CBM magnet overview of the BINP work

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Panda Solenoid Timelines. General Layout constraints and HOLD POINTS.
Advertisements

Mezentsev Nikolay Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics
Guenther Rosner FAIR Design Study, PANDA 3, GSI, 19/1/06 1 PANDA3: Magnet design and integration of detectors Tasks & participants Progress Milestones.
23 October 2005MICE Meeting at RAL1 MICE Tracker Magnets, 4 K Coolers, and Magnet Coupling during a Quench Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.
1 Update on Focus Coil Design and Configuration M. A. Green, G. Barr, W. Lau, R. S. Senanayake, and S. Q. Yang University of Oxford Department of Physics.
Superconducting Large Bore Sextupole for ILC
G.N. Kulipanov, N.A.Mezentsev, A.V. Philipchenko, K.V. Zolotarev
1 M. Modena for the CLIC MDI magnet study Team (A. Aloev, P. Thonet, E. Solodko, A. Vorozhtsov) CLIC MDI Meeting,16 January 2015.
Short period wiggler prototype for the CLIC damping ring Alexey Bragin, Denis Gurov, Anatoly Utkin, Pavel Vobly Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk,
E. Todesco PROPOSAL OF APERTURE FOR THE INNER TRIPLET E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland With relevant inputs from colleagues F. Cerutti, S. Fartoukh,
Magnet designs for Super-FRS and CR
Robin Wines. Verbal agreement with BNL to acquire 48D48 magnet Contact at BNL indicates 4 of these magnets in storage BNL agrees to disassemble magnet.
Zian Zhu Magnet parameters Coil/Cryostat/Support design Magnetic field analysis Cryogenics Iron yoke structure Mechanical Integration Superconducting Magnet.
February 13, 2012 Mu2e Production Solenoid Design V.V. Kashikhin Workshop on Radiation Effects in Superconducting Magnet Materials (RESMM'12)
CEA DSM Dapnia DIRAC-Phase-1 Annual Report meeting Status of the R3B-GLAD Magnet DIRAC-Phase-1 Annual Report Meeting 26 September 2006 Bernard Gastineau.
Design and construction of Nuclotron-based Ion Collider fAcility (NICA) and Mixed Phase Detector (MPD) Design and construction of Nuclotron-based Ion Collider.
NSLS-II Transfer Lines BUDKER INSTITUTE OF NUCLEAR PHYSICS NOVOSIBIRSK.
22 October 2005MICE Meeting at RAL1 Tracker Solenoid Overview Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting 22 October 2005.
Cold test of SIS-300 dipole model Sergey Kozub Institute for High Energy Physics (IHEP), Protvino, Moscow region, Russia.
Correctors magnets V. Zubko, IHEP, Protvino SIS 300 Pre-consortium Meeting Thursday 19 March 2009, Protvino.
ILC Main Linac Superconducting Quadrupole V. Kashikhin for Superconducting Magnet Team.
Super Fragment Separator (Super-FRS) Machine and Magnets H. Leibrock, GSI Darmstadt Review on Cryogenics, February 27th, 2012, GSI Darmstadt.
CERN –GSI/CEA MM preparation meeting, Magnetic Measurements WP.
GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH The Optimized Superconducting Dipole of SIS100 for Series Production ICEC26 March 9th, 2016 GSI Helmholtzzentrum.
FNAL Workshop, July 19, 2007 ILC Main Linac Superconducting Quadrupole V.Kashikhin 1 ILC Main Linac Superconducting Quadrupole (ILC HGQ1) V. Kashikhin.
September 27, 2007 ILC Main Linac - KOF 1 ILC Main Linac Superconducting Quadrupole V. Kashikhin for Magnet group.
SAMURAI magnet Hiromi SATO SAMURAI Team, RIKEN Requirements Geometry Magnetic field Superconducting coil and cooling system Present status of construction.
GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH Super-FRS multiplet field.
GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH Super-FRS magnet configurations.
HTS and LTS Magnet Design and Prototyping for RAON
Panda Forward Dipole Magnet design status International Workshop on Antiproton Physics and Technology at FAIR November 2015 Budker Institute of Nuclear.
CBM Dipole Conceptional Design Review
Status of the PANDA Solenoid Magnet Production in BINP
Magnet design and field calculations
Design ideas for a cos(2q) magnet
The Status of the CBM Experiment
Status of the PANDA Solenoid Magnet Production in BINP
Update on PANDA solenoid design
MQXC Nb-Ti 120mm 120T/m 2m models
Cryogenic behavior of the cryogenic system
Quench estimations of the CBM magnet
6th BINP-FAIR-GSI Workshop,
Status of the CLIC DR wiggler design and production at BINP
PANDA Yoke of the Magnet
Coil design the CBM magnet
BINP, Sergey Pivovarov, Panda magnet meeting at GSl, June 07, 2016
LARP Vertical Test Facility
Status of the PANDA Magnet
Magnets for the ESRF upgrade phase II
Main magnets for PERLE Test Facility
Yingshun Zhu Accelerator Center, Magnet Group
Cryostat design and heat loads
SoLID Magnet - Engineering and Cost
BESIII Collaboration Meeting, June 5~6, 2002, Zian Zhu
Assembly, survey, alignment of the CBM Dipole Magnet
Updated concept of the CBM dipole magnet
The superconducting solenoids for the Super Charm-Tau Factory detector
IR Magnet Layout/Design - JLEIC
Status of the PANDA Solenoid Magnet Production in BINP
Design of the cryogenic system of the CBM magnet
as a prototype for Super c-tau factory
Cryogenic behavior of the magnet
Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics,
Proposal for new coil design the CBM magnet
Quench calculations of the CBM magnet
PANDA Cryostat and Yoke
CEPC Final Focus Superconducting Quadrupole and Anti-solenoid Magnets
Magnet design, field calculations
Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics,
IR Beam Transport Status
Presentation transcript:

CBM magnet overview of the BINP work Alexey Bragin on behalf of BINP team Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk, Russia CDR meeting, May 2017 October 2010

Design parameters of the CBM magnet to be realized Geometry - Opening angle: ±25° vertically, ± 30° horizontally from the target - Free aperture: 1.44 m vertically x 1.8 m horizontally, no conical geometry - Distance target- magnet core end: 1m (STS detector must fit in) - Total length: 1.5 m - Space upstream of the magnet: <1 m Magnetic field - Field integral within STS detector (along straight lines): 0,972 Tm -> max. Field ≈ 1 T, depending on the magnet length - Field integral variation over the whole opening angle along straight lines: ≤ 20% (± 10%) - Fringe field downstream < reasonable value of the order of 50 to 100 Gauss at a distance of 1.6 m from the target (RICH only) Operating conditions - Operates at both polarities - 100% duty cycle, 3 months/year, 20 years - No real time restriction on the ramp: 1 hour up ramp - Radiation damage (<10MG for organics): no problem - Radiation Energy deposit in the cryosystem: max. 1 W

Design parameters of the CBM magnet to be realized, continued Assembly - Field clamps dismountable for MUCH - Assembly in situ - Weight restriction: crane 30 tons (including lifting jacks) - Maximum floor load: 100 tons/m2 - beam height over the floor: 5.8 m Alignment - Position accuracy: ± 0.2 mm - Orientation accuracy (roll): ± 0.5 mrad The requirements given above are mandatory. Remark: the free aperture was increased from 1.4m (TDR) to 1.44 m. However, the integral field was decreased in order to keep the nominal current the same as in the TDR. The CBM superconducting dipole will be designed as follows: • Warm iron yoke ( huge vertical and horizontal balks) • Warm round (tapered) poles • Removable field clamps • cylindrical NbTi coils wound on cylindrical bobbin , cooled with LHe • Thermal shield cooled with Helium gas (50-80K) • Two independent cold masses and cryostats • Vertical forces transferred from the coil to the cryostat and finally to the yoke • Normal conducting leads

Design work in BINP BINP is responsible for the CBM magnet design. BINP designers are: Sergey Pivovarov – general management Vasily Syrovatin – coil design, will start in August 2017 Mikhail Kholopov – cryostat and cryogenics, started in April 2017 Sergey Peshekhonov – iron yoke The current work was started from the TDR developed previously.

General view of the CBM magnet

The CBM magnet general view

Coil design Stored energy – 5 MJ

Cold mass suspended on the tie rods

Cooling of the CBM magnet Single cryostat cooling. Liquid helium at 4.5 K from the cryostat goes down to the coils Gaseous helium goes up due to gravitation. Coil design should not have gas pockets.

View of the cryostat The cryostat is placed by the top side of the detector.

Cryostat view 2

Interface to the detector as example In further work BINP people responsible for the control systems should specify conditions demanded for FAIR. Typically BINP provides the required control systems as presented on these figures.

Assembling

Status of BINP work on the CBM magnet Principle problems for manufacturing of the CBM magnet by BINP are not seen. Test place in BINP will be ready by end of 2018. LHe supply is ~ 500 l/day. Subcontractors for manufacturing the superconducting cable and the iron yoke are ready to work. The discussions will be going on the cryogenics design (details of operations) and the coil design (proposal to change the coil design). Proposal to finalize the CDR agreements by July 2017 within the CDR document. For the preliminary design (October 2017) the coil design should be confirmed.