Interferometer configurations for Gravitational Wave Detectors

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stefan Hild for the GEO600 team October 2007 LSC-Virgo meeting Hannover Homodyne readout of an interferometer with Signal Recycling.
Advertisements

Beyond The Standard Quantum Limit B. W. Barr Institute for Gravitational Research University of Glasgow.
Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik (Albert-Einstein-Institut) HOMODYNE AND HETERODYNE READOUT OF A SIGNAL- RECYCLED GRAVITATIONAL WAVE DETECTOR.
Gravitational Wave Astronomy Dr. Giles Hammond Institute for Gravitational Research SUPA, University of Glasgow Universität Jena, August 2010.
FINESSE FINESSE Frequency Domain Interferometer Simulation Versatile simulation software for user-defined interferometer topologies. Fast, easy to use.
19. October 2004 A. Freise Automatic Alignment using the Anderson Technique A. Freise European Gravitational Observatory Roma
Dual Recycling for GEO 600 Andreas Freise, Hartmut Grote Institut für Atom- und Molekülphysik Universität Hannover Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik.
Gravitational Wave Astronomy Dr. Giles Hammond Institute for Gravitational Research SUPA, University of Glasgow Universität Jena, August 2010.
Cascina, January 25th, Coupling of the IMC length noise into the recombined ITF output Raffaele Flaminio EGO and CNRS/IN2P3 Summary - Recombined.
Polarization Techniques for Interferometer Control Peter Beyersdorf National Astronomical Observatory of Japan LSC March 2002 Advanced Configurations LIGO-G Z.
Optics of GW detectors Jo van den Brand
LIGO NSF review, 11/10/05 1 AdLIGO Optical configuration and control Nov 10, 2005 Alan Weinstein for AdLIGO Interferometer Sensing and Control (ISC) and.
Koji Arai – LIGO Laboratory / Caltech LIGO-G v2.
LIGO NSF review, 11/10/05 1 AdLIGO Optical configuration and control Nov 10, 2005 Alan Weinstein for AdLIGO Interferometer Sensing and Control (ISC) and.
Marcus Benna, University of Cambridge Wavefront Sensing in Dual-Recycled Interferometers LIGO What is Wavefront Sensing? How does it work? –Detection of.
Higher order TEM modes: Why and How? Andreas Freise European Gravitational Observatory 17. March 2004.
Higher order laser modes in gravitational wave detectors
Marcus Benna, University of Cambridge Wavefront Sensing in Dual-Recycled Interferometers LIGO What is Wavefront Sensing? How does it work? –Detection of.
Shot noise in GW detectors G González. x Power (ASDC) bright dark /2 The dark fringe L+  L L-  L i  L  P=P 0 sin 2 (  t+k  l) = (P 0 /2) (1+sin.
Koji Arai – LIGO Laboratory / Caltech LIGO-G v1.
TeV Particle Astrophysics August 2006 Caltech Australian National University Universitat Hannover/AEI LIGO Scientific Collaboration MIT Corbitt, Goda,
Generation of squeezed states using radiation pressure effects David Ottaway – for Nergis Mavalvala Australia-Italy Workshop October 2005.
G R DC Readout for Advanced LIGO P Fritschel LSC meeting Hannover, 21 August 2003.
RF readout scheme to overcome the SQL Feb. 16 th, 2004 Aspen Meeting Kentaro Somiya LIGO-G Z.
Interferometer Control Matt Evans …talk mostly taken from…
Degeneracy for power-recycling and signal recycling cavities in Advanced Virgo.
GEO‘s experience with Signal Recycling Harald Lück Perugia,
LIGO-G D Enhanced LIGO Kate Dooley University of Florida On behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration SESAPS Nov. 1, 2008.
SQL Related Experiments at the ANU Conor Mow-Lowry, G de Vine, K MacKenzie, B Sheard, Dr D Shaddock, Dr B Buchler, Dr M Gray, Dr PK Lam, Prof. David McClelland.
Koji Arai – LIGO Laboratory / Caltech LIGO-G v1.
Displacement calibration techniques for the LIGO detectors Evan Goetz (University of Michigan)‏ for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration April 2008 APS meeting.
LIGO- G R Amaldi7 July 14 th, 2007 R. Ward, Caltech 1 DC Readout Experiment at the Caltech 40m Laboratory Robert Ward Caltech Amaldi 7 July 14.
LIGO- G R Sensing and control, SPIE conference, June Sensing and control of the Advanced LIGO optical configuration SPIE conference at.
G Z AJW for Marcus Benna, Cambridge Wavefront Sensing for Advanced LIGO Model of wavefront sensing in a dual- recycled interferometer Consequences.
Advanced Virgo Optical Configuration ILIAS-GW, Tübingen Andreas Freise - Conceptual Design -
Koji Arai – LIGO Laboratory / Caltech LIGO-G v2.
LIGO-G R Quantum Noise in Gravitational Wave Interferometers Nergis Mavalvala PAC 12, MIT June 2002 Present status and future plans.
AIGO 2K Australia - Italy Workshop th October th October 2005 Pablo Barriga for AIGO group.
Dual Recycling in GEO 600 H. Grote, A. Freise, M. Malec for the GEO600 team Institut für Atom- und Molekülphysik University of Hannover Max-Planck-Institut.
SQL Related Experiments at the ANU Conor Mow-Lowry, G de Vine, K MacKenzie, B Sheard, Dr D Shaddock, Dr B Buchler, Dr M Gray, Dr PK Lam, Prof. David McClelland.
Monica VarvellaIEEE - GW Workshop Roma, October 21, M.Varvella Virgo LAL Orsay / LIGO CalTech Time-domain model for AdvLIGO Interferometer Gravitational.
FINESSE FINESSE Frequency Domain Interferometer Simulation Andreas Freise European Gravitational Observatory 17. March 2004.
LOGO Gravitational Waves I.S.Jang Introduction Contents ii. Waves in general relativity iii. Gravitational wave detectors.
Stefan Hild 1GWADW, Elba, May 2006 Experience with Signal- Recycling in GEO 600 Stefan Hild, AEI Hannover for the GEO-team.
LIGO-G D Advanced LIGO Systems & Interferometer Sensing & Control (ISC) Peter Fritschel, LIGO MIT PAC 12 Meeting, 27 June 2002.
ET-ILIAS_GWA joint meeting, Nov Henning Rehbein Detuned signal-recycling interferometer unstableresonance worsesensitivity enhancedsensitivity.
Technologies of Gravitational Wave Detection
A look at interferometer topologies that use reflection gratings
GEO600 Control aspects where do the error signal come from?
Progress toward squeeze injection in Enhanced LIGO
Nergis Mavalvala Aspen January 2005
Generation of squeezed states using radiation pressure effects
The Advanced LIGO Angular Control System (ASC) (Hanford edition)
Homodyne readout of an interferometer with Signal Recycling
Commissioning the LIGO detectors
Heterodyne Readout for Advanced LIGO
Quantum effects in Gravitational-wave Interferometers
Homodyne or heterodyne Readout for Advanced LIGO?
Current Status of the 40m Detuned RSE Prototype
Advanced LIGO Quantum noise everywhere
Workshop on Gravitational Wave Detectors, IEEE, Rome, October 21, 2004
Heterodyne Readout for Advanced LIGO
Thermal lensing effect: Experimental measurements - Simulation with DarkF & Finesse J. Marque (Measurements analysis: M. Punturo; DarkF simulation: M.
“Traditional” treatment of quantum noise
Advanced LIGO optical configuration investigated in 40meter prototype
LIGO Scientific Collaboration
Squeezed Light Techniques for Gravitational Wave Detection
RF readout scheme to overcome the SQL
Advanced Optical Sensing
Homodyne detection: understanding the laser noise amplitude transfer function Jérôme Degallaix Ilias meeting – June 2007.
Presentation transcript:

Interferometer configurations for Gravitational Wave Detectors 引力波 LIGO-G1601926-v1 Interferometer configurations for Gravitational Wave Detectors Koji Arai (新井宏二) – LIGO Laboratory / Caltech GW mini-school: Beijing Normal University 2016/9/15~18

Optical configurations

Laser interferometry GW detection = High sensitive detection of displacement Laser interferometry is an indispensable technology (lambda ~ 1um) We use optical cavities in many places What is an optical cavity?

Gaussian beam Propagation of EM waves Plane wave Spherical wave A solution to paraxial approximated wave equation Amplitude distribution of the beam is Gaussian Equiphase Planes Rayleigh range Coherent Light source Spherical- wave like waist divergence angle Plane-wave like

Fringes Two beams overlap at the BS Differential change of the arm length => fringe condition changed Power Bright Fringe Power Dark Fringe dx

Fringes Contrast Contrast Defect with mirror tilting Dark Fringe Light intensity at the output with a mirror swept

Simplified interferometer GW detector Differential motion => Michelson interferometer

Introduction ~ Interferometer? Interferometry Utilize characteristic of a Michelson interferometer as a length comparator Michelson Interferometer In reality... Advanced LIGO Dual-Recycled Fabry-Perot Michelson Interferometer Fabry-Perot cavity No worries: It’s just a combination of MI and FPs

Plain wave (single mode) model

Michelson interferometer Light intensity at the output port Difference of the electric fields from the arms Output intensity is sensitive to the differential phase

Michelson interferometer Frequency response of the Michelson to GWs Frequency response of the Michelson interferometer Ω: optical angular frequency, λOPT laser wavelength ω: angular frequency of GW, λGW wavelength of GW Jean-Yves Vinet,et al Phys. Rev. D 38, 433 (1988)

Michelson interferometer Frequency response of the Michelson to GWs Cut off freq longer -> lower DC Response longer -> larger Notch freq f = n c / (2 L) Michelson arm length optimized for 1kHz GW -> 75km, too long!

Michelson shot noise limit Quantum noises: Shot noise Photon shot noise associated with photodetection Michelson interferometer Michelson response (@DC) iDC : DC Photocurrent η : PD Quantum Efficiency ν : Optical Frequency at the limit of d𝜙->0 Michelson Strain Sensitivity Shot-noise limit of the Michelson phase sensitivity 1.3x10-20 1/sqrtHz @1W, 1064nm, 4km (5x10-17 m/sqrtHz)

Supplemental slide Shot noise derivation

Fabry-Perot optical resonator Storing light in an optical cavity Input vs circulating: constructive Prompt reflection vs leakage: destructive => The circulating field grows up N times more power Equivalent to have N times longer arm 99% 99.999% Finesse Folding Number

Fabry-Perot optical resonator Storing light in an optical cavity

Fabry-Perot optical resonator Storing light in an optical cavity Field equations Very fast phase response

Pound-Drever-Hall technique (PDH) Signal extraction scheme for the cavities Phase modulation -> RF optical sidebands Reflected beam -> detected / demodulated V Laser Electro-Optic Modulator Faraday Isolator or Pick-off mirror dL or f

Fabry-Perot optical resonator Storing light in an optical cavity Finesse Cutoff freq “Cavity pole” DC Response amplification 1. FP increases stored power in the arm 2. FP increases accumulation time of the signal => Above the roll-off, increasing F does not improve the response

Fabry-Perot Michelson Interferometer Differential nature of the Michelson + Longer photon storage time of Fabry-Perot cavities = Fabry-Perot Michelson Interferometer Basic form of the modern interferometer GW detector

Optical Recycling Technique Power recycling Place a mirror in front of the interferometer to form a cavity with the Michelson (compound mirror) “Power Recycling Mirror” The internal light power is increased = equivalent to the increase of the input laser power compound mirror

Optical Recycling Technique Power-recycled Fabry-Perot Michelson Interferometer Internal light power in the arms is increased From the laser side / common arm length change It looks like a three mirror caivty = high finesse cavity For the differential motion (=GW) It looks like just an arm cavity

Optical Recycling Technique Dual-recycled Fabry-Perot Michelson Interferometer Another mirror is added at the dark port “Signal Recycling Mirror” Dual recycling allows us to set different storage times for common and differential modes Common mode = high finesse three mirror cavity Differential mode (=GW) = low (or high) finesse three mirror cavity

To tuned or not to tune Bandwidth of the detector can be changed by changing the resonant phase of the signal recycling cavity (SRC) Optimize the curve depending on the noise shape Dynamic signal tracking Signals: resonant in SRC (Resonant Sideband Extraction) Signals: anti-resonant in SRC (Signal Recycling)

Summary Optical phase measurement => Interferometry Michelson interferometer: requires too long arm Fabry-Perot arm: longer light storage time Optical recycling technique: allows us to set different storage time for the incident light and the GW signals Power recycling: maximize the stored light power Resonant sideband extraction: optimize the signal bandwidth