Conducted by LJR Custom Strategies

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 8 Confidence Intervals 8.3 Confidence Intervals about a Population Proportion.
Advertisements

Ledgemont School District A Data Analysis October 14, 2013.
WHO ARE KENYANS PREPARED TO VOTE FOR AS OF NOW? SPEC BAROMETER RESULTS November 9th 2007.
1 Customer: Contractor: Public Opinion Survey on Awareness of Possibilities on Protection of Industrial Property February 2008.
120 Exchange Street Portland Maine 1 October 2010 Maine Voter Preference Study – Wave III Prepared for: Maine Today Media October.
American Views of Churches in Schools Survey of Over 2,000 American Adults.
Transportation Authority of Marin SB83/VRF Feasibility Survey June 2010.
Protestant Pastor Views of the Accuracy of News Coverage Survey of 1,000 Protestant Pastors.
Survey Conducted May 11-22, Methodology Telephone survey (landline and cell phones) of a random sample of 295 voters registered to vote.
Key findings from a survey of 193 likely voters throughout the LaSalle-Peru High School District conducted June 4-8, 2016.
Page 1 July 2016 City of El Cerrito: Library Bond Measure Tracking Survey July 2016.
Families Against Mandatory Minimums MASSACHUSETTS Poll Results
2006 WCVI National Exit Poll Results
Summary of West Virginia Statewide Polling
GS/PPAL Research Methods and Information Systems
Swing State Clean Energy Survey
Medical Resident Work Hours
Confidence Intervals for Proportions
Asian American Survey - Illinois
Asian American Survey - Nevada
SPANISH Results Schools comparison. SPANISH Results Schools comparison.
The Democratic Process
Erasmus + /Strategic Partnership Youth Bridges to Reach Efficient European Citizenship Awareness RO01-KA
Margin of Error: We’re Only Human…
Term 1 Week 5 Warm Ups.
Public Relations and The Professional School Counselor
Chapter 8: Mass Media and Public Opinion Section 2
SAMPLING (Zikmund, Chapter 12.
Fall Community Survey Summary Conducted for the City of Port Hueneme
Trust Translates Into Influence As Multi-Screen TV Is Much More Likely To Influence Voters’ Final Decision Than Any Other Media Survey Fun Fact: 55% of.
Plus/Minus Grading Is it Time for a Modification to Auburn’s Grading System? Report to University Senate by Academic Standards Committee, November 15,
.
RC Ohio Valley Region Strategic and Annual Planning Process January – September 2016 Notes Fr John says greeting and reflects on 75 anniversary and then.
G.O. Bond Survey Results Presentation for
2017 Vacant Property Community Input Survey Final Report
Adding & Subtracting Integers
SAMPLING.
Elementary Statistics: Picturing The World
Section 8.1 Day 4.
Referendum Baseline Public Opinion Poll June 2010
Survey of the General Public Ohio November 2012
Fundamentals of Statistics
Honors Statistics Chapter 2
ATC Alliance Committee
Lesson 11.5 Interpreting Data
Fundamentals of Statistics
Looking at and responding to Street Art
Chapter 8: Mass Media and Public Opinion Section 2
Coalition to Promote Choice for Seniors
Charles Chiu and K. Sathasivan
Sampling Distributions
SAMPLING (Zikmund, Chapter 12).
Opinion poll on referundum
Results from Newbury Local School focus groups
Referendum Baseline Public Opinion Poll July 2010
Chapter 2 The 6 W’s & H.
Sampling Methods.
2019 Tennessee Tobacco & Vape Policy Poll
General Interest Questions
2008 Space Grant Regional Meetings Survey Results
Objective 4.3.
Chapter 8: Mass Media and Public Opinion Section 2
Why 25% of Voter Polls are Wrong
Chapter 8: Mass Media and Public Opinion Section 2
Reflective Democracy National Survey.
The Process of a Statistical Study
Choice of Public and Private Plan Options
Puerto Rican Diaspora Findings and Recommendations from two statewide surveys in Florida and New York May 2019.
Day 2 proportions (independent samples)
Los Angeles County Public Opinion Landscape
Presentation transcript:

A SURVEY OF REGISTERED VOTERS IN THE NEWBURY AND BERKSHIRE SCHOOL DISTRICTS IN OHIO Conducted by LJR Custom Strategies 2257 Marais Street – New Orleans – LA – 70117 – 504.717.8509 343 Tennessee Ave NE – Washington – DC – 20002 – 202.330.2374

METHODS Survey of 400 registered voters in the Newbury and Berkshire school districts in Ohio. Conducted from June 5-7, 2016. Findings applying to the 400 sample are subject to sampling error of plus or minus 4.9%; subgroups of the sample are subject to error of up to plus or minus 10%.

SUBGROUP KEY The following definitions describe less than obvious subgroups of the sample. REGION Berkshire (67%) includes all voters who live in the Berkshire school district. Newbury (33%) includes all voters who live in the Newbury school district. VOTE FOR CONSOLIDATION For (51%) includes voters who are strongly or not strongly for consolidating the Berkshire and Newbury schools in to one district. Against (19%) includes respondents who say they are strongly or not strongly against consolidation. Undecided (31%) includes respondents who are not sure (Q.17). VOTE FOR BOND ISSUE For (38%) includes voters who are definitely or probably for a subsequent bond issue to build new schools on the Kent State Geauga campus. Against (30%) includes respondents who say they are definitely or probably against the bond issue. Undecided (32%) includes respondents who are not sure (Q.32).

SUBGROUP KEY (cont.) LENGTH OF RESIDENCE 0-20 yrs. (34%) includes respondents who have lived in their current school district for 20 years or less. 21-30 yrs. (23%) includes respondents who have lived in their current school district 21 and 30 years. 31+ (37%) includes respondents who have lived in their current school district for over 30 years (Q.51). NEWBURY/BERKSHIRE STUDENT IN HOUSEHOLD Yes (16%) includes respondents who have a current Newbury or Berkshire student in their household. No (82%) includes respondents who do not have a student from either school district in their household (Q.48, Q.49).

KEY FINDINGS

THE NEWBURY AND Berkshire SCHOOLS

Chart 1

Chart 2

Chart 3

Chart 4

Chart 5

CONSOLIDATION

Chart 6

Chart 7

Chart 8

Chart 9

Chart 10

Chart 11

Chart 12

Chart 12 (cont.)

Chart 13

Chart 13 (cont.)

Chart 13 (cont.)

THE bond issue

Chart 14

Chart 15

Chart 16

Chart 17

Chart 18

Chart 19

Chart 20

Chart 20 (cont.)

Chart 20 (cont.)

STRATEGIC RECOMMENDATIONS