Date of download: 10/9/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Date of download: 5/28/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Application of an Iterative High Order Difference Scheme Along With an Explicit.
Advertisements

Date of download: 6/2/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Thermodynamic Equilibrium Model and Exergy Analysis of a Biomass Gasifier J. Energy.
Date of download: 6/22/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Effects of Fuel Temperature on Injection Process and Combustion of Dimethyl Ether.
Date of download: 6/24/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Infill-Drilling Potential in Tight Gas Reservoirs J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2012;135(1):
Date of download: 6/26/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Numerical Simulation of Complex Fracture Network Development by Hydraulic Fracturing.
Date of download: 6/27/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Smart Glass and Its Potential in Energy Savings J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2013;136(1):
Date of download: 7/3/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Modeling of Entropy Generation in Turbulent Premixed Flames for Reynolds Averaged.
Date of download: 7/9/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Experimental Investigation of Boiler Pressure Behavior in Closed-Open-Closed System.
Date of download: 7/16/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Study on Hardness and Elastic Modulus of Surface Nanostructured 304 Stainless.
Date of download: 9/16/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Evaluation of Heat and Mass Transfer Models for Sizing Low-Temperature Kalina.
Date of download: 9/17/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling of a Catalytic Flat Plate Fuel Reformer.
Date of download: 9/17/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Thermal Performance Prediction of a Biomass Based Integrated Gasification Combined.
Date of download: 9/19/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Comparative Analysis of Different Configuration Domestic Refrigerators: A Computational.
Date of download: 9/30/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/2/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/6/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/8/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Measures of Bulk and Grain Strain in Deformation Processes
The Tilted Rocket Rig: A Rayleigh–Taylor Test Case for RANS Models1
From: Boilers Optimal Control for Maximum Load Change Rate
Date of download: 10/16/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/17/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/17/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/17/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/19/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/20/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/21/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/22/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/23/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/23/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Toughness-Dominated Hydraulic Fracture in Permeable Rocks
Date of download: 10/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/1/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/1/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/2/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/2/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/3/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/6/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Numerical Simulations of Peristaltic Mixing
Date of download: 11/7/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/7/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/11/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/11/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/15/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Recommendations for Energy–Water–Food Nexus Problems
Energy Conservation Education: Major Considerations*
Date of download: 12/17/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/17/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/18/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/19/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/20/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: A New MPPT Algorithm for Vehicle Integrated Solar Energy System
Date of download: 12/22/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/23/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/24/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/28/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/28/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/28/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/29/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Figure Legend: From: The resolution of facial expressions of emotion
Date of download: 12/31/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/31/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 1/1/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 1/2/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: The Use of Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles for Peak Shaving
From: Variational Integrators for Structure-Preserving Filtering
Presentation transcript:

Date of download: 10/9/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Modeling of Hydraulic Fracture Propagation in Shale Gas Reservoirs: A Three-Dimensional, Two-Phase Model J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2016;139(1):012903-012903-13. doi:10.1115/1.4033856 Figure Legend: Visual representation of height growth model

Date of download: 10/9/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Modeling of Hydraulic Fracture Propagation in Shale Gas Reservoirs: A Three-Dimensional, Two-Phase Model J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2016;139(1):012903-012903-13. doi:10.1115/1.4033856 Figure Legend: (a) Length (ft) versus time (min) and (b) width (in.) versus time (min). The grid sizes of 0.1, 1, 10, and 100 ft are studied.

Date of download: 10/9/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Modeling of Hydraulic Fracture Propagation in Shale Gas Reservoirs: A Three-Dimensional, Two-Phase Model J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2016;139(1):012903-012903-13. doi:10.1115/1.4033856 Figure Legend: Schematic of gridding system in both fracture and matrix domain

Date of download: 10/9/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Modeling of Hydraulic Fracture Propagation in Shale Gas Reservoirs: A Three-Dimensional, Two-Phase Model J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2016;139(1):012903-012903-13. doi:10.1115/1.4033856 Figure Legend: Schematic flowchart of the three-dimensional, two-phase numerical solution

Date of download: 10/9/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Modeling of Hydraulic Fracture Propagation in Shale Gas Reservoirs: A Three-Dimensional, Two-Phase Model J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2016;139(1):012903-012903-13. doi:10.1115/1.4033856 Figure Legend: Comparison results showing favorable comparison between PKN and model developed herein for fracture height evolution through time (a), and fracture width versus time (b)

Date of download: 10/9/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Modeling of Hydraulic Fracture Propagation in Shale Gas Reservoirs: A Three-Dimensional, Two-Phase Model J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2016;139(1):012903-012903-13. doi:10.1115/1.4033856 Figure Legend: Visual representation of three-layer height growth model input values

Date of download: 10/9/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Modeling of Hydraulic Fracture Propagation in Shale Gas Reservoirs: A Three-Dimensional, Two-Phase Model J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2016;139(1):012903-012903-13. doi:10.1115/1.4033856 Figure Legend: Height growth comparison result for seven-layer case. Solid lines indicate the result from the model developed herein while square symbols represent the results from the reference model.

Date of download: 10/9/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Modeling of Hydraulic Fracture Propagation in Shale Gas Reservoirs: A Three-Dimensional, Two-Phase Model J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2016;139(1):012903-012903-13. doi:10.1115/1.4033856 Figure Legend: Vertical stress profile for each layer

Date of download: 10/9/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Modeling of Hydraulic Fracture Propagation in Shale Gas Reservoirs: A Three-Dimensional, Two-Phase Model J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2016;139(1):012903-012903-13. doi:10.1115/1.4033856 Figure Legend: Height comparison between the model developed herein and DFN. (Left: height versus network length from the model developed herein and the black and grey to white color bar indicates the width of a fracture in ft; right: height versus width of the fracture at the perforation (primary fracture) from DFN. The contour map shows the width of a primary fracture as length increases.)

Date of download: 10/9/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Modeling of Hydraulic Fracture Propagation in Shale Gas Reservoirs: A Three-Dimensional, Two-Phase Model J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2016;139(1):012903-012903-13. doi:10.1115/1.4033856 Figure Legend: Final fracture network comparison (top view). Top network is from Jacot's result and the bottom is from the model developed herein. The horizontal well is located along the zero in x-axis and perforation is placed at (0,0).

Date of download: 10/9/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Modeling of Hydraulic Fracture Propagation in Shale Gas Reservoirs: A Three-Dimensional, Two-Phase Model J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2016;139(1):012903-012903-13. doi:10.1115/1.4033856 Figure Legend: Final fracture network characteristics (height, length, and aperture) from the model developed herein. This representation is for only half of a fracture network.

Date of download: 10/9/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Modeling of Hydraulic Fracture Propagation in Shale Gas Reservoirs: A Three-Dimensional, Two-Phase Model J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2016;139(1):012903-012903-13. doi:10.1115/1.4033856 Figure Legend: Fracture domain discretization along x-direction