Chapter 24: Governing the States Section 5

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
American Government Chapter 24
Advertisements

The Federal Courts Original Jurisdiction: Court hears cases for the first time. Appellate jurisdiction: Court hears cases on appeal, or cases that have.
GA Government Bailey Smith 3rd Period.
Warm Up: 11/26/12 Copy the following on a NEW notes page:
CHAPTER SEVEN, SECTION TWO THE JUDICIAL BRANCH: THE FEDERAL COURT SYSTEM.
Georgia and the American Experience
Unit 4– Judicial Branch in Georgia
BELLRINGER:. Chapter 8 / Section 2: How Federal Courts Are Organized.
Chapter 2 Section 1 A Dual Court System. The Federal Court System.
Chapter 12.4 The State Judicial Branch. Lower State Courts The state court system handles most of the nation’s legal matters. State courts interpret and.
Georgia’s General Assembly  Meets each year for a 40 day session that starts the 2 nd Monday in January.  Can pass legislation on taxes, education, contracts,
In the Courtroom.
The Federal Court System. District Courts The federal courts where trials are held and lawsuits are begun. The federal courts where trials are held and.
The Courts What reporters need to know. Civil and criminal  Criminal law covers harms done against the people.  Examples: Murder, theft, reckless driving.
Georgia and the American Experience Chapter 15: Government of the Empire State Section 3 Judicial Branch ©2005 Clairmont Press.
The Judicial Branch Unit 5. Court Systems & Jurisdictions.
Michigan Capitol Building in Lansing. State Constitutions  State Constitutions are the State’s Supreme Law of the Land  A States Constitution is superior.
 Most legal matters that arise within a state fall under the state court system.  Most states have a three-tiered system similar to the federal court.
Georgia’s Judicial Branch. The Judicial Branch Consists of the state’s courts Supreme Court Magistrate Court Probate Court Municipal Court Juvenile CourtState.
Civics & Economics – Goal 3 NC Judicial Branch. Types of NC Courts Trial courts hear evidence and arguments of the parties in a case and issue a decision.
GEORGIA HISTORY 12/2/21012  INTRODUCTION TO: THE STATE LEVEL OF GEORGIA’S GOVERNMENT /CHAPTER 15 1) EXECUTIVE BRANCH 2) LEGISLATIVE BRANCH 3) JUDICIAL.
The Judiciary Chapter 9. LEARNING OBJECTIVES LO 9.1 Describe the differences between criminal and civil cases and between original and appellate jurisdiction.
Virginia RULES Teens Learn & Live the Law Virginia’s Judicial System.
Take out a sheet of Notebook Paper. 1.Write down 3 court cases that have made an impact on history. Explain each case. 2.What are three types of laws.
Supreme Court 1 court  Highest ranking court  7 justices, elected to 6-year terms  hears appeals from lower courts  no witnesses or juries  interprets.
Chapter 18 The Judicial Branch: The Federal Court System.
North Carolina Courts. The Role of the Courts North Carolina courts resolve disputes, including lawsuits involving private disagreements, as well as criminal.
The State Judicial Branch.
The Court System in Texas
Intro to Virginia’s Judicial System
Civics & Economics – Goal 3 NC Judicial Branch
The jurisdiction of state and federal courts.
organization and jurisdiction of the federal court system
NORTH CAROLINA COURTS.
Chapter 5 The Court System A Dual Court System.
American Court Structure
Lesson 4: The Judicial Branch of State Government
State government notes
Georgia Studies Unit 8 – Judicial Branch in Georgia
NORTH CAROLINA COURTS.
The Federal Court System
Business Law Chapter 3 Court Systems.
Section 8.4: The State Judicial Branch.
The Courts and Their Judges
How does a case move from local courts to the U.S. Supreme Court?
Objective 5.5 Describe the organization and jurisdiction of the Virginia Court system.
The Judicial Branch of Georgia’s Government
1. What position is the Chief Executive of the State Executive Branch?
1. Who is the Chief Executive of the State Executive Branch?
Judicial Branch Chapter 10.
Section 13.4: The State Judicial Branch.
How Federal Courts Are Organized
Chapter 15: Courts, Judges and Laws.
The Judicial Branch of Georgia’s Government
The Judicial Branch November 10, 2014 Standard: SS8CG4
The Judicial Branch of Georgia’s Government
Chapter 18: The Federal Court System Section 1
The State Judicial Branch
The Federal & State Courts
Business Law – Mr. Lamberti
Georgia Studies Unit 8 – Judicial Branch in Georgia
Take out your notes and a plain sheet of paper numbered 1 through 5.
Write name, date, and period on a blank sheet of paper.
Chapter 18: The Federal Court System Section 1
State and Local Governments Lesson 4 State Courts
State and Local Governments Lesson 4 State Courts
Texas Judicial System Consists of : Courts Judges
Georgia Studies Unit 8 – Judicial Branch in Georgia
The Lower Courts District Courts The lowest level of federal system
The Federal Court System
Presentation transcript:

Chapter 24: Governing the States Section 5

Objectives Explain how State courts are organized and describe the work that each type of court does. Examine and evaluate the different methods by which judges are selected among the States.

Key Terms Justice of the Peace: the lowest level of State judges, who preside over justice courts warrant: a court order making some official action legal preliminary hearing: the first step in a major criminal prosecution, where the judge decides if the evidence is enough to hold the accused for further action

Key Terms, cont. magistrate: judges serving urban courts that handle misdemeanors and minor civil complaints appellate jurisdiction: jurisdiction based on hearing appeals of cases already decided in trial courts, rather than trying original cases

Introduction How are the State and local courts organized and staffed? At the top is the State supreme court, followed by the intermediate appellate courts and the general trial courts. Minor civil and criminal offenses are handled by magistrates, Justices of the Peace, and municipal courts. Most courts serve judicial districts organized by geography. In some States, courts are organized by case type.

JPs and Magistrates Justices of the Peace (JPs) Magistrates Serve in small courts in smaller towns and rural areas Serve in small courts in urban areas Handle minor cases Preside over justice courts Preside over police courts Elected by popular vote and hear misdemeanor and minor civil cases

Municipal Courts These courts are found in many cities—they hear misdemeanors and many civil cases. They are organized into divisions that specialize in cases such as criminal, civil, small claims, probate, and traffic.

Juvenile Courts Minors—those under 18 years of age—are often tried in juvenile courts rather than adult courts. Juvenile courts are designed to deal with the special needs of young people. They focus on rehabilitation more than punishment. Recently, more States have allowed minors to be tried in adult courts in an effort to fight juvenile crime.

Juvenile Courts, cont. 1800s Young people accused of serious crimes were jailed with adults, and those as young as seven could be tried and sentenced in criminal courts. 1974 Congress passes the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act requiring that young people be jailed separately from adults. 1899 Cook County, Illinois creates the first juvenile court. The court protects both public safety and the needs of the juveniles accused of crimes. Today While juvenile courts still flourish, States increasingly allow juveniles accused of serious crimes to be tried and sentenced in adult courts.

Juvenile Courts, cont. Juvenile courts arose from decades of struggle at the State level to adapt and reform the criminal justice system. Why do you think reformers sought separate jails and prisons for young people? Answer: Reformers probably felt that young people put into prison with adults would have less chance of being rehabilitated and might be subjected to being abused or corrupted by older inmates.

General Trial Courts Most major civil and criminal cases are heard in general trial courts. Each State is divided into judicial districts, each with a trial court. These general trial courts are the first to hear most of their cases. Cases are tried before a single judge, most often with a trial jury present.

Intermediate Appellate Courts Intermediate appellate courts of appeal stand in between trial courts and the State supreme court. They most often review appeals of cases first decided in State trial courts. Rather than holding trials, appellate judges study legal briefs and hear oral arguments from the lawyers in each case. Their job is to decide if the law was properly applied in a case.

State Supreme Court The State supreme court reviews appeals of cases decided by lower State courts. It has the final say in matters of State law—few of its cases are appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. Justices are either appointed by the governor or elected by the people. NOTE TO TEACHERS: This image shows Chief Justice Leah Sears, Supreme Court of Georgia.” Chief Justice Leah Sears

Unified Court System Checkpoint: Why do some States have a unified court system? Most State court systems are arranged by geography. In a unified court system, there is one court for the entire State, divided into different levels. At each level, divisions are set up to hear specific types of cases—such as criminal or juvenile. This lets judges specialize in handling cases for which they are best suited. Checkpoint Answer: A unified court system lets judges specialize in handling cases for which they are best suited.

Selecting Judges Checkpoint: What are the two main ways that judges are selected? Most are selected by popular election. About a fourth of all State judges are appointed by State governors. Governors also appoint replacements when a judge dies or resigns midterm and must be replaced. In two States, the legislatures choose most or all of the judges. NOTE TO TEACHERS: In 11 States, popular election is the sole way to select judges unless a midterm vacancy needs to be filled. In 5 States, the governor appoints all State judges. Checkpoint Answer: Popular election and appointment by State governors. 15

Selecting Judges, cont. Supporters of electing judges argue that it best represents the will of the people and enforces separation of powers. Supporters of appointing judges argue that it results in more qualified judges. Analyzing Political Cartoons Answer: This answer suggests that an inflexible judicial philosophy will have a significant impact on the rulings made by the judge, and that voters or executives must be careful when choosing a judge based on such philosophies.

The Missouri Plan The Missouri Plan combines the election and appointment of judges. The governor appoints the justices of the State supreme court, the court of appeals, and many trial court judges, choosing from a list of candidates recommended by a judicial commission. After at least a year, voters then decide whether to keep or remove each judge. Some form of this plan is used in over half the States.

Review Now that you have learned about how the State and local courts are organized and staffed, go back and answer the Chapter Essential Question. How much power should State government have?