SCCTP Basic Serial Cataloging Workshop

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Modeling Continuing Resources in FRBR [and More] Judith A. Kuhagen CPSO, Library of Congress FRBR Workshop - OCLC May 2, 2005.
Advertisements

RDA Test Train the Trainer Module 2: Structure [Content as of Mar. 31, 2010]
Teaching RDA Train-the-trainer course for RDA: Resource Description and Access Presented by the National Library of Australia September – November 2012.
5: Related works, expressions, manifestations Relationship Designators in MARC 21 Citing linking relationships in MARC 21 Common serial relationships 1.
Serials/Integrating Resources Charlene Chou March 18 th,
RDA Test “Train the Trainer” Module 6: Identifying Families [Content as of Mar. 31, 2010]
Session 6 Issues in Cataloging Loose-leaf Integrating Resources Original content by Rhonda K. Lawrence Head of Cataloging, UCLA Law Library.
MARC 21, FRBR, RDA Review terminology (especially for non-native English speakers) Conceptual models Elements Attributes Future: Probably not a bib record,
Microform/Reproduction Charlene Chou at the CEAL RDA Workshop March 19 th,
RDA & Serials. RDA Toolkit CONSER RDA Cataloging Checklist for Textual Serials (DRAFT) CONSER RDA Core Elements Where’s that Tool? CONSER RDA Cataloging.
3: Cataloging Preliminaries Process of cataloging a serial – Basis for identification of the resource – Source of information – Identifying manifestation.
6: Identifying Works and Expressions Terminology Constructing the authorized access point for a serial work Additions to authorized access points Authorized.
Module B: Identifying works User task = identify.
Module 8 Series in AACR2 and RDA: What’s the same? What’s different?
Module 17 Describing Serials and Integrating Resources RDA Training University of Nevada, Reno February 2013.
Bibliographic Description of Web pages and Serials LIS 532. Session 4. 1.
1 Too Dynamic to Describe? NASIG Annual Conference June 2004, Milwaukee, Wis. Bonnie Parks, Oregon State Univ. Jian Wang, Portland State Univ.
IMT530- Organization of Information Resources1 Feedback Like exercises –But want more instructions and feedback on them –Wondering about grading on these.
5: Describing Carriers and Content 1.Content type 2.Media type 3.Carrier type 4.Extent 5.Describing content 6.Other content attributes 5-1.
Integrating Resources: the Cataloging of Chameleons Judith A. Kuhagen Cataloging Policy & Support Office Library of Congress Washington, D.C. U.S.A. Hong.
MARC Tags 7XX, 8XX, 9XX. How they’re used n MARC tags 7XX u Added entries u Linking fields--serials n MARC tags 8XX u Series u Holdings data u Linking.
Module 5: Relationships -- in bibliographic records and in authority records.
RDA AND AUTHORITY CONTROL Name: Hester Marais Job Title: Authority Describer Tel: Your institution's logo.
RDA Test “Train the Trainer” Module 7: Identifying Corporate Bodies [Content as of Mar. 31, 2010]
4: Identifying works and expressions Authorized access points representing works Making additions to authorized access points Authorized access points.
Module C: Identifying expressions User task: identify.
7: Basics of RDA Relationships for Serials Relationships in RDA Relationship designators Creators and other corporate bodies related to works Corporate.
Session 3 : Numbering & Publishing Statement What is relationship between field 362 and “Description based on” note? What is a “Latest issue consulted”
LC Training for RDA: Resource Description & Access Module 6: Authorities II Part 4: FRBR Group One and NARs Cooperative and Instructional Programs Division.
Continuing Resources: Serials RESOURCE DESCRIPTION AND ACCESS: A COBEC WORKSHOP FEBRUARY 3, 2014 GUY FROST VALDOSTA STATE UNIVERSITY.
Session 5 Modifying Records for Integrating Resources.
PCC RDA POST- IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES Highlights of the Task Group Report PCC Participants Meeting January 27, 2013.
5/14/2003ALAO Spring Workshop 2003 Providing Access Cataloging –Requirements –One record or separate records for multiple formats –CONSER policy for simultaneous,
Module 5: Relationships -- in bibliographic records and in authority records LC RDA for NASIG - June 1, 2011.
Cataloguing Electronic resources Prepared by the Cataloguing Team at Charles Sturt University.
CONSER RDA Bridge Training [date] Presenters : [names] 1.
6: Working with Copy & When to Create a New Record 1.
RDA Toolkit With thanks to Lori Robare (University of Oregon) and Robert Maxwell (Brigham Young University) for most of these slides.
SLIDE 1IS 257 – Fall 2007 Introduction to Description and AACR II University of California, Berkeley School of Information IS 245: Organization.
Module 8 Series in AACR2 and RDA: What’s the same? What’s different?
Module 8: Changes to RDA LC RDA for NASIG - June 1, in general and for serials.
RDA in NACO Module 6.a RDA Chapter 11: Identifying Corporate Bodies—Overview Recording the Attributes.
RDA Toolkit is an integrated, browser-based, online product that allow user to interact with a collection of cataloging-related documents and resources.
Serials Cataloging with RDA. What is a serial? A resource issued in successive parts usually bearing numbering that has no predetermined conclusion (e.g.,
2: Getting started Is this a serial? –Mode of issuance Which issue should I use? –Basis for identification of the resource What sources within this issue?
Integrating Resources Cataloging Workshop Instructors Place/Date 1-1.
RDA Compared with AACR2 Presentation given at the ALA conference program session Look Before You Leap: taking RDA for a test-drive July 11, 2009 by Tom.
RDA DAY 1 – part 2 web version 1. 2 When you catalog a “book” in hand: You are working with a FRBR Group 1 Item The bibliographic record you create will.
11 Ana Lupe Cristán Policy and Standards Division Library of Congress June 2012 Name Authorities - What’s New?
RDA Updates Since the Creation of LC RDA Training Material (May 2012) Annual Meeting of Council on East Asian Libraries March 19, 2013 Jessalyn Zoom Library.
4: Identifying works and expressions Authorized access points representing works Making additions to authorized access points Authorized access points.
Session 2 Tools and Decisions. 2-2 Session 2 1. What tools are available to help you catalog IR’s? 2. What decisions need to be made?
Book Cataloging with RDA. RDA Instructions & Guidelines General things: – Core elements (required) – Alternative guidelines and instructions – Optional.
Relationship in RDA Section 8 : Recording Relationships between Works, Expressions, Manifestations, & Items By: Habirah Binti Mohamad Pusat Bibliografi.
RDA for Law Catalogers Cataloging New Editions of Monographs presented at the AALL Annual Meeting 2012 July 21, 2012 (revised July 31, 2012) George Prager.
RDA Training at EAL Session eight—Special topics, Serials, Integrating Resources & E-resources Charlene Chou May 7 th,
Using Relationship Designators in RDA. Work Expression Manifestation Item realized through embodied in exemplified by Person Related Work author revision.
1-1 Serials Cooperative Cataloging Training Program (SCCTP) BASIC SERIALS CATALOGING WORKSHOP Instructors: Organizer / Dates.
RDA for Law Catalogers Serials and Integrating Resources Melissa Beck UCLA Law Library.
RDA for Law Catalogers:
2016 CTP Cataloging Workshop Session one
Cataloging Unique Collections with RDA and Non-MARC Standards
Electronic Integrating Resources
Module 8: Changes to RDA -- in general and for serials
Module 6: Preparing for RDA ...
Cataloging Tips and Tricks
MARC: Beyond the Basics 11/24/2018 (C) 2006, Tom Kaun.
NACO Updates Since April 2017
Recording the Attributes of Series MARC21 in NACO RDA Series Authority Records Welcome back, everyone. In this module, we are going to continue talking.
FRBR and FRAD as Implemented in RDA
Presentation transcript:

SCCTP Basic Serial Cataloging Workshop Special Topics AAP for Serials works/expressions (CCM 5) Linking Relationships (CCM 14) Cathy Weng The College of New Jersey CJK CONSER Funnel Project August 15, 2017 The content for today’s class is based on SCCTP Basic Serials Workshop module 6-7 and CCM module 5 and 14 May 2014

Identifying Works and Expressions SCCTP Basic Serial Cataloging Workshop Identifying Works and Expressions Terminology Constructing the authorized access point for a serial work Additions to authorized access points Authorized access points representing expressions This module was revised Sept. 10, 2014 In Module 6 we will cover how to identify and create authorized access points for works and expressions, including additions needed when there is a conflict with another authorized access point. May 2014

SCCTP Basic Serial Cataloging Workshop Terminology Preferred title of a serial work: The title or form of title chosen to identify the work. The preferred title is also the basis for the authorized access point representing that work. Preferred title of a serial work: The title or form of title chosen to identify the work. The preferred title is also the basis for the authorized access point representing that work. Additions to the preferred title may be made in constructing authorized access points for a serial work to distinguish it from other authorized access points. May 2014

SCCTP Basic Serial Cataloging Workshop Terminology Creator of a serial: For a serial, usually a corporate body responsible for originating … or causing the work to be issued. (See LC-PCC PS 19.2.1.1.1) Creator of a serial: A person, family, or corporate body responsible for the creation of a work. Usually it is a corporate body if there is a creator. LC-PCC PS 19.2.1.1.1 provides the guidelines for deciding when a corporate body is a creator. Practical implications for creating the cataloging record? Corporate body creators will be coded as 110 or 111. May 2014

SCCTP Basic Serial Cataloging Workshop Terminology Authorized access point: The standardized access point representing an entity. The authorized access point uniquely identifies the serial work. Authorized access point: The standardized access point representing an entity. The authorized access point uniquely identifies the serial work. If there is a creator the authorized access point is made up of the creator plus the preferred title. If there is no creator the authorized access point may simply be the preferred title. The preferred title may be the same as the title proper or it may have an addition or qualifier to make it unique if there is a need. May 2014

Authorized Access Points SCCTP Basic Serial Cataloging Workshop Authorized Access Points To identify and to differentiate similar entities To collocate various expressions or manifestations of a same work To identify the work or expression and differentiate it from all other similar entities To bring together various expressions or manifestations of the same work. When a work has multiple expressions or manifestations, the AAP can be used to collocate (bring together) various expressions or manifestations. May 2014

Identifying and Constructing the Authorized Access Point for a Work SCCTP Basic Serial Cataloging Workshop Identifying and Constructing the Authorized Access Point for a Work Two elements Creator (RDA 6.27.1.2 - 6.27.1.8) Determine if there is a creator (19.2.1.1) Construct authorized access point (9.19.1 for persons), (10.10.1 for families), (11.13.1 for corporate bodies) Preferred title of the work (6.2.1 - 6.2.2) Now that we have briefly introduced the topic of authorized access points for works, let’s determine how to identify and construct authorized access points for works. Creator: construct the authorized access point representing that person/family/corporate body. Preferred title: The best place to start is by referring to 6.27.1.2 – 6.27.1.8. These instructions provide a walkthrough on how to determine authorized access points for various types of works. These instructions refer to RDA 6.2.1 - 6.2.2 and their LC-PCC PSs for guidance on how to record the preferred title of a work. The preferred title for the work is based on the title proper of the first manifestation. Next, if we are dealing with a work created by one person, family, or corporate body, we would refer to 19.2.1.1 to determine if the person, family, or corporate body was responsible for creating the work. This instruction is basically the RDA equivalent of AACR2 21.1. If we determine that the body is not responsible, we simply accept the preferred title of the work as the entire authorized access point for the work. If the body is responsible, however, we would refer to one of three RDA instructions on how to construct the authorized access point based on whether the creator is a person, family, or corporate body. Note that we would be able to skip this step if the authorized access point for the creator is already established in the NACO file. Finally, we would combine the authorized access point for the creator and the preferred title of the work to form the authorized access point for the work. May 2014

Corporate Body Creators of Serials (RDA and LC-PCC PS 19.2.1.1.1) SCCTP Basic Serial Cataloging Workshop Corporate Body Creators of Serials (RDA and LC-PCC PS 19.2.1.1.1) Works of an administrative nature (Category a) -- e.g., annual reports and directories Collective thought of a body (Category b) -- e.g., Reports of commissions Collective activity of a body (Category d) -- e.g., Conference proceedings Corporate bodies are considered to be creators when they are responsible for originating, issuing, or causing to be issued, works that fall into one or more of the following categories: There are eight categories given under RDA 19.2.1.1.1. The LC-PCC PS at 19.2.1.1.1 contains important advice for deciding whether a body fits under one of the categories and whether in fact the body can be considered to have created the work. Note that it is the nature of the contents and not the nature of the title that determines the main entry. Category a) works of an administrative nature is the one that most often applies to serials, as it includes most annual reports, financial reports, directories, etc. of a body. Category b) includes reports of commissions that are frequently serials, particularly reports that are mandated by a government. Category d) covers conference proceedings and the reports of annual meetings: i) a conference (e.g., proceedings, collected papers); OR ii) an expedition (e.g., results of exploration, investigation); OR iii) an event (e.g., an exhibition, fair, festival) falling within the definition of a corporate body (see 18.1.2) provided that the conference, expedition, or event is named in the resource being described Other categories: Category c works that record hearings conducted by legislative, judicial, governmental, and other corporate bodies e) works that result from the collective activity of a performing group as a whole where the responsibility of the group goes beyond that of mere performance, execution, etc. f) cartographic works originating with a corporate body other than a body that is merely responsible for their publication or distribution g) legal works of the following types May 2014

Corporate Body Creators of Serials SCCTP Basic Serial Cataloging Workshop Corporate Body Creators of Serials Corporate body creator: 110 2# $a International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes. 245 10 $a Annual report of the ICSID. No creator (most common): 245 00 $a Look Japan. 245 00 $a Adobe magazine. For serial works of an administrative nature dealing with the body itself, its policies, procedures, finances, operations (e.g., annual reports), the main entry is the corporate body. This is the most commonly applied category for serials. Entry under title is the most common for serial publications. May 2014

Person or Family Creators of Serials RDA 19.2.1.1.3 SCCTP Basic Serial Cataloging Workshop Person or Family Creators of Serials RDA 19.2.1.1.3 Entry under personal author (rare): 100 1# $a Gresham, Don. 245 14 $a The country music newsletter. Personal authorship is rare for serials and is used only when the publication is so closely identified with one person that it is doubtful it would continue without them. Text of RDA 19.2.1.1.3 A person or family is considered to be the creator of a serial if it is responsible for the serial as a whole, not an individual issue or a few issues. Indications that a person or family may be considered responsible for the serial as a whole include the following: a) the name or part of the name of the person is in the title proper b) the person or family is the publisher of the serial c) content consists of personal opinions, etc. d) lack of another person, another family, or a corporate body involved with the serial. EXAMPLES: Stone, I. F. (Isidor Feinstein), 1907-1989 [Authorized access point representing the creator for: I.F. Stone’s weekly. Stone was also the publisher] Bolles, Richard Nelson [Authorized access point representing the creator for: What color is your parachute? An annual publication of Bolles' career advice] Lehrer, Jonah [Authorized access point representing the creator for: Frontal cortex. A blog]   If different issues of the serial are likely to be created by different persons or families, do not consider a person or family to be the creator. If it is likely that the serial would continue without that person’s or family’s responsibility for the serial, do not consider the person or family to be the creator. In case of doubt, do not consider the person or family to be the creator. May 2014

Preferred Title of a Serial SCCTP Basic Serial Cataloging Workshop Preferred Title of a Serial Base the preferred title on the title proper Title proper is derived from the preferred source of identification from the first or earliest issue in hand For further instructions about recording preferred title, see RDA 6.2.2 For additions to preferred title, see LC-PCC PS to RDA 6.27 Preferred title of a serial work: The title or form of title chosen to identify the work. The preferred title is also the basis for the authorized access point representing that work. The preferred title is based on the title proper taken from the preferred source Additions to the preferred title may be made in constructing authorized access points for a serial work to distinguish it from other authorized access points. (see 6.27 LC-PCC PS) We will discuss this in more detail later in this session. [see slides beginning 6-19] May 2014

Authorized Access Point for a Work SCCTP Basic Serial Cataloging Workshop Authorized Access Point for a Work RDA 5.5 Combining 2 parts: Creator of the work Preferred title for the work Does not include relationship designators As we briefly discussed on earlier, the authorized access point representing a work is simply the preferred title for the work preceded by the authorized access point for the creator responsible for the work. Please note that relationship designators are not included in the authorized access point for the creator. Only the controlled portion is included. So in this example, the $e author and $e issuing body in the 110 field would not be included in the authorized access point for the creator. Thus, the authorized access point would be United Nations Population Fund. Maternal Health Thematic Fund annual report. May 2014

Authorized Access Point for a Work SCCTP Basic Serial Cataloging Workshop Authorized Access Point for a Work A work does not necessarily have a “creator” Preferred title: 245 $a $n $p However, for serials, often there is no “creator” responsible for the work, meaning there would be no 1XX name access point present in the MARC record. In these cases, the authorized access point for the work is simply the preferred title of the work. And remember, the preferred title of the work only includes subfields a, n, and p, so in the first example, the preferred title is simply “Region.” May 2014

Additions to the Authorized Access Point for a Work SCCTP Basic Serial Cataloging Workshop Additions to the Authorized Access Point for a Work LC-PCC PS 6.27.1.9 To distinguish different works Consider authorized access point conflicts among all resources, not just serials Authorized access points are identical: addition is required Authorized access points are similar: cataloger’s judgment Enter in 130 or 240 Unfortunately, it is possible that the authorized access point for a work may be in conflict with a different work. Consult LC-PCC PS 6.27.1.9 for instructions on when and how to modify an access point for a work. One difference to note between previous and current CONSER practice is that we must check for conflicts in all types of resources, not just serials. Additions to the authorized access point of a work are required when it is exactly the same as the authorized access point of a different work. Use cataloger’s judgment when authorized access points are “similar.” May 2014

Identical Authorized Access Point SCCTP Basic Serial Cataloging Workshop Identical Authorized Access Point 245 00 $a Pose. 246 1# $a Pose Cairo 246 1 # $a Pose magazine 130 0# $a Pose (Dubai, United Arab Emirates) 245 10 $a Pose. In this scenario, the authorized access points for each work are the same, so an addition would be required for the authorized access point of the incoming work. May 2014

Similar Authorized Access Point SCCTP Basic Serial Cataloging Workshop Similar Authorized Access Point Serial in catalog: 245 00 $a Hogs & cows today. Serial in hand: 245 00 $a Hogs and cows today. Result: 130 0# $a Hogs and cows today (Fresno, Calif.) 245 10 $a Hogs and cows today In this completely made up scenario, it would be cataloger’s judgment whether or not to include an addition to the authorized access point of the incoming work. May 2014

Choice and Form of Qualifying Term (RDA LC PCC PS 6.27.1.9) Place of publication Corporate body Date of publication Frequency Edition statement, carrier type Other distinguishing element No priority order

Corporate Body as Qualifier SCCTP Basic Serial Cataloging Workshop Corporate Body as Qualifier Use a corporate body as a qualifier when the preferred title consists solely of very general words that indicate the type of publication and/or periodicity. Examples: 130 0# Newsletter (Judo Ontario) 130 0# Information digest (U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission) 130 0# Monthly bulletin (Canadian Conference of the Arts) Using corp body as qualifier for works like these to meaningfully distinguish it from other different works May 2014

SCCTP Basic Serial Cataloging Workshop Other Situations Use judgment in determining the most appropriate qualifier. May 2014

Additions to Authorized Access Points SCCTP Basic Serial Cataloging Workshop Additions to Authorized Access Points 130 0# $a Molecular biology (Los Angeles, Calif.) 245 10 $a Molecular biology. 246 1# $a MBL 264 #1 $a Los Angeles, CA : $b OMICS Publishing Group, $c [2012]- There is no prescriptive list of terms that can be used as qualifiers for authorized access points, though common qualifiers include corporate body, date of publication, descriptive data elements, and the place of publication. This example shows the place of publication as the qualifier. Note that if you use the place of publication as a qualifier, you should use the form of the place as found in the NACO file. May 2014

Additions to Authorized Access Points SCCTP Basic Serial Cataloging Workshop Additions to Authorized Access Points 130 0# $a International directory of little magazines & small presses (2011) 245 10 $a International directory of little magazines & small presses. 246 1# $a International directory of little magazines and small presses 264 #1 $a Paradise, CA : $b Dustbooks, $c [2011]- Here is an example of publication date used as a qualifier May 2014

Additions to Authorized Access Points (Multiple qualifiers) SCCTP Basic Serial Cataloging Workshop Additions to Authorized Access Points (Multiple qualifiers) 130 0# $a Volshebnyĭ fonarʹ (Moscow, Russia : 2012) 245 10 $a Volshebnyĭ fonarʹ : $b alʹmanakh. 264 #1 $a Moskva : $b Volshebnyĭ fonarʹ, $c 2012- Note: The use of date as a qualifier is often used when a serial has changed title, then changed back. May 2014

Authorized Access Point for an Expression SCCTP Basic Serial Cataloging Workshop Authorized Access Point for an Expression Expression: the intellectual or artistic realization of a work in the form of text, sound, image, etc. and in what language. LC-PCC PS 6.27.3 Music resources (6.28.3) Sacred scriptures (6.30.3) Translations (described in the LC-PCC PS) Language editions (described in the LC-PCC PS) The authorized access point for an expression is constructed simply by adding to the authorized access point for the work. Consult LC-PCC PS 6.27.3 for when and how to create an authorized access point for an expression. This is following LC practice. PCC practice is still pending. May 2014

Translations vs. Language Editions SCCTP Basic Serial Cataloging Workshop Translations vs. Language Editions Translations Are usually issued at different times Are usually issued by different publishers Generally have the same contents Language editions Are usually issued simultaneously Are usually issued by the same publisher Contents are more likely to differ In general, the differences between serials translations and language editions are: May 2014

Translations Original Translation 245 00 $a Fiziologiia rastenii / $c ... Translation 130 0# $a Fiziologiia rastenii. $l English 245 10 $a Plant physiology.

Language Editions One edition chosen as the “primary edition” 245 00 $a Data on petroleum and economy of Venezuela. Spanish language edition: 130 0# $a Data on petroleum and economy of Venezuela. $l Spanish. 245 10 $a Datos básicos sobre la industria petrolera y la economia venezolana / $c ...

Authorized Access Point for an Expression SCCTP Basic Serial Cataloging Workshop Authorized Access Point for an Expression Language edition 130 0# $a Duaḥ ha-inflatsyah. $l English. 245 10 $a Inflation report / $c Bank of Israel. 775 08 $i Hebrew edition: $t Duaḥ ha-inflatsyah $w (DLC) 00207719 $w (OCoLC)45203459 This example of a language edition shows the authorized access point for an expression in the 130 field. In this case, the authorized access point for the expression is formed by adding $l English to the authorized access point for the work, which was simply the preferred title of the work in Hebrew. May 2014

SCCTP Basic Serial Cataloging Workshop Authorized Access Point for Translations and Language Editions in a Compilation 245 00 $a Diplôme international de l'OIV en management du secteur de la vigne et du vin. 546 ## $a Parallel text in French, English, German, Italian, and Spanish. 730 02 $i Container of (expression): $a Diplôme international de l'OIV en management du secteur de la vigne et du vin. 730 02 $i Container of (expression): $a Diplôme international de l'OIV en management du secteur de la vigne et du vin. $l English. This slide shows analytical authorized access points when there are two or more language editions in a serial compilation. 245 00 $a Diplôme international de l'OIV en management du secteur de la vigne et du vin : $b OIV MSc in wine management = International diploma of the OIV in management of the vine and wine sector. 546 ## $a Parallel text in French, English, German, Italian, and Spanish. Only the first parallel title is required per LC-PCC PS to RDA 6.27.3 LCPCC PS 6.27.3 “… give analytical authorized access points for the original expression and at least one translation.” May 2014

SCCTP Basic Serial Cataloging Workshop Summary Authorized access point for a work: Authorized access point for creator Preferred title of work Additions to authorized access point for a work Add parenthetically to authorized access point Authorized access point for an expression Added to authorized access point for the work Remember to consider the entire authorized access point for a work when checking for conflicts. If a monograph and serial share the same preferred title, but the monograph also has a creator (1XX name field) while the serial does not, the authorized access points are not the same. May 2014

RDA Linking Relationships for Serials SCCTP Basic Serial Cataloging Workshop RDA Linking Relationships for Serials CONSER practice for linking entry fields (CCM 14) Common serial relationships Related works Related expressions and manifestations Relationships in note fields May 2014

Linking Relationships and Entry Fields SCCTP Basic Serial Cataloging Workshop Linking Relationships and Entry Fields Express the relationship of resources Connect related records in the catalog Linking fields generate structured descriptions of related resources Express sequential relationships: e.g. continues, continued by Express horizontal relationships: e.g. online and print versions MARC fields: 76X-78X While RDA provides many relationship designators, it is CONSER practice to designate some relationships with MARC 21 coding definitions or in some cases using terms that are not in the RDA relationship designator lists. For example, it is CONSER practice to designate “Continues/Continued by” relationships using 780/785 00, format relationships using 776 08 $i Print/Online version, and language versions using 775 08 $i English edition, etc. May 2014

Common Serial Relationships SCCTP Basic Serial Cataloging Workshop Common Serial Relationships Related serial works: Supplement; whole/part Earlier, later title Expressions Language expressions Manifestations Other formats Change in mode of issuance Reproductions Serials relationships can also be expressed in terms of FRBR entities, such as: work level relationships, expression level or manifestation level relationships. List of the common serial relationships in our records. We will continue to relate earlier/later works. At the expression level, we will continue to relate language expressions. And at the manifestation level, we will continue to relate manifestations in different formats or modes of issuance, as well as original and reproduction. May 2014

Sequential Relationships Session 8 Sequential Relationships Relationships of a serial to its predecessors and successors Each record covers a different span of time Relationships are given in fields 780 & 785 Preceding Title (780) Serial Being Cataloged (245) Succeeding Title (785) Are relationships in time between serials, monographs, and integrating resources; may also be thought of as chronological relationships. Fields 780 and 785 are the most commonly used linking fields and are the only mandatory links in the serial core record, except for field 776 in some formats.

Horizontal Relationships Session 8 Horizontal Relationships Equivalent relationship Reproductions (776, 775) Accompanying relationship Supplements (770/772), issued with (777), companions (787) Derivative relationship Translations, language editions (765/767, 775), accumulations (787) Horizontal relationships between serials include “equivalent,” “accompanying,” and “derivative” relationships.

Creating/Constructing Linking Fields Session 8 Creating/Constructing Linking Fields Determine a linking relationship exists Determine a related record exists A linking field may consist of: authorized access point representing the related resource an ISSN, and control numbers relationship designator 780 00 $t BRS news $x 0435-1231 $w (DLC)sc 85003531 $w (OCoLC)1570435 For information on control numbers suggest consulting the CONSER Editing Guide and OCLC documentation. CONSER policy has always mandated use of the LCCN in the $w, with others being optional. OCLC will be making linking fields clickable in the future as long as $w contains an OCLC record number. For this reason, CONSER policy has been changed to mandate use of the OCLC number in linking fields. Note that CONSER catalogers give the ISSN in the link only when: 1) the related record has been authenticated by NSDP or ISSN Canada; or 2) for foreign titles, when it is available either in the related record of the ISSN Register.

SCCTP Basic Serial Cataloging Workshop Linked Records 780/785 linking fields most common (earlier/later titles, changes in creator or corporate body qualifier) CONSER policy: not to use a relationship designator ($i) for 780/785 relationships (for now) 580 linking entry complexity note: 580 ## $a Split into: New title, and: New title. 580 ## $a Merger of: Old title, and: Old title. 580 ## $a Merged with: Old title, to form: New title. - Linking entry fields are sometimes referred to as “super notes” because, in addition to providing a note that a serial has been continued by another, continues another, and so forth, the fields actually link the records in the online catalog. Thus, in some systems, you can search one title and bring up the records for the earlier and later titles as well. - Fields 780 (preceding entry) and 785 (succeeding entry) are the most commonly used. - While “continues” and “continued by” are the most common relationships expressed in the field 780 and 785, serials can also split or merge, absorb others, or be continued in part by another title. All of these relationships are expressed by using the correct second indicator value in the 780/785 fields. For diagrams of these relationships, see the CONSER Cataloging Manual, Module 14. - Field 580 (linking complexity note) is used when the note that would be printed from the 780/785 field is not adequate. CONSER participants have also used the 580 note anytime that two or more titles are to be included in one note, such as with splits and mergers. May 2014

CONSER Practice for Relationship Designators in Linking Entry Fields SCCTP Basic Serial Cataloging Workshop CONSER Practice for Relationship Designators in Linking Entry Fields Always use 1st indicator “0” 780 00 785 00 776 08 $i Online version: 775 08 $i English edition: While RDA provides many relationship designators, it is CONSER practice to designate some relationships with MARC 21 coding definitions or in some cases using terms that are not in the RDA relationship designator lists. For example, it is CONSER practice to designate “Continues/Continued by” relationships using 780/785 00, format relationships using 776 08 $i Print/Online version, and language versions using 775 08 $i English edition, etc. May 2014

SCCTP Basic Serial Cataloging Workshop 2nd Indicator values – 780/785 780 0 Continues 1 Continues in part 4 Formed by the union of … and … (or Merger of … and …) 5 Absorbed 6 Absorbed in part 7 Separated from 785 0 Continued by 1 Continued in part by 4 Absorbed by 5 Absorbed in part by 6 Split into … and … 7 Merged with … to form … 2nd indicator value determines the type of relationship May 2014

Examples (continues/continued by) Session 8 Examples (continues/continued by) Serial A is continued by serial B; serial A ceases to exist. Numbering continues or starts over again. Title A: 245 00 American junior colleges. 785 00 $t American community, technical, and junior colleges $w … Title B: 245 00 American community, technical, and junior colleges. 780 00 $t American junior colleges $w … “Continues” and “Continued by” are the most common chronological relationships. A 780 field can be given for an earlier title when the title is known, even when there is no record online. .

Session 8 Example (Split into: ) Serial A splits into two or more separate serials (Title B & C) each of which continues part of serial A; serial A ceases. Title A: 245 00 Journal of electronics and control. 580 Split into: International journal of control, and: International journal of electronics. 785 06 $t International journal of electronics $w … 785 06 $t International journal of control $w … CONSER policy is to use 580 notes for relationships involving more than one title, requiring more than one linking field. OCLC and RLIN policy is to use 580 notes for relationships involving three or more titles, requiring three or more linking fields.

Example (Continues in Part) Session 8 Example (Continues in Part) Title B: 245 00 International journal of electronics. 780 01 $t Journal of electronics and control $w... Title C: 245 00 International journal of control. 780 01 $t Journal of electronics and control $w … Each of these will display a note: Continues in part: Journal of electronics and control Titles B and C may have entirely different titles or common title/part title. Numbering may be the same for each title with the addition of a letter.

Example (absorbed/absorbed by) Session 8 Example (absorbed/absorbed by) Serials A and B began as two separate publications; serial B becomes part of serial A Title A: 245 00 Journal of chromatography. 362 0 Vol. 1, no. 1 (Jan. 1958)-v. 651, no.1-2 (May 20, 1994). 780 05 $t Chromatographic reviews $g 1971 $w … Title B: 245 00 Chromatographic reviews. 362 0 Vol. 1 (1959)-v. 15, no. 2-3 (Dec. 1971). 785 04 $t Journal of chromatography $w …

SCCTP Basic Serial Cataloging Workshop Translations (765/767) 765 – Original Language Entry 767 – Translation Entry Original language record: Translation record: A Russian title has an English translation May 2014

Supplement/Parent Relationship (770/772) SCCTP Basic Serial Cataloging Workshop Supplement/Parent Relationship (770/772) 770 – Supplement/Special Issue entry 772 – Parent record entry Parent entry: 245 00 $a Journal of cellular biochemistry. 770 0# $t Journal of cellular biochemistry. Supplement $x 0733-1959 $w … Supplement entry: 245 00 $a Journal of cellular biochemistry. $p Supplement. 772 0# $t Journal of cellular biochemistry $x 0730-2312 $w ... May 2014

SCCTP Basic Serial Cataloging Workshop Related Serials 787 08 $i Preliminary report issued as: $t English housing survey. Headline report 787 08 $i Complemented by (work): $t English housing survey. Household report 775 08 $i English edition: $t Azerbaijan focus 776 08 $i Online version: $t Bone bouquet 776 08 $i Continued by online database: $t Antarctic bibliography $w (OCoLC) 52065227 775 08 $i Reproduction of (manifestation): $t Hîwa (Baghdad, Iraq) 787 field used when the relationships of serial resources are not covered in the types of relationships specified in 780 or 785. (776 – additional physical form entry ; 775 – Other edition entry) This first example indicates that the work being described is a supplement to another work, and the second and third examples show earlier and later works. No relationship designator is needed because the MARC tag number and indicators tell what the relationship is. In the last two examples, $i has been added to indicate what the relationship is because the 787 just means “other relationship.” In the last example, the relationship designator was taken from RDA Appendix J. May 2014

Session 8 Linking to Monographs Links can be made to a monograph record when earlier or later issues are cataloged as monographs Link only to the monograph directly preceding or succeeding the serial This is most commonly done for conference publications, annual supplements to a monograph, etc. Link can be made to a monograph record. But generally no link to a serial record is made in a monograph record.

Linking to Integrating Resources Session 8 Linking to Integrating Resources Links to integrating resources may be made when a serial changes its mode of issuance (usually accompanied by a change in physical medium as well) Example: a printed serial changes to an online directory If the entry for the integrating resource changes over time, the link in the serial record will also need to be changed 245 00 $a IR 780 00 $t serial 245 00 $a serial 785 00 $t IR

SCCTP Basic Serial Cataloging Workshop When to use 580 Notes For relationships that cannot be fully expressed by a linking field 580 Vols. for Jan. 1923-Dec. 1926 include section: Food and health education, later published separately, Jan. 1927- 785 01 $t Food and health education For relationships involving multiple titles CONSER policy is to use a note 245 04 The American journal of theology. 580 Merged with: Biblical world, to form: Journal of religion. 785 07 $t Biblical world 785 07 $t Journal of religion May 2014

When Not to Link When relationship is too vague or unclear Session 8 When Not to Link When relationship is too vague or unclear Related serials for which the title is the same and there is no online record Related serial is not separately cataloged Brother sister relationships (both related to one publication, but no direct related to each other)

Constructing Linking Fields Session 8 Constructing Linking Fields The title in subfield $t is the title proper ($a, $n, $p) or the uniform title from field 130 and/or 245 of related record. 780 00 $t Bulletin (Colorado Geological Survey) 780 00 $t Trade policy review. Republic of Peru 767 0# $t Fiziologiia rastenii. English. Plant physiology $x 0097- 384X (AAP for an expression)

Constructing Linking Fields: Catalog Entry Examples Session 8 Constructing Linking Fields: Catalog Entry Examples Corporate body ($a)/Title proper ($t) 780 00 $a British Columbia. Fish and Wildlife Branch. $t Management report Corporate body ($a) /Uniform title from 240 ($s) 785 00 $a Advertising Research Foundation. $s Annual report (1986) $t … When AAP includes a creator (1xx field) and title proper (245) Subfield $a contains all components of corporate and conference names. Note that these examples are in OCLC format which does not display subfield $a. Subfield $b is not used with the subdivisions of the name. Note that subfield $s is used instead of subfield $t when a uniform title is given in field 240 of the related record.

Constructing Linking Fields/Reciprocal linking Title A Title B 245 00 $a East Asian languages & cultures. . 785 00 $t Asian languages & cultures $w(DLC) 2007222901 $w (OCoLC)156888820 245 00 $a Asian languages & cultures. . 780 00 $t East Asian languages & cultures $w (DLC) 2007222900 $w (OCoLC)156888817 This slide shows the earlier record on the left, which has been closed off and linked with field 785 to the later record on the right. The examples are both cataloged according to CSR. SCCTP Basic Serials Cataloging Workshop

Relationships in Note Fields SCCTP Basic Serial Cataloging Workshop Relationships in Note Fields 525 (supplement) - use for supplements not input as separate records 530 (additional physical form) - prefer 776 $i 533 (reproduction) - use only for digital preservation project records with $5 SCS Response: PCC Task Group Report on RDA Microform Reproductions Cataloging While it is CONSER practice to generally enter relationships in 1XX or 7XX fields, they can be included in 5XX note fields in some instances. These are some examples of relationship notes. May 2014

Relationships in Note Fields SCCTP Basic Serial Cataloging Workshop Relationships in Note Fields 534 (original version) - do not use in CONSER records 550 (issuing body) - use to justify 7XX 580 (linking entry complexity note) - use to express complex note in conjunction with 7XX May 2014

Session 8 Summary The purpose of linking entry is to express the relationship of resources and to link records in a catalog Sequential relationships are those that link successive entry records resulting from major changes

Session 8 Summary 580 notes are often used for relationships that cannot be fully expressed by a linking field or, according to CONSER policy, involve multiple titles Do not link to another serial if the relationship is unclear or uncertain or if the related title is not cataloged separately

SCCTP Basic Serial Cataloging Workshop Summary Record relationships in authorized access points, notes, & linking fields Provide reciprocal relationship fields for serials 760-787 fields: Authorized access point of related record (minus subfield codes) Appropriate designators (excluding 780, 785) May 2014