Traps for antiprotons, electrons and positrons in the 5 T and 1 T magnetic fields G. Testera & Genoa group AEGIS main magnetic field (on axis) : from Alexei.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What is the ISOLDE cooler RFQ CB - ISCOOL H. Frånberg.
Advertisements

Ion-Induced Instability of Diocotron Modes In Magnetized Electron Columns Andrey Kabantsev University of California at San Diego Physics Department Nonneutral.
December 10, 2008 TJRParticle Refrigerator1 The Particle Refrigerator Tom Roberts Muons, Inc. A promising approach to using frictional cooling for reducing.
Rotating Wall/ Centrifugal Separation John Bollinger, NIST-Boulder Outline ● Penning-Malmberg trap – radial confinement due to angular momentum ● Methods.
A Proposal of a Polarized 3 He ++ Ion Source with Penning Ionizer for JINR N.N. Agapov, Yu.N. Filatov, V.V. Fimushkin, L.V. Kutuzova, V.A. Mikhailov, Yu.A.
Ion Injector Design Andrew Seltzman.
Technical studies for the HIE- ISOLDE Frontend upgrade Jacobo Montaño Marie Curie Fellow; CATHI Project * The research project has been supported by a.
Simulations of Neutralized Drift Compression D. R. Welch, D. V. Rose Mission Research Corporation Albuquerque, NM S. S. Yu Lawrence Berkeley National.
Plasma Dynamics Lab HIBP Abstract Measurements of the radial equilibrium potential profiles have been successfully obtained with a Heavy Ion Beam Probe.
STRIPLINE KICKER STATUS. PRESENTATION OUTLINE 1.Design of a stripline kicker for beam injection in DAFNE storage rings. 2.HV tests and RF measurements.
KICKER LNF David Alesini LNF fast kickers study group* * D. Alesini, F. Marcellini P. Raimondi, S. Guiducci.
The Production of Cold Antihydrogen w. A Brief History of Antimatter In 1928, Paul Dirac proposes antimatter with his work in relativistic quantum mechanics.
3 GeV,1.2 MW, Booster for Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
Design and Technical Challenges of the ILC Small Angle Interaction Regions October 19 th, 2006J. Borburgh, CERN, AB/BT Electrostatic separator limits With.
Zoran Andjelkovic Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz GSI Darmstadt Laser Spectroscopy of Highly Charged Ions and Exotic Radioactive Nuclei (Helmholtz.
FETS H - Ion Source Experiments and Installation Scott Lawrie, Dan Faircloth, Alan Letchford, Christoph Gabor, Phil Wise, Mark Whitehead, Trevor Wood,
FAST KICKER STATUS Fabio Marcellini On behalf of LNF fast kickers study group* * D. Alesini, F. Marcellini P. Raimondi, S. Guiducci.
FLAR project S.L. Yakovenko JINR, Dubna,Russia. 2 Contents 1.FlAIR project 2.AD facility at CERN 3.Antyhydrogen and Positronium in-flight at FLAIR 4.LEPTA.
Calculation of the beam dynamics of RIKEN AVF Cyclotron E.E. Perepelkin JINR, Dubna 4 March 2008.
Electron String Phenomenon: Physics and Applications by E. D. Donets, S. V. Gudkov, D. E. Donets, E. E. Donets, A. D. Kovalenko, S. V. Salnikov, V. B.
The REXTRAP Penning Trap Pierre Delahaye, CERN/ISOLDE Friedhelm Ames, Pierre Delahaye, Fredrik Wenander and the REXISOLDE collaboration TAS workshop, LPC.
A mass-purification method for REX beams
Toward a Stark Decelerator for atoms and molecules exited into a Rydberg state Anne Cournol, Nicolas Saquet, Jérôme Beugnon, Nicolas Vanhaecke, Pierre.
111 Antimatter. Congratulations and Thanks Ron! Plasma Fusion Center, MIT Physics of Plasmas ‘95 Plasma Study.
FLAIR meeting, GSI March Positron Ring for Antihydrogen Production A.Sidorin for LEPTA collaboration JINR, Dubna.
EMMA: Pulsed magnets Kiril Marinov MaRS group, ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory 1.
LDRD: Magnetized Source JLEIC Meeting November 20, 2015 Riad Suleiman and Matt Poelker.
CERN, LIU-SPS ZS Review, 20/02/ Brief review on electron cloud simulations for the SPS electrostatic septum (ZS) G. Rumolo and G. Iadarola in LIU-SPS.
Non Double-Layer Regime: a new laser driven ion acceleration mechanism toward TeV 1.
Antihydrogen Workshop, June , CERN S.N.Gninenko Production of cold positronium S.N. Gninenko INR, Moscow.
Villars, 26 September Extra Low Energy Antiproton Ring (ELENA) for antiproton deceleration after the AD Pavel Belochitskii for the AD team On behalf.
Merritt Moore Physics 95, 2009 T R A P P E D ANTIPARTICLES.
Updates of EC Studies at KEKB 1.EC studies at KEKB 2.Recent results 1.Clearing Electrode 2.Groove surface 3.TiN coating 4.Measurement of EC in solenoid.
KIT - The cooperation of Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH and Universität Karlsruhe (TH) Florian Fränkle EPS HEP 2009 Krakow 1 KATRIN: An experiment to.
PS-ESS and LEBT State of the art Lorenzo Neri Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Laboratori Nazionali del Sud.
Ялта Конференция Yalta-, Univ. of Tokyo, Ryo FUNAKOSHI Univ. of Tokyo Ryo FUNAKOSHI ATHENA collaboration ATHENA: a High Performance detector for.
Zeudi Mazzotta* On behalf of the AEgIS collaboration from Università degli studi di Milano Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare.
High intensity electron beam and infrastructure Paolo Valente * INFN Roma * On behalf of the BTF and LINAC staff.
Recent Studies on Electron Cloud at KEKB 1.EC studies at KEKB 2.Recent results –Clearing Electrode –Groove surface –EC measurement in Q and solenoid field.
Testing antimatter gravity: the Aegis experiment at Cern Phd Student: Michele Sacerdoti Phd Workshop: 12-13/10/2015 Supervisors: Fabrizio Castelli, Marco.
MCP Analysis on ALpha Howard Chiao.
Alexander Aleksandrov Spallation Neutron Source Oak Ridge, USA
Parameters of ejected beam
AEGIS positron transfer line
Studies at BINP Alexander Krasnov
Integration of the e+ elements
Preliminary result of FCC positron source simulation Pavel MARTYSHKIN
Acknowledgements Slides and animations were made by Dr. Jon Karty Mass Spectrometry Facility Indiana University, Bloomington.
Preliminary results for electron lens with beam current of 20 A
E-beam scanner experience at FNAL
Calculation of Beam Equilibrium and Luminosities for
ELENA Overview and Layout Start of ELENA Commissioning Next Steps
Physics design on Injector-1 RFQ
Electron cloud and collective effects in the FCC-ee Interaction Region
Siara Fabbri University of Manchester
Angela Gligorova on behalf of the AEgIS and Medipix collaborations
Parameters of the NF Target
Ionization detectors ∆
ATF Fast Kicker R&D at LBNL ILCDR06, Cornell University
Magnetized Electron Beam for Ion Cooling at JLEIC
Production of Magnetized Electron Beam from a DC High Voltage Photogun
I Alexander Nass for the JEDI collaboration
ELENA Extra Low ENergy Antiproton Ring
R. Suleiman and M. Poelker September 29, 2016
Chapter 28 Magnetic Fields
LCLS Injector/Diagnostics David H. Dowell, SLAC April 24, 2002
LEPTA project Measuring lifetime of positrons
Update on ERL Cooler Design Studies
Plans for future electron cooling needs PS BD/AC
Improvement of a dc-to-pulse conversion efficiency of FRAC
Presentation transcript:

Traps for antiprotons, electrons and positrons in the 5 T and 1 T magnetic fields G. Testera & Genoa group AEGIS main magnetic field (on axis) : from Alexei

Traps for antiprotons, electrons and positrons in the 5 T and 1 T magnetic fields Penning type electric field 2 ztrap: about 6 rtrap rtrap z Half length of the harmonic region: about 1.6 rtrap ztrap z Malmberg type electric field: 2 ztrap>>rtrap

The antiproton catching trap used in ATHENA: r=1.25 cm Length 35 cm

Catching and cooling antiprotons 5 108 electrons preloaded in the catching trap Degrader Solenoid - B = 5 Tesla e - Antiprotons Cold electron cloud [cooled by Synchtrotron Radiation, t ~ 0.15s] a) Degrading b) Reflecting 99.9% lost 0.1% E<10kV c) Trapping t=0 antiprotons t=200 ns c) Cooling t=several tens s [through Coulomb interaction]

The dimensions of the AEGIS antiproton catching trap Length of the antiproton catching trap Antiproton axial energy max : 10 KeV Velocity v : 1.4 106 m/s AD bunch length t : 200 ns (up to about 500 ns) L (length of the 10KeV potential well ) : L=0.5 v t= 35 cm Real trap Length : 40 cm Trap radius : y Antiproton cyclotron radius = 2.8 mm (10 KeV) beam radial size = ? mm Beam centering Note: rtrap>> cloud radial size rtrap =1.5 cm (max 2 cm) Positron injection??? x

Electrons in the antiproton catching trap rp Cold cloud at equilibrium a=zp/rp zp Radial size of the plasma Trap size Potential well Number of particles N=108 Rtrap=2 cm rp= 1mm Zp=1.77 cm V0=200 V N =5 108 Rtrap=2 cm rp = 2 mm Zp = 3 cm V0 =200 V change rp with RW change zp with V0

The position of the trap in the 5 T magnet The region with uniform magnetic field

The position of the trap in the 5 T magnet The region with uniform magnetic field e- 10KV Movable degrader

A movable degrader with few different foils: in situ optimization of the catching efficiency ATHENA results FWHM=10mm Additional Al thickness mm Degrading materials in ATHENA: 67 mm silicon beam monitor 25 mm Stainless steel 130 mm Al foil (last degrader)

Summary of the parameters of the antiproton catching trap Electrode voltages : 10 KV on HV1, HV2 + - 200 V on the others electrode (DAC+ amplifiers) HV2 connected also to +-200 V HV1, HV2 L=2.5 cm 7 electrodes for Penning trap 11 additional electrodes 1 electrode radially split in 4 sectors Total : 21 wires (200 V) coaxial cables 2 HV cables (10 KV) Voltages connected through filters Voltage rise and fall time: hundreds msec Fast pulses ( 10 ns rise time, duration about 100-200 ns) added to some electrodes to dump the particles Plasma mode detection RW voltages superimposed to the trap voltages

Positron transfer In the e+ accumulator B=0.15-0.2T The last trap can be Malmberg or Penning (as we like) e+ cooling : only buffer gas No significant radiation cooling (B too low) Radial compression through RW wall during accumulation with gas cooling Accumulation time : 300-500 sec Stop accumulation : gas pump out 3 108 e+ R e+ = max 5 mm L e+ = 2-3 cm (?) Temperature: 300K or eV e+ The space charge electric field cancels the applied axial electric field inside the plasma V Space charge energy: several tens of eV z

e+ transfer from the accumulator in the main magnet e+ in the accumulator V z V1 V2 Kinetic energy in the flight direction >> velocity spread in the cloud (temperature) Space time gradient of the accelerating field: optimized to give the “same energy” to all the positrons Fligtht time << Coulomb explosion time Energy in the flight direction >> space charge energy Mirror effect of the magnetic field e+ energy in the flight direction: several hundreds eV vflight = 6 106 m/s (100 eV) = 1.9 107 m/s (1 KeV)

e+ catching in the main magnet 5 Tesla region V3+D V1= 500 V (example) Transfer line V3 After catching all the voltages can be lowered Only D is important V2 (=0) Transfer flight time : few hundreds ns Positron catching trap : initial L about 30 cm No antiprotons in trap during e+ transfer Fast e+ cooling in 5 T magnetic field Collection of e+ in a shorter trap in the region with high B homogeneity Compression by RW (several tens sec) At the same time: catch and cool pbar again

The position of the trap in the 5 T magnet The region with uniform magnetic field e+ Movable degrader out

Could we have 10 cm more 5T magnetic field with 10-4 homogeneity? The solenoid can be longer

Summary of the parameters of the positron catching trap Electrode voltages : 1 KV max added to + - 200 V (DAC+amplifiers) 7 electrodes for Penning trap 10 additional electrodes 1 electrode radially split in 4 sectors Total: 23 (1.2 KV) coaxial cables (or more, it depends on the length of the magnetic field) Voltages connected through filters Voltage rise and fall time: hundreds msec Fast pulses ( 10 ns rise time, duration about 100-200 ns) added to some electrodes to dump the particles Plasma mode detection RW voltages superimposed to the trap voltages Entrance electrode: fast pulse

Adiabatic transfer Shaping time : 50 msec Wait at each stage: ms several rotation 5 10 15

Single to double particle injection: see last meeting Pbars lye on axis all the time Normal “adiabatical” transfer Positrons have to jump off axis to be shooted on the porous target to form positronium Diocrotron excitation of the positron plasma (J. R. Danielson and C. M. Surko Physics of Plasmas 13 (2006), 123502) 18

100 mK region 10 cm 22.5 cm Trap radius 2.5 cm (big trap) 0.8 cm (small trap)

Particle transfer in the 1 Tesla magnetic field Transfer length 1m (-40 cm, +60 cm) About 40 transfer electrodes (l=2.5 cm each)

Big radius trap: 17 coaxial cables +- 200 V Small radius traps pbar manipulation : 10 coaxial cables +- 50 Volts e+ manipulation 10 coaxial cables +- 50 Volts e+ acceleration toward the target : 5 (or more) cables (3KV?) pbar cooling and Rydberg accelerator: 25 coaxial cables +- 50 Volts 1KV for about 100 msec Additional electrodes after the trap??? MCP+ phosphor screen: can be installed in the place of the grating system They have to be removed when the grating will be installed

Still preliminary summary of the needed cables: this is the minimum number…. 100 mK 20 50 V   5 3 KV e+ acceleration (only for few tens ns) 25 50 V-1 KV 1KV only for 100 microsec 4K 17 200 V big trap before the small ones 40 transfer region 23 1.2 KV e+ catching 21 pbar catching 2 10 KV

Trap mechanics+ electronics & control system HV pulser DAC+amplifiers Fast pulser Faraday cup amplifiers MCP+Phosphor+CCD Plasma mode detection (FPGA based) RW & plasma manipulation Labview boards Assuming to build the electronics : 162 KEuro Pumps, feedthroughs, vacuum gauges,flanges,movable feedthr. : 90 KEuro