Date of download: 10/9/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Date of download: 5/28/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Comparison of Spar and Semisubmersible Floater Concepts of Offshore Wind Turbines.
Advertisements

Date of download: 6/3/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Floating Offshore Wind Turbine Dynamics: Large-Angle Motions in Euler-Space J.
Date of download: 6/6/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Influence of Wave Induced Second-Order Forces in Semisubmersible FOWT Mooring Design.
Date of download: 6/18/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Analysis of Design Wave Loads on an FPSO Accounting for Abnormal Waves J. Offshore.
Date of download: 6/23/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: A Two-Dimensional Numerical Investigation of the Hysteresis Effect on Vortex Induced.
Date of download: 6/25/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Efficient Predictions of Unsteady Viscous Flows Around Bluff Bodies by Aerodynamic.
Date of download: 6/25/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: The Effect of Gas Models on Compressor Efficiency Including Uncertainty J. Eng.
Date of download: 7/7/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: The Effect of Size and Location of Tears in the Supraspinatus Tendon on Potential.
Date of download: 7/8/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Time-Dependent Reliability Analysis for Function Generator Mechanisms J. Mech.
Date of download: 11/12/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Comparison of Distributions of Wave Heights From Nonlinear Schröedinger Equation.
Date of download: 11/13/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Numerical Analysis of the Iridescent Ring Around Cavitation Erosion Pit on Stainless.
Date of download: 9/30/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/7/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/8/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Pressure Surge During Cryogenic Feedline Chilldown Process
From: Forced Flexural Gravity Wave Motion in Two-Layer Fluid
From: Flow Fields Inside Stocked Fish Cages and the Near Environment
Date of download: 10/16/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/16/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/16/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/17/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/17/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/21/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/21/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Tool Path Generation for Turbine Blades Machining With Twin Tool
From: Cost-Optimized FPSO Mooring Design Via Harmony Search
Date of download: 10/25/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/25/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Wave Response of Closed Flexible Bags
Date of download: 10/25/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/27/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Computer Simulation of Rapid Granular Flow Through an Orifice
Date of download: 10/28/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/28/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/2/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Heat Exchanger Efficiency
From: Anisotropic Materials Behavior Modeling Under Shock Loading
From: Parallel Dynamic Optimization of Steel Risers
Date of download: 11/3/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/5/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/7/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/7/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/7/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Experimental Results From an Offshore Wave Energy Converter
From: Wave Power Statistics for Sea States
Date of download: 11/12/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/13/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/13/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/2/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/16/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/17/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/17/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/21/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/22/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/24/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/27/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Wave Response of Closed Flexible Bags
Date of download: 12/27/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/29/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/29/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Steady-State Hydrodynamic Power Attenuation by Finned-Buoys
Date of download: 12/31/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Seabed Shear Stress Spectrum for Very Rough Beds
From: The Multimodal Dynamics of a Walnut Tree: Experiments and Models
Date of download: 1/3/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 1/13/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 1/14/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Experimental and Numerical Validation of a Wind Gust Facility
Date of download: 1/23/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Presentation transcript:

Date of download: 10/9/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: An Efficient Three-Dimensional FNPF Numerical Wave Tank for Large-Scale Wave Basin Experiment Simulation J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. 2013;135(2):021104-021104-10. doi:10.1115/1.4007597 Figure Legend: Sketch of 3D-NWT geometry and parameters, for wave generation by a snake piston wavemaker (notation and details of mathematical model can be found in Sec. 3)

Date of download: 10/9/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: An Efficient Three-Dimensional FNPF Numerical Wave Tank for Large-Scale Wave Basin Experiment Simulation J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. 2013;135(2):021104-021104-10. doi:10.1115/1.4007597 Figure Legend: Solitary waves of target wave height H = (a) 0.3 m; (b) 0.45 m, in depth h = 0.75 m. Numerical (—) and experimental (-o-) water particle velocity components (u, w) as functions of time, at gauge g3 location: x = 18.7 m, y = 0, at depth z = −0.61 m (only 25% of experimental points are shown).

Date of download: 10/9/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: An Efficient Three-Dimensional FNPF Numerical Wave Tank for Large-Scale Wave Basin Experiment Simulation J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. 2013;135(2):021104-021104-10. doi:10.1115/1.4007597 Figure Legend: Snapshot of 3D-NWT simulations for the propagation of a solitary wave over constant depth in a geometry identical to that of OSU's wave basin (48.8 m long, 26.5 m wide, 0.78 m deep)

Date of download: 10/9/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: An Efficient Three-Dimensional FNPF Numerical Wave Tank for Large-Scale Wave Basin Experiment Simulation J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. 2013;135(2):021104-021104-10. doi:10.1115/1.4007597 Figure Legend: Solitary waves of target height H = (a) 0.3 m; (b) 0.45 m, in water depth h = 0.75 m. Surface elevations versus time at the wavemaker, in (—) numerical model; (-o-) OSU's 3D tank experiments (experimental data were shifted by a 0.04 s time lag; only 25% of experimental points are shown).

Date of download: 10/9/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: An Efficient Three-Dimensional FNPF Numerical Wave Tank for Large-Scale Wave Basin Experiment Simulation J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. 2013;135(2):021104-021104-10. doi:10.1115/1.4007597 Figure Legend: Solitary waves of target wave height H = (a) 0.3 m; (b) 0.45 m, in depth h = 0.75 m. Numerical (—) and experimental (-o-) surface elevations as functions of time, at three gauges at x = 8.8 m (g1), 14.9 m (g2), and 18.7 m (g3), with y = 0 (experimental data were shifted by a 0.16 s time lag; only 25% of experimental points are shown).

Date of download: 10/9/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: An Efficient Three-Dimensional FNPF Numerical Wave Tank for Large-Scale Wave Basin Experiment Simulation J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. 2013;135(2):021104-021104-10. doi:10.1115/1.4007597 Figure Legend: Cnoidal wave of target height H = 0.3 m and period T = 3.5 s, in water depth h = 0.75 m. Numerical (—) and theoretical (- - -) surface elevations at the wavemaker as functions of time.

Date of download: 10/9/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: An Efficient Three-Dimensional FNPF Numerical Wave Tank for Large-Scale Wave Basin Experiment Simulation J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. 2013;135(2):021104-021104-10. doi:10.1115/1.4007597 Figure Legend: Cnoidal wave of Fig. 6 numerical wave elevation as a function of time, at three wave gauges at x = (g1: —) 8.8 m, (g2: - - -) 14.9 m, and (g3: —.) 18.7 m, with y = 0

Date of download: 10/9/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: An Efficient Three-Dimensional FNPF Numerical Wave Tank for Large-Scale Wave Basin Experiment Simulation J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. 2013;135(2):021104-021104-10. doi:10.1115/1.4007597 Figure Legend: Cnoidal wave of Figs. 6 and 7. Numerical: (a) bottom pressure as a function of time at two gauges at x = (—) 4 and (- - -) 16 m, with y = 0; (b) wave particle velocity components u (—), w (- - -) as functions of time at gauge g3, with x = 18.7 m, y = 0, at depth z = −0.61 m.

Date of download: 10/9/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: An Efficient Three-Dimensional FNPF Numerical Wave Tank for Large-Scale Wave Basin Experiment Simulation J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. 2013;135(2):021104-021104-10. doi:10.1115/1.4007597 Figure Legend: Airy wave of target height H = 0.2 m and period T = 3.0 s, in water depth h = 0.75 m. Numerical (—) and theoretical (- - -) surface elevations at the wavemaker as functions of time.

Date of download: 10/9/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: An Efficient Three-Dimensional FNPF Numerical Wave Tank for Large-Scale Wave Basin Experiment Simulation J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. 2013;135(2):021104-021104-10. doi:10.1115/1.4007597 Figure Legend: Airy wave of Fig. 9 numerical surface elevation as a function of time, at three wave gauges at x = (g1: —) 8.8 m, (g2: - - -) 14.9 m, and (g3: —.) 18.7 m, with y = 0

Date of download: 10/9/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: An Efficient Three-Dimensional FNPF Numerical Wave Tank for Large-Scale Wave Basin Experiment Simulation J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. 2013;135(2):021104-021104-10. doi:10.1115/1.4007597 Figure Legend: Case of Figs. 9 and 10, numerical: (a) bottom pressure as a function of time at two gauges at x = (—) 4 and (- - -) 16 m, with y = 0; (b) wave particle velocity components u (—), w (- - -) as functions of time at x = 18.7 m, z = −0.61 m, y = 0

Date of download: 10/9/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: An Efficient Three-Dimensional FNPF Numerical Wave Tank for Large-Scale Wave Basin Experiment Simulation J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. 2013;135(2):021104-021104-10. doi:10.1115/1.4007597 Figure Legend: Clock time versus number of BEM nodes N and CPUs: 1 (- - -) or 8 (—), for five time steps of 3D-NWT simulations for various application (o) (Fig. 2), using n = (5) to (8) FMA tree levels. The straight lines (—.) and (— —) indicate clock time: ∝N1.3 and N log N, respectively.

Date of download: 10/9/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: An Efficient Three-Dimensional FNPF Numerical Wave Tank for Large-Scale Wave Basin Experiment Simulation J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. 2013;135(2):021104-021104-10. doi:10.1115/1.4007597 Figure Legend: Clock time (—) and speed-up (- - -) versus number of CPUs, for five time steps of 3D-NWT simulations (Fig. 2) for application: (a) 1, using N = 2592 nodes and n = 6 FMA tree levels; (b) 2, using N = 13,838 nodes and n = 7