George Mason School of Law

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Duress F.H. Buckley
Advertisements

George Mason School of Law
Civil & criminal law Civil Law.
Business Law: Ch 8 Consideration.
Chapter 16 Lesson 1 Civil and Criminal Law.
Ch. 3.D.Duress1.  Threats of Physical Harm or Imprisonment  Threats of Contract Breach  Enforceability of Contract Modifications  Coercion and Reasonable.
Part III Formation Defenses. Voidable Contract: R2 § 7 A voidable contract is one where one or more parties have the power, by a manifestation of election.
McGraw-Hill ©2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Performance & Termination of Contract (Discharge of Contract)
1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I XII. PreliminaryNegotiations © F.H. Buckley
Business Law and the Regulation of Business Chapter 12: Consideration
Civil Law Resolutions to disputes between people..
Genuine Assent- True and complete agreement Voidable Contract- Contract in which the injured party can withdraw, thus canceling the contract Rescission:
Consideration is legal value bargained for and given in exchange for an act or a promise Elements of Consideration Purely gratuitous promises are.
1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I K. PreliminaryNegotiations © F.H. Buckley
1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Duress Not to be shared © F.H. Buckley
Introduction to Contracts Chapter 8. Definition of Contract A contract is a promise or a set of promises for the breach of which the law gives a remedy.
Chapter 9 Mutual Consideration. Consideration Main purpose of consideration is to distinguish between social promises and more serious transactions where.
1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I VII.Acceptance II F.H. Buckley
Chapter 12 Contract Discharge and Remedies for Breach.
1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I P.Contract Modification F.H. Buckley
1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I XX.Contract Modification F.H. Buckley
1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I Duress F.H. Buckley
1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I P. Contract Modification F.H. Buckley
1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I K. PreliminaryNegotiations © F.H. Buckley
By Richard A. Mann & Barry S. Roberts
CHAPTER 7 GENUINENESS OF ASSENT.
1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Duress Not to be shared © F.H. Buckley
© 2010 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Prentice-Hall 1 NATURE OF TRADITIONAL AND E-CONTRACTS © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Prentice-Hall.
Copyright © 2010 South-Western Legal Studies in Business, a part of South-Western Cengage Learning. and the Legal Environment, 10 th edition by Richard.
Chapter 9 Contracts. Definition of a Contract Definition A contract is an agreement that is enforceable by a court of law. A contract is a promise or.
LAW FOR BUSINESS AND PERSONAL USE © SOUTH-WESTERN PUBLISHING Chapter 9Slide 1 When Is Consideration Not Required? Identify when promissory estoppel applies.
Copyright © 2010 South-Western Legal Studies in Business, a part of South-Western Cengage Learning. and the Legal Environment, 10 th edition by Richard.
LAW FOR BUSINESS AND PERSONAL USE © SOUTH-WESTERN PUBLISHING Chapter 9Slide 1 Legal Value and Bargained-For Exchange Identify when there is legal value.
Consideration Chapter Types of Consideration Identify the 3 requirements of consideration Discuss the adequacy of consideration.
Contract Law for Paralegals: Traditional and E-Contracts © 2009 Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ All rights reserved Nature of Traditional.
Contracts Chapter 23. Kinds of Civil Law TortsContracts What binds individuals Laws of society, as defined by statutes and precedents Specific Agreements.
UNIVERSITY OF LUSAKA FACULTY OF LAW
Legislations.
11-2 Capacity to Contract A competent party is a person who must meet all the following conditions: Must be of legal age. Must have normal mental capacity.
Chapter 10 Principles of Contract Law. Chapter 10 Principles of Contract Law.
David P. Twomey - Boston College
Chapter 26 Forms of Business Organization
Legal Contact Act Business Law
BELL QUIZ ON CHAPTER 11 What is it called when a contract has been properly and completely carried out? What does the court ask when determining if the.
ESSENTIAL QUESTION Why does conflict develop?
Chapter 12: Consideration
Chapter 11 Consideration
Chapter 9 Nature of Traditional and E-Contracts
George Mason School of Law
International Civil Litigation Procedure
Torts: A Civil Wrong.
Rules and Laws An introduction.
Contract & Its Kind Chapter 1.
George Mason School of Law
Law For Personal And Business Use
Civil Law: Trial Procedures
As Law Students You will learn that the study of law is complex.
George Mason School of Law
George Mason School of Law
George Mason School of Law
Remedies for Breach of Contract
When is consideration “not” required
Contracts- Genuine Agreement
CHAPTER 7 Genuineness of Assent
Legal Value and bargain for exchange
NATURE OF TRADITIONAL AND
Chapter 9 Nature of Traditional and E-Contracts
Differences and similarities
CHAPTER 9 Test review.
Presentation transcript:

George Mason School of Law Contracts II Duress Not to be shared © F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The highwayman Stand and deliver! Lee Marvin, as highwayman Liberty Valance, holding up wimpy Jimmy Stewart, The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance (John Ford, 1962)

Duress makes a contract voidable §175(1) If a party's manifestation of assent is induced by an improper threat by the other party that leaves the victim no reasonable alternative, the contract is voidable by the victim.

Duress makes a contract voidable §175(1) If a party's manifestation of assent is induced by an improper threat by the other party that leaves the victim no reasonable alternative, the contract is voidable by the victim. §176(1) A threat is improper if what is threatened is a crime or a tort…

Physical Duress is an easy one Restatement § 174: where assent “is physically compelled by duress

The Highwaymen 1962 Steve Trott on the far left

Ninth Circuit Judge Steve Trott

The Highwaymen 1996

The Original Highwaymen Their Opening Act 9

Was that duress?

Was that duress? Assume I have the right to do x (sue Johnny Cash) When is it wrongful to say “I will do x unless you do y”

Was that duress? Is the general principle that, provided one has the right to do x, one is permitted to extract some advantage by a threat to do x?

What about blackmail, then? David Letterman

Improper threats Does the blackmailer have the right to reveal that Letterman preyed on his female staffers?

Improper threats Does the blackmailer have the right to reveal that Letterman preyed on his female staffers? Does the blackmailer have the right to ask Letterman for money?

Improper threats Does the blackmailer have the right to reveal that Letterman preyed on his female staffers? Does the blackmailer have the right to ask Letterman for money? Does the blackmailer have the right to ask Letterman for money and to tell him he will reveal the information if he is not paid?

Improper threats Does the blackmailer have the right to ask Letterman for money and to tell him he will reveal the information if he is not paid? How do two rights make a wrong? What might make the threat “improper” under Restatement § 175?

Improper threats What might make the threat “improper” under Restatement § 175? §176(1) (1) A threat is improper if what is threatened is a crime or a tort, or the threat itself would be a crime or a tort if it resulted in obtaining property And Blackmail is a crime

Blackmail: The Reality Show How would life be different were blackmail legalized?

Blackmail How would life be different were blackmail legalized? Blackmail Inc.: more resources expended to discover dirt.

Blackmail Is that the kind of world we want? If not, why not?

So what was the duress in Wolf v. Marlton at 403?

What was the duress in Wolf v. Marlton? A white crowd gathers on the front porch at 1863 E. 70th Street in South Los Angeles, where W.H. Whitson planned to sell his home to a black family. Sept. 7, 1949, LA Weekly 23

Was that duress? What did the Δ’s do in the end? 24

Was that duress? What did the Δ’s do in the end? 4th Grade Class, Beeler Public School, Marlton NJ, 2007 25

Was that duress? Didn’t the plaintiffs have the right to buy the house and sell it to whomever they wanted? 26

Was that duress? Did the plaintiffs have the right to buy the house and sell it to whomever they wanted? “A threat may be wrongful even though the act threatened is lawful.” 27

Was that duress? Did the plaintiffs have the right to buy the house and sell it to whomever they wanted? “A purely malicious motive” Define malice 28

Malice: Restatement § 176(2)(a) “A threat is improper is the resulting exchange is not on fair terms and the threatened act would harm the recipient and would not significantly benefit the party making the threat”

Can there be duress without malice? Is this case like Hochman at 407? “Further instructive is…” 30

Can there be duress without malice? Is this case like Hochman at 407? “Further instructive is…” Advantage-taking? 31

Improper threats The threat to bring criminal proceedings. Restatement § 176(1)(b) A threat is improper if what is threatened is a criminal prosecution

Improper threats The threat to bring bad faith civil proceedings. Restatement § 176(1)(c) A threat is improper if (b) what is threatened is the use of civil process and the threat is made in bad faith

Austin v. Loral at 409 Why did Loral agree to the contract modification? 34

Austin v. Loral A situational monopoly: Loral can’t get the equipment from anyone except Austin, and must have it 35

Austin v. Loral A situational monopoly: Loral can’t get the equipment from anyone except Austin, and must have it A classic case of post-contractual opportunism 36

Austin v. Loral Suppose you had been counsel for Austin? How might you have amended your pleadings? 37

Austin v. Loral Consider the Tower Records hypothetical at p. 412 38

Recall Alaska Packers Restatement § 73. Performance of a legal duty owed to a promisor which is neither doubtful nor the subject of honest dispute is not consideration; but a similar performance is consideration if it differs from what was required by the duty in a way which reflects more than a pretense of bargain.

Alaska Packers Restatement § 89 MODIFICATION OF EXECUTORY CONTRACT. A promise modifying a duty under a contract not fully performed on either side is binding (a) if the modification is fair and equitable in view of circumstances not anticipated by the parties when the contract was made; or (b) to the extent provided by statute; or (c) to the extent that justice requires enforcement in view of material change of position in reliance on the promise.

Rescue at Sea How do Admiralty Courts handle rescue claims? Post v. Jones at 417

Rescue at Sea How do Admiralty Courts handle rescue claims? Post v. Jones What would an efficient rescue contract look like?

Rescue at Sea How do Admiralty Courts handle rescue claims? Post v. Jones What would an efficient rescue contract look like? It would minimize all Social Costs

Rescue at Sea How do Admiralty Courts handle rescue claims? Post v. Jones What would an efficient rescue contract look like? Social Costs = all costs associated with the possibility that the ship will be lost PLUS the rescue costs

Rescue Contracts If the parties can reach an agreement, the rescuer will attempt a rescue provided that L > R, where: L = the cost of the loss if no rescue R = the cost of the actual rescue

Rescue Contracts The rescuer will attempt a rescue* provided that L > R, where: L = the cost of the loss if no rescue R = the cost of the actual rescue The bargaining surplus to be divided between them is thus L – R.

Rescue Contracts One tends to assume that the rescuer scoops the entire bargaining surplus of L – R. Do you think this is what happened in Post v. Jones?

Rescue Contracts Suppose that the rule of duress prevented the rescuer from bargaining for any recovery

Rescue Contracts Suppose that the rule of duress prevented the rescuer from bargaining for any recovery How much would the rescuer invest in recovery costs R?

Rescue Contracts Suppose that the law imposed a positive Good Samaritan duty to rescue (and assume rescue costs R)?

Ex Ante Rescue Contracts Suppose that rescuer and victim could bargain ex ante for a rescue, before the victim embarked on his voyage How could such a thing exist?

Ex Ante Rescue Contracts How could such a thing exist?

Ex Ante Rescue Contracts Suppose that rescuer and victim could bargain ex ante for a rescue, before the victim embarked on his voyage Both parties might want to invest in pre-rescue care

Ex ante Rescue Contracts By investing in pre-rescue care x the victim can reduce the probability that he’ll need to be rescued And how would he do this?

Ex ante Rescue Contracts By investing in pre-rescue care x the victim can reduce the probability that he’ll need to be rescued And how would he do this?

Ex ante Rescue Contracts By investing in pre-rescue care x the victim can reduce the probability that he’ll need to be rescued He might take extra precautions or extra care He might avoid dangerous places 56

Ex ante Rescue Contracts By investing in pre-rescue care y the rescuer can increase the probability of a successful rescue. He might take extra precautions or extra care He might frequent dangerous places

Rescue Contracts Suppose that the rule of duress limited the rescuer to a recovery of R upon a rescue. How much would the rescuer invest in pre-rescue care y?

Efficient Rescue Contracts On Dry Land? Livingston is an explorer who finds himself without food or water, alone in the desert. After a week he comes across an inn, owned by Conrad. “I’ll give you food and water,” says Conrad, “in exchange for all your money.” Livingston is a millionaire. “Think it over…,” says Conrad.

Efficient Rescue Contracts On Dry Land? Might Conrad possibly be unhappy with this result?

Status obligations Hale, De portibus maris

Status obligations Hale, De portibus maris There cannot be taken arbitrary and excessive duties for cranage, wharfage, [etc.,] neither can they be enhanced to an immoderate rate, but the duties must be reasonable and moderate, though settled by the king's license or charter. For now the wharf and crane and other conveniences are affected with a publick interest, and they cease to be juris privati only...

So who owes Status Obligations? Innkeepers

So who owes Status Obligations? Physicians Restaurants

Status Obligations Natural monopolies