Comparison of the correlation of the Selvester QRS scoring system with cardiac contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging–measured acute myocardial infarct size in patients with and without thrombolytic therapy Walther C.M. Rovers, MD, Marit C. van Boreen, MD, Madeleine Robinson, MD, Thomas N. Martin, MD, Charles Maynard, PhD, Galen S. Wagner, MD, Anton P.M. Gorgels, MD Journal of Electrocardiology Volume 42, Issue 2, Pages 139-144 (March 2009) DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2008.12.004 Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions
Fig. 1 The distribution of the patients within the different ceMRI-documented MI locations whose ECG met the criteria for STEMI or STEMI equivalent, or did not meet either of those criteria (non-STEMI). Journal of Electrocardiology 2009 42, 139-144DOI: (10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2008.12.004) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions
Fig. 2 The mean infarct sizes measured by ceMRI and estimated by Selvester QRS Score both in patients who did not receive thrombolytic therapy and those who did. Journal of Electrocardiology 2009 42, 139-144DOI: (10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2008.12.004) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions
Fig. 3 Infarct size on ECG vs infarct size on MRI in both groups including the trend lines. The identity lines are also present in the figure. Journal of Electrocardiology 2009 42, 139-144DOI: (10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2008.12.004) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions