PHIL 151 Logic: The Art of Reasoning Spring 2017 Critical Contribution

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An Introduction to Argumentative Writing
Advertisements

AIM: How can we apply our knowledge of the argumentative essay to “Who Speaks for the Carriage Horses?” Do Now: Take out a notebook where you can take.
Research Paper Arguments Premises Fallacies Take Notes!
Responding Critically to Texts
Developing a Research Question.  You need to first choose a topic. Make sure that the topic you choose is one in which you are interested – one that.
Persuasion Getting people to agree with you Part I: Organizing your paper.
Argumentative vs. Analytical Writing An Introduction to Terms and Concepts.
Writing Exercise Try to write a short humor piece. It can be fictional or non-fictional. Essay by David Sedaris.
Argumentative Evaluation and Writing
Pre-Writing your Spring Senior Project
Aim: To test our skills on part 2 of the regents exam
ARGUMENTATIVE WRITING
Argumentative Writing: Logical Progression
Paraphrasing Class #8 February 14, 2013.
Argument.
Argumentative Essay Terminology.
ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY.
Do you agree with the message in the source?
Reconsider the prompt: To what extent does Civil Disobedience promote social progress?   Write your thesis (either the original you included in your timed.
How to Write an Argumentative Essay
Writer’s Workshop Argument Essay.
Types of Essays: End the Confusion
Persuasive Essay.
Paper #2: Advertisement Analysis
Argument Notes English IV.
SAT Notes: Please get out your notebook and turn to the writing section. We are taking notes today.
Book Review Format A book review is an exercise in analysis (a critical assessment of what the book says, not an exercise in description (simply what the.
JC Clapp North Seattle Community College
RWS 100 – Monday - 9/18/17 Body Paragraphs.
So What’s Your Point? In writing, a CLAIM is the point the writer is trying to make. Different types of writing require different types of CLAIMS.
Argument Writing: Taking a Stand
PPT QUESTIONS Is Survival Selfish?.
Compare Texts Wild Animals Aren’t Pets (pg. 223); Let People Own Exotic Animals (pg. 227)
Read-Listen-view Essay Rationale
Writing for History Class
Argumentative Writing: Logical Progression
The In-Class Critical Essay
Types of Writing English 10,
Essential elements of an argument
Audience.
A model for argumentative writing
Historical thinking skill: comparison
Writing to Argue Pamela Fox.
Peer Editing English 110 Synthesis.
Argumentative Research Essay
Developing Arguments for Persuasive Speeches
Audience.
Writing Prompts…. What comes to mind when you hear writing prompt?
Historical Argumentation
Barnet, Bellanca, Stubbs Presentation #3
Writing a strong thesis statement
Module 1: Unit 2: Lesson 7 Analyzing the Model Analytical Mini-Essay
The discursive essay.
Essay.
Argumentative Essay Body Paragraph Precis
Topic Of Presentation Group Members
D14 – Bellringer Make sure that you have contacted your chosen school / competition, so that we can move forward with specific competitions and goals.
The art of persuasive writing
D11 – Bellringer Which of the following topics is most interesting to you? Let’s pick one, research, and debate! (20 minute research, 15 to debate!) Format:
RECAP Persuasive with no reasons or evidence OR arguments
Unit 2 Read, wRite, and Research
Writing the Analytical Essay
Warm Up Objective: Scientists will demonstrate their writing by applying ELA conventions to the Research Task Simulation Pre-Assessment. What is the.
Audience.
Lesson 4 Synthesis Overview & Peer Evaluation
Writing workshop.
Argumentative Writing: Logical Progression
Of Mice and Men Critical Essay.
Megan Smoot 4th Quarter Project 5/1/19
Using the Words of Others
Presentation transcript:

PHIL 151 Logic: The Art of Reasoning Spring 2017 Critical Contribution

Critical Contribution The Critical Contribution for PHIL 151 is a short, analytical essay. In this essay, you will analyze arguments relating to a particular topic. You will: Choose a topic: Killer Robots or Genetic Selection Find two discussions relating to your topic Write an analysis at least one key argument within each of those two discussions The essays are short – 1000 words – so you will need to be concise! Due: Friday, October 20th. Submit your paper as a PDF via Moodle.

Key Points This is an exercise in analyzing arguments, not in persuasive writing. You aren’t writing for or against Killer Robots/Genetic Selection: you’re assessing the argument that other people have given. Don’t try to summarize the entire discussion: focus on particular arguments! Some discussions will include many arguments, so choose one (or a few) that seem interesting. Make sure you explain the arguments you are assessing before analyzing them. What conclusion is the author defending, and what reasons or evidence is being offered? Use whatever concepts/techniques are helpful in analyzing the arguments you have chosen. This could include talking about validity, argument form, problems of meaning, fallacies, hidden assumptions, etc. Some of these things will be more useful than others, depending the particular arguments you are discussing.

Topic #1 – Killer Robots Some Key Issues: What is a ‘killer robot’? How are they different from ordinary robots? What are the threats? Why are killer robots particularly dangerous? What are the analogies? Are killer robots like other forms of weapons? Are they like other forms of acceptable weapons or banned weapons?

Topic #2 – Genetic Selection Some Key Issues: What are the process for genetic selection? What technology is involved? What are the potential benefits? What are the potential risks? How does genetic selection compare with other forms of ‘selection’? For instance, is it comparable to selective breeding in agriculture? If it is, does that make a difference to whether or not it is acceptable in humans?

Mini Debates With a partner, develop one good argument for or against either Killer Robots or Genetic Selection. Write your argument down so that it’s easy to share. Share your arguments with each other and discuss. What are the important assumptions in your arguments? What claims need to be clarified, and what additional evidence is needed? Share your overall assessment with the class. Which side seems to have the stronger case, and why?