Rock Island County Drug Court

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Callie Glanton Steele Supervising Deputy Federal Public Defender Central District of California.
Advertisements

El Paso County COMMUNITY CUSTODY PROGRAM AN OVERVIEW Originally Presented to EPC Board of County Commissioners November 14, 2002 CCP.
Residential Community Supervision Programs
Juvenile Justice system
Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. Treatment Research Institute at the University of Pennsylvania TRI science addiction Effective Strategies for Drug-Abusing.
Drug Offender Sentencing Alternative (DOSA): Treatment and Supervision
Criminal Intent Purposely Knowingly Recklessly Negligently.
West Virginia’s Drug Courts: An Overview Division of Probation Services,
Misdemeanor Sanctions
Introduction to Kenosha County Behavioral Health Courts Kenosha County Division of Aging & Disability Jim Truchan (LMFT,LPC,LCSW) Human Services Manager.
MILWAUKEE COUNTY’S PRETRIAL RELEASE DECISION PROCESS & PRETRIAL SERVICES RE-DESIGN PRESENTED TO THE MILWAUKEE COUNTY COMMUNITY JUSTICE COUNCIL JULY 24,
Alternative Sanctions Changing Lives to Ensure a Safer Florida Trust*Respect*Accountability*Integrity*Leadership.
Criminal Justice Process: Proceedings Before Trial
Hamilton County Veterans’ Treatment Court Structure, Process, and Purpose.
Sentencing Unit 2 Chapter 11.
Elmore County Drug and DUI Court
Drug Court ♦The alternative to incarceration  History žHow and why the experiment evolved  Main Features of Drug Court žCooperation within the adversarial.
1 Ed Monahan Public Advocate Substance Abuse: Senate Bill 4 (2009) Treatment options expanded Ernie Lewis KY Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers June.
Steps in the Adult Criminal Justice Process
Drug Offender Reform Act Smarter Sentencing + Smarter Treatment = Better Outcomes and Safer Neighborhoods.
EXTENDING THE THERAPEUTIC JUSTICE MODEL TO PROBLEM GAMBLERS Mark G. Farrell, JD; Jessica Aungst Weitzel, MPH; Thomas H. Nochajski, PhD, Buffalo Center.
Snohomish County Sheriff’s Office Special Investigations Unit n 98% of our investigations involve crimes where the victim has been assaulted by someone.
TREATMENT COURTS Inns of Court Presentation By John Markson & Elliott Levine October 17, 2012.
North Carolina TASC NC TASC Bridging Systems for Effective Offender Care Management.
RISK AND NEED TRACKS SAMHSA 2013 Orleans Parish Drug Court Expansion Grant.
© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Chapter 4 Diversion and Probation: How Most Offenders Are Punished 1.
Chapter 2 Pretrial Release and Diversion. Pretrial Services Pretrial Services is a department with two overlapping functions: Assisting the court with.
(POST – TRIAL). The Act states that the sentencing judge is obliged to consider the following when sentencing:  Maximum penalty  Current sentencing.
Immediate Sanction Probation Pilot Project Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission June 8, 2015.
Viola Läänerand & Taavi Kruus
Proposed Recommendations for Guidelines Revisions.
Judge Neil Edward Axel District Court of Maryland (retired) Maryland Highway Safety Judicial Conference December 2, 2015 Best Practices & Sentencing Alternatives.
Legal Consequences Illegal Drug Possession And Underage Drinking Presented by Mrs. Noël.
Connecticut Department of Correction Division of Parole and Community Services Special Management Unit Parole Manager Frank Mirto October 14, 2015.
THE PENAL SYSTEM AN OVERVIEW. Why do we have a penal system? Incapacitation: remove dangerous people from society so they don’t harm the rest of us. Deterrence:
 Sentence - punishment imposed on a person convicted of committing a crime.  The goal or purpose of a sentence ◦ Protection of public ◦ Retribution.
Court Services A Continuum of Behavioral, Therapeutic and Supervision Programs.
Problem Solving Courts Bench Bar Conference Double Tree Hotel April 20, rd Judicial District Court of Common Pleas – Berks County.
Senate Bill 64 Omnibus Crime/Corrections Bill To improve public safety, slow the growth of Alaska’s prison population, and save money. 1.
Okaloosa County Department of Corrections. Population Reports.
FLORIDA CRIMINAL LAWS DEPUTY DYE CRIMINAL JUSTICE CLASSES – UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL.
History and Concepts of Drug Courts
BCJ 3150: Probation and Parole
Introduction to the Florida Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ)
Itasca County Wellness Court
STANDARDS: SS8CG6 The student will explain how the Georgia court system treats juvenile offenders. a. Explain the difference between delinquent behavior.
Judicial Best Practices in Drug & DUI Court
Summit County Probation Services
10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
A MULTI-TRACK DUI COURT SYSTEM FOR REPEAT OFFENDERS
sealing of adult convictions
SENTENCING.
Chapter 4 Probation: How Most Offenders Are Punished
Andres F. Rengifo Christine S. Scott-Hayward Vera Institute of Justice
Chapter 16: The Criminal Justice System.
Overview of the Juvenile Justice System
Beyond the referral Presented by:
SEALING & EXPUNGING.
DIVERSION PROGRAMS.
Treatment Court Dockets
Criminal Justice System Components: Locating Probation and Parole
Sentencing CLN4U.
Criminal Justice Process: Sentencing & Corrections
Juvenile Offenders Delinquent acts and unruly acts are legal terms for behavior in minors under the age of 16. Delinquent behavior is an act committed.
10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
Sentencing Guidelines/Mandatory Minimums and Charging
Criminal vs. Civil Law SWBAT: Explain the differences between criminal and civil law.
Sentencing.
Coconino County Recovery Court
DRUG COURTS IN ILLINOIS
Presentation transcript:

Rock Island County Drug Court Sobriety Opportunity Accountability Responsibility

The Rock Island County Drug Court seeks to reduce recidivism through therapeutic intervention and court supervision to insure Sobriety, Opportunity, Accountability, and Responsibility. MISSION STATEMENT

GOALS It is the goal of the Rock County Drug Court to enhance public safety and reduce recidivism by diverting persons with substance dependence disorders charged with a criminal offense from the Criminal Justice system to Drug Court for appropriate treatment and support services. This will be achieved by:  Client participation in and completion of drug treatment. Increased awareness and knowledge of court personnel in the physiology of addiction and recovery. The time from arrest to receipt of treatment will decrease. The ratio of probationers to probation officers will decrease within the Drug Court Program. Timely court response to positive and negative behaviors will be routine.

TARGET POPULATION – HIGH RISK and HIGH NEEDS The National Association Of Drug Court Professionals Best Practice Standards states that our target population are those who are “High Risk and High Needs.” Some Drug Courts serve only individuals charged with drug-possession offenses or may disqualify offenders who are charged with or have a history of a serious felony. Research reveals, however, that Drug Courts yielded nearly twice the cost savings when they served addicted individuals charged with felony theft and property crimes (Carey et al., 2008, 2012). Drug Courts that served only drug-possession cases typically offset crimes that did not involve high victimization or incarceration costs, such as petty theft, drug possession, trespassing, and traffic offenses (Downey & Roman, 2010). As a result, the investment costs of the programs were not recouped by the modest cost savings that were achieved from reduced recidivism. The most cost-effective Drug Courts focused their efforts on reducing serious felony offenses that are most costly to their communities. TARGET POPULATION – HIGH RISK and HIGH NEEDS

Drug Court vs Traditional Probation Clients are assessed as: Low risk– clients reports once every three months. Moderate risk- clients reports on time per month. High risk – clients reports bi-weekly. DRUG COURT Clients are assessed High Risk and High Needs: Drug Court client report no less than twice a week for a minimum of 18 months. Drug Court vs Traditional Probation

ELIGIBILITY / EXCLUSIONARY CRITERIA The candidate must meet the following eligibility standards: Rock Island County resident. Score as high risk and high needs on the RANT (Risk and Needs Triage). Have a diagnosis of drug/alcohol dependence. Meet the eligibility requirements as outlined in the drug court treatment act.

DRUG COURT TREATMENT ACT 730 ILCS 166/20)   Sec. 20. Eligibility.   (a) A defendant may be admitted into a drug court program only upon the agreement of the defendant and with the approval of the court.   (b) A defendant shall be excluded from a drug court program if any of one of the following apply: (1) The crime is a crime of violence as set forth in clause (4) of this subsection (b). (2) The defendant denies his or her use of or addiction to drugs. (3) The defendant does not demonstrate a willingness to participate in a treatment program. (4) The defendant has been convicted of a crime of violence within the past 10 years excluding incarceration time. As used in this Section, "crime of violence" means: first degree murder, second degree murder, predatory criminal sexual assault of a child, aggravated criminal sexual assault, criminal sexual assault, armed robbery, aggravated arson, arson, aggravated kidnaping, kidnaping, aggravated battery resulting in great bodily harm or permanent disability, stalking, aggravated stalking, or any offense involving the discharge of a firearm. (c) Notwithstanding subsection (a), the defendant may be admitted into a drug court program only upon the agreement of the prosecutor if: (1) the defendant is charged with a Class 2 or greater felony violation of: (A) Section 401, 401.1, 405, or 405.2 of the Illinois Controlled Substances Act; (B) Section 5, 5.1, or 5.2 of the Cannabis Control Act; (C) Section 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 56, or 65 of the Methamphetamine Control and Community Protection Act; or (2) the defendant has previously, on 3 or more occasions, either completed a drug court program, been discharged from a drug court program, or been terminated from a drug court program. (Source: P.A. 99-480, eff. 9-9-15.) DRUG COURT TREATMENT ACT

CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE Upon the determination of acceptability the case shall be set on the Drug Court call list. The Court will advise the candidate of the nature of Drug Court, review the Consent To Participate with the candidate, advise the candidate of his/her responsibilities, and determine the candidates’ willingness to participate. The Court shall determine whether the candidate is accepted into the Drug Court Program. The defendant shall enter an open plea of guilty to the charges/petition to revoke probation and sign the Drug Court Recognizance Bond. The defendant shall appear in court for further hearings as required by the Court or the Drug Court Officer for review of the terms and conditions of the Drug Court Recognizance bond. Sentencing shall be stayed pending completion of the Drug Court Program. CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE

DRUG COURT PHASES PHASE I (Minimum of 4 weeks) Probation appointments – 1 scheduled per week. Weekly court appearances. Sober Support meetings i.e. AA/NA- 3 each week. Drug Testing – minimum of 2 each week (includes breath and urinalysis). In/Outpatient treatment. 30 days sobriety.   PHASE II (Minimum of 8 weeks) Every other week court appearances. Sober support meetings i.e. AA/NA - minimum 3 week. Complete In/outpatient treatment and aftercare. Obtain employment / or start school. DRUG COURT PHASES

Drug Court Phases CONTINUED PHASE III (Minimum of 12 weeks)   Probation appointments - 2 scheduled per month (every other week). Court 1 time per month. Continued participation in sober support meetings i.e. AA/NA. Complete relapse prevention group. Budget/Bank Account. Set up payment plan. Drug Testing – minimum of 2 each week (includes breath and urinalysis). 1 year sobriety. PHASE IV (Minimum of 6 months) Probation appointments – 1 scheduled per month. Continued education/work plan. Progress on payment plan. Have court approved independent housing. Drug Court Phases CONTINUED

A sanction may be imposed for each violation A sanction may be imposed for each violation. The court, with input from the team, will determine which sanction is appropriate depending on the nature of the violation and the overall compliance of the individual. The final decision as to whether to impose a sanction and what sanction is appropriate rests within the sole discretion of the Drug Court Judge and may only be imposed in accordance with the procedural fairness principles of fairness and neutrality after the participant is given an opportunity to be heard. Sanctions can include but are not limited to: Admonishment from the team Reading/writing assignments Curfew Public Service Employment (PSE) hours Electronic monitoring Periodic imprisonment Increased reporting Increased drug/alcohol testing Video education Sanctions

Rewards will be imposed as deemed appropriate by the court and the team. Rewards may be appropriate when an individual has either successfully completed a treatment phase or has been in compliance for a significant period of time. Rewards may include but are not limited to:   Praise from the team Reduction in previously imposed sanctions Reduction of length of supervision Tokens of progress Decreased court appearances Reduction of pending fines and fees Dismissal of criminal charges Graduation ceremony Decreased level of supervision Letter of recognition REWARDS

Participants who have completed all the requirements for a successful discharge from Drug Court will be eligible to participate in graduation. Prior to graduation each participant will complete the pre-graduation questionnaire. Upon graduation from Drug Court the participants’ charges/PTR will be dismissed. If the participant owes restitution or court costs at the time of graduation he/she will be discharged with a pay plan. GRADUATION

Facts The Rock Island County Drug Court inception date is July 31, 2000. As of 05-11-17: We have screened 1,815 candidates for the program. We screen an average of 9 candidates per month. 546 candidates have started the drug court program. 179 candidates will have graduated our drug court program. We have a graduation rate of 33%. According to the National institute of Justice; as of June 2015, there are approximately 3,142 drug courts operating within the United States.

According to the National Association of Drug Court Professionals http://www.nadcp.org/learn/facts-and-figures Drug Courts Reduce Crime FACT: Nationwide, 75% of Drug Court graduates remain arrest-free at least two years after leaving the program. FACT: Rigorous studies examining long-term outcomes of individual Drug Courts have found that reductions in crime last at least 3 years and can endure for over 14 years. FACT: The most rigorous and conservative scientific “meta-analyses” have all concluded that Drug Courts significantly reduce crime as much as 45 percent more than other sentencing options.

Drug Courts Save Money FACT: Nationwide, for every $1.00 invested in Drug Court, taxpayers save as much as $3.36 in avoided criminal justice costs alone. FACT: When considering other cost offsets such as savings from reduced victimization and healthcare service utilization, studies have shown benefits range up to $27 for every $1 invested. FACT: Drug Courts produce cost savings ranging from $3,000 to $13,000 per client. These cost savings reflect reduced prison costs, reduced revolving- door arrests and trials, and reduced victimization. FACT: In 2007, for every Federal dollar invested in Drug Court, $9.00 was leveraged in state funding.

Drug Courts Ensure Compliance FACT: Unless substance abusing/addicted offenders are regularly supervised by a judge and held accountable, 70% drop out of treatment prematurely. FACT: Drug Courts provide more comprehensive and closer supervision than other community-based supervision programs. FACT: Drug Courts are six times more likely to keep offenders in treatment long enough for them to get better.

Drug Courts Combat meth addiction FACT: For methamphetamine-addicted people, Drug Courts increase treatment program graduation rates by nearly 80%. FACT: When compared to eight other programs, Drug Courts quadrupled the length of abstinence from methamphetamine. FACT: Drug Courts reduce methamphetamine use by more than 50% compared to outpatient treatment alone.