. Many Republicans began to think that Lincoln might make a strong candidate for president in 1860. The national debate over slavery was growing more intense and North and South were more divided than ever.

JOHN BROWN ! 1859

John Brown’s Raid on Harper’s Ferry After the Pottawatomie Massacre in 1856, John Brown fled from Kansas. He was wanted for murder and spent the next few years hiding out in upstate New York. In 1859, he began to plan a slave uprising. His plan was unrealistic and it failed, but it would have a major affect on the coming of the Civil War. In October 1859, Brown led 18 men into the town of Harper’s Ferry, Virginia and seized the federal arsenal located there. His men took several hostages. He hoped that slaves in the surrounding area would rise up and join him and he would provide them with weapons from the arsenal. That didn’t happen. U.S troops stormed into the arsenal and many of his men were killed. Brown was captured alive, charged with treason & murder, found guilty and hanged less than two months later.

John Brown’s Raid on Harper’s Ferry John Brown’s raid did not free a single slave, nor did his death change any laws on slavery. What it did do was polarize the North and South! In the North, Brown was praised by many as a hero and martyr who had given his life to the cause of ending the evil of slavery. More moderate Northerners thought that Brown had gone too far. In the South, Brown was viewed as a terrorist and murderer who threatened the lives of white Southerners by trying to start a violent slave revolt.

The Election of 1860

The Election of 1860 Lincoln wins the Republican nomination as a “moderate” over the more “radical” William Seward. The Democratic party splits and holds two conventions. The Northern faction nominates Stephen Douglas, the Southern faction nominates John C. Breckinridge of Kentucky. A new party is formed called the Constitutional Union party which tries to reach a compromise. It only wins support in the “border states.” The split in the Democratic vote allows Lincoln to win the election without any support in the South.

Southerners are outraged that a “Black Republican” has won the election. Lincoln’s name did not even appear on the ballot in most Southern states. Southern extremists see only one solution….. Secession!