Vacuum Simulations for ELENA’s LNR-01 R. Kersevan IIC Meeting 9/6/2015

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Vacuum Pressure Calculations. 2 Vaccalc The program vaccalc was used for all calculations. The program required three pieces of information for each.
Advertisements

Beam-plug under M2 and HCAL shielding studies Robert Paluch, Burkhard Schmidt October 9,
Upgrade Plan of KEKB Vacuum system Pre-kickoff KEK1 Y. Suetsugu KEKB Vacuum Group Contents Challenges for vacuum system Designs for.
11-13/10/2007 ILC BDS Kick-Off Meeting, SLAC, US 1 BDS Vacuum System Dr. Oleg B. Malyshev ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory.
Tagger and Vacuum Chamber Design. Outline. Design considerations. Stresses and deformations. Mechanical assembly.
F.Brinker, DESY, July 17 st 2008 Injection to Doris and Petra Fitting the detector in the IP-region Radiation issues Beam optic, Target cell Polarisation.
Vacuum, Surfaces & Coatings Group Technology Department Vacuum tests for CLIC module prototypes 6 November 2013 C. Garion2 Outline: Reminder: specification.
Tagger and Vacuum Chamber Design. Outline. Design considerations. Stresses and deformations. Mechanical assembly.
Vacuum system in the main Linacs C. Garion CERN/TE/VSC CLIC09 workshop, October.
1 Cryostat assembly, integration and commissioning procedures M.Olcese Version: 07 May 2008.
SiD Forward Region Tom Markiewicz/SLAC KILC’12, Taegu, Korea 24 April 2012.
26-28 August 2008 Final EUROTeV Scientific Workshop, Uppsala University, Sweden 1 ILC DR vacuum system related problems and solutions Oleg B. Malyshev.
30/05-03/06/2007 LCWS2007 and ILC2007, DESY Hamburg Germany Vacuum System Specifications What needs to be specified in Vacuum Specification for ICL Damping.
Status of vacuum & interconnections of the CLIC main linac modules C. Garion TE/VSC TBMWG, 9 th November 2009.
13/09/2005Vacuum Systems for Synchrotron Light Sources Workshop, Barcelona, Spain 1 Gas Flow Modelling in Design of the Vacuum System for of the Synchrotron.
VELO workshop, Amsterdam, april ‘00M.Ferro-Luzzi Difficulties with current mechanical design recent FEA results: to obtain sufficient stiffness of center.
Vacuum studies at LAL Bruno Mercier, Christophe Prevost Alexandre Gonnin, Christian Bourgeois, Dirk Zerwas R.P. ILD MDI Meeting 24/3/15.
SuperKEKB Vacuum System - for the positron ring - Y. Suetsugu KEKB Vacuum Group Outline Design and production status of key components Beam pipes for arc.
F. Mazzolini Vacuum Systems for Synchrotron Light Sources Barcelona, September 12– Front-end vacuum system F.Mazzolini.
ELENA Vacuum System R. Kersevan, TE-VSC-IVM R. Kersevan, “ELENA Vacuum System”, - ELENA Project Review, Oct14-15, 2013, CERN.
1 NEG COATING RESULTS AND TRENDS R. Kersevan, Vacuum Group, Tech.Serv.Division, ESRF, Grenoble ALBA-MaxLab Workshop on Vacuum Systems for Synchrotron Radiation.
ALBA Vacuum System, E. Al-Dmour Vacuum Systems for Synchrotron Light Sources 12 th -13 th Sep ALBA Vacuum System ALBA VACUUM SYSTEM E. Al-Dmour On.
Status of the activities on vacuum system C. Garion TBMWG, 20/06/2012.
ELENA Source Vacuum System, LNS R. Kersevan Integration and Installation Committe – 18 Sept 2014.
Preliminary calculations for the vacuum system of ELENA R. Kersevan TE/VSC-IVM – 21/6/2012 The vacuum sectors, the position of vacuum pumps, flanges, and.
Booster and Collider SC magnets. Design & prototyping of UHV and cryostat systems for Booster and Collider A.Smirnov JINR, Dubna, Russia NICA Machine Advisory.
Discussion and preliminary conclusions LIU-SPS ZS Electrostatic Septum Upgrade Review M.J. Barnes.
September 17-21, 2007Workshop on ILC Interaction Region Engineering Design, SLAC IR Vacuum Systems first thoughts Oleg Malyshev ASTeC, STFC Daresbury Laboratory.
Status of the ELENA transfer lines with special consideration of vacuum, hand-over optics and beam time distribution after 2017 W. Bartmann, D. Barna,
SKEKB Mini Work SKEKB Vacuum System – Arc Section – Contents Y.Suetsugu KEKB Vacuum Group 1.Beam Chambers 2.Pumps: Pump, Pressure,
August 4-5, 2004 PEP-II Post Run 4 Review 1 M. Sullivan PEP-II Post Run 4 Review August 4-5, 2004 IR Summary and Issues.
Vacuum chamber fabrication Dates refer to end of fabrication, then 8 weeks are to be added for NEG coating, bake-out, acceptance tests, etc. EN-MME LNR.
1 MONTECARLO CALCULATIONS OF PRESSURE PROFILES FOR THE ESRF DIPOLE/CROTCH AREA R. Kersevan – Vacuum Group, Tech.Serv.Division, ESRF, Grenoble ALBA-MaxLab.
Status of the activities on the vacuum system C. Garion TBMWG, 27/03/2013 Outline: ON/OFF mechanism: tribology study Pumping technology: MB quad VC Accelerating.
ECR - PSB: New KSW magnet in 16L1 Luis Feliciano, 4 th February.
Technology Department MKP status L. Sermeus, L. Ducimetière TCM 18 November 2014.
Vacuum assessment for BI equipment TE-VSC. Why do we need to assess BI components 10/6/2015 BI Beam Operational Spare Strategy Workshop No 2 2 The main.
Vacuum System Requirements for a Higgs Factory e + e - Accelerator R. Kersevan CERN, Technology Department Vacuum, Surfaces and Coatings Group R. Kersevan,
ALBA labs  Magnetic lab  RF lab  Vacuum lab Francis Perez.
L. Sermeus TE-ABT-FPSELENA IIC meeting 3 th April Review of ELENA Injection kicker Luc Sermeus on behalf of WP 2.8 (with informations from EN-MME)
LHC Beampipes Ray Veness / AT-VAC FP XII 08Beam Vacuum- R.Veness.
Wakefield effect in ATF2 Kiyoshi Kubo
2008/12/10 INFN R&D on Low Impedance Beam Chamber and Components Y. Suetsugu, for KEKB Vacuum Group Contents Introduction Beam Chamber Components Connection.
Vacuum conditions in PANDA pbar-line Alexander Gruber, SMI, Vienna, Austria.
A. Kraemer, OLAVIII, July 11th, Gas Loads into SIS100 Cryogenic Vacuum Sections A. Kraemer, Calculations and Transparencies courtesy of St. Wilfert.
Tagger and Vacuum Chamber Design Jim Kellie Glasgow University.
ELENA installation progress F. Butin / ELENA collaboration.
SPSU M.Taborelli Results from MD week 45 Views of extracted liners and RF shields M. Taborelli for SPSU team.
Radiation Shutter Re-Purposing Roy Preece STFC RAL 18 th December 2014.
Vacuum System P. Chiggiato TE-VSC
First ideas on particle free installation of BESSY VSR
Full Anode Insert Pressure Cycle Simulation Device
Sub-system integration for the VBOX
Vacuum Problems in the ILC Damping Ring
ELENA – Vacuum chambers and vacuum activities
ELENA installation and commissioning status
Update on He3 Services design since the ORNL meeting
The Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics
SAES Project: Combination of NEG module and sputter ion pump
General remarks about the HESR and PANDA vacuum system
R. Kersevan, TE-VSC-VSM 30/06/2016
Preliminary Electron Transportation Channel Project for EIC Facility (FAIR, Germany) Dmitry Berkaev Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Russia, ,
Update on MKP Strategy ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS M.J. Barnes
Update on the PSB Transfer Lines
PSB-PS instrumentation for LIU
Summary of NEG material, installation configuration
Hall C Down Stream Beam Pipe And Dump Interface Design
XFEL Collimation and Beam Switchyard Vacuum Issues
SNS PPU Cryomodule Vacuum Vessel
Vacuum in LER and HER. First estimation for the pumping system requirements A.Variola for B.Mercier, C.Prevost, F.Letellier.
Presentation transcript:

Vacuum Simulations for ELENA’s LNR-01 R. Kersevan IIC Meeting 9/6/2015

Recent measurements in VSC premises have shown that the ELENA kicker tank and magnet is far from the specified pressure value, due to an extremely high outgassing (possibly virtual leaks in trapped volumes of the magnet), and also to the fact that the purpose-built NEG-coated plates inserted on the two bulging flanges become saturated during the long bake-out/activation phase; This short and necessarily preliminary presentation aims at showing how an improved pumping on the kicker tank may help attaining a lower pressure along the LNR-01 ring section; The values presented here should NOT be taken at face value: they should be used as an inter-comparison for different configurations… baseline pumping vs upgraded pumping, with and without NEG coating on the neighbouring chambers;

The critical section LNR-01, with the “Y” septum chamber, BTV, kicker tank, BPM, and connecting bellows, as been modelled and analysed with Molflow+; The figure on the left shows the geometry; the pulses kicker magnet is highlighted in red; An outgassing rate of 2E-12 mbar*l/s/cm2 has been assumed for the chambers’ walls; 4E-12 for the surfaces representing bellows; 2E-11 for the surfaces representing the magnet; The kicker chamber shown here represents the updated version with 2000 and 2100 l/s NEG pumps

Distributed pumping (NEG-coating): Vacuum Gauge (CCG) Lumped pumps: 1x 500 l/s NEXTorr at BTV; 2000 l/s CapaciTorr at bottom kicker flange (was 500 l/s StarCell ion-pump); 2100 l/s ZAO pump at kicker side port; Pumping at boundaries (LNI, left side of LNR-01, and right of the BPM: either 300 l/s or 500 l/s; ---*-- Distributed pumping (NEG-coating): On “Y” chamber, BTV body, BPM; No coating on bellows; No coating on kicker tank (coated panels are assumed to be saturated);

Distributed pumping (NEG-coating): Baseline case: NEXTorr D1000 on side port of kicker; 500 l/s StarCell ion-pump at bottom flange of kicker; 3x 300 l/s at boundaries; ---*-- Distributed pumping (NEG-coating): On “Y” chamber, BTV body, BPM; No coating on bellows; No coating on kicker tank (coated panels are assumed to be saturated);

NO Distributed pumping (NEG-coating): Baseline case: NEXTorr D1000 on side port of kicker; 500 l/s StarCell ion-pump at bottom flange of kicker; 3x 300 l/s at boundaries; ---*-- NO Distributed pumping (NEG-coating):

WITH Distributed pumping (NEG-coating): Baseline case: NEXTorr D1000 on side port of kicker; 500 l/s StarCell ion-pump at bottom flange of kicker; 3x 300 l/s at boundaries; ---*-- WITH Distributed pumping (NEG-coating):

NO Distributed pumping (NEG-coating): Upgraded Pumping: CapaciTorr 2000 l/s; ZAO 2100 l/s; ---*-- NO Distributed pumping (NEG-coating):

Upgrade pumping and NEG-coating on “Y”, BTV body, BPM ---*-- WITH Distributed pumping (NEG-coating):

Conclusions An improvement of the installed pumping speed from 500+1000 l/s (nominal, for H2) to 2000+2100 l/s on the kicker tank does not bring a proportional improvement on the average pressure calculated along the antiproton beam trajectory; The main reason for this seems to be the reduction of the corresponding effective pumping speed caused by the geometry of the magnet and the tank, which creates rather narrow passages for the H2 desorbed in large part by the magnet; The pressure bump is localised inside the kicker tank; The pressure measured by the gauge placed on top of the tank should be a bit higher than the average pressure along the magnet; Work to do: try to match precisely the pressures recorded during the lab tests;

SOLID surfaces at the flanges of the kicker tank; “SEPARATED CHAMBERS” ---*-- SOLID surfaces at the flanges of the kicker tank; Outgassing and pumping as per slide 9;