Alternative Turbulence Correction Methods

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PCWG 9 th Meeting: 12 December Glasgow Introduction, Agenda and Review of Actions.
Advertisements

Introduction: The General Linear Model b b The General Linear Model is a phrase used to indicate a class of statistical models which include simple linear.
1 BINARY CHOICE MODELS: LOGIT ANALYSIS The linear probability model may make the nonsense predictions that an event will occur with probability greater.
Regression Analysis Using Excel. Econometrics Econometrics is simply the statistical analysis of economic phenomena Here, we just summarize some of the.
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011 Muhammad Ali, Jovica V. Milanović Muhammad Ali – United Kingdom – RIF Session 4 – 0528 Probabilistic Assessment Of Wind.
Development of Empirical Models From Process Data
Transforms What does the word transform mean?. Transforms What does the word transform mean? –Changing something into another thing.
Chris Slinger, John Medley, Rhys Evans Use of nacelle lidar data to explore impact of non-linear averaging
Power Curve Working Group Overview
1 PCWG Peter Stuart 02 September Agenda (1) 2 Morning Session: 10am-1pm – “Welcome” Peter Stuart (RES) – “Review of Actions.
PCWG 9 th Meeting December Glasgow PCWG 2015 Roadmap: Detailed Survey Results.
LiDAR analysis at a site with simple terrain Alex Clerc, Lee Cameron Tuesday 2 nd September
Investment Analysis and Portfolio management Lecture: 24 Course Code: MBF702.
3D Power Deviation Matrix PCWG Meeting – New Orleans, LA. September 14, 2015 Alex Head.
Author(s): Brenda Gunderson, Ph.D., 2011 License: Unless otherwise noted, this material is made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution–Non-commercial–Share.
The Normal Probability Distribution
Extrapolation of Extreme Response for Wind Turbines based on Field Measurements Authors: Henrik Stensgaard Toft, Aalborg University, Denmark John Dalsgaard.
ECE 7800: Renewable Energy Systems
EWEC2007 Milano, 8 May 2007 Extrapolation of extreme loads acc. to IEC Ed.3 in comparison with the physics of real turbine response Dirk Steudel,
3.2 Least Squares Regression Line. Regression Line Describes how a response variable changes as an explanatory variable changes Formula sheet: Calculator.
Far Shore Wind Climate Modelling Background Far shore wind conditions are expected to be favorable for wind energy power production due to increased mean.
How Errors Propagate Error in a Series Errors in a Sum Error in Redundant Measurement.
A New Theoretical Basis for Describing Low Turbulence Wind Turbine Performance Peter Stuart PCWG Meeting – 26 June 2015.
Random Variable The outcome of an experiment need not be a number, for example, the outcome when a coin is tossed can be 'heads' or 'tails'. However, we.
Variability Introduction to Statistics Chapter 4 Jan 22, 2009 Class #4.
PCWG 15 th Meeting December 2015 – Kings Langley PCWG 2016 Roadmap: Detailed Survey Results.
Upflow correction method EWEA Power Curve Working Group London, 2015 December.
PCWG-Share-01 Initial Results PCWG Meeting Kings Langley 9 th December 2015 Peter Stuart (RES), Lee Cameron (RES), Alex Clerc (RES) & Andy Clifton (NREL),
Measurements and Their Analysis. Introduction Note that in this chapter, we are talking about multiple measurements of the same quantity Numerical analysis.
Resource Analysis. Objectives of Resource Assessment Discussion The subject of the second part of the analysis is to dig more deeply into some of the.
1 BINARY CHOICE MODELS: LOGIT ANALYSIS The linear probability model may make the nonsense predictions that an event will occur with probability greater.
Business Calculus Derivative Definition. 1.4 The Derivative The mathematical name of the formula is the derivative of f with respect to x. This is the.
Chapter 14 Introduction to Regression Analysis. Objectives Regression Analysis Uses of Regression Analysis Method of Least Squares Difference between.
Understanding the Power Curve Interpolation Issue Power Curve Working Group, , Hamburg Axel Albers.
11-1 Copyright © 2014, 2011, and 2008 Pearson Education, Inc.
PCWG-Share-01 Current Status PCWG Meeting Hamburg 10 th March 2016 Peter Stuart (RES) and Andy Clifton (NREL), on behalf of the Power Curve Working Group.
Higher Maths 1 3 Differentiation1 The History of Differentiation Differentiation is part of the science of Calculus, and was first developed in the 17.
PCWG Intelligence Sharing Initiative Update
PCWG Intelligence Sharing Initiative Update 13 December 2016
Virtual University of Pakistan
Chapter 13 Simple Linear Regression
The simple linear regression model and parameter estimation
Statistical analysis.
Lesson 8: Basic Monte Carlo integration
SUR-2250 Error Theory.
QM222 Class 9 Section A1 Coefficient statistics
PCWG 2016 Roadmap & Meeting Overview
Results from the Offshore Wind Accelerator (OWA) Power Curve Validation using LiDAR Project Lee Cameron, Alex Clerc, Peter Stuart, Simon Feeney, Ian Couchman.
Statistical Data Analysis - Lecture /04/03
Power curve loss adjustments at AWS Truepower: a 2016 update
Normal Distribution.
Statistical analysis.
Introduction to Statistics for the Social Sciences SBS200 - Lecture Section 001, Spring 2017 Room 150 Harvill Building 9:00 - 9:50 Mondays, Wednesdays.
Production in the Short Run
Power Curve Interpolation, What We’ve Learnt?
Combining Random Variables
Normal Distribution Links Standard Deviation The Normal Distribution
When will we see people of negative height?
6-1 Introduction To Empirical Models
Horndon SMER 29th November 2011.
Virtual University of Pakistan
Simple Linear Regression and Correlation
Summary (Week 1) Categorical vs. Quantitative Variables
Summary (Week 1) Categorical vs. Quantitative Variables
The Normal Distribution
Test 2 Covers Topics 12, 13, 16, 17, 18, 14, 19 and 20 Skipping Topics 11 and 15.
Normal Distribution.
Unit 2 - Derivatives.
REGRESSION ANALYSIS 11/28/2019.
Presentation transcript:

Alternative Turbulence Correction Methods Some Early Thoughts Peter Stuart PCWG Meeting – 26 June 2015

Modified IEC Turbulence Correction

Power Curve Simulation Method Concept: a simulation method which can generate a power curve at any required turbulence. Note: as said previously the simulated power at a given turbulence is trusted to define a correction (from one turbulence to another), but not trusted to defined the absolute value at given turbulence. Hypothesize: that we can define a zero turbulence power curve which gives the ‘instantaneous’ power of a wind turbine. Zero Turb Power Wind Speed Illustration of instantaneous wind speed. Turbulence Intensity = Std Dev / Mean (of instantaneous values) Assume: the power output perfectly follows the zero turbulence power curve for each instantaneous wind speed value. Note: we will explain later how to calculate the zero turbulence power curve.

Power Curve Simulation Method Don’t worry we haven’t explained how to derive the zero turbulence power curve yet (we’ll do this later) Starting Point: A zero turbulence power curve Values of wind speed and turbulence intensity End Point: Simulated power at a given power curve and turbulence intensity In place of using instantaneous wind speed values we assume that the variation of wind speed within the ten minute period is described by a normal distribution as follows: Mean = 10-minute Wind Speed Mean Std Dev = (10-minute Wind Speed Mean) * (10-minute Turbulence Intensity) Zero Turbulence Power Normal Distribution (for 10minute period) Interpolate the zero turbulence power curve at every wind speed in the probability distribution (0 to 100m/s in 0.1m/s steps) Take the sum product of the interpolated probability distribution and the interpolated zero turb power values: = Σ × Simulated Power Zero Turb Power Probability

Behaviour of Zero Turbulence Power Curve at the Power Curve Knee At the power curve knee turbulence causes the 10-minute average power to fall below the zero turbulence (instantaneous) power (knee degradation) Zero Turb Power Wind Speed Turbulence (variation in instantaneous wind speed) 10-minute average wind speed value 10-minute average power value In the above illustration the 10-minute average value is exactly at the rated wind speed of the zero turbulence curve. Therefore half of the ten minute period is at rated power and half below rated power. Hence the ten-minute average power is less than the rated power. Note: mathematically speaking we can say this behaviour is because the second derivative of the power curve at the knee (with respect to wind speed) is negative.

Behaviour of Zero Turbulence Power Curve at the Power Curve Ankle At the power curve ankle turbulence causes the 10-minute average power to be above the zero turbulence (instantaneous) power. Zero Turb Power Wind Speed Zero turbulence power Turbulence (variation in instantaneous wind speed) 10-minute average wind speed value 10-minute average power value The above effect is essentially the inverse of the knee behaviour. Note: mathematically speaking we can say this behaviour is because the second derivative of the power curve at the ankle (with respect to wind speed) is positive.

Overview of Impact of Applying Turbulence Correction (Resource Assessment Context) = - Correction (Simulated Power at Site Turb) (Simulated Power at Reference Turb) Wind Speed Turbulence High Ankle Knee Inflection Wind Speed Positive Correction (Performance Gain) Negative Correction (Performance Degradation) Reference Turbulence Negative Correction (Performance Degradation) Positive Correction (Performance Gain) Low Low High

IEC Turbulence Correction The fundamental premise of the Turbulence Correction defined in the current draft of IEC61400-12-1 is that a correction can defined as follows:   PTarget_TI = PRef_TI + δP δP = STarget_TI - SRef_TI where: P is the power S is the simulated power For more details and worked examples of this method please visit www.pcwg.org

IEC Turbulence Correction > Zero Turbulence Curve The simulated power is calculated using a ‘zero turbulence power curve’. We can express the turbulence correction as: δP = STarget_TI[Z] - SRef_TI[Z] An initial guess is made of the zero turbulence power curve (ZInitial) based upon the CPMax, cut-in wind speed and rated power of the reference turbulence power curve. The final zero turbulence power curve is then calculated by deriving a correction to take the reference turbulence power curve to the target turbulence using the initial zero turbulence power curve ZFinal = PRef_TI +( STarget_TI[ZInitial] - SRef_TI[ZInitial]) Using the functional notation (whereby square brackets denote an input function)

Proposed Relaxation Factor Validation of the Turbulence Correction has both demonstrated its effectiveness and identified some shortcomings.). One key observation is the tendency for overcorrection of the knee of the power curve in high turbulence. The proposed modified method attempts to adjust the performance by introducing a ‘relaxation factor’: δP = (1+a) × (STarget_TI[Z] - SRef_TI[Z])

δP = (1+a) × (STarget_TI[Z] - SRef_TI[Z]) Relaxation Factor δP = (1+a) × (STarget_TI[Z] - SRef_TI[Z]) where a is a step function of both turbulence intensity and wind speed a TI Wind Speed Range a1 TI < TILower U > USaddle (High Turbulence, High Speed) a2 TI > TIUpper (Low Turbulence, High Speed) a3 U < USaddle (High Turbulence, Low Speed) a4 (Low Turbulence, Low Speed) where a1, a2, a3 & a4 are fitted to observations.

Low TI ‘Empirical Extra Correction’

Measured Power Deviation Matrix: Deviation vs TI and Wind Speed Introduction Observed wind turbine performance Measured Power Deviation Matrix: Deviation vs TI and Wind Speed Existing correction methods (REWS and IEC Turbulence Correction) do not fully describe behaviour at low/medium wind speeds and low turbulence.

IEC Turbulence Correction The proposed correction attempts to describe the residual correction necessary after the Rotor Equivalent wind speed (REWS) and Turbulence Correction (Renormalisation) methods have been applied. The methodology involves the following quantities. x’ = xsaddle – x t’ = (treference – t) / treference   where: x = windspeed xsaddle = turbine saddle (inflection) wind speed i.e. somewhere between cut-in and rated. t = site turbulence treference = power curve reference turbulence

Proposed Correction The loss is then calculated as follows:   IF x’ >0 and t’ >0 loss = A*x’ + B ELSE loss = 0 where: A = -2% * tanh(2t’) B = -3% * (e3/2t’-1) x’ = xsaddle – x t’ = (treference – t) / treference T’ A vs data (fitted) B vs data (fitted) Value