Classroom teaching observation tools

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Co-Teaching as a Model of Student Teaching: Common Trends and Levels of Student Engagement Co-Teaching as a Model of Student Teaching: Common Trends and.
Advertisements

LESSON-DESIGN ELEMENTS THAT REFLECT THE COLLEGE-AND CAREER- READY STANDARDS FOR MATHEMATICS AND THE STANDARDS FOR MATHEMATICAL PRACTICE. CCRS IMPLEMENTATION.
CO-TEACHING CHICAGO PUBLIC SCHOOLS OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND SUPPORTS.
Lee County Human Resources Glenda Jones. School Speech-Language Pathologist Evaluation Process Intended Purpose of the Standards Guide professional development.
To Challenge all Learners
1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,
Lesson Design Study Suggestions from our text: Leading Lesson Study.
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
In order to succeed, your desire for success should be greater than your fear of failure. McPherson
Problem Based Learning (PBL) David W. Dillard Arcadia Valley CTC.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 1: Content and Structure Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Ms. Caley Hughes’s Candidate Teaching Presentation Anonymous: Anything your mind can believe, you can achieve. Believe and achieve. Website.
Unit 1 – Preparation for Assessment LO 1.1&1.2&1.3.
Assessing Program Quality with the Autism Program Environment Rating Scale.
Protocols for Mathematics Performance Tasks PD Protocol: Preparing for the Performance Task Classroom Protocol: Scaffolding Performance Tasks PD Protocol:
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
Cathy Taylor Teaching children to count is good, but teaching what counts is better.
Standard 1: Teachers demonstrate leadership s. Element a: Teachers lead in their classrooms. What does Globally Competitive mean in your classroom? How.
Laura Blake Candidate Teaching Summit Presentation “The shell must break before the bird can fly” ~ Alfred Lord Tennyson Website .
Literacy Plan Kara Klokis and Carol Pippen Longwood University.
What Are the Characteristics of an Effective Portfolio? By Jay Barrett.
STANDARD V AND WRAP-UP: NC TEACHER CANDIDATE EVALUATION TRAINING GWU TRAINING SESSION.
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
Teacher Evaluation University of New England - EDU 704 Dr. William Doughty Submitted By: Teri Gaston.
Nevada Department of Education Office of Educational Opportunity Nevada Comprehensive Curriculum Audit Tool for Schools NCCAT-S August
The North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process November 1, 2012
PLC Analysis Westport Middle School Gavin Osborne EPP 610 Dr. Lynne Wheat.
Iredell-Statesville Schools Orientation to the North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Instrument & Process
Welcome to... Introduction to A Framework for Teaching 7/8/2016pbevan 1.
Oconee Keys Training September, Oconee Keys is designed to: Evaluate classroom teachers using qualitative rubrics to assess instructional practices.
Peer Consultancy: Observation, Debrief, Analysis.
Philippines – Australia Basic Education Assistance for Mindanao Beam Pre-service Workshop “Authentic Assessment”
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
Standard One: Engaging & Supporting All Students in Learning
SECTION 3 Facilitating Skill Development
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
TEACHERS COLLABORATING TO IMPROVE INSTRUCTION
School – Based Assessment – Framework
Monica Sienders, Jos van den Bongaardt & Gonny Schellings
Evaluating Student-Teachers Using Student Outcomes
Snaptutorial ESE 697 Help Bcome Exceptional/ snaptutorial.com
Partnership for Practice
ISBE Mathematics Foundational Services Training
After Teaching is the Core
An Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Lesson Design Study Leading Lesson Study.
Understanding Your Child’s Report Card
The science subject knowledge
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
Transforming Grading Robert Marzano
Teacher and Leader Quality Education Support and Improvement
Diagnosis and Remediation of Reading Difficulties
ELT. General Supervision
Changes to the Educator Evaluation System
Align Combine Design.
Personal Growth and Professional Development
Mary Weck, Ed. D Danielson Group Member
Georgia Department of Education
The WIDA ELP Standards and Formative Assessment
Planning and Preparation
Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning Modules Phil Lafontaine, Director Professional Learning and Support Division.
The Technology Integration Planning Model
PRIME+ Day 1 September 24, 2013 Welcome to PRIME+
SUPPORTING THE Progress Report in MATH
We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence then, is not an act,
The Planning Process for Differentiating Instruction
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Designing Programs for Learners: Curriculum and Instruction
INTASC STANDARDS Sharae Frazier.
Presentation transcript:

Classroom teaching observation tools 2016 -2017

How to observe effective teaching (Basic literature review on methods and practices observation and evaluation)

Differentiated Classroom Observation Scales Content Practices Differentiated Classroom Observation Scales Cassady et al. (2004) Chapman & King (2005) VanTassel-Baska et al. (2005) Downes (2006) Tomlinson and Imbreau (2013) Tomlinson & Hockett Subban & Round (2015) Theories Basic literature review 1. Teacher/ Classroom observation DI? 2. Research based DI classroom observation

1. Key terms in advance a. It will be formed groups of five teachers. b. Each group must list the five terms related to classroom observation in terms of differentiated instruction (CODI). c. A representative of each group presents the results. d. Based on the results and discussions are developed conceptual map. e. CODI definition will be introduced.

Theories Basic literature review The definition of the differentiated instruction classroom observation (CODI)? Represents a set of criteria and standards for evaluating how the teacher design and achieve a differentiated instruction lesson, according with several categories and subcategories of indicators, on levels of professional development or difficulty (Mâţă, 2016). What the teacher need to respect during a differentiated instruction lesson? LEVEL INDICATORS STANDARDS Standards Indicator 1 level 1 level 2 Indicator 2 level n

2. Brainstorming ON 2 GROUPS a. What issues do you think should be taken into account when we realize CODI? b. Note all solutions. Responses are grouped into categories. c. It will be discussed about the CODI indicators. c. It will be introduced 2 studies and CODI tools will be presented.

Research based DI classroom observation No Author(s) Objective Method Results 1. Cha & Ahn (2014) design guidelines for a teacher tool to support students’ diverse needs by facilitating differentiated instructions (DIs) interview Five categories of facilitating factors: student information management; educational policy and systems; tools and resources; communication; students with special needs 2. Subban & Round (2015) focus group interviews Five themes (pp. 128-129): -the structure, organization and development of a lesson; - classroom management; differentiated strategies/ techniques during teaching ; differentiated activities, materials and teaching aids; differentiated assessments and application

Differentiated Classroom Observation Scales Cassady et al. (2004) - The Differentiated Classroom Observation Scale Preparation: Before doing the observation, the observer will contact the teacher to find a time that is convenient for the observation. Preobservation Interview: The observer should review the lesson plan before the interview. For the interview, the observer will use questions from and record answers on the ACD Scoring Form (p. 4). This is an informal interview that is conducted to gain essential descriptive information in order to inform the observation. Classroom Observation and Scoring: The observer will use the Instructional Activity Codes (see p. 3) to assist in recording what is seen in the observation during 5–10- minute segments. In addition, the observer will use the ACD Scoring Form to record the codes and assessments. There are other questions on the ACD Scoring Form to complete during this phase as well. Postobservation Debriefing: The observer should follow directions on the ACD Scoring Form. Reflection: The observer should add final comments after leaving the classroom.

Differentiated Classroom Observation Scales Chapman & King (2005) - Differentiated Classroom Assessment Form 1. Conduct a Self-Assessment – “Differentiated Classroom Assessment Form” (the degree to which you have incorporated each aspect into your classroom -1 = not implemented 2 = implementation started 3 = partially implemented 4 = fully implemented); 2. Organize a Peer-Assessment – Invite a peer to your classroom to observe you interacting with your students. Use the “Differentiated Classroom Assessment Observation Form.” 3. Arrange a Discussion – Arrange a time for a discussion with your colleague about his or her observations and seek suggestions for moving along the continuum from a traditional to a more differentiated classroom. 4. Develop a Plan – Decide on a list of components you want to work on. Prioritize your list. Develop a plan for implementing the aspects you choose. Identify what you will do, when, with which group or in what subject area. You may want to consider introducing one new component or aspect each quarter. Perhaps your grade level or subject area team will agree to join you in your efforts.

Differentiated Classroom Observation Scales VanTassel-Baska et al. (2005) - Classroom Observation Scale (p. 10) Categories and items within each category Curriculum Planning and Delivery (CPD) Accommodations for Individual Differences (AID) Problem solving (PS) Critical Thinking Strategies (CRI) Creative Thinking Strategies (CRE) Research Strategies (RS)

Differentiated Classroom Observation Scales Downes (2006), Maeng & Bell (2012) Differentiated Instruction Implementation Matrix-Modified - Novice (1), Apprentice (2), Practitioner (3), Expert (4) Domain 1: Quality Curriculum and Lesson Design Domain 2: Planning and Response to Learner Needs Domain 3: Instructional Practices Domain 4: Classroom Routines Domain 5: Student Assessment Domain 6: Positive, Supportive Learning Environment Domain 7: Evidence of Differentiation (after Tomlinson) Downes (2006) DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION CLASSROOM OBSERVATION RESPONSE FORM

Differentiated Classroom Observation Scales Tomlinson and Imbreau (2013) - Categories, Look- Fors, Rubrics and Guiding Questions / Advances, Proficient, Basic Look- For 1: Classroom Environment Look- For 2: Curriculum

Differentiated Classroom Observation Scales Subban & Round (2015) - The Checklist to Observe Differentiated Instruction at Work (pp. 128-129) The structure, organization and development of a lesson Classroom Management Differentiated activities, materials and teaching aids Differentiated assessments and application

3. CUBE Method b. Each group selects one instrument CODI. a. It will be 6 teams. b. Each group selects one instrument CODI. c. Each group will use the cube method in the analysis of the selected instrument (analyze, compare, describe, argue, associate, apply).

4. GALLERY TOUR a. Results will be presented as poster for each group. b. Discussion and Conclusions.

5. ARGUMENTS ON CARTOON a. Each participant will write the argument on post-it in favor of CODI.