TOK: A Quick Review 1/9.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Basic Terms in Logic Michael Jhon M. Tamayao.
Advertisements

Argumentation.
Text Table of Contents #5 and #8: Evaluating the Argument.
Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 More Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking
Logic and Logical Fallacies A.P. English Language.
Moral Reasoning   What is moral reasoning? Moral reasoning is ordinary critical reasoning or critical thinking applied to moral arguments.
Logic and Reasoning Panther Prep North Central High School.
Logos Formal Logic.
Basic Argumentation.
Lecture 7: Ways of Knowing - Reason. Part 1: What is reasoning? And, how does it lead to knowledge?
Time 2 hr No choice 1st six week course will be for the paper (including teasers) The 1st six week outlines attached in form of slides.
Reason: as a Way of Knowing Richard van de Lagemaat, Theory of Knowledge for the IB Diploma (Cambridge: CUP, 2005)
AP English Language and Composition
PERSUASION. “Everybody Hates Chris”
9/20/12 BR- Who are the 3 Argument Brothers (from yesterday) Today: How to Argue (Part 1) MIKVA!!
 Reason A Way of Knowing.  Logic is the beginning of wisdom, Valeris, not the end. - Spock.
Logic. What is logic? Logic (from the Ancient Greek: λογική, logike) is the use and study of valid reasoning. The study of logic features most prominently.
An Introduction to Logic And Fallacious Reasoning
INFORMAL FALLACIES The aim of this tutorial is to help you learn to recognize and resist fallacious arguments.
The construction of a formal argument
{ Methods of Persuasion Speech class.  The audience perceives the speaker as having high credibility  The audience is won over by the speaker’s evidence.
PHIL 2525 Contemporary Moral Issues Lec 2 Arguments are among us…
09/17/07 BR- What is “logic?” What does it mean to make a logical argument? Today: Logic and How to Argue (Part 1)
Deductive Reasoning. Deductive reasoning The process of logical reasoning from general principles to specific instances based on the assumed truth of.
 Induction is the process of drawing a general conclusion from incomplete evidence.  You consider evidence you have seen or heard to draw a conclusion.
Persuasive Speeches To persuade is to advocate, to ask others to accept your views. A Pocket Guide to Public Speaking.
1 WRITING THE ACADEMIC PAPER ——Logic and Argument Tao Yang
TOK: A Quick Review 1/9.
TOK: A Quick Review 1/9.
PHIL102 SUM2014, M-F12:00-1:00, SAV 264 Instructor: Benjamin Hole
Part 4 Reading Critically
09/17/08 BR- Identify the premises and the conclusion in the following deductive argument. Is it valid or invalid? All fish need gills to breath water.
Argumentation.
What is Inductive Reasoning?
Chapter 9 Warranted Inferences. Chapter 9 Warranted Inferences.
A Lesson on Rhetorical Appeals: Ethos, Pathos, Logos
Author’s Viewpoint and Strength of an Argument
3 Types of Arguments: Ethos- Establishing a reason to listen or believe the speaker. E.g., “that guy is wearing a tie so he must know what he’s saying.”
Understanding Fallacy
Relevance Premises are relevant to the conclusion when the truth of the premises provide some evidence that the conclusion is true Premises are irrelevant.
Inductive / Deductive reasoning
Topic: Logical Fallacies Objective: I will identify various logical fallacies EQ: What are the most common logical fallacies and where do they appear?
Rhetorical Appeals English III.
Chapter 17 Methods of persuasion.
Chapter 9 Persuasion.
10/28/09 BR- What is the most important factor in winning an argument
If A happens, then B happens then A must cause B
Chapter 16 and 17 Review December 8, 2008.
Chapter 3 Philosophy: Questions and theories
Logical Fallacies.
C/Maj Nicholas Schroder
Extraversion Introversion
Chapter 3 Speech Ethics.
Reasoning about Reasoning
Arguments.
The Rational Appeal Sydney Czurak Mariah Felt.
Inductive and Deductive Logic
Using Principles of Logic to Strengthen Argument Writing
Fallacious Reasoning a.k.a. Fallacy.
Fallacies.
Reading Comprehension Rocks!
Chapter 6 Reasoning Errors
Critical Thinking Lecture 2 Arguments
Logical Fallacies.
Phil2303 intro to logic.
Syllogisms and Enthymemes.
Propositional Logic 1) Introduction Copyright 2008, Scott Gray.
ID1050– Quantitative & Qualitative Reasoning
Argumentation & Persuasion
Basic Errors in Logic Featured in “Love is a Fallacy” By Max Shulman
Presentation transcript:

TOK: A Quick Review 1/9

Agenda Discuss what is coming Review the three WOKs we have already discussed – emotion, perception, language END GOAL – Remind yourself about the main ideas so that we can move on.

What’s Coming… Work Days? Still need them? Start them this week?

What’s Coming Late Work? I will grade everything handed in to me on/before January 17th

What’s Coming Last WOK – Reason The Goal– Finish is by next Thursday (might be hard with a work day and day off…)

Language ”Political language is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind.” George Orwell What does this quote mean? Do you agree or disagree with it? What are some examples from current events? What other “types” of language are there?

Language “Our language is a reflection of ourselves. A language is an exact reflection of the character and growth of its speakers.” –Cesar Chavez Do you agree or disagree? Would you choose different words if every word you spoke was tattooed on your body? Can the same be said about emotion? Are your emotions a reflection of your character?

Emotion “Your intellect may be confused, but your emotions will never lie to you.” Roger Ebert What does this quote mean? Do you agree or disagree with it? Can you connect it to your perceptions of different current events?

Perception “If ’seeing is believing’ what happened to taste, touch, sound, and smell? Did our creator really intend to favour sight over other senses? I don’t believe so.” Alex Morritt, Impromptu Scribe Is sight the most reliable of our senses?

Perception “Perception is reality to the one in the experience.” Danielle Bernock, Emerging with Wings: A True Story of Lies, Pain, and the Love That Heals Can two people have different perceptions of the same event and still be correct? Think: Current Events?

Intro To Reason 1/10

Agenda Quote Reflection Introduction to Unit End Goal – Is Reason the most reliable WOK?

Quote 1 “The head is always fooled by the heart.” –La Rochefoucauld (1613-1680) What does this quote mean? Do you agree with it? Disagree? Examples: personal life, society, current events

Reason Reason is the “gatekeeper” to all of the other WOKS Our perceptions need to make sense Our intuitions are tested by reason Our emotions are held in check Our language is intentional

Reason Reason is a part of our identity – we are rational animals (Personal/Philosophical) Rational = sitting and thinking=reason=logic Empirical=going and looking=perception=observation

Reason Empirical Rational Relies on observation and experience Relies on logic and reasoning

The Power of Reason Claim: We posses a quality of mind unmatched in nature Few of us doubt that other creatures perceive and feel and act, but reason? In the same way? Doubtful. Only our species argues with words to defend our opinions and reasons about our beliefs and their consequences.

Reason as meaning making Instrumental Value of Reasoning – to make things cogent and clear Personal Value – Society seems to have a ”craving” for sense and order We do not like a mystery for too long Because we search for the point of things, logic and reason consume our daily lives

Quote 2 “You do not reason a man out of something he was not reasoned into.” Jonathan Swift What does this quote mean? Where do you see evidence of this quote in our society? Current Events?

Quote 3 “I do not think, sir, you have any right to command me, merely because you are older than I, or because you have seen more of the world than I have; your claim to superiority depends on the use you have made of your time and experience.” Charlotte Bronte, Jane Eyre How important are ”time and experience” when it comes to the WOKs? Do you get better and filtering them with time and experience? What are some other factors that may improve your ability to filter WOKs?

Reason - Logic 1/12

Agenda Deductive Reasoning as Logic Logic as Form Practice Essay Question End Goal- Is reason a reliable way of knowledge?

Deductive Reasoning as Logic Difference between inductive and deductive reasoning Deductive Reasoning: Can be called logical Demonstration of reasons linked to a conclusion Not necessarily a demonstration of thinking (how people think is a matter for psychology; studying the correct reasoning is a matter of logic)

Logic as Form TOK Purpose: Practical applications of deductive reasoning Mostly as a way of prediction and justification

Logic as Form Strength of deduction comes from its form, not its content Bridge analogy

Logic as Form Syllogism A form of reasoning in which a conclusion is drawn from two given or assumed premises Each premise shares a term with the conclusion Each premise shares a common or middle term not present in the conclusion 1- All dogs are animals. 2- All animals have four legs. Conclusion: All dogs have four legs.

Classic Syllogism - Valid All men are mortal. True Proposition/Major Premise Socrates is a man. True Proposition/Minor Premise Socrates is mortal Conclusion VALID

Classic Syllogism – INVALID All men are mortal. True Proposition/Major Premise Socrates is mortal. True Proposition/ Minor Premise Socrates is a man. Conclusion INVALID

Difference? The argument of the second has changed. Therefore, you can see, it is the form, not the content In the second one, the conclusion DID NOT NECESSARILY follow from the premises given.

VALID INVALID If I study, I will pass. I studied. Therefore, I passed. If I study, I will pass. I chose not to study. Therefore, I did not pass

It can get more confusing.. Even if a premise (or both!) is not true, the conclusion can still be VALID

Example The moon is made of green cheese. My arm is part of the moon. False proposition/major premise My arm is part of the moon. False proposition/minor premise My arm is made of green cheese. False proposition/ conclusion VALID

Logic as Form Format matters, not accuracy The argument may be valid by form alone “The upshot is that validity has its appeal independent of truth, which warns us to be wary of those dealing in lies, but winning the day through the power of logic.”

Logic as Form “Just as the Devil can quote scripture in order to confound believers, so we should recognize that there are those who stand to gain by using logic to distort truth and spread lies.”

Practice Essay Title Thinking is larger than reasoning and reasoning is larger than logic. Discuss.

WOK: Reason - Continued 1/18

Agenda Based on Weekly Reflections, clear some things up Inductive Reasoning End Goal – How does reasoning work with other WOKs to help you gain knowledge

Weekly Reflection Clear Ups… Valid does not equal true. An argument can be valid based on its form For what we did last week, you are not worried if the conclusion is true, you are thinking about its validity

Weekly Reflection Clear Ups.. Reasoning is like an umbrella – it is the larger term Logic is a specific way to reason Deductive Reasoning is a specific way to reason

Reasoning Last week = deductive Today = Inductive FAR LESS COMLPICATED THAN DEDUCTIVE

Reasoning Deduction goes from general to particular Major Premise to minor premise to conclusion Induction goes from the particular to general

Inductive Reasoning Inductive Reasoning is… Less technical Less formal Less rule-governed THUS – open to exception

Inductive Reasoning Our inductive inferences (Generalizations) are only probable to a degree

Inductive Reasoning The reasoning we use the most – but we do not even realize it We add up our experiences and draw generalizations from them

Inductive Reasoning Inductive reasoning is how we create our expectations of what the world will be like the next minute, the next day, or forever

Inductive Reasoning Car/Red light example..

Inductive Reasoning A generalization is only as strong as its ability to withstand exceptions White Swan example Scientists – they test the strengths of their findings to falsify them

Reasoning and Generalizations Sloppy reasoning leads to stereotypes and fallacies

Sloppy Reasoning Mistakes of inductive reasoning: Jumping to conclusion/hasty generalization Ad hominem (against person, not position) Post hoc (A occurs before B, therefore A is the cause of B) Slippery Slope (extreme hypotheticals) Appeal to pity (distract from truth by using pity) False analogy (alike in 1 or 2 ways, must be alike in others) Red Herring (a clue that is intended to be misleading)

Prescribed Essay We are more likely to be mistaken in our generalizations than in our particular observations. Agree?

WOK: Reason - Continued 1/19

Agenda Discuss knowledge question pertaining to prescribed essay Talk about induction/deduction together Practice using and locating inductive/deductive reasoning End Goal – Why is reason the gatekeeper to other WOKs?

Knowledge Question With your partner, share out your knowledge question. Together, choose the strongest. Make sure you can justify WHY it is the strongest. Make sure you can also connect back to TOK Essay Title.

Knowledge Questions Let’s share out and evaluate/critique some of them

Deduction and Induction Can deduction and induction work together? Do our minds shift between the two?

Deduction and Induction Go back to the study/pass test example from last week If I study, I will pass. I studied. Therefore, I passed

Deduction and Induction With that example, you are using reason, perception, and memory all intertwined together Hypo-deductive method – combines deductive and inductive methods Used in science!

Hypo-deductive Method? USING SCIENCE? Major premise is a scientific law When iron is exposed to oxygen, it rusts. Minor Premise is an observed fact This iron was exposed to oxygen. Conclusion is a prediction or expectation Therefore, it will rust.

Sooo… Deductive reasoning is different from inductive reasoning HOWEVER – they can work together. Especially when YOU are creating a premise

Exercise 1 It’s snowing, so school will be closed tomorrow. What is the missing first premise?

Exercise 1 First Premise: When it snows, school closes. It’s snowing, so school will be closed.

Exercise 2 When it snows, schools closes. And sure enough it closed. What is the missing premise?

Exercise 2 When it snows, school closes. It is snowing. And sure enough it closed.

Exercise 3 When it snows, school closes. And it snowed. What is the missing conclusion?

Exercise 3 Conclusion: Therefore, school is closed.

Ethics Ethics and Reason?

Ethics and Reason Ethics and logic are not a familiar pairing (ethics and science are VERY familiar)

Ethics and Reasoning Inductive/deductive reasoning inform a lot of our daily activity Some people form moral assumptions about what is right and wrong and those become principles that they live by

Ethics and Reasoning Principles can be the same as generalizations and used as major premises Scale a single situation against premise - you can make ethical decisions All stealing is wrong – major premise

Exercise Read the passage Try to find the presence of inductive and deductive reasoning (bonus – you might find other ways of knowledge as well!)