Alternatives to Using a Reference Strip for Reflectance-Based Nitrogen Application in Corn (Presented at 8th International Conference on Precision Agriculture,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ECE Longest Path dual 1 ECE 665 Spring 2005 ECE 665 Spring 2005 Computer Algorithms with Applications to VLSI CAD Linear Programming Duality – Longest.
Advertisements

Missouri algorithm for N in corn
FIELD-SCALE N APPLICATION USING CROP REFLECTANCE SENSORS Ken Sudduth and Newell Kitchen USDA-ARS Translating Missouri USDA-ARS Research and Technology.
Mark Twain Lake/Salt River CEAP – CSWQRU Columbia, MO Overview of the Mark Twain Lake/ Salt River Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP) Contributing.
A) 80 b) 53 c) 13 d) x 2 = : 10 = 3, x 3 = 309.
What is the purpose of this presentation? n Provide a better understanding of site specific yield information and the value that it can bring to your.
Comparing Two Samples: Part II
Biological and Environmental Engineering Soil & Water Research Group Spatial Variability of Groundwater Soluble Phosphorous on an Alluvial Valley-Fill.
Real-Time Corn Assessment for Variable Rate Nitrogen Management Newell R. Kitchen, Kenneth A. Sudduth USDA-ARS, Columbia, MO Peter Scharf, Harlan Palm,
Evaluated Surface Drainage Problems with Data Charles Ellis Kent Shannon Ag Engineering Extension Specialists.
GPS and Precision Ag Technologies Is There Anything New? Kent Shannon Associate Director Missouri Precision Agriculture Center.
INTEGRATED FARMING SYSTEMS November, COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL.
In-Situ NIR Spectroscopy to Measure Carbon and Other Soil Attributes Colin Christy, Veris Technologies David Laird, USDA-ARS Kenneth Sudduth, USDA-ARS.
Comparison of Commercial Crop Canopy Sensors Ken Sudduth Newell Kitchen Scott Drummond USDA-ARS, Columbia, Missouri.
Integrating Weather and Soil Information With Sensor Data Newell Kitchen USDA ARS Cropping Systems and Water Quality Research Unit Columbia, Missouri.
Spatial Interpolation of monthly precipitation by Kriging method
Effectively Using GPS in Management Terry Griffin & Jess Lowenberg-DeBoer Site Specific Management Center Purdue University.
Introduction: Business Meetings: Sensor-Based Nutrient Management Community Wednesday, October 24 th 4:00 pm – 4:30 pm Duke Energy Convention Center, Room.
Sensors for Mapping Soil pH Eric Lund, Veris Technologies, Salina, KS Sensors for Crop Management Conference Stillwater OK January 17, 2008.
Effects of the spatial variability of soil hydraulic properties on water dynamics in cranberry production Gumiere, S.J.; Caron, J.; Périard, Y.; Lafond,
Field-Scale Sensor Evaluation Ken Sudduth, Newell Kitchen, Scott Drummond USDA-ARS Columbia MO.
What is Soil Electrical Conductivity?
Tracy Blackmer Peter Kyveryga Advancing Agricultural Performance ® 1 Iowa Soybean Association On-Farm Network®
Agenda Item 2. A review of basic concepts and terminology related to phosphorus movement from cropland to streams and rivers. Great Lakes Protections Fund.
Sensors Role In Agriculture
Interfacing Sensors with (VR)Application Equipment Scott Drummond Ken Sudduth IT Specialist Agricultural Engineer.
Active-Crop Sensor Calibration Using the Virtual-Reference Concept K. H. Holland (Holland Scientific) J. S. Schepers (USDA-ARS, retired) 8 th ECPA Conference.
Improving NUE Using Crop Sensing : “It Takes a Village”
Chapter 3: Soil Sampling And Soil Sensing
Missouri algorithm: Design & objectives Peter Scharf University of Missouri Peter Scharf Newell Kitchen, Ken Sudduth, Glenn Davis, John Lory, Vicky Hubbard,
Variable-Rate N Fertilization of Wheat and Corn in the Mid-Atlantic Variable-Rate N Fertilization of Wheat and Corn in the Mid-Atlantic Wade Thomason,
Refinement of the Missouri Corn Nitrogen Algorithm Using Canopy Reflectance Newell Kitchen, Ken Sudduth, and Scott Drummond USDA-Agricultural Research.
Current N Fertilization Strategy for Corn in Missouri Newell Kitchen Cropping Systems and Water Quality Research Unit Columbia, Missouri USDA-ARS.
NCERA-180 Jan 5, 2007 Spatial Variability & Crop Simulation Modeling James W. Jones Yield Soil type Images Pests Elevation Drainage Fertility Diagnose.
N Fertilization in Colorado Raj Khosla Colorado State University May 19 th & 20 th Oklahoma State University Raj Khosla Colorado State University May 19.
Class 13, October 15, 2015 Lessons 2.7 & 2.8.  By the end of this lesson, you should understand that: ◦ Each statistic—the mean, median, and mode—is.
Sensors vs. Map Based Precision Farming Chris Sechrest.
Variable Rate Technology Brian Montgomery InTime, Inc Director, Marketing and Customer Relations.
Corn Nitrogen Management: Progress in Missouri Newell R. Kitchen, Kenneth A. Sudduth, and John Hummel USDA-ARS, Columbia, MO USDA-ARS, Columbia, MO Peter.
Dave Mengel, Kansas State University Multi-State Winter Wheat Sensor Project,
Nitrogen efficiency in our N systems study fields Peter Scharf, Newell Kitchen, and Ken Sudduth University of Missouri and USDA-ARS.
An Environmental Assessment of Sensor-Based Variable-Rate N Management in Corn Darrin Roberts Dr. Newell R. Kitchen, Advisor Thesis Committee Members:
Theory of Predicting Crop Response to Non-Limiting Nitrogen.
Precision Agriculture Technologies: An Opportunity for new Approaches to N management John Schmidt Department of Agronomy Kansas State University.
Workforce Development Precision Agriculture
Manal ELarab GIS in Water Resources Term Project 2012
Structure Model structure.
Topsoil Depth at the Centralia Site
Precision Agriculture
Agronomic Spatial Variability and Resolution
Nicolas Tremblay, M.Y. Bouroubi
Zones Grids and EC.
Redball NUE Conference August 9, 2007

Agronomic Spatial Variability and Resolution
Precision Agriculture
ચાલો માટી વિશે જાણીએ All About Soil.
Intro to Precision Agriculture
Objective: To discuss the current regional project and identify improvements needed for conducting future collaborative sensor-based research.
Use of Precision Ag in Hay and Forage Production
ВОМР Подмярка 19.2 Възможности за финансиране
Споразумение за партньорство
Agronomic Spatial Variability and Resolution
Tastes Great. Less Filling
Agronomic Spatial Variability and Resolution
Variability in Corn Response to N Fertilizer along a 1000-ft Hillslope
Agronomic Spatial Variability and Resolution
Results from Regional Algorithm Evaluation Study
Grid Sampling: Point vs. Random
Newell R. Kitchen, Kenneth A. Sudduth USDA-ARS, Columbia, MO
Presentation transcript:

Alternatives to Using a Reference Strip for Reflectance-Based Nitrogen Application in Corn (Presented at 8th International Conference on Precision Agriculture, July 2006) D. Kent Shannon Newell R. Kitchen Kenneth A. Sudduth Peter C. Scharf Harlan L. Palm

Alternative Approaches Small Sample Area One Field Length Strip Multiple Field Length Strips – Interpolated into a Reference Map Using Soil Electrical Conductivity (EC)

Study Layout

Missouri Corn N Algorithm Ratio Reference ≤ 0.25 60 ≤ N Rec ≤ 210

Small Sample Area Ratio = 0.2141

One Field Length Strip Ratio = 0.2736

Using Multiple Strips

Using Soil EC

Using Soil EC y = 0.0017x + 0.1838 R2 = 0.5348 C Site

C Site – N Rec Using Ceiling Ratio Value of 0 C Site – N Rec Using Ceiling Ratio Value of 0.25 and Minimum N Rate of 60 lbs/acre Sample – R2 = 0.79 One Strip – R2 = 0.94 Multiple Strips Using EC – R2 = 0.94

W Site - N Rec Using Ceiling Ratio Value of 0 W Site - N Rec Using Ceiling Ratio Value of 0.25 and Minimum N Rate of 60 lbs/acre Sample – R2 = 0.25 One Strip – R2 = 0.26 Multiple Strips Using EC – R2 = 0.35

Comparison of Sites – R2 Site Sample Strip EC B 0.69 0.63 NA C 0.79 0.94 D 0.70 0.48 0.60 E 0.61 H 0.64 S 0.80 W 0.30 0.31 0.35 Ceiling and 60 min

Comparison of Sites – Mean Nitrogen Rate in lbs/acre Sample One Strip Multiple Strips EC B 188.35 160.96 187.69 NA C 189.08 172.03 177.64 174.82 D 146.76 99.02 149.66 114.73 E 105.56 107.17 101.07 H 121.51 129.51 126.98 S 115.02 113.57 125.79 W 146.10 158.87 170.99 161.14 Ceiling and 60 min

W Site – N Rec Ceiling Ratio Value of 0 W Site – N Rec Ceiling Ratio Value of 0.25 and Minimum N Rate of 60 lbs/acre Strip Ratio Mean St Dev 1 0.3353* 112.12 55.86 2 0.2166 143.66 58.40 3 0.2582* 4 0.22 140.13 58.81 5 0.1989 162.61 52.89 6 0.1761 186.04 37.94 All Variable 166.85 52.17 * Ceiling Ratio Value of 0.25 Used Using a Sample at the Beginning of Each Strip

Conclusions Spatial reference information is important for some fields. A sample reference is sufficient in some cases, but the location of the reference can be critical. We need to be able to determine where spatial information is most important.

Questions

W Site - N Rec Using Ceiling Ratio Value of 0 W Site - N Rec Using Ceiling Ratio Value of 0.25 and Minimum N Rate of 60 lbs/acre Sample – R2 = 0.30 One Strip – R2 = 0.31 Multiple Strips Using EC – R2 = 0.35

Comparison of Sites – Standard Deviation Sample Strip Multiple Strips EC B 24.14 36.17 23.46 NA C 41.54 51.37 44.23 49.15 D 49.58 49.22 50.07 51.71 E 44.28 44.41 46.22 H 32.12 31.43 36.09 S 40.73 40.50 46.06 W 49.66 45.6 43.15 41.37 Ceiling and 60 min River Bottom Fields

Missouri Corn N Algorithm

Missouri Corn N Algorithm