REMOVING BURDENS – a European rail system fit for the future

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cross-Acceptance: UNIFE expectations Alice Polo Safety and Certification Manager.
Advertisements

Moving Forward with Safety Management Systems December 9, 2014 Standing Committee on Public Transportation Winter Meeting American Association of State.
REMOVING BURDENS – a European rail system fit for the future Thierry Breyne – European Rail Agency - Head of the Safety Unit International Railway Safety.
Challenges and the benefits of interoperability for the railway industry and the rail transport Eric Fontanel UNIFE General Manager.
BEWAG (UIP) General assembly European Railway Agency Jean-Marie DECHAMPS, Head of Sector (Safety) Brussels, 27 April 2015.
Workshop BeWag UIP Implementation of certification of entities in charge of maintenance Jean-Marie DECHAMPS-SAFETY Unit Brussels 28/04/
© 2015 BELGORAIL 27/04/2015 – BEWAG « Staff (human) in the ECM regulation 445/20111/EU» Staff (human) in the ECM regulation.
Public hearing on the 4 th Package 1 The future role of the European Railway Agency Tuesday, 07 May 2013 Steer Davies Gleave Upper Ground London,
Environmental Management System Definitions
JOINING UP GOVERNMENTS EUROPEAN COMMISSION Establishing a European Union Location Framework.
UIC ERTMS World Conference Certification and Assessment of GSM-R Begoña DOMINGO, GSM-R Project Officer Istanbul, 3/04/2014.
A European campaign on Risk Assessment Common errors in Risk Assessment.
European Railway Safety Strategy EIM Safety Group (PhGALLEY and J-Å HALLDEN) 29 september 2009.
Recommendation 2014/897/EC (DV29bis) Key Principles.
RE-E / IRSC / 27/09/ /10/09 1 The necessary evolution of railway safety regulations in Europe A challenge – Risks to be controlled.
UNITED NATIONS Conference on Trade and Development Contents 1.The ASYCUDA Programme 2.Risk Management 3.Risk Management in Customs 4.The ASYCUDA tool.
Transport Rail Safety & the Railway Safety Directive Frank Jost Single European Rail Area EU Commission 1.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Safety Objectives of European Railway Agency Raigo Uukkivi Estonian Railway Inspectorate DAGOB Final Conference , Tallinn.
Alex Ezrakhovich Process Approach for an Integrated Management System Change driven.
Improving performance, reducing risk Dr Apostolos Noulis, Lead Assessor, Business Development Mgr Thessaloniki, 02 June 2014 ISO Energy Management.
Workshop accreditation and recognition / conformity assessment Removing Technical Barriers - TSIs within New Approach and Safety Directive Dr.-Ing. Andreas.
Slide n° 1 EU railway legislation - Safety regulatory framework NAB/RB training workshop in Valenciennes, April 2016 NAB/RB Training Workshop In Valenciennes,
Harmonised use of accreditation for assessing the competence of various Conformity Assessment Bodies Dr Andreas Steinhorst, EA ERA workshop 13 April 2016,
The International Society for Quality in Health Care (ISQua) – Guidelines.
Sharing Personal Information Programme Health and Social Care Joint Conference February 2011 David Middleton SPI Branch.
JMFIP Financial Management Conference
Basic Principles of Good Management
Session 3 General RIA Training 6–8 July 2009 EuropeAid/125317/D/SER/TR
Niall Byrne, Deputy Director, Social Services
Workshop on CSM-DT, November 2016
TRANSPORT SCIENCE: INNOVATIVE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS
Safety alerts.
Good practices abroad / Cyprus case The OiRA implementation
Integrated Management Framework
European Rail Infrastructure Managers
NAB/RB Training Workshop In Valenciennes, April 2016
Accident investigations: developments and roles
Maria Price, DPhil. (Oxon.) Head of EU Policies and Public Affairs
The Logical Framework Approach
WP 3 How to assess implementation of ALARA
4th Railway Package – Implementation of the Technical Pillar
The move from a rule based system to a risk based system Challenges for the competent authorities October 2017.
EU policy on combating hate speech online
THE POTENTIAL FOR BIG DATA AND OCCURRENCE REPORTING FOR BETTER SAFETY MANAGEMENT Jen ABLITT, Head of Safety Strategy and Performance Sector.
Presented by Jianping YAN UNDP/ BCPR/ GRIP On behalf of
Session II: System authority for ERTMS 4RP Trackside approval
Chances for quick wins in the railway sector
ERA Seminar Cross Acceptance Ad hoc Summary
European Rail Freight Association (ERFA), represents the independent rail freight sector across the whole value chain : Railway Undertakings (RUs) Wagon.
ERTMS Conference 4RP VA Authorisation
Project Specification
Asset Governance – Integrated Strategic Asset Management
2016 Procurement Framework Contract Management
Eurostat Quality Management (in the ESS context)
CEBS’ role in the CRD implementation
Introduction to the training
European Railway Agency
Phytosanitary Process Modelling
Commission strategy to
Managed Content Services
Portfolio, Programme and Project
Valvira The National Supervisory Authority for Welfare and Health
Industry Engagement Program Medical Diagnostic Imaging (MDI) Equipment
Fitness Check EU Water Policy
REFIT Fitness Check Chemicals Legislation
Fourth Railway Package Technical Pillar Hearing at the European Parliament, Brussels 7 May 2013 José GORTAZAR Chief Technical Officer, CAF.
“Information Society Technologies and the Environment” H
Railway Conference Pardubice
CEng progression through the IOM3
Presentation transcript:

REMOVING BURDENS – a European rail system fit for the future Thierry Breyne – European Rail Agency - Head of the Safety Unit International Railway Safety Conference – 2012 LONDON

Introduction Rail transport is a key necessity Rail transport is safe BUT for it to continue to maintain its competitive position, railways must become more efficient and effective

Existing legal framework Part A – is the acceptance of a RUs SMS. This is valid throughout the EU Part B - is the acceptance of RU’s capability to meet the specific requirements necessary for the safe operation of the relevant network. This is valid for the relevant Member State

Safety management system (SMS) SMSs provide the key tool for managing different operational requirements/risks Because: Allocate clear responsibilities Set risk management controls, which are monitored and reviewed Recognises the need to work together to deal with shared interfaces Learning and continuously improving Systematic approach to managing changes A coherent approach to managing the competence of staff and the different work environments

Flexible and proportionate legal framework RUs and IMs take forward their full responsibility for managing, controlling and monitoring risks of their operation There is harmonised decision making and supervision of the safety of the sector by NSAs Management & Control of Operational Activities using Processes & Rules The SMS TODAY Same in 2020! SMS and CSMs CSMs Result: it should be a small step change to the single safety certificate??

Common safety methods CSM on risk assessment Related to change management – builds on the SMS CSM on monitoring Helps ensure that the SMS continues to be effective CSM on conformity assessment Harmonised assessment process CSM on supervision Sets out a clear structured way for NSAs to ensure that safety performance is managed without them taking on the responsibility

The problems Incorrect implementation and application Duplicate requirements by some Member States (re-checking what is in the Part A) Onerous requirements by some Member States Divergent interpretation of the assessment and acceptance of safety certificates Problems with time and costs of issuing certificates Source ERFA

The solutions A legal framework which sets out a proportionate, targeted and harmonised approach to managing safety across the EU Correct implementation and application of the legal framework and collecting information on whether this has taken place Improving compliance of the actors Result: it will be a small step change to the single safety certificate

Aim: Single safety certificate Simplified system with the single safety certificate But no major changes to the legal framework - consolidation The pre-conditions are in place RUs and IMs take forward their full responsibility for managing, controlling and monitoring risks of their operation There is harmonised decision making and supervision of the safety of the sector by NSAs CSM on risk assessment CSM on monitoring CSM on conformity assessment CSM on supervision COST Savings of between 50 to 100K Euros for an RU over a 5 year period

Achieving continous improvement Helping NSAs to move: FROM To 17/07/2012 InnoTrans 2012 planning

Review existing framework to ensure it is fit for purpose What the Agency will do Review existing framework to ensure it is fit for purpose Understand the system - collect and analysis data Provide better targeted and simpler guidance Develop training and educate Work closely with our stakeholder to deliver this 17/07/2012 InnoTrans 2012 planning

Result: Single safety certificate Make the railway system work better by removing burdens and making a EU rail system fit for the future SINGLE SAFETY CERTIFICATE WILL: SIMPLIFY REQUIREMENTS – One certificate valid throughout Europe based on the SMS and the RU controlling risks BE CHEAPER – because NSAs will not be duplicating what other NSAs do and requiring additional checks with no safety benefits PUT RESPONSIBILITY – where it should be; RUs managing & monitoring risks and NSAs supervising that that they do in co-operation with other NSAs The system is there and if correctly applied it is just a small step

We make the railway system work better for society era.europa.eu 17/07/2012 InnoTrans 2012 planning