Part II: Case Studies and Statistical Results

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Jet Stream Compression Turbulence Mountain wave Icing IFR ceiling and visibility CWSU Products MIS CWA PIREPS Questions and Comments Created 9/14/2008.
Advertisements

U.S. Turbulence Program Update
Workshop on Aviation Turbulence 28 August 2013 NCAR, Boulder, CO
NAM-WRF Verification of Subtropical Jet and Turbulence DOUGLAS N. BEHNE National Weather Service, Aviation Weather Center, Kansas City, MO.
Mountain Operations. REFERENCES FM 1-202, Environmental Flight, February 1983 TC 1-218, Aircrew Training Manual Utility Aircraft, March 1993 Aircraft.
Aviation Meteorology A Northwest Airlines Perspective Tom Fahey, Manager Meteorology American Meteorological Society - Memphis Chapter 20 September 2005.
1 Localized Aviation Model Output Statistics Program (LAMP): Improvements to convective forecasts in response to user feedback Judy E. Ghirardelli National.
The use of satellite water vapor imagery and model output to diagnose and forecast turbulent mountain waves Nathan Uhlenbrock Steve Ackerman Wayne Feltz.
Weather Information for the Ballooning Community Jennifer McNatt Lead Forecaster National Weather Service Tampa Bay Office.
Lecture 12:Approach Lighting System
Verification has been undertaken for the 3 month Summer period (30/05/12 – 06/09/12) using forecasts and observations at all 205 UK civil and defence aerodromes.
Ch 4 - Wind Introduction Introduction –The motion of air is important in many weather- producing processes. –Moving air carries heat, moisture, and pollutants.
On the relationship of in-cloud convective turbulence and total lightning Wiebke Deierling, John Williams, Sarah Al-Momar, Bob Sharman, Matthias Steiner.
Data Integration: Assessing the Value and Significance of New Observations and Products John Williams, NCAR Haig Iskenderian, MIT LL NASA Applied Sciences.
1 Federal Aviation Administration Turbulence-related Efforts Within the FAA July 27, 2010 Interagency Weather Research Review Turbulence Facilitator: Tammy.
The NWS/NCAR “Forecaster Over the Loop” Fort Worth Operational Demonstration Human Enhancement of a Thunderstorm Nowcasting System Eric Nelson, Rita Roberts,
Operational Forecasting of Turbulence in Radial Bands around Mesoscale Convective Systems (MCS’s) 06 August 2013 Midwest US Melissa Thomas, Lead & Training.
THE OPERATIONAL PREDICTION OF MOUNTAIN WAVE TURBULENCE (MWT) USING A HIGH RESOLUTION NONHYDROSTATIC MESOSCALE MODEL Bob Sharman, Bill Hall, Rod Frehlich,
Turbulence forecasting goals Completely automated – no human-in-the-loop “Operational”, i.e., 24x7 Rapid updates Easy to understand output for airline.
Hastings, Nebraska National Weather Service Considerations for TAF Composition UNK Aviation Department October 12, 2006.
SIGMET These messages are intended to provide short term warnings of certain potentially hazardous weather phenomena. These messages are intended to provide.
Aviation/Turbulence Forecasting. Aviation Weather Center (AWC) National Weather Service office Turbulence, flight rules, upper level progs.
Julie Haggerty National Center for Atmospheric Research Friends and Partners of Aviation Weather October July 2014.
Severe turbulence cases NOMEK Aviation requirements ICAO Annex 3 – “The objective of meteorological service for international air navigation shall.
© Crown copyright Met Office Probabilistic turbulence forecasts from ensemble models and verification Philip Gill and Piers Buchanan NCAR Aviation Turbulence.
1 Flash Floods in the South-Central U.S.: What are They and How Can we Forecast Them? Matt Kelsch Thursday, 30 March 2000 UCAR Cooperative Program for.
What set the atmosphere in motion?
HEMS Weather Summit – 21 March The Outlook for National-Scale Ceiling and Visibility Products Paul Herzegh Lead, FAA/AWRP National C&V Team.
1 NWS and GA Safety National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Cyndie Abelman NOAA/NWS Aviation Weather Services July 22, 2014.
© Crown copyright Met Office WAFC CAT verification Objective verification of GRIB CAT forecasts Dr Philip G Gill, WAFS Workshop on the use and visualisation.
5.32 Estimating regions of tropopause folding and clear-air turbulence with the GOES water vapor channel Tony Wimmers, Wayne Feltz Cooperative Institute.
GOES-R Aviation Weather Applications Frederick R. Mosher NWS/NCEP Aviation Weather Center.
MeteoExpert workstation.Visualization of new gridded forecasts MeteoExpert workstation. Visualization of new gridded forecasts.
Identifying CIT cases using in situ data and satellite cloud top temperatures Jamie Wolff NCAR/RAL CIT mini-workshop Oct 12, 2006.
1) Verification of individual predictors Development of improved turbulence forecasts for aviation Debi Turp © Crown copyright Met Office and the Met Office.
National Convective Weather Forecast (NCWF) Collaborators: C. Mueller, J. Pinto, D. Ahijevych, D. Megenhardt, N. Rehak Stan Trier, NCAR
1. Major Upgrades All diagnostics mapped to Eddy Dissipation RateAll diagnostics mapped to Eddy Dissipation Rate ADDS now displays EDR valuesADDS now.
Inversions. Usually temperature decreases with height by approximately 5.5 C per km But with high pressure, clear or near clear skies, and light winds,
Influences of Large-Scale Moist Convection on Turbulence in Clear Air (CAT) Stan Trier NCAR, Boulder Outline: 1)Observations and High Resolution Simulations.
Gridded WAFS Icing Verification System Matt Strahan WAFC Washintgon.
New developments in the Graphical Turbulence Guidance (GTG) product
Methodology n Step 1: Identify MOG (EDR ≥ 0.25) observations at cruising altitude (≥ FL250). n Step 2: Account for ascending/descending flights by filtering.
Developing GFS-based MOS Thunderstorm Guidance for Alaska Phillip E. Shafer* and Kathryn Gilbert Meteorological Development Laboratory, NWS, NOAA
GEO Turbulence Detection: Tropopause Folds and Clear Air Turbulence Tony Wimmers Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies (CIMSS), UW-Madison.
RUC Convective Probability Forecasts using Ensembles and Hourly Assimilation Steve Weygandt Stan Benjamin Forecast Systems Laboratory NOAA.
Fog/Low Clouds: Formation and Dissipation Scott Lindstrom University of Wisconsin-Madison CIMSS (Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies)
“Friends/Partners in Aviation Weather” Forum NBAA Convention – Orlando
Weather Information for Pilots
Turbulence in the National Airspace System
How do models work? METR 2021: Spring 2009 Lab 10.
New developments in the Graphical Turbulence Guidance (GTG) product
5. Temperature Structure
BASED ON SPONTANEOUS IMBALANCE PART I: APPLICATION OF THEORY
Title: Air Pressure Notes
Tony Wimmers, Wayne Feltz
Usage Guidelines for Jeopardy PowerPoint Game
Aviation Forecast Guidance from the RUC
Turbulence-Related Products Robert Sharman NCAR/RAP
SCIENCE MISSION DIRECTORATE
Industry Update on Turbulence
Katelyn Barber University of North Dakota
The FAA Aviation Weather Research Program’s
Studies of convectively induced turbulence
Warm-Up – 4/17 – 10 minutes Utilizing your notes and past knowledge answer the following questions: Name the four type of weather observations. What are.
Upper Air Observations The atmosphere is 3D and can not be understood or forecast by using surface data alone ATM 101W2019.
Turbulence forecasting from upper-air data
Quality Assessment Activities
P2.5 Sensitivity of Surface Air Temperature Analyses to Background and Observation Errors Daniel Tyndall and John Horel Department.
Short Range Ensemble Prediction System Verification over Greece
17 Questions on Atmosphere and Weather
Presentation transcript:

Part II: Case Studies and Statistical Results A New Direction in Clear-Air Turbulence Forecasting Based on Spontaneous Imbalance Part II: Case Studies and Statistical Results Donald McCann McCann Aviation Weather Research, Inc. Overland Park, Kansas don@mccannawr.com John A. Knox Faculty of Engineering, University of Georgia Athens, Georgia Paul D. Williams Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Reading UK CASE STUDY STATISTICAL RESULTS A major outbreak of upper level turbulence occurred during the morning on 24 October 2007. We counted 317 turbulence pilot reports between 1100 UTC and 1300 UTC. We tested our method with 9542 text pilot reports carefully collected between 1500 UTC and 1700 UTC on each day from 3 November 2005 and 26 March 2006. PIREPs near convection, in mountain waves, or in the planetary boundary layer were not included. The maximum TKE dissipation in the layer with the PIREP FL computed from the corresponding 1-hour RUC2 forecast verifying at 1600 UTC within 50 km of the PIREP location validated the PIREP. 3-hr RUC2 300mb forecast from 0900 UTC. 3-hr RUC2 forecast verifying 1200 UTC 24 Oct 2007 of Lighthill-Ford Radiation (blue) and Richardson number (pink) at FL290. The Lighthill-Ford method’s Relative Operating Characteristic curve is much closer to the upper right corner than Graphical Turbulence Guidance (GTG). The highest score for the differentiation between no turbulence and positive turbulence is for a zero threshold. In other words, when there is positive TKE dissipation forecast, aircraft will likely feel some turbulence. At MODERATE and SEVERE intensities the Heidke Skill Score peaks with higher TKE dissipation; this indicates that the higher the forecast rate, the stronger the expected turbulence. For turbulence at all flight levels our application reaches the U.S. government goal with a PODyes for MODERATE or greater turbulence of .831 and a PODyes of SMOOTH of .851. 3-hr RUC2 forecast of our TKE Dissipation, starting in the lower right clockwise, at FL170, FL230, FL290, and FL350 verifying 1200 UTC 24 Oct 2007. Color fills roughly correspond to LIGHT (blue), MODERATE (yellow), and SEVERE (red) turbulence. Pilot reports within 2000 ft and one hour of verifying altitude and time are plotted in standard notation. Using Lighthill-Ford Radiation as a gravity wave trigger, we are able to skillfully forecast turbulence at all flight levels.