Lecture 8 – Detectors - II

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Experimental Particle Physics
Advertisements

ISS meeting UCIrvine 21 August 2006 Alain Blondel 1 Evaluation of « optimal » segmentation for neutrino factory far detectors A. magnetized iron sampling.
STFC RAL Graduate lectures 2007/8 R M Brown - RAL 1 An introduction to calorimeters for particle physics Bob Brown STFC/PPD.
HEP Experiments Detectors and their Technologies Sascha Marc Schmeling CERN.
Detectors & Measurements: How we do physics without seeing… Prof. Robin D. Erbacher University of California, Davis References: R. Fernow, Introduction.
LHeC - Detector Layout Tracker HCAL Solenoid Dipole Muon Detector Fwd Calorimeter Inserts Bwd Calorimeter Inserts p/A e∓e∓ EMC Dipole The Large Hadron.
Particle interactions and detectors
Detection of Gamma-Rays and Energetic Particles
Calorimetry and Showers Learning Objectives Understand the basic operation of a calorimeter (Measure the energy of a particle, and in the process, destroy.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
CERN Summer Student Lectures 2003 Particle Detectors Christian Joram IV/1   Basic principles Interaction of charged particles and photons Electromagnetic.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Neil Collins Birmingham Masterclass Tuesday 24 April 2007 ATLAS and the LHC.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
PFA Development – Definitions and Preparation 0) Generate some events w/G4 in proper format 1)Check Sampling Fractions ECAL, HCAL separately How? Photons,
Calorimetry: Energy Measurements
Application of Neural Networks for Energy Reconstruction J. Damgov and L. Litov University of Sofia.
880.P20 Winter 2006 Richard Kass 1 Energy Measurement (Calorimetry) Why measure energy ? I) Not always practical to measure momentum. An important contribution.
Calorimeters A User’s Guide Elizabeth Dusinberre, Matthew Norman, Sean Simon October 28, 2006.
1 Calorimetry - 2 Mauricio Barbi University of Regina TRIUMF Summer Institute July 2007.
David Attié Club ‘ILC Physics Case’ CEA Saclay June 23, 2013 ILD & SiD concepts and R&D.
Mauricio Barbi University of Regina TRIUMF Summer Institute July 2007
Recirculation Concept - Cyclotron Radio frequency alternating voltage Hollow metal drift tubes time t =0 time t =½ RF period D-shaped.
Lecture 1.3: Interaction of Radiation with Matter
LHC Detectors 101 Vivek Sharma (with slides stolen from talks of several people ) 1 Good review article: ARNPS 2006, “General purpose detectors for large.
Particle Detectors for Colliders Calorimeters Robert S. Orr University of Toronto.
International Workshop on Linear Colliders, Geneve Muon reconstruction and identification in the ILD detector N. D’Ascenzo, V.Saveliev.
Calorimeters Chapter 4 Chapter 4 Electromagnetic Showers.
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Joel Goldstein, RAL 1.Introduction & Accelerators 2.Particle Interactions and Detectors (2/2) 3.Collider Experiments.
The ATLAS detector (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS). LHC facts.
P ARTICLE D ETECTORS Mojtaba Mohammadi IPM-CMPP- February
LHeC - Detector Layout Tracker HCAL Solenoid Dipole Muon Detector Fwd Calorimeter Inserts Bwd Calorimeter Inserts p/A e∓e∓ EMC Dipole Abstract The Large.
Coil and HCAL Parameters for CLIC Solenoid and Hadron-calorimetry for a high energy LC Detector 15. December LAPP Christian Grefe CERN.
Introduction to CERN Activities
1 Methods of Experimental Particle Physics Alexei Safonov Lecture #15.
The Compact Muon Solenoid. What does CMS do? The Compact Muon Solenoid is a general purpose particle detector installed at point 5 of the Large Hadron.
Particle Detectors for Colliders Robert S. Orr University of Toronto.
R.S. Orr 2009 TRIUMF Summer Institute
1 FK7003 Lecture 17 – Interactions in Matter ● Electromagnetic interactions in material ● Hadronic interactions in material ● Electromagnetic and hadronic.
January 15, 2004CMS Heavy Ions Bolek Wyslouch1 Bolek Wyslouch MIT for the CMS Collaboration Quark Matter 2004, Oakland, CA CMS HI groups: Athens, Auckland,
Learning Objectives Calorimetry and Showers
Edouard Kistenev for the PHENIX Collaboration Calorimetry based upgrade to PHENIX at RHIC CALOR 2012 Santa Fe, NM, June 4-8, 2012.
July 27, 2002CMS Heavy Ions Bolek Wyslouch1 Heavy Ion Physics with the CMS Experiment at the Large Hadron Collider Bolek Wyslouch MIT for the CMS Collaboration.
Search for Excited Quark by HERA e-p Collider KUHEP colloquium 22 th Jun, 2009 Maeda Yosuke.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
DE/dx in ATLAS TILECAL Els Koffeman Atlas/Nikhef Sources: PDG DRDC (1995) report RD34 collaboration CERN-PPE
G. Sullivan – Quarknet, July 2003 Calorimeters in Particle Physics What do they do? –Measure the ENERGY of particles Electromagnetic Energy –Electrons,
Lecture 18 - Detectors Detector systems
Layout of Detectors for CLIC
Calorimeters at CBM A. Ivashkin INR, Moscow.
Particle detection and reconstruction at the LHC (IV)
Methods of Experimental Particle Physics
PEDESTAL STABILITY OF HCAL DURING GLOBAL RUNS AND 2009 CASTOR DQM ANALYSIS Emine GÜRPINAR Cukurova University 7/31/2018.
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #14 Energy Deposition in Media Particle Detection
Study of Gamma+Jets production
The Compact Muon Solenoid Detector
State-of-the-art in Hadronic Calorimetry for the Lepton Collider
Calorimeters in HEP Add hermiticity CC event - calibration
How a Particle Detector works
Spectrometry of high energy gamma ray
Experimental Particle Physics
Project Presentations August 5th, 2004
Rick Salcido Northern Illinois University For CALICE Collaboration
Detector Optimization using Particle Flow Algorithm
Experimental Particle Physics
Steve Magill Steve Kuhlmann ANL/SLAC Motivation
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #17 Particle Detection Particle Accelerators
Particles going through matter
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #18 Monday ,April 9, 2012 Dr. Brandt Calorimeter
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #14 Energy Deposition in Media Particle Detection
Presentation transcript:

Lecture 8 – Detectors - II Calorimetry Considerations for designing a collider detector -- with LHeC as an example Introduction to Particle Physics - Max Klein – Lecture 8 - Liverpool University 17.3.14 M.Klein 17.3.2014 L8

Particle Identification ν neutrino carries energy away (“missing E”) -- Hermetic Detector! M.Klein 17.3.2014 L8

H1 DIS event in xy view 1m Electromagnetic calorimeter M.Klein 17.3.2014 L8

Calorimeters  Sensitive to charged and neutral particles Cascade (showers of particles) N ~ E: /E~1/√E Longitudinal dimension scales ~ lnE Segmentation: spatial and angular information Different response to e, h, : particle ID Hermetic coverage to detect neutrinos (“missing E”) Fast time response: high rates, time measurement Calorimeters are “sampling calorimeters”: Several layers of active medium/absorber for optimum energy deposition and measurement M.Klein 17.3.2014 L8

Electromagnetic energy loss - electrons re2 ~ me-2: muon deposits 2 10-5 times less energy than electron by the bremsstrahlung process. Bremsstrahlung Ionisation critical energy Bremsstrahlung dominates rather uniform energy loss: high resolution of elm calorimeters M.Klein 17.3.2014 L8

Muon Energy Loss Critical energy for muons very large. Ec = 200 GeV in Pb (~10 MeV for electron) Muon energy losses for precision measurements and high momenta have to be controlled too Taken from PDG2010 M.Klein 17.3.2014 L8

Radiation Length X0 distance over which 1/e of E0 is lost in bremsstrahlung also = 7/9 of mean free path of a photon [γZ  Ze+e-] Energy loss is additive: For example: Air: f(N)=0.77, f(O2)=0.22, f(Ar)=0.01, X0 =0.3km Absorbers for electromagnetic calorimeters: Pb: X0 =0.56 cm, Fe: X0 = 1.6 cm Y.T. Tsai Rev.Mod.Phys 46(1974)815 M.Klein 17.3.2014 L8

Electromagnetic Calorimeter Radiation length Lateral extension Shower extends perpendicularly to incident direction due to bremsstrahlung (~E/m) and multiple scattering 95% of shower is contained in cone of one Molière radius (1.8cm in lead) Pb: X0 =0.56 cm, Fe: X0 = 1.6 cm Electromagnetic calorimeters are rather compact. They are placed in between the tracker and the hadronic calorimeter. They thus represent the first stage of the hadronic energy measurement. If space and cost permit, the magnet coil is outside the calorimeters – not possible for LHeC: 20 layers 0.56cm plus LAr gaps: ~40cm Electron and photon energy loss very similar: σγ=7/9σe M.Klein 17.3.2014 L8

Hadronic Calorimeter Interaction or absorption length Hadronic energy loss Particle production (strong interaction) n ~ 20 ln(E/GeV) -18 secondaries Nuclear collisions and excitations Electromagnetic interactions (0  ) Ionization, muons, neutrinos Stronger fluctuation of energy loss than for electromagnetic interactions. Thus the resolution is worse. Fe: =132 g/cm2 =17 cm =10 X0 The hadronic calorimeters are placed behind electromagnetic ones and used as “tail catchers” of the elm. shower 95% of secondaries are confined in 1  A shower is absorbed fully after 7  ATLAS Scintillator tile – Fe Calorimeter (7=1.1m) M.Klein 17.3.2014 L8

H1 Detector Tracker Liquid Argon Calorimeter Coil Return Iron/  Detector beam line Forward muon detector M.Klein 17.3.2014 L8

H1 Liquid Argon (LAr) Calorimeter elm. 25X0 12%/√E H1 Liquid Argon (LAr) Calorimeter Hadr. 7 50%/√E Pb: G10|Lead\G10, SS: stainless steel HRC: high resistive coating (10M/area) Photograph after deassembly, October 2007 M.Klein 17.3.2014 L8

ATLAS Calorimeters Tile barrel and extended barrel LAr hadronic electromagn. endcaps Central barrel electromagnetic Forward calorimeter M.Klein 17.3.2014 L8

ATLAS LAr Electromagnetic Calorimeter D.Pitzl M.Klein 17.3.2014 L8

ATLAS Scintillator Tile Hadronic Calorimeter Scintillator and Fe absorber, read out perpendicular to beam axis M.Klein 17.3.2014 L8

LHeC Detector*) Central silicon tracker: 48cm, EMC: D=40cm, Solenoid: R=1m, HAC: D=140cm *) from LHeC design report 2012 M.Klein 17.3.2014 L8

Dimensions of the LHeC Detector Tracker: Silicon only, compact, D=50cm Locate solenoid between EMC and HAC: Cost [and joins dipole for beam bending] The LHeC detector is surrounded by a muon detector system, conceptionally for muon identification only. There are forward and backward detectors as part of the central detector, and there are further apart detectors for tagging p,n in p beam direction and e,γ in e beam direction (“backwards”) EMC: LAr-Pb: D=40cm HAC: Sc-Fe: D=140cm M.Klein 17.3.2014 L8

LHeC Detector Design Concept Muon detector: ID with few detector planes, no momentum measurement – unlike ATLAS M.Klein 17.3.2014 L8

Detector - Summary The requirement to select often rare events (“trigger”) has replaced the photographic methods. The physics of heavy quarks has boosted the development of Silicon track detectors. Energies are measured in “sampling calorimeters” – in multilayers of absorber and active material. Modern collider detectors have a common structure: tracker, ecal., hcal., solenoid, muon detector. The (xy) dimension of a tracker is determined by the required momentum resolution (B,Δ,L). An electromagnetic calorimeter absorbs 95% of the shower energy in 20 radiation lengths (X0). The em. energy loss mechanism is primarily bremsstrahlung and the energy resolution ~10%/√E. A hadronic calorimeter absorbs a hadron shower completely after 7 absorption lengths (λ). Due to the more stochastic nature of hadron interactions and the complexity of the hadron energy loss processes, the energy resolution is ~40%/√E. The “HCAL” catches the elm. shower tail. 10. Calorimetry has to be hermetic (4π) acceptance in order to reconstuct the energy balance (ν’s MET). 11. Muons penetrate the whole calorimeter and can thus be identified and their momentum reconstructed. Detectors have to fulfill further demands as from trigger complexity, readout speed and data volume… M.Klein 17.3.2014 L8