50 Years of BILC: The Evolution of STANAG 6001 1976 – 2016 and the first Benchmark Advisory Test Ray Clifford 24 May 2016.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Tale of Two Tests STANAG and CEFR Comparing the Results of side-by-side testing of reading proficiency BILC Conference May 2010 Istanbul, Turkey Dr.
Advertisements

Getting Organized for the Transition to the Common Core What You Need to Know.
BILC Standardization Initiatives and Conference Objectives
Mentorship. More people are applying for and completing mentorship Mentorship recommended  15 Completing mentorship  2.
Culture Programme - Selection procedure Katharina Riediger Infoday Praha 10/06/2010.
Bureau for International Language Coordination
Created by NWRESD Data Quality Project CCSS Stewardship Committee 2013 Created by NWRESD Data Quality Project EQuIP Network Common Core Stewardship Committee.
School Improvement Planning Today’s Session Review the purpose of SI planning Review the components of SI plans Discuss changes to SI planning.
Standardizing Testing in NATO Peggy Garza and the BAT WG Bureau for International Language Co-ordination.
Bureau for International Language Coordination Julie J. Dubeau BILC Secretary Istanbul, Turkey May 24, 2010.
BILC UPDATE Rome, Italy, June 8, 2009 BILC Secretary & D/Secretary Bureau de Coordination Linguistique Internationale Bureau for International Language.
Closing Remarks and Report from the Steering Committee This has been a remarkable week! –Educational. –Engaging. –Productive. We want to thank our hosts.
NATO BAT Testing: The First 200 BILC Professional Seminar 6 October, 2009 Copenhagen, Denmark Dr. Elvira Swender, ACTFL.
Welcome! - Current BILC activities. - Comments regarding the theme of this seminar. Dr. Ray T. Clifford BILC Seminar, Vienna 8 October 2007.
STANAG OPI Testing Julie J. Dubeau Bucharest BILC 2008.
V 2.1 Version 2.1 School-wide PBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory.
Standards of Achievement for Professional Advancement District 2 Career Ladder Training April 29, 2016 Ronda Alexander & Michael Clawson.
SPDG Competition FY 2011 Management Plan. (f) Quality of the management plan. (20 points) (1) The Secretary considers the quality of the management plan.
1 Documentation Workflow Proposal By Michael Wheatland LibreOffice Documentation Team
BEHAVIOR BASED SELECTION Reducing the risk. Goals  Improve hiring accuracy  Save time and money  Reduce risk.
Final Exam Specifications
Deliverables, final review and final reporting
Test Validation Topics in the BILC Testing Seminars
SNOMED CT Education SIG: Strategic Plan Review
Feedback/Performance Review and Compensation Process
What are standards-based report cards?
Bureau for International
CHAPTER 22 Public Relations Project
STANAG 6001 Testing Update and Introduction to the 2017 Workshop
BILC Conference Prague 2012
BACK TO BASICS BILC Professional Seminar Bled, Slovenia
Writing your personal project report
Creating Analytic Rubrics April 27, 2017
ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING
Release of PARCC Student Results
How Does a State Make an Award to Eligible Providers?
Transforming Grading Robert Marzano
Parent Forum – Elementary Report Card
Tester Assessing and Training The Austrian Armed Forces Approach
Steering Committee Report & Closing Presentation
DESE Educator Evaluation System for Superintendents
Academically Intellectually Gifted Program
CASAS Reports: Assess, Analyze and Adjust
Canadian Defence Academy
Career Banding Program for North Carolina State Government Employees
Chief of English Testing, Language Programs
Performance Review for County Educators
Instructional Learning Cycle:
Roadmap Towards a Validity Argument
TELPAS Alternate Student Eligibility
Performance Review for County Educators
BILC Updates “DEVELOPING OPERATIONAL PROFICIENCY”
Title and Total Compensation Project
Basic Statistics for Non-Mathematicians: What do statistics tell us
Julie Dubeau BILC Secretary COPENHAGEN 4-8 Oct 2009
Recruitment Company considers: 1) internal vs. external recruitment
Defence Requirements Authority for Culture and Language (DRACL)
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
EPAS Educational Planning and Assessment System By: Cindy Beals
Assessing Academic Programs at IPFW
Grade 3 Reading Student Portfolio
SUPPORTING THE Progress Report in MATH
BILC 2012 Prague.
“Language is the most complicated human behaviour” ”
BILC Conference Report of the Steering Committee
European Institute of Public Administration (NL)
Common Core State Standards May 2011
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Developing SMART Professional Development Plans
Successful trialling: from trial and error to best practices
Presentation transcript:

50 Years of BILC: The Evolution of STANAG 6001 1976 – 2016 and the first Benchmark Advisory Test Ray Clifford 24 May 2016

1976: STANAG 6001, Edition 1 NATO adopted the standards that were drafted by BILC during 1973 through 1975. The lack of consistent specifications limited the STANAG’s usefulness for assessment purposes. The brevity of the descriptions allowed for multiple interpretations. A testing expert later called those descriptions “thin, haphazard, and often off the mark”. To fill the gaps, NATO nations implemented their own interpretations.

Negative Impact of Edition 1 National interpretations were not aligned. National tests and ratings were not equivalent. My level 3 might equal your level 2 or even your level 1. The Standardized Language Profile (SLP) for jobs became inflated. SLP’s were often set by people-comparisons rather than by criterion-based job task analyses. “The last guy was a 3; and his language skills were weak, so we need a 4.” The lack of language skills was identified as NATO’s greatest challenge to interoperability.

Actions Taken 1999: BILC formed a working group on Testing and Assessment. Its initial goal was to elaborate on and interpret the original STANAG 6001 descriptors. Representatives from 11 BILC member-nations participated. 2000: That working group produced the “Interpretation and Elaboration Document”. That “Interpretation” was successfully trialed in the new BILC Language Testing Seminar.

2003: STANAG 6001, Edition 2 2002: The BILC Steering Committee Approved the “Interpretation Document”. Forwarded it to the NATO Standardization Agency for approval and publication. 2003: STANAG 6001, Edition 2 was released. It was the first substantive change in a quarter of a century. The interpretation and elaboration document was included as Annex A.

2009: STANAG 6001, Edition 3 After extensive study and work, Edition 3 was published with several substantive changes. It changed the labels for the levels so they better reflected the content of the level descriptions. 0 = No proficiency. 1 = Elementary Survival. 2 = Fair Functional. 3 = Good Professional. 4 = Very Good Expert. 5 = Excellent Highly-articulate native.

2009: STANAG 6001, Edition 3 (Continued) It defined language proficiency as “unrehearsed, general language communication ability”. It added descriptions of “plus levels” as Appendix 1 to Annex A. “A plus level is understood to be more than halfway between two base levels.” “A plus level substantially exceeds the base level, but does not fully or consistently meet all of the criteria for the next higher base level.”

2010: STANAG 6001, Edition 4 Added two additional purposes for which plus levels may be used. Edition 3: “A plus level may be added to a base level for training or evaluation purposes … “ Edition 4: “A plus level may be added to a base level for training, evaluation, recording or reporting purposes … “

2014: STANAG 6001, Edition 5 2014: Edition 4 reformatted and republished in ATrainP-5 as Edition 5. The format and introductory pages were modified. The standards were not intentionally changed. But typos were introduced in the publication process. 2016: Edition 5, version 2 was just published. Typos have been corrected. Edition 5 will also be available on the BILC website.

Benchmark Advisory Test (BAT) A Parallel Effort that Applied the Improved STANAG 6001

Why Benchmark Testing? To promote consistent interpretation and interpretation of STANAG 6001 across national testing programs. To provide an external measure against which nations can compare their national STANAG test results. To pursue a joint development project as a way of demonstrating how STANAG 6001 tests can be designed, developed, and scored.

Benchmark Advisory Test (BAT) 2003: Possibility raised; options discussed. 2004: Steering committee recommended the concept to the NATO Joint Services Subcommittee Group. 2005: BILC launched a volunteer, collaborative effort to create a Reading and Listening BAT. 2005-6: ACT took accepted the BILC work and Contracted to complete tests in 4 skill modalities. Set an implementation date of 2009.

2009 BAT Administration 200 tests were allocated across 11 Nations. Testing began in May, 2009. Tests were administered by Language Testing International. Results were reported to each participating nation, but only for their own personnel. Overall results were reported without identifying the test takers’ nationality.

Summary The STANAG 6001 revision and the BAT development project were an unparalleled success. You, the BILC family, are the reason they succeeded I have never seen an international team that worked with such a high level of energy, goodwill, cooperation, and dedication.

Congratulations on your accomplishments! Summary The STANAG 6001 revision and the BAT development project were an unparalleled success. You, the BILC family, are the reason they succeeded I have never seen an international team that worked with such a high level of energy, goodwill, cooperation, and dedication. Congratulations on your accomplishments!

Stop! Your time is up!

A Footnote In case you don’t remember the BAT study, … the overall BAT test results will be reviewed in my presentation on Thursday.