M. Sullivan Apr 27, 2017 MDI meeting

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
M. Sullivan Mini-workshop on the MEIC design Nov 2, 2012.
Advertisements

Status of the Tagger Hall Background Simulation Simulation A. Somov, Jefferson Lab Hall-D Collaboration Meeting, University of Regina September
Super-B Factory Workshop April 20-23, 2005 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 1 Status on an IR Design for a Super-B Factory M. Sullivan for the Super-B Factory.
January 2004 GLC/NLC – X-Band Linear Collider Peter Tenenbaum Beam Dynamics of the IR: The Solenoid, the Crossing Angle, The Crab Cavity, and All That.
MAC Review December 13-15, 2004 IR Upgrade M. Sullivan 1 Interaction Region Upgrade M. Sullivan for the Machine Advisory Committee meeting December 13-15,
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 Beam pipes M. Sullivan 1 Detector Beam Pipe Diameter Discussion M. Sullivan Super-B Factory Workshop Hawaii.
June 2-4, 2004 DOE HEP Program Review 1 M. Sullivan for the PEP-II Team DOE High Energy Physics Program Review June 2-4, 2004 PEP-II Status and Plans.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 IR Upgrade M. Sullivan 1 PEP-II Interaction Region Upgrade M. Sullivan for the Super-B Factory Workshop Hawaii.
27 June 2006Ken Moffeit1 Comparison of 2mrad and 14/20 mrad extraction lines Ken Moffeit ILC BDS 27 June 06.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 1 Interaction Region Design for a Super-B Factory M. Sullivan for the Super-B.
Synchrotron Radiation (SR) in Super-KEKB / Belle Osamu Tajima ( Tohoku univ )
IR Beamline and Sync Radiation Takashi Maruyama. Collimation No beam loss within 400 m of IP Muon background can be acceptable. No sync radiations directly.
Working Group 3 Summary M. Sullivan / Y. Funakoshi.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project NLC Backgrounds What’s New? Tom Markiewicz LC’99, Frascati, Italy October 1999.
NEW COMMENTS TO ILC BEAM ENERGY MEASUREMENTS BASED ON SYNCHROTRON RADIATION FROM MAGNETIC SPECTROMETER E.Syresin, B. Zalikhanov-DLNP, JINR R. Makarov-MSU.
1/18 The Distribution of Synchrotron Radiation Power in the IR C. H. Yu IR Overview SR Distribution in the IR The Protection of SR Power.
IR summary M. Sullivan Nov. 3, 2011 JLAB MEIC IR workshop.
Synchrotron radiation at eRHIC Yichao Jing, Oleg Chubar, Vladimir N. Litvinenko.
Page 1 Overview and Issues of the MEIC Interaction Region M. Sullivan MEIC Accelerator Design Review September 15-16, 2010.
Latifa Elouadrhiri Jefferson Lab Hall B 12 GeV Upgrade Drift Chamber Review Jefferson Lab March 6- 8, 2007 CLAS12 Drift Chambers Simulation and Event Reconstruction.
ILC MDI workshop January 6-8, 2004 PEP-II IR M. Sullivan 1 Interaction Region of PEP-II M. Sullivan for the ILC MDI workshop January 6-8, 2005.
Interaction Region Backgrounds M. Sullivan for the MEIC Collaboration Meeting Oct. 5-7, 2015.
Working Group D Backgrounds M Sullivan for everyone in WG D IRENG07 Sept 20, 2007.
Interaction Region Issues M. Sullivan for the EIC User Group Meeting Jan. 6-9, 2016.
1 M. Sullivan IR update IR Update M. Sullivan for the 3 rd SuperB workshop SLAC June14-16, 2006.
ILC IP SR and PEP-II M. Sullivan for the ILC IR engineering workshop IRENG07 Sept 17-21, 2007.
Joint Belle SuperB Background Meeting Feb 9 – 10, 2012 SuperB SR bkgds 1 SR Backgrounds in SuperB M. Sullivan For M. Boscolo, K. Bertsche, E. Paoloni,
Beam Background Simulation at Belle/KEKB Motivation SR background Particle background Feedback to the detector design SR alarm Summary O. Tajima (Tohoku.
Initial Study of Synchrotron Radiation Issues for the CEPC Interaction Region M. Sullivan SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory for the CEPC14 Workshop.
SuperB Meeting XVII May 28 – June 2, 2011 IR design status 1 IR Design Status and Update M. Sullivan For M. Boscolo, K. Bertsche, E. Paoloni, S. Bettoni,
Synchrotron Radiation Absorption and Vacuum Issues in the IR at PEP-II and a Higgs Factory John Seeman, SLAC October 11, 2014 HF2014 Beijing.
MAIN DUMP LINE: BEAM LOSS SIMULATIONS WITH THE TDR PARAMETERS Y. Nosochkov E. Marin, G. White (SLAC) LCWS14 Workshop, Belgrade, October 7, 2014.
Further SR Studies for the Electron Polarimeter M. Sullivan for the JLEIC Collaboration Meeting Oct. 5-7, 2016.
FCC-ee Interaction Region design
JLEIC MDI Update Michael Sullivan Apr 4, 2017.
MDI Issues M. Sullivan For
M. Sullivan SuperB General Meeting Perugia, Italy June 15-20, 2009
Update of the SR studies for the FCCee Interaction Region
M. Sullivan for the SLAC SuperB Workshop Jan , 2009
M. Sullivan International Review Committee November 12-13, 2007
Layout of Detectors for CLIC
LHeC interaction region
The Interaction Region
SuperB General Meeting XI
M. Boscolo, K. Bertsche, E. Paoloni, S. Bettoni,
Analysis of 14/20 mrad Extraction Line Energy Chicane
E. Paloni, S. Bettoni, R. Pantaleo, M Biagini, et al.
Final Focus Synchrotron Radiation
AD & I : BDS Lattice Design Changes
The PEP-II Interaction e+e- Factories Workshop
Challenges for FCC-ee MDI mechanical design
Estimation and Protection on Synchrotron Radiation in CEPC Main Ring
The design of interaction region
Hongbo Zhu (IHEP, Beijing) On behalf of the CEPC Study Group
Comparison of the final focus design
Interaction Region Design Options e+e- Factories Workshop
Higgs Factory Backgrounds
GEANT Simulations and Track Reconstruction
EIC Accelerator Collaboration Meeting
Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting Local double ring MDI Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting
M. Boscolo, K. Bertsche, E. Paoloni, S. Bettoni,
Background Simulations at Fermilab
IR Beam Transport Status
Summary of the FCCee IR Workshop Jan 2017 at CERN
IR Magnet Design and Engineering Considerations
SR Update for JLEIC June 8, 2017
Some of the Points Raised During my JLAB Visit
IR/MDI requirements for the EIC
SR Background Update for JLEIC
Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting Work summary Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting
Presentation transcript:

M. Sullivan Apr 27, 2017 MDI meeting Update of the SR M. Sullivan Apr 27, 2017 MDI meeting

Outline Current beam pipe layout Improved SR calculations How Lumi-monitor fits in Improved SR calculations Binning for critical energy histograms was found to be too coarse. This has been resolved. New tt SR background estimate HH running SR background estimate WW running SR background estimate Summary

Here is where the beam pipe needs to be enlarged LumiCal HOM absorbers

Features The natural chamber wall geometry is OK All LumiCal tracks now have a 20 mrad or higher angle of incidence to the beam pipe walls There looks to be enough room on the other side of the beam pipe for a NEG vacuum pump Now we come to the next question…..

Shielding The question now arises about shielding the central detector from SR from the last bend magnet The LumiCal needs a window in the beam pipe where we can no longer put shielding For the Z running this is probably not an issue The photon energies are very low (Ave scattered=1.8 keV) But for the Top running this is more important Ave scattered is 200 keV Effectively the central part of the beam pipe increases from +/-12.5 cm to +/-50 cm due to the LumiCal window This will increase the number of photons going into the central chamber (factor of 10? More?) GEANT simulation comparison will tell us the answer

tt scattered photon energy spectrum in Jan. The photons that cause trouble are coming from the high energy tail of the bend radiation

Scattered energy spectrum for tt in Mar. 522458 out of 100 million incident scatter through the tip I found an inaccuracy in my code where the binning for the critical energy histograms was calculated too coarsely. Came about because there are very strong FF quads and a very soft last bend magnet

Energy scattered/incident ratio

Scattered energy spectrum from HH 433219 out of 1billion incident scatter through the tip Number incident > 10 keV is 187 million/xing so 81,000 scatter from the tip

Scattered energy spectrum for WW 389692 out of 10 billion incident scatter through the tip Number incident > 10 keV is 28 million/xing so 109 scatter from the tip

WW scat. ener. with expanded scale

For the Top running 2.1109 photons are incident on the mask tip from every beam bunch (9.9108 > 10 keV) 0.52% scatter through the mask tip (5.15 million) Of these, 1.4% go through 1 cm of Ta (72,000) Or 0.16% go through 2 cm of Ta (8200) This is looking like it might be OK We will probably need 2 cm of shielding (Ta, W or Pb) near the mask tip Once the photons are going through the shield at a 45 deg or smaller angle of incidence 1 cm of shielding should be enough A detailed GEANT simulation should verify this

What about the other running points? SR photon critical energies are listed here The critical energy of the last soft bend magnet For the Top (175 GeV) – 100 keV For the Higgs (125 GeV) – 40 keV For the WW (80 GeV) – 9.5 keV For the Z (46 GeV) – 1.8 keV (3.6 keV?) More simulation runs with the GEANT4 model of the beam pipe Do we want/need the LumiCal for the Higgs? Stay tuned……

Summary The LumiCal looks OK at the Z running Even with smaller beta* optics (needs to be checked) We need a Be beam pipe for the LumiCal window in order to minimize the RL to the LumiCal and to minimize the HOM power in this region The LumiCal window will cause central detector SR backgrounds to increase at the Top running because of the higher energy of the scattered photons and some reduced shielding but in general SR backgrounds look like they can be controlled

FF quads Magnet designs are converging and the next big step is to get initial dimensions for the cryostats Can we have warm bores as asked? How much actual space is needed for the magnets and correction coils and compensation coils

Conclusions A great deal of progress has been made in deciding on baseline parameters and general layout of the IR SR at the Z does not appear to be an issue due to the very low photon energies SR backgrounds at the Higgs and Top will be more of an issue. The photon energies are significantly higher, but at first blush it looks like they can be controlled