Mesoscale Convective Systems over the Maritime Continent:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Contrasting Tropical Rainfall Regimes Using TRMM and Ground-Based Polarimetric Radar Steven A. Rutledge, Robert Cifelli, Timothy J. Lang Colorado State.
Advertisements

FACTORS INFLUENCING CLIMATE
Precipitation Over Continental Africa and the East Atlantic: Connections with Synoptic Disturbances Matthew A. Janiga November 8, 2011.
The Convective Cloud Population during the Buildup of the Madden- Julian Oscillation AGU Fall Meeting, San Francisco, 7 December 2011 R. Houze, S. Brodzik,
Synoptic, Topographic, and Diurnal Effects on Summer Convection in South America Ulrike Romatschke University of Washington, University of Vienna Robert.
Seminar, National Taiwan University, Taipei, 15 April 2011 Robert Houze University of Washington The tropical convective cloud population.
Extreme Convection in South America as Seen by TRMM Ulrike Romatschke 1, 2 and Robert A. Houze, Jr. 1 1 University of Washington, 2 University of Vienna.
Convective Clouds Lecture Sequence Basic convective cloud types
The Tropical Cloud Population R. A. Houze Lecture, Indian Institute of Tropical Meteorology, Pune, 9 August 2010.
Mesoscale Convective Systems in the Initiation of the MJO Jian Yuan and Robert A. Houze University of Washington CloudSat/CALIPSO Science Team Meeting.
Global Variability of Mesoscale Convective System (MCS) Anvils Jian Yuan Robert A. Houze Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington CloudSat.
Schumacher and Houze (2006) This Lecture: Review of Schumacher and Houze, 2006: Stratiform precipitation over sub- Saharan Africa and the Tropical.
Cirrus Production by Tropical Mesoscale Convective Systems Jasmine Cetrone and Robert Houze 8 February 2008.
Cirrus Production by Tropical Mesoscale Convective Systems Jasmine Cetrone and Robert Houze University of Washington Motivation Atmospheric heating by.
FACTORS INFLUENCING CLIMATE
Contrasting Tropical Rainfall Regimes Using TRMM and Ground-Based Polarimetric Radar Steven A. Rutledge, Robert Cifelli, Timothy J. Lang Colorado State.
TRMM Observations of Convection over the Himalayan Region R. A. Houze and D. C. Wilton University of Washington Presented 1 February 2005 at the International.
Anvil Clouds of Mesoscale Convective Systems and Their Effects on the Radiative Heating Structure Jian Yuan and Robert A. Houze, University of Washington.
The tropical convective cloud population Peking University Seminar, Beijing, 4 July 2011 Robert Houze University of Washington.
Multi-sensor Analysis of Tropical Mesoscale Convective Systems Jian Yuan and R. A. Houze [J. Clim., J. Atmos. Sci.] NASA A-Train Symposium, New Orleans,
Diurnal Variability of Deep Tropical Convection R. A. Houze Lecture, Summer School on Severe and Convective Weather, Nanjing, July 2011.
Diurnal Variability of Deep Tropical Convection R. A. Houze Lecture, Indian Institute of Tropical Meteorology, Pune, 12 August 2010.
Global Variability of Mesoscale Convective System Anvil Structure Jian Yuan Jasmine Cetrone Robert A. Houze, Jr. ARM Cloud Modeling Working Group, Princeton,
Orographic triggering and mesoscale organization of extreme storms in subtropical South America Kristen Lani Rasmussen Robert A. Houze, Jr. ICAM 2013,
Global Patterns & Relative Humidity
Understanding the effects of aerosols on deep convective clouds Eric Wilcox, Desert Research Institute, Reno NV Tianle.
Earth's Atmosphere Troposphere- the layer closest to Earth's surface extending roughly 16 km (10 miles) above Earth. Densest – N, O, & water vapor Stratosphere-
Chapter 18 – Climate and Climate Change
The mesoscale organization and dynamics of extreme convection in subtropical South America Kristen Lani Rasmussen Robert A. Houze, Jr., Anil Kumar 2013.
Diurnal Variations of Tropical Convection Ohsawa, T., H. Ueda, T. Hayashi, A. Watanabe, and J. Matsumoto, 2001 : Diurnal Variations of Convective Activity.
Climate and Climate Change Environmental Science Spring 2011.
Determination of Tropical Pacific Cloud Structures using AQUA MODIS Data Presented By: Terry Kubar Advisors: Dennis Hartmann and Rob Wood.
25N 30N 65E75E65E75E65E75E Height (km) 8 Distance (km)
The MJO Cloud Population over the Indian Ocean
MJO Insights from the S-PolKa radar in DYNAMO Robert A. Houze, Jr. H. C. Barnes, S. W. Powell, A. K. Rowe, M. Zuluaga University of Washington Symposium.
1 Spatio-temporal Distribution of Latent Heating in the Southeast Asian Monsoon Region School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences Georgia Institute of Technology.
Section 1.2 The Causes of Weather
Global Distribution of Different Forms of Convection as Seen by TRMM Robert A. Houze, Jr. University of Washington with: K. L. Rasmussen, M. D. Zuluaga,
Impact of Cloud Microphysics on the Development of Trailing Stratiform Precipitation in a Simulated Squall Line: Comparison of One- and Two-Moment Schemes.
Multisensor Investigation of Deep Convection AGU, San Francisco, 5 December 2012 Robert A. Houze, Jr., & Jian Yuan University of Washington.
Factors affecting Temperature
Earth Science Chapter 8 Climates.
FACTORS INFLUENCING CLIMATE
Starter: When is the Earth closest to the sun?
Tropical and subtropical convection in South Asia and South America
Section 1.2 The Causes of Weather
Temperature Variations
Maritime Continent Convection
Hannah C. Barnes, Robert A. Houze, Jr., and Manuel D. Zuluaga
What Causes Different Climates?
The Variable Structure of Convection at Low Latitudes
M. D. Zuluaga and R. A. Houze, Jr. University of Washington
Ulrike Romatschke University of Washington, University of Vienna
Impact of the vertical resolution on Climate Simulation using CESM
Polarimetric radar analysis of convection in the complex topography
Agenda: Tues Opening Activity: Rocks and Glaciers Review
Note: Winds are parallel to the lines of constant pressure height.
MJO Modulation of Lightning in Mesoscale Convective Systems
Chapter 18.1: What causes climate? Page 614
Climate Causes and Zones.
Climatology of coastal low level jets over the Bohai Sea and Yellow Sea and the relationship with regional atmospheric circulations Delei Li1, Hans von.
Katrina Virts and Robert A. Houze, Jr. University of Washington
Aura Science Team meeting
Analysis of CO in the tropical troposphere using Aura satellite data and the GEOS-Chem model: insights into transport characteristics of the GEOS meteorological.
Jennifer C. DeHart, Robert A. Houze, Jr. and Deanna A. Hence
Mesoscale Convective Systems Observed by CloudSat
Ulrike Romatschke, Robert Houze, Socorro Medina
Ming-Dah Chou Department of Atmospheric Sciences
Dual-Aircraft Investigation of the Inner Core of Hurricane Nobert
Presentation transcript:

Mesoscale Convective Systems over the Maritime Continent: A CloudSat/Multisensor Perspective Angela Rowe, Robert Houze, Jr., Katrina Virts, Manuel Zuluaga University of Washington, Seattle, WA CALIPSO-CloudSat Science Team Meeting Newport News, VA 1 March 2016

Tropical rainfall TRMM PR From Houze et al. (2015) Distribution of rainfall (average rain rates) across the tropics in Dec-Feb and Jun-Aug from 16+ years of TRMM Precipitation Radar Tropical latent heating concentrated in three zones associated with land masses: central Africa, Amazonia, monsoonal complex extending from South Asia through the Maritime Continent to northern Australia Significant amounts of latent heating also occurs over open oceans: ITCZ, SPCZ; note near-coastal maximization of oceanic convection occurs in connection with monsoonal climates, mountain ranges near coastlines From Houze et al. (2015) TRMM PR

A-Train Identification of MCSs Aqua MODIS and AMSR-E, CloudSat CPR Smallest 25% (<12,000 km2) Largest 25% (>40,000 km2) “Superclusters” Size of MCS is size of cold cloud top. To qualify as MCS, must have large cold cloud top, large rain area, and some heavy rain. This figure shows spatial distribution of active MCSs. Color of each point shows the number of active MCSs found within a circular area with radius of five degrees centered on that point. (a) Small separated MCSs (<12,000km2; i.e., the smallest 25%) in DJF, (b) large separated MCS (>40,000km2; i.e., the largest 25%) in DJF, (c) connected MCS in DJF, (d)-(f) same as (a)-(c) except for JJA. Small separated MCSs numerous mainly over continental regions of Africa and S. America Large separated MCSs occur frequently in these same continental regions Large separated MCSs occur with great frequency over the MC (relatively few small ones occur) Oceanic conditions in the MC favor growth of MCSs to larger sizes Connected MCSs occur mostly over warm pool regions of Indian and west Pacific Oceans (weaker diurnal cycle – strong diurnal cycle over MC likely limits large connected systems there) Yuan and Houze 2010 Yuan and Houze 2010 Aqua MODIS and AMSR-E, CloudSat CPR

A-Train Identification of Anvils Aqua MODIS and AMSR-E, CloudSat CPR Annual climatology of MCS anvil clouds for 2007. Color shows percentage of area covered by anvil clouds associated with (a) Small separated MCSs, (b) large separated MCSs, and (c) connected MCSs for each 5x5 grid. Anvil clouds from large separated MCSs favored over open water, occur 10 times more frequently than those of small separated MCSs and cover several times more area overall Nonraining anvils of MCs throughout tropics mostly <~10 km thick (modal thickness of ~4-5 km) Over warm oceans of the warm pool, less thick anvils may extend out to 5 times the equivalent radii of primary rain areas of the MCs Relationship to distance from raining core, processes forming anvil (convective/stratiform) Differences in reflectivity distributions of anvils in MCSs over ocean, continents (thicker anvils nearly absent over continental regions) Focus on frequency of anvils in MC, WP Maritime Continent: Important energy source of global circulation GCMs still have trouble resolving convection over MC (boreal winter) Poor representation of MJO Significant diurnal cycle Cloud lifecycle Latent heating (convective/stratiform) Radiative heating (anvil characteristics) CloudSat CPR: vertical structure of anvils (diurnally, regionally) Aqua MODIS and AMSR-E, CloudSat CPR Yuan and Houze 2010

IWC anomalies WV anomalies MC WP Conventions for the IWC and WV plots are as in the paper--what's plotted are anomalies from the climatological monthly mean, overlaid with CALIPSO cloud fraction and ERA-Interim wind anomalies.  IWC and water vapor mixing ratio profiles retrieved from thermal microwave emissions in five spectral regions measured by the MLS aboard A-Train’s Aura IWC: Outward advection of cloud ice at high altitudes (TTL above 150 mb), greatest for larger systems MC interior (left) vs West Pacific open ocean (right) See Virts and Houze (2015) Aura MLS (IWC, WV: shading), CALIPSO CALIOP (cloud fraction: black contours)

Warm Pool/MC Day (1330 LT) – Night (0130 LT) CloudSat CPR Noticeable narrowing of CFADs and decreases in overall reflectivity found when moving away from rain areas Anvils in CMCSs tend to show a sharply peaked, narrower histogram at most levels, whereas SMCSs show a mode of high reflectivity concentration in the lower portion of the cloud Difference CFADs: Daytime small SMCSs stronger, broader reflectivities aloft (convective) For large and connected MCSs, the daytime distributions are narrower, perhaps indicating their maturity (more time for size sorting/aggregation processes). Similar for connected MCSs Larger reflectivities in anvil clouds are due to the presence of larger particles Broadening of PSDs with distance below cloud top due primarily to aggregation of large particles and depletion of smaller ones Aggregation broadens the size distribution, thereby decreasing the slope Closest to the raining centers, thick anvils have broadest distribution of reflectivity at any level Narrowing of reflectivity distribution and weakening of overall reflectivity with increasing distance from raining center consistent with increase in age of anvils (with time, larger particles settled out – size sorting/sedimentation) Compared to oceanic MCSs, those in continental regions appear to have broader reflectivity distributions, especially in upper portions of anvil clouds Narrower-peaked, high-frequency distribution tilting toward weaker reflectivity with increasing height is characteristic of a stratiform cloud in which ice particle growth dominated by vapor diffusion and aggregation (less influenced by detrainment of ice from convective cores) CloudSat CPR

Maritime Continent Diurnal, land/ocean Aqua MODIS and AMSR-E Hot spots over land/coasts at night, Differences in interior Maritime Continent (diurnal cycle, large separated MCSs) and western Pacific (connected MCSs) Aqua MODIS and AMSR-E

Maritime Continent - anvils Over Maritime Continent: greater difference in diurnal cycle than land/ocean Daytime: Narrower distribution/decreased slope – mature/aggregation, but higher reflectivities aloft (larger particles) CloudSat CPR

Maritime Continent - anvils CloudSat CPR

Broad Stratiform Regions Deep Convective Cores Diurnal Cycle Land Broad Stratiform Regions Ocean Probability of a location being under a DCC, WCC, BSR during NDJF 1998-2013 Analysis for the Maritime Continent! At 1330 LT (CloudSat “day”): Over land, increase in deep/wide convection (not quite peak), near min in stratiform (small separated MCSs) Over ocean: min in convection, more stratiform (decaying) At 0130 LT (CloudSat “night”) : Over land, increasing stratiform, nearing min in convection Over ocean, max convection (still less than afternoon convection over land), increasing stratiform DCC WCC BSR SHI TRMM PR

Maritime Continent - anvils MCSs tend to form during the night then slowly spread out, weaken during the day Day: Diurnally driven convection Night: Developing system Day: Decaying system Night: Developing system CloudSat CPR

West Pacific Ocean Ocean CloudSat CPR, TRMM PR Similar diurnal dependence over Warm Pool (oceanic only) Analysis for the West Pacific Ocean At 1330 UTC (CloudSat “day”): peak in stratiform (mature) At 0130 UTC (CloudSat “night”): min in stratiform, developing from convection So are there differences between anvil characteristics over WP and MC? Taller anvil with mature system during day, but broader distribution at night (convective) CloudSat CPR, TRMM PR

Maritime Continent vs. West Pacific Subtle difference overall! Taller, broader, more intense over MP Diurnal? Land vs Ocean? Conv/strat? Not much difference Slight tendency for deeper, stronger, broader reflectivities over MC (land? Convection?) CloudSat CPR

Maritime Continent vs. West Pacific Biggest differences during day At night, similar pattern to all But during day, while reflectivity distributions are broader and stronger over MC, see deeper anvils over WP when isolate ocean areas only Maximum anvil reflectivity over ocean located higher in altitude during day: widespread cold cloud entities slowly rising in the upper troposphere (relevant to injection of ice and water vapor into troposphere Taller, strong, broader over MC at night More intense, broader over MC Taller for WP CloudSat CPR

Conclusions Maritime Continent W. Pacific Land Ocean Ocean Day Similar Maritime Continent W. Pacific Similar Land Ocean Ocean Stronger, lower Developing SMCSs Decaying LMCSs Mature LMCSs Day Taller, Stronger, Broader Taller, Stronger, Narrower Taller, Narrower Relationship with lifecycle (mature: more time for size sorting/aggregation, decaying, proximity to convection) Daytime peak in stratiform over WP: widespread cold cloud entities slowly rising in upper troposphere (aggregation processes, mature) Future work MJO phase Comparison with continental (Africa), green ocean (Amazonia), coastal regions Developing LMCSs Developing LMCSs Developing LMCSs Similar Night Dependence on diurnal cycle, MCS type, lifecycle (multisensor) Implications for feedbacks, Comparison to other regions

Thank you! This work is supported by NASA Grants #NNX13AQ37G, #NNX13AG71G, #NNX16AD75G