DACSC TG3 (UAS Funding) Recommendations for the Near Term

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EUROCAE WG 73: UAS integration Elements for the European Commission UAS panel Presentation at Workshop 2 UAS insertion into airspace Gérard Mardiné (SAFRAN-Sagem)
Advertisements

SIP/2012/ASBU/Nairobi-WP/19
A PERFORMANCE BASED GLOBAL AIR NAVIGATION SYSTEM: PART II
Gregory S. Winton, Esq. The Aviation Law Firm
ICAO TECHNICAL COOPERATION PROJECTS IN INDONESIA 1973 to 2004.
6th Framework Programme Thematic Priority Aeronautics and Space.
Integrated Pest Management Symposium Progress and Challenges With Integrating UAS Into the National Airspace System Robin Koch Program Director, Aviation.
International Civil Aviation Organization Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) Saulo Da Silva Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology.
Runway Safety Teams (RSTs) Description and Processes Session 5 Presentation 1.
FAA ICAO ANNEX 6 PROPOSAL & OVERSIGHT ISSUES IN DISPATCH
1 FNGATSWG-Initial Observations Financing the Next Generation Air Transportation System Working Group (FNGATSWG) July 27, 2005.
Presented to: Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems Committee By: Stan Pszczolkowski, Manager, System Analysis Division Date: March 1, 2006 Federal Aviation.
1 Module 4: Designing Performance Indicators for Environmental Compliance and Enforcement Programs.
Federal Aviation Administration Unmanned Aircraft Systems in the National Airspace System Coming soon to airspace near you…..UAS-101 Presented At: Pecora.
Module N° 8 – SSP implementation plan. SSP – A structured approach Module 2 Basic safety management concepts Module 2 Basic safety management concepts.
The MIDCAS Program is to be considered as one of the strategic components of the UAV Roadmap 2012 Health Monitoring ATOL Sense & Avoid Frequency Spectrum.
10/31/06 F E D E R A L A V I A T I O N A D M I N I S T R A T I O N A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N I Z A T I O N 1 Unmanned Aircraft Systems in Civil Aviation.
THE STATE OF UAS REGULATION. T HE FAA M ODERNIZATION AND R EFORM A CT OF 2012 Congress Mandated Safe Integration by Sept., 2015 Why is it taking so long?
Federal Aviation Administration 0 Certification Standards for New Technologies June 9, 2005 Certification Standards for New Technologies Presentation to:
2/27/021 Spaceport Vision Team Members. 2/27/022 Systems Definition Spaceport System Spaceport Stakeholder Needs High-Level Trade Study Performance Gaps.
UAS and NAS A glance at FAA guidelines and challenges PEAK 3 1.
ITS Standards Program Strategic Plan Summary June 16, 2009 Blake Christie Principal Engineer, Noblis for Steve Sill Project Manager, ITS Standards Program.
Information requested following SMS implementation presentation.
08 June 2006 Portland 2006: aircraft certification session Yves Morier The EASA Advance -NPA for UAV systems Certification Presentation by: Y Morier EASA.
Indicators to Measure Progress and Performance IWRM Training Course for the Mekong July 20-31, 2009.
03/11/021 Spaceport Vision Team Members. 03/11/022 Systems Definition Spaceport System Spaceport Stakeholder Needs High-Level Trade Study Performance.
CENTER FOR AIR TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING (CDM) Testimony before the National Civil Aviation Review Commission Testimony.
Cargo Strategic Action Plan Prepared by: Cargo Strategic Action Group Air Carrier Maintenance Branch, AFS-330.
Enhanced Airworthiness Program for Airplane Systems (EAPAS) Presented by: Massoud Sadeghi FAA - Aging Systems Program Manager EAPAS Workshop November 2002.
Methodologies and Tools for Technology Needs Assessment: an Overview Zou Ji Dept. of environmental Economics and Management, Renmin University of China.
Victor Kourenkov ICAO EUR/NAT Regional Officer Almaty, 5 to 9 September 2005 LEGISLATION AND ORGANISATION CONSIDERATIONS.
Air Line Pilots Association, International Shared Skies: Safe Integration of Remotely Piloted Aircraft Captain Sean Cassidy 1 st Vice President National.
FAA sUAS ARC Support Documentation © ASTM International. All Rights Reserved. The Unmanned Aircraft System Initiative F38 on Unmanned Aircraft Systems.
International Civil Aviation Organization Global Runway Safety Symposium ICAO’s Harmonization Initiatives John Illson Air Navigation Bureau 25 May 2011.
A Technology Partnership for the New Millennium Anne Harlan, Director William J. Hughes Technical Center 68th NASAO Annual Convention September 20, 1999.
03/20/021 Spaceport Vision Team Members Organizations that contributed: Air Force NASA NCSS FAA Industry University Etc.
Cooperative Development of Operational Safety and Continuing Airworthiness Programme COSCAP South East Asia Program Progress Report Discussion Paper 2.
ICAO TECHNICAL COOPERATION PROJECTS IN INDONESIA
“The use of RPAS/drones and the impact on aviation safety and security
Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) Saulo Da Silva
AVIATION SYSTEM BLOCK UPGRADES (ASBU)
UNCA UAS Integration 04/23/2017 Louis Toms
Drones, RPAS, UAV’s, UAS Unmanned aircraft.
Collaborative Decision Making Module 5 “The Collaborative Environment”
FF-ICE A CONCEPT TO SUPPORT THE ATM SYSTEM OF THE FUTURE
Emerging Technology Converging Regulations
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
SIP/2012/ASBU/Nairobi-WP/19
COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING CONFERENCE
Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS): Local Ordinance Considerations
Enhancing employers’ involvement in Social Protection policy debates
A PERFORMANCE BASED GLOBAL AIR NAVIGATION SYSTEM: PART II
Blocks 2 & 3 Overview Samuli Vuokila Air Navigation Commissioner
World-Wide CNS/ATM Systems Implementation Conference
WMO Integrated Global Observing System (WIGOS) 16-RA VI Side Event Helsinki, Finland, 11 September 2013 Dr Miroslav Ondráš, Dr Wenjian Zhang (WMO) Dr.
Standards Overview and UAS Update
FAA Building Blocks Leading to UAS Integration Emerging Trends
Session – 4: Existing ICAO Standards relating to Air Traffic Control
1 Million+ UAS Registrations
Drones and Autonomous Systems
The Single European Sky Implementation Programme: SESAME
IAOPA Participation Work Efforts IAOPA (and IAOPA Affiliates) are currently participating on the following workgroups that are focused on Integration.
2018 Roadmap for the Aerial Industrial Revolution
New Entrants, Commercial Space and Changing Airspace Management
WRC-15 Agenda Item 1.5 Fixed Satellite Service spectrum to support the safe operation of Unmanned Aircraft Systems Aeronautical Spectrum Workshop Preparation.
The Air Traffic Organization: Building Today to Ensure Our Future
Finance & Planning Committee of the San Francisco Health Commission
Joint Planning and Development Office “Where new ideas are welcome”
WRC-15 Agenda Item 1.5 Fixed Satellite Service spectrum to support the safe operation of Unmanned Aircraft Systems Aeronautical Spectrum Workshop Preparation.
North Asia Regional Aviation
Presentation transcript:

DACSC TG3 (UAS Funding) Recommendations for the Near Term

Background Future success of the drone industry depends on government and private sector funding to support and facilitate the integration and operations of drones in the NAS. The FAA requires new resources to be devoted to this task. The FAA asked the DAC to provide near term funding recommendations by July 2017, and longer term recommendations by March 2018. TG3 was established to provide these recommendations.

Assumptions and Guiding Principles TG3 agreed to the following guiding principles: There will be a combination of government, industry, and shared funding across the integration efforts. Options for funding should not be constrained by the current traditional aviation funding structure, although in the near-term a new model may be difficult to implement. The recommended funding structure should not alter the current structure of funding for traditional, manned aviation.

Methodology We used the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) via “Decision Lens” to rank all FAA UAS activities against a comment set of criteria. Safety among UAS operators, for people and property on the ground, and with current manned aviation, given a 60% weight. Enabling operations and technological readiness, given a 28% weight. Economic benefits to society and the government, given a 12% weight. The vast majority of members participated in the rating and ranking process.

Informing our Methodology – FAA UAS Activities

Decision Lens Results A prioritized list of FAA activities

Work Flow The group validated the results and divided into teams. Each team worked through their prioritized results to define the short-term government, industry, and collaborative efforts to fund these activities and provided written recommendations. The reports were circulated and discussed, and consensus was reached on the recommendations. The groups also used the recommendations from TG2 to ensure there was common guidance across all three work groups: Prioritization of UAS BVLOS operations within the Mode C Veil below 400 ft. AGL Development of technology neutral navigation performance requirements Evaluation of the ability of existing networks to meet low altitude UAS C2 requirements Establishment of a FAR Part 135 regulatory pathfinder program for commercial UAS low-altitude BVLOS operations

Recommendations All regulations, policies, and standards necessary in the next 24 months should be developed primarily by the FAA with significant industry input. We recommend that Congress appropriate additional funding and increase FAA staffing to address this ambitious work schedule. The research and development, and system development necessary in the next 24 months, should be shared between government and industry. Communications, outreach, and training necessary in the next 24 months should be shared between government and industry, depending on the activity. Any recommended funding structure should not alter the current structure of funding for traditional, manned aviation. In the future, the UAS industry may be expected to pay for the operation, maintenance, and modernization of an automated Unmanned Traffic Management (UTM) system through a yet-to-be-created “pay-for-what-you-use” funding model.

Regulations Costs for these priority efforts should be primarily bourn by the FAA. These rules include: Operations Over People (OOP) Identification and Tracking Section 2209 – Designation of prohibited/restricted airspace over fixed-site facilities Counter-drone Operations and Activities Expanded Operations (BVLOS, package delivery) Air Carrier Certification and Operations UAS Fee Structure

Policies and Standards Costs for these priority efforts should be shared, depending on activity: Flights Standards Policies Air Traffic Control Policies Operator Policies Airports Policies Pilot Certification and Qualification Standards Airworthiness Certification Standards Command and Control Standards Detect and Avoid Standards

Systems and R&D Costs for these priority efforts should be shared, depending on activity: LAANC Related R&D Activity: Air Traffic Management, C2 & Spectrum, Separation Related Systems Activity: Traffic Management System, Authorization Portal, ATC Systems/Capabilities, CNS Systems, Registration System, Spectrum Management IT Gateway Related R&D Activity: Air Traffic Management, Separation Related Systems: Traffic Management System, Authorization Portal, CNS Systems: Registration System UTM Related R&D Activity: Air Traffic Management, C2 & Spectrum, Separation, Human Factors, Environmental Related Systems: Traffic Management System, Authorization Portal, ATC

Outreach and Training Costs for these priority efforts should be shared, depending on activity: Training Air Traffic Control Training Flight Standards Training Airports Training AVS/AOV Oversight Training Outreach and Communication

Activity and Funding List Priority Activity Lead Funding 1 Pilot Certifications/Qualifications Gov’t. & Ind. 2 Air Traffic Management – R&D 3 Flight Standards Policies/Procedures Government 4 Air Traffic Controls - Policies/Procedures 5 Injury Severity – R&D Govt. & Ind. 6 Rulemaking 7 C2 & Spectrum – R&D 8 Separation 9 DAA Standards 10 Traffic Management System 11 Airports - Policies/Procedures 12 Outreach/Communication 13 Airworthiness Certification 14 Authorization Portal 15 Operators 16 ATC Systems/Capabilities 17 C2 Standards - Standards 18 CNS Systems 19 Air Traffic Control - Training 20 Flight Standards - Training 21 Human Factors – R&D 22 Airspace Charting 23 Registration System 24 Size/Impact Energy 25 Spectrum Management 26 AVS/AOV Oversight 27 Airports - Training 28 Environmental – R&D 29 Environmental - Standards

FAA Reauthorization and Appropriations FY17 FAA UAS Budget: +$20M for ATO, +$10M for AVS, and +$2.67M for R&D (based on the FY17 President’s Budget request). Authority for these funds runs through FY18. Significant portions of the House and Senate’s FAA Reauthorization bills are dedicated to UAS. Many of the provisions come with new rulemaking and reporting requirements, which will strain already limited FAA budgetary resources.

What’s Next for TG3? The long term questions are more complicated. Cost accounting measures? TG3 will consider options and identify self-sustaining and scalable funding sources that allow all users of the NAS to fund the necessary resources to ensure its safe and efficient operation. TG3 will work to identify a funding option for the UAS industry that is segregated from the system that funds manned aviation. The funding mechanism should be flexible enough to support potential far-reaching structural changes to FAA funding and activities. TG3 will consider new sources of funding for the long term, including user fees or similar pay-for-what-you-use services.

Listening Session TG3 had a listening session on long-term issues on July 14th. It was open to the entire DAC SC, for as many options and voices to heard. What we heard.

Questions?

Informing our Workflow – FAA UAS Integration . . . . . . 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2025 Registration & Part 107 Security & UAS Over People Integrated Operations Small Cargo Operations Expanded Operations Capital Investments & Automation Segregation LAANC Pre- Implementation UTM Implementation (full data exchange) $$ LAANC Implementation / UTM Pre-Implementation Ongoing Maintenance – $$ Registration, Waiver Portal Integrated Gateway & Data Warehouse Development Integrated Gateway Sustainment $ + Additional Modules Medium / Large UAS Integration Pre-Implementation (R&D) Medium / Large UAS Integration Implementation $$ Integration ATM Updates – ERAM, STARS, NAS Voice Switch Development of Minimum Performance Standards Policy, Coordination, & Operations ATO, AVS Manual Processing of Authorizations (e.g. waivers, airspace authorizations, COAs) $ All FAA Program and Activity Support $ (e.g. rulemaking, safety standards, policy development, enforcement, security, outreach, etc.)

Informing our Workflow – FAA Definitions Policies and Procedures: Procedures that must be developed for air traffic control facilities, such as ARTCCs and other Air Traffic Management personnel, UAS operators, manufacturers, and other airspace users, to enable the operational milestones. Specific policies/procedures to be developed or updated include: Flight Standards, Air Traffic Controls, Operator Policies, Airport Policies, and Airspace Charting. Rulemaking: Key rulemaking activities needed to enable the milestone, as well as any relevant public law changes associated with the milestone that may be needed or expected. Standards: Standards needed to guide technical and operational aspects of the operational milestone; e.g., detect and avoid, pilot certification, aircraft and control station certification standards. Specific examples include: Pilot Certifications/Qualifications, DAA Standards, C2 Standards and Environmental Standards. Outreach/Communication: Any major outreach and communications efforts with the public, UAS stakeholders, other airspace users, Tribal Governments, or oversight organizations such as Congress, required to support safe implementation of the operational milestone, including a process to address concerns that may come up from communities, interest groups and individuals as UAS are integrated into the NAS Training: Any training of the FAA workforce that will be needed to enable the UAS activity. Specific examples of training include: Air Traffic Control Training, Flight Standards Training, AVS/AOV Oversight training and Airports Training. R&D: All R&D activities needed to determine solutions to unresolved or potential issues associated with that operational milestone; e.g., supporting performance-based requirements or safety analyses for Detect and Avoid (DAA). Specific R&D examples include: Air Traffic Management, Injury Severity, C2 and Spectrum, Separation, Human Factors, and Environmental Research. Systems: Any infrastructure development or modification needed to enable the operational milestone; e.g., ATC systems, communications, navigation, and surveillance (CNS) infrastructure, and UAS operator support systems such as the registration system. Specific examples of FAA Systems include: Traffic Management System, Authorization Portal, ATC Systems/Capabilities, CNS Systems, Registration System, and Spectrum Management.