A Bus Corridor for George Street in New Brunswick

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Salt Lake City Downtown Transportation Master Plan Light Rail & Bus; Presentation Background and Introduction August 23, 2006.
Advertisements

Transport for Canberra 07 November2013. Transport for NSW: Regional Transport Plan ACT, whilst not part of the region, is an important destination Transport.
Index The Region: Regional Transit West East North West Side Access Downtown: Transit Lines Catchment Areas BACKNEXT INDEXEND Lower Manhattan Transit.
City of Omak Central Avenue Bridge Replacement Project Prepared by Highlands Associates Photos by FlyBy Photos.
1 Corey W. Hill Chief of Public Transportation May 20, 2008 May 20, 2008.
Prof. R. Shanthini 09 Feb 2013 Source: Winner: Ahmedabad, India In only a few months of.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood TODs & Complete Streets Unit 6: Station Design & Access.
The City of Gdynia City rights in 1926 With Sopot and Gdańsk forms the Tri-City agglomeration It has inhabitants Port city, employment structure:
The Swedish delegation presents: LundaMaTs - an integrated effort of creating a sustainable environmentally friendly car traffic in the city of Lund.
SR520 Urban Partnership Project 2008 ITS Washington Annual Meeting November 12th, 2008 – Seattle Jennifer Charlebois, P.E. Tolling and Systems Project.
Public Expenditure Analysis May 4, 2007 Cost-Benefit Analysis: Seattle Link Light Rail, Initial Segment Your presenters: Annie Gorman Hazel-Ann Petersen.
Goal: 10,000 interactions in 2015 –Extensive civic engagement Goal: To develop a great regional transit system –Update every five years –All options considered.
SUSTAINABILITY CONCEPTS IN TRANSPORT SECTOR/ OPTIONS AND BENEFITS
Presentation by: Permanent Secretary - PMORALG Mr. Jumanne Sagini 3 rd June 2014.
1 Metrolinx delivers The Big Move Regional Transportation Plan: Transforming Transportation in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area November 5, 2012 Bruce.
Freeway Revolts: Why not the Twin Cities? Thomas More Nick Dobda Xiaozheng He.
Chapter 4. Your number one priority as a driver is to drive your vehicle carefully and safely. Your speed and manner of driving must create a safe environment.
TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Houston, Texas May 2009 Ann Arbor Transportation Plan Update-- Connecting the Land Use & Transportation.
1 Item 11: Review of Draft Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan for the National Capital Region Michael Farrell TPB Staff Presentation to the Transportation Planning.
 City of Hamilton – Transportation Sustainable Mobility Summit – October 27, 2013.
Green Transport Dr Lina Shbeeb Minister of Transport. Jordan.
TRB/APTA 2004 Bus Rapid Transit Conference When is BRT the Best Option? the Best Option? 1:30 – 2:40 p.m. Paul Larrousse Director, National Transit Institute.
Sustainable mobility in Lviv mobility.lviv.ua. Sustainable mobility – any type of transportation that can help reduce environmental impact. This may include.
Business Logistics 420 Urban Transportation Fall 2000 Lectures 6: Coping with Edge City Transportation Problems: Livable Cities, Transit-Friendly Land.
Write down one word that comes into your thought when you read the following word: 15 Feb 2008 R. Shanthini Transport.
February 2014 Bus Rapid Transit for Chennai. Chennai city bus service GOOD PATRONAGE  50 lakh daily passenger trips  3650 buses  Maximum flow of.
Putting Luas Cross City in context - Public Transport and Sustainable Measures in Dublin Dublin City Council 21 st March 2013 Gerry Murphy.
Tom Norton, Executive Director Colorado Department of Transportation American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials September 9, 2003.
The Burnham Transportation Plan of Chicago: 100 Years Later CTS-IGERT Weekly Seminar April 23, 2009 Joseph DiJohn Urban Transportation Center.
1. Variety of modes (types) of transport (public and private) 2. Density of transport networks more nodes and.
Weighing the Scenarios: The Costs and Benefits of Future Transit Service Produced for MTDB by The Mission Group © 2000 by The Mission Group. 1 Dave Schumacher.
Public Transportation Planning: Rapid transit solutions for adequate mass movement Mobility.
ROBERT LANG, PH.D. | PROFESSOR & EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR BROOKINGS MOUNTAIN WEST | THE LINCY INSTITUTE GREENSPUN COLLEGE | UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS LEARNING.
Urban Land Use. Residential – Includes all places where people live – Generally the largest land use in most cities often taking up to 40% or more of.
LUAS Cross City Brendan O’Brien Roads & Traffic Department.
Valley Metro Update Open House and Public Hearing March 9, 2007.
Transit Technology Hampton Roads Transit. Hampton Roads Transit (HRT) provides public transportation for six cities in the South Hampton Roads region:
Chapter 12: Urban Transportation Policy “Everything in life is somewhere else, and you get there in a car.” E. B. White, One Man’s Meat, (NY: Harper &
MODULE 4, LESSON 2 Fundamentals of Transit Service and Networks.
The Gauteng Economic Indaba Transport and Logistics Mr Piet Sebola Group Executive Strategic Asset Development Date: 09 th June 2016.
Prepared for the Milford Board of Selectman May 9, 2016.
Urban Land Uses 6 Land Classifications. 1.0 Residential Land Uses includes all the places where people live often takes up to 40% or more of the developed.
Sustainability Programs
APTA Sustainability and Public Transportation Workshop Benjamin Smith
Cost-Benefit Analysis: Seattle Link Light Rail, Initial Segment
Downtown Valdosta Truck Traffic Mitigation Study
A People’s Plan for Baltimore Transit
Congestion Charging: An idea that makes sense?
Gunnison Valley Transportation Authority (RTA) 2016 Transit Planning Process Funded through a Section 5304 Planning Grant 5/23/2018.
Regional Roads Committee
Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) ACEC Presentation May 25, 2017
Transportation Summit
and Transportation Impacts
Transportation Report
CDOT North I-25 Express Lanes Update April 28, 2016
School Bus and School Zone Safety
Rules of the Road.
URBAN LAND USES 6 Land Classifications.
Urban Land Use (chapter 21)
Land Use Planning - Goals
Chapter 5. The Transportation-Planning Process
Urban Land Use (chapter 21)
D Line Project Overview
WELCOMES YOU TO THE COMMUNITY OPEN HOUSE OCTOBER 2018.
Central Avenue Rapid Transit
Innovation in Railways NTA Ireland
2020 RTP Update - Proposed Changes to Transit Projects
MPO Transit Planning Coordination in the Twin Cities
Alex Henry FDOT District Seven Safety Office
Presentation transcript:

A Bus Corridor for George Street in New Brunswick A Proposal: A Bus Corridor for George Street in New Brunswick Slide 1 Image 1 By: Paul Onyx Lozito

New Brunswick Central Business District The Area of Study New Brunswick Central Business District Bus Stops Corridor Route

The Problems Congestion Equity and Access Affected Parties: Students Slide 3 Image 1 Two Related Problems Congestion: Between the hours of four and six, getting across the city of New Brunswick can take 20 minuets. Equity and Access: During rush hour, it becomes hard to access downtown businesses by bus, car, and even walking due to gridlock. This unevenly affects residents and businesses within New Brunswick, and delays buses and pedestrians who can not or chose not to drive. The affect parties of traffic include students who try to reach Douglas or College Avenue Campus of Rutgers University during this time, businesses located in the CBD as people avoid the area as traffic tries to facilitate through the area, and cross-town commuters who wish to get to and from homes within the city. Equity and Access Slide 3 Image 2 Affected Parties: Students Downtown Businesses Cross Town Commuters

Several Possible Solutions Slide 4 Image 1 Slide 4Image 4 Modified Car Traffic Light Rail Bus Rapid Transit Slide 4 Image 2 Monorail Slide 4Image 3 Slide 4Image 5 A Bus Corridor

Monorail and Light Rail Examples: Seattle Monorail Newark Airport Monorail Pros: Popular Quick Has a right of way Cons: Extremely cost- prohibitive to build and maintain Needs manpower Despite the wonders of light rail travel, there are several setbacks that make implementation of light rail service incongruent with New Brunswick at its present state. Firstly, the cities in which light rail was implemented had populations much between five and ten times the size of New Brunswick. The city doesn’t have the population and necessary density to financially sustain a light rail. Secondly, light rail systems have become cost prohibitive to construct as demand for such systems have increased (Urbitran 18). A light rail system can cost between ten and thirty million dollars per mile to construct. New Brunswick may reach a point one day where the feasibility exists to construct a light rail along a major transport route, but the demand does not yet exists for such a system. These types of systems should be a long term goal!

Modified Car Traffic Examples of Modified Car Traffic Exist Everywhere. One-way Roads Roads with limited Access to Trucks Reverse Traffic lanes Slide 6 Image 1 Cost/Benefits This type of solution may help with congestion. This solution will not help with equity or access.

Bus Rapid Transit Benefits BRT would be cost effective to impliment BRT would fit into the small scale urban environment of New Brunswick. BRT would help show the city is ready for a more substantive investment such as light rail or monorail. Organizations such as the Massachusetts Bay Transit Authority have implemented a more cost effective alternative to light rail called Bus Rapid Transit (BRT). BRT has been implemented in some level in many transit agencies throughout the country. Bus rapid transit is a system in which buses are prioritized in on-street traffic. A bus will have its own lane, often priority at a traffic light, and in some occasions a bus tunnel to avoid traffic. Bus rapid transit has proven an excellent way for existing transit agencies to make trunk bus routes feel like light rail systems (Muller 66). Yet, New Brunswick does not contain a municipal or regional transit company that prioritizes the city. Costs Must purchase a bus fleet Must pay drivers Must set up support staff, schedules, administrative infrastructure Must secure government funding Must comply with DOT expensive public transport regulations.

A Bus Corridor is the solution for New Brunswick Successful Examples: A Bus Corridor provides for a bus exclusive street that public buses may use. All buses must stop at all bus stops, and all buses have priority over cross traffic. Boston Why in New Brunswick? A Bus corridor puts into place infrastructure for any independent bus company to use. No employees, administrators, fare structure A Corridor allows for flexible expansion later. You CAN Still Build a BRT, or light rail on the same right of way. A Bus corridor is extremely inexpensive to build. New Brunswick provide the proper landscape for such a system Slide 8 Image 1 Ottawa Slide 8 Image 2 Beijing Slide 8 Image 3

The Proposal Route Rules: 1. Only buses which carry 20 People Shall be Allowed on the Bus Route. 2. The Bus Route Must make all stops. Infrastructure Changes New Street and Commercial Avenue, on street parking will be removed, and replaced by a bus lane in each direction. Hamilton Street to Albany Street along George Street, a painted bus lane should be in each direction . A bus for this concept plan shall be defined as a vehicle which a carrying capacity of twenty-five or more individuals, either for profit or free, will supply transit indiscriminately for the population. The Bus corridor in New Brunswick should be implemented over an the area of study as follows: Between Hamilton Street and Albany Street along George Street, a painted bus lane should be implemented in each direction with a major bus shelter installed at the stairs of the train station on Somerset Street. Traffic lights on Albany Street should be calibrated to prioritize north and south bound traffic in order to help relieve stress of the bus lane Between Albany Street and New Street, George Street will be reserved for vehicles making with twenty-five or more passengers who are making transit stops in New Brunswick. The traffic lights in this area will be converted to flashing lights. Buses along George Street will have a constant yellow flashing light while traffic crossing George Street will have a constant red flashing light. New Street traffic light would be calibrated to prioritize travel across George Street. The area will include a major bus stop at the Triangle Park, and a minor bus stop between Church and Paterson Streets. Between New Street and Commercial Avenue, on street parking will be removed, and replaced by a bus lane in each direction. Another major bus stop will be built near the corner of Commercial Avenue. Commercial Avenue and Remsen cross traffic will be prioritized at those traffic lights. Between Commercial Avenue and Nichol Avenue, a bus lane shall be painted in each direction with a major stop at the intersection of Nichol and George Street. Between Albany Street and New Street, George Street traffic lights in this area will be converted to flashing lights.

Price Strength Stops Signs Slide 10: Image 1 Strength Slide 10: Image 3 Stops The costs reflect closing George Street as the sole BRT route for New Brunswick. The cost of a bus lane would include the price for the traffic signs necessary to inform motorist of the passenger requirement to travel in the bus lane. The cost of such signs would be about $10.00 per sign, for approximately 40 signs. Therefore, that cost should not exceed $400. The route should maintain bus approximately five bus stops. Four stops costing $1000, and one central stop that would cost $2000. All other costs of the system can be integrated into great city cooperation. This brings the grand total for the project to $6400 plus labor and street paint. Signs Slide 10: Image 2

Perfect Together Thank You The objective of this project is to raise the level of mobility and access in the city of New Brunswick while minimizing cost to government and institutions. Perfect Together

Image Bibliography Slide 1: Image 1: http://www.mdot.state.md.us/bin/v/p/BRT%20cover%20bus.jpg Slide 3: Image 1:http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/24/Trafficjamdelhi.jpg/800px-Trafficjamdelhi.jpg Slide 3: Image 2: http://www.streetsblog.org/wp-content/uploads/2007/04_09/london_pedspace2.jpg Slide 4: Image 1: http://www.kkcsworld.com/Houston%20Light%20Rail.jpg Slide 4: Image 2:http://www.theage.com.au/ffximage/2006/09/02/knCOPENHAGEN_wideweb__470x337,0.jpg Slide 4: Image 3: http://www.globaltelematics.com/padelford/brtpugetsound.htm Slide 6: Image 1: http://www.lightrailnow.org/images/anh-mon-disney-monorail-trn-bmway-drippan.jpg Slide 8: Image 1: http://www.wpclipart.com/travel/US_Road_Signs/regulation/reg_4/one_way_2.png Slide 8: Image 2: http://www.fta.dot.gov/about/about_FTA_2451.html Slide 8: Image 3: http://www.edmontonprt.com/ottawa%20brt.jpg Slide 10: Image 1: http://www.getdowntown.org/images/busshelter.JPG Slide 10: Image 2: http://blog.syracuse.com/shelflife/2007/08/large_labor.jpg Slide 10: Image 3: http://www.freefoto.com/preview/41-01-53?ffid=41-01-53