Summary of Outreach Webpage with video & comment form Public meetings

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Central Puget Sound Regional Fare Coordination System Regional Program Administrator Seattle, WA Cheryl Huston March 18, 2013.
Advertisements

The Fare Study Objective: Simplify RTD’s fare policy in an equitable and cost-effective manner to better serve the needs of the District and its customers.
Summary of Fare Change Feedback and Proposal Hillary Foose Director, Communication & Marketing.
Airport Shuttle Agreements Presented by: John McCarthy GO Airport Express.
November 26, 2007 Smart Card. Smart Travel. TransLink ® Parking Initiative Presentation to the TransLink ® Management Group Information Brief.
School District No. 73 (Kamloops/Thompson) Draft Operating Budget DRAFT BUDGET FOR
WRTA Advisory Board Meeting February 19, 2015 Charlie Card Saves Money Dollars and Quarters Only Policy Saves Your Time.
FARE STUDY ECOPASS RECOMMENDATION Operations & Customer Service Committee September 8, 2015.
1 Presented to the Transportation Planning Board October 15, 2008 Item 9 Metrobus Priority Corridor Network.
Review of Fare Collection Concept of Operations and High Level Data Requirements FC RSTWG Webinar May 19, :30 – 4 pm Prepared by: Paula Okunieff,
1 Fare Process so far EQUITY January: FCMB voted for two options to advance to public comment Late January - February: Public Comment process – 10 meetings.
Increasing Success & Credibility of Your Service Through End-User Involvement.
FARE STUDY: STRUCTURE & LEVEL RECOMMENDATION Operations & Customer Service Committee February 10,
FARE STUDY RTD Board Study Session April 28,
FARE STUDY ECOPASS Board of Directors Study Session August 25, 2015.
FARE STUDY UPDATE Operations & Customer Service Committee October 21,
Review of 2016–2021 Strategic Budget Plan Development Process and 2016 Budget Assumptions Financial Administration and Audit Committee April 14,
FARE STUDY UPDATE Operations & Customer Service Committee September 9,
2015 – 2020 Strategic Budget Plan Financial Administration & Audit Committee June 10, 2014.
TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY RECOMMENDATIONS AND SERVICE OPTIONS JUNE 14, 2016.
New product demo + real-time update
The Federal Reserve System
2018 – 2023 Strategic Budget Plan
The Passenger View David Beer Passenger Executive.
Update of Transportation Priorities Plan
Finance Committee & City Council October 10, 2016
Review of 2018–2023 Strategic Budget Plan Development Process and
Gunnison Valley Transportation Authority (RTA) 2016 Transit Planning Process Funded through a Section 5304 Planning Grant 5/23/2018.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2017 AMENDMENT PROCESS and DOCKET
US 36 BRT/ Flatiron Flyer Proposed Service Plan
Playing in Traffic: A New Look at Management and Operations
THE REGIONAL JET INTER-AIRPORT MOTOR COACH PASSENGER SERVICES
and Transportation Impacts
Service Routes and Community Transit Hubs: Right Sizing Transit
CDOT North I-25 Express Lanes Update April 28, 2016
Dial-A-Ride Service Report to the Community
2018 Adopted Budget February Financial Plan
Proprietary and Confidential
Orange County Transportation Authority Micro-Transit Pilot Program
HB 2017 Transit Advisory Committee January 19, 2018
Transportation Management Plan Modernization Project
An Overview Title VI Applicability Public Outreach Fare Policy
PPWG Recommendation February 27, 2018
HB 2017 Transit Advisory Committee February 23, 2018
Paratransit Fare Increase
GMT NEXT GEN TRANSIT PLAN FARE ANALYSIS FINDINGS
Central Puget Sound Regional Fare Coordination System
Microtransit Pilot In Sacramento
Proposed Service Changes
Transit Competitiveness and Market Potential
Managing Farebox Ratio
RPPP Policy and Procedures Update
Rail transport statistics developments Agenda Item 4.1
Transit Signal Priority: The Importance of AVL Data
MTA 2019 Final Proposed Budget November Financial Plan
Paratransit Fare Increase
INNOVATIVE SENIOR TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS AND SERVICES
April 23, 2018.
GMT NextGen Update CVRPC TAC
Transfer Trip Expansion Quality Service Subcommittee
I-81 Corridor Improvement Plan
Sample ‘Scheduling Process’
Transfer Trip Expansion Community Advisory Committee
Transfer Trip Expansion
Transportation Management Plan Modernization Project
Automated Fare Collection 2.0 Next Generation MBTA Fare System
Red Line/HealthLine Extension Major
AC Transit Proposed Fare Structure Revision & Pricing Changes
Reimagine RTS Public Hearing
January 2020 Proposed Service Changes Public Comment Meetings
Presentation transcript:

FARE STUDY UPDATE Operations & Customer Service Committee January 13, 2015

Summary of Outreach Webpage with video & comment form Public meetings 560 comments Video sent to Local Channel 8’s Public meetings Six meetings with 200 total attendees Advertised in local print media and on all RTD vehicles RTD Online Customer Community survey 147 responses out of 199 members

Current Fares BUS Local/Limited Express Regional SkyRide RAIL 1 or 2 Zones 3 Zones All Zones n/a PRICE $2.25 $4.00 $5.00 $9/$11/$13 Route HX Boulder US 36 & McCaslin Denver Local Express Regional -- Fare Table for the HX Regional Route. Fare tables are currently used on all Regional and SkyRide routes. Current Light Rail Fare Zone map

Four Types of Service Structure No Zones Bus or Rail to/from DIA

What we Heard: Types of Service Four types are better than current system Zoned rail fares: Most passengers do not like the existing zones and prefer the single rail fare Suggestions to combine types of service for pricing levels Rail and Local Bus Regional Bus and Airport A few individuals would prefer a distance based structure for the whole system Split opinion on charging more for DIA

Payment Alternatives for Further Evaluation Pay per Boarding 2. Pay for Time

What we Heard: Pay per Boarding Simpler system Potential for passengers who need to transfer to pay more for their trip Concerns that this could impact low income passengers Cash paying customers could increase dwell times Difficult to enforce on rail Day pass is desirable

What we Heard: Pay for Time Simpler than the current system since it eliminates the round-tripping transfer restriction Does not solve operator/customer disputes about transfer time windows Concerns about service delays cutting into the time window Three hours is too short Option would overcharge riders for short trips

What we Heard: General Keep monthly and other pass programs Expand smart card program Desire for a low-income pass (or major improvements to existing non-profit agency reduced fare program) Why are fares necessary if we already pay for RTD with taxes? Desire for a day pass with either payment option Difficult to evaluate these options without pricing

RTD Task Force Discussions: Bus Service Two types of bus service are desirable Regional service could be called “REX” and priced closer to current Express service REX service classified by type of operation (few stops and higher operating speed) Current Express routes will be moved to Local/Limited or REX category based on travel time and operating speed On REX service passengers pay REX fare independent of trip length Goal to match vehicle to type of service (i.e. over the road coach = REX)

RTD Task Force Discussions: Rail Elimination of zones is simpler Improves enforcement and customer education Could improve parking supply utilization Best to set Rail fare equivalent to Local bus Airport surcharge Ideal to have bus and rail to the airport priced at the same level Airport surcharge requires enforcement of a “zone” but still simpler than current four zones

RTD Task Force Discussions: Payment Options Preference for pay per boarding with a low-priced day pass available on the bus Price day pass to minimize impact of the change on passengers who make transfers Day pass is easier to enforce than current transfers or a three-hour ticket TriMet recently added ticket printers on their buses to sell 2-Hour tickets or day passes Source: TriMet (Portland)

Updated Project Schedule Board decision on fare structure will be combined with pricing levels based on public feedback February – staff to present revenue analysis and proposals for structure and levels March – Board approves public hearings for fare structure and levels in March/April May – Board approval of fare structure and levels May approval supports goal of implementing policies in early 2016 in advance of new FasTracks corridors Pass programs and public education continue through 2015

Next Steps Analysis to include “revenue neutral” fare levels Develop a structural/fare proposal by February Identify both “revenue neutral” ($119M) and Board approved Strategic Budget Plan (SBP) target revenue level ($131M) for comparison Develop proposals for fare levels that correspond to the Board approved 2016 SBP fare revenue target ($131M) Note that revenue neutral pricing would require service reductions