Logic Part 2 A Mr. C Production.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING

Advertisements

Rules of Inferences Section 1.5. Definitions Argument: is a sequence of propositions (premises) that end with a proposition called conclusion. Valid Argument:

1 Valid and Invalid arguments. 2 Definition of Argument Sequence of statements: Statement 1; Statement 2; Therefore, Statement 3. Statements 1 and 2 are.

2.4 Deductive Reasoning HW: Lesson 2.4/ 1 – 10, 13.

Logos Formal Logic.

Introduction to Earth Science Doing Science.  Scientific method – a systemic approach to answering questions about the natural world  Sufficient observation.

Inductive & Deductive Reasoning

Deductive vs. Inductive Reasoning. Objectives Use a Venn diagram to determine the validity of an argument. Complete a pattern with the most likely possible.

Section 2-3 Deductive Reasoning. Types of Reasoning:

Ch. 4 DEDUCTIVE ARGUMENT Reasoning from the General to the Specific.

Deductive Reasoning Chapter 2 Lesson 4.

Reasoning. Inductive and Deductive reasoning Inductive reasoning is concerned with reasoning from “specific instances to some general conclusion.” Deductive.

Question of the Day!  We shared a lot of examples of illogical arguments!  But how do you make a LOGICAL argument? What does your argument need? What.

10/21/09 BR- Identify the (1)premises and the (2)conclusion in the following deductive argument. Is it valid or invalid? All fish need gills to breath.

HOW TO CRITIQUE AN ARGUMENT

DEDUCTIVE VS. INDUCTIVE REASONING. Problem Solving Logic – The science of correct reasoning. Reasoning – The drawing of inferences or conclusions from.

DEDUCTIVE VS. INDUCTIVE REASONING Section 1.1. PROBLEM SOLVING Logic – The science of correct reasoning. Reasoning – The drawing of inferences or conclusions.

This mini lesson will cover: 1. What are the roles of inferences and arguments in science. 2. How can we make stronger scientific arguments and inferences.

Deductive Reasoning. Deductive reasoning The process of logical reasoning from general principles to specific instances based on the assumed truth of.

Deductive and Inductive Reasoning

Deductive s. Inductive Reasoning

p qp q q pq p p  q ~p  ~q ~q  ~p q p September 17, 2014.

Argument: What you don’t know already Works Cited Page Murphy, Barbara L & Estelle Rankin. 5 Steps to a 5 AP English Language. New York: McGraw-Hill,

DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING

Use of Reason and Logic RATIONALISM.  A Rationalist approach to knowledge is based on the belief that we can ascertain truth by thinking and reflection.

09/17/08 BR- Identify the premises and the conclusion in the following deductive argument. Is it valid or invalid? All fish need gills to breath water.

DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING

DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING

Deductive and Inductive Reasoning

Reasoning and Proof Unit 2.

Chapter 3 Basic Logical Concepts (Please read book.)

Critical Thinking Lecture 13 Inductive arguments

SELECTING DEBATE PATTERNS, ATTACKING FALLACIES, & REFUTATION

Deductive and Inductive REASONING

Inductive vs. Deductive Reasoning

Deductive Logic, Categorical Syllogism

Fallacies of Logic A Mr. C Production.

10/28/09 BR- What is the most important factor in winning an argument

DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING

Inductive and Deductive Reasoning

MAT 142 Lecture Video Series

DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING

Logic, Philosophical Tools Quiz Review…20 minutes 10/31

Reasoning, Logic, and Position Statements

DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING

DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING

DEDUCTIVE REASONING Forensic Science.

Philosophy of Research by Zain Ullah Khattak

Inductive and Deductive Logic

Argumentation Strategies

Deductive and Inductive Reasoning

DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING

DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING Section 1.1. Problem Solving Logic – The science of correct reasoning. Reasoning – The drawing of inferences or conclusions.

DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING

Constructing a Logical Argument

Deductive vs. Inductive Reasoning

Section 3-6 Inductive Reasoning.

Introduction to Logic start a new RAW Book entry (#7)

10/9 Objective: Identify deductive reasoning in forensic cases.

BASIC SCIENCE PROCESS SKILLS

Syllogisms and Enthymemes.

2.3 Deductive reasoning Brett Solberg AHS ’11-’12.

TODAY’S OBJECTIVE: Standard: MM1G2

ID1050– Quantitative & Qualitative Reasoning

If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.

DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING

If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.

Presentation transcript:

Logic Part 2 A Mr. C Production

DO nOW What does a genetic fallacy mean? What does ambiguity mean? What does an inconsistency fallacy mean? Please give me an example.

Activity Please get into groups of 3 or 2, no one is allowed to work alone! Pick out 1 fallacy that we learned about yesterday and do a role play/skit with it. Everyone in your group should be talking and you will have to present in front of the class. You can include a script if you want. This will be graded based off your participation, so participate and be vocal!

How do we problem solve? Logic- Correct reasoning through science. Reasoning- Drawing conclusions or inferences from assumed or known facts. We have to 1. Understand the problem, 2. Gather the facts, 3. Analyze the problem, 4. Compare with prior problems, 5.Use pictures and formulas to solve the problem. Notice the similarities and differences.

Syllogism It’s a part of deductive reasoning It is an argument made up of 2 premises or statements that is immediately followed by a conclusion. If the conclusion is guaranteed then the arguments are valid. If there is one instance in which the conclusion doesn’t follow then the arguments are invalid.

More examples of Deductive reasoning 1. All college students eat Dominos Pizza. Josh is a student at FSU. Therefore, Josh eats Dominos Pizza. 2. All dogs are cute. Penny is a dog. Therefore, Penny is cute. 3. All Stephen King novels are amazing. 11.22.63 is Stephen King novel. Therefore 11.22.63 is amazing.

You know if it is deductive reasoning If you see therefore after all, that will always be the hint or clue to knowing that a statement is deductive. If p, then q. (major premise) x is p. (minor premise) Therefore, x is q. (conclusion Above ^ is the formula for deductive.

More examples of Inductive reasoning What is the next number in the sequence: 6, 13,20,27? There’s more than one answer for this sequence. Every quiz has been hard, therefore the test will be hard. Every winter snow comes. Therefore this winter snow will come. Max reads books on Monday. Therefore he will read a book on Tuesday.

Types of Inductive Arguments Predictions Retrodictions (predictions about the past based on current information) Analogies Statistical Reasoning Causal Reasoning / Explanations

Activity/Reflection Please work on this activity individually. Please create your own deductive reasoning and inductive reasoning examples from what you’ve learned in class today. We will discuss if time permits.