The Myers-Briggs Typology Indicator

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lets do The Buzz……. EI I think out loud I generally act quickly Im a good talker I prefer to stand out I think before I speak I.
Advertisements

Kamran Waheed (Fa2012/MSc-EM/CE/ 001) INDIVIDUAL PRESENTATION.
Building Your Leadership Profile By Carrie Pilant Presented at Imogene Gideon Elementary Monday, November 15, 2010.
Who Do You Want on Your Team? Lesson on Communication Styles in the Classroom Randi Purvis CPSY 646.
1 Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Carl G. Jung’s theory of psychological types Differences between normal healthy people Source of misunderstanding and miscommunication.
Plan Ahead 11 th Do What You Are #1. Objectives To continue the career planning process by identifying: – Your personality type – Careers that match your.
Sherfield and Moody Cornerstones
Why Does it Matter? Presumably, different types are better/worse at different tasks – CS needs an unusually broad range of types to get everything done.
Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Career Applications The MBTI measures Preferences Tendencies Characteristics.
Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Workshop
Getting to know me…. Myers-Briggs Type Indicator.
Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI). Description of the MBTI Based on Jung’s theory of types People are classified as one of 16 types (does not use dimensions)
Collection 1: Chasing Success
What’s Your Type? Understanding personality types: How people see the world and make decisions differently Robert Ford World Academy Facilitator.
© Copyright 2013 OPP Ltd. All rights reserved. Using type to enhance your coaching and feedback style Alice King, Principal Consultant.
DJE– If you had to describe yourself in one word, what would it be?
Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. MBTI Background Based on Jung – late 1800’s and early 1900’s – Interested in individual differences to explain behavior Preferences.
Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Presented by: Jennifer Scott 1.
1 Helping you discover your own personal leadership style using Meyers Briggs using Meyers Briggs Nick Mathys, Ph.D. Leadership Assessment.
Myers-Briggs Type Inventory (MBTI) Carl Jung: Theory explaining predictable patterns of behavior Predictable differences caused by differences in how people.
Looking At Type Looking At Type A Description of the Preferences Reported by The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator By Earle C. Page CAPT.
Internship and career services Summer Fusion 2015.
Myer Briggs Type Indicators. WHO ARE YOU? “know thyself” - Socrates Introduction to TypeIntroduction to Type, Sixth Edition, p 25 by Isabel Briggs Myers.
Myers-Briggs Type Indicator
Why Does it Matter? Presumably, different types are better/worse at different tasks – CS needs an unusually broad range of types to get everything done.
What the personality typology letters mean? E vs. I, S vs. N, T vs. F, J vs. P.
The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI). Overview 1.Self-Report Instrument 2.Nonjudgmental Instrument 3.Preference Indicator 4.Well Researched Instrument.
 Myers & Briggs Personality Dimensions 1. Carl Jung & Personality Types  Jung’s way of classifying people and their personalities assumes:  Human behavior.
The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) Will B. Goode University of Iowa.
08 Aug 2005CSE403, Summer'05, Lecture 14 Lecture 14: Personality Types Valentin Razmov.
MBTI – KGI Myers-Briggs Type Indicator – Klein Group Instrument Robert R. Klein, Ed.D.
Improvement Leaders Collaboratives Residential Module MBTI.
MYERS-BRIGGS WORKSHOP Knowing Yourself and Others… Heidi Lender, M.A. Assistant Director Strommen Career and Internship Center.
And LEARNING SYTLE. Extroverts Extroverts focus on the outer world of people and things. Extroverts need interaction with people. In school extroverts.
PERSONALITYPERSONALITYPERSONALITYPERSONALITY PERSONALITYPERSONALITYPERSONALITYPERSONALITY.
Session Learning Goals Better understand your personality dimensions Better understand others Be able to apply MBTI results to your personal and professional.
Faculty Development Workshop September 17, 2010 Work Style Differences: Pearls from Myers Briggs.
Your Learning Style.
Meghan-Rose O’Neill Senior Academic Program Advisor, The Washington Center MYERS BRIGGS PERSONALITY TYPE INDICATOR.
Facilitating Learning Personality Preferences and Student Learning.
Personality Type and Learning Style of the Intro to Business Student: A Bridge to Stronger Teams
Why Does it Matter? Presumably, different types are better/worse at different tasks CS needs an unusually broad range of types to get everything done Numerical.
Cornerstones for Career College Success 3rd edition
Amity Business School Amity School of Business BBA, SEMESTER II INDIVIDUAL, SOCIETY AND NATION Divya Goel Module 1.
Myers Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI)
Paragon Learning Style Inventory (PLSI)
Psychodynamic Approach
MBTI and Communication: A Guide to the Sixteen Types
Copyright Type Association Benelux
Sherfield and Moody Cornerstones
MYERS-BRIGGS WORKSHOP
MYERS-BRIGGS WORKSHOP
Personality Profiles.
Individual differences
Extraversion Introversion
Shannon Avison David Freeman Linda Kirby Nancy Barger
MYERS-BRIGGS WORKSHOP
A Tool for Audience Analysis
Myers – Briggs Type Indicator ( MBTI )
Understand your audience and aligning the communication for your RIA
Paragon Learning Style Inventory (PLSI)
MYERS-BRIGGS WORKSHOP
B4 r ENFJ ENFP ENTJ ENTP ESFJ ESFP ESTJ ESTP INFJ INFP INTJ INTP ISFJ
PSI Conference on Philanthropy June 26, 2018
Exploring Your Personality and Major
MYERS-BRIGGS WORKSHOP
MYERS-BRIGGS WORKSHOP
MYERS-BRIGGS WORKSHOP
Leadership style Task Planful flexible People Introduction:
A Tool for Audience Analysis
Presentation transcript:

The Myers-Briggs Typology Indicator ISTJ “Take your time and do it right” ISFJ “On my honor, to do my duty…” INFJ “Catalyst for positive change” INTJ “Competence + Independenct = Perfection” ISTP “Doing the best I can with what I’ve got” ISFP “It’s the thought that counts” INFP “Still waters run deep” INTP “Ingenious problem solvers” ESTP “Let’s get busy!” ESFP “Don’t worry, Be Happy” ENFP “Anything’s possible” ENTP “Life’s Entrepreneurs” ENTJ “Everything’s fine – I’m in charge” ENFJ “The public relations specialist” ESFJ “What can I do for you?” ESTJ “Taking care of business” The Myers-Briggs Typology Indicator

What is the Myers-Briggs Typology Indicator? An instrument to make Carl Jungs’ theories accessible and usable in everyday life. It is currently the most widely used personality preference instrument in the world. A tool that reflects an individual’s preferences, but does NOT measure abilities, likelihood for success, intelligence, skills, maturity, or mental health. A tool for helping people understand each other’s differences.

Constructive Use of Differences Isabel Myer’s goal for type and the MBTI® instrument: Becoming aware of differences Acknowledging the value of differences Practicing new behaviors, seeking out others with differences Incorporating different perspectives into our own processes

Type Preference Type describes innate preferences – we all have access to both aspects of type, we just have a preference for using a particular one The preferred type has been strengthened by use We all use both preferences, but usually not with equal comfort

INTROVERSION OR EXTRAVERSION

Favorite world: Do you prefer to focus on your own inner world or on the outer world? This is called Introversion (I) or Extraversion (E).

People who prefer Introversion Are attracted to the inner world of thoughts, feelings, and reflections Are usually very aware of their inner reactions Prefer to interact with people they know Are often quiet in meetings and seem uninvolved Are often reserved and harder to get to know May not be as aware of the outer world around them

People who prefer Extraversion Are attracted to the outer world of people and events Are aware of who and what is around them Enjoy meeting and talking with new people Are friendly, often verbally skilled, and easy to know Tend to speak out easily and often at meetings May not be as aware of what is going on inside themselves

Introverts (I) vs. Extraverts (E) Good I/E Words Introverts (I) vs. Extraverts (E) Introverts Territorial Concentration Internal Depth Intensive Limited relationships Cautious disclosure Contained Internal reactions Reflective Thinks to speak Extraverts Social Interaction External Breadth Extensive Multiple relationships Free disclosure Expressive External events Gregarious Speaks to think

I E Self-Assessment ? ? Very Clear Fairly Clear Fairly Clear Very Given the choice, which do you prefer: Introversion or Extraversion? How clear are you about your preference? ? I E ? Very Clear Fairly Clear Fairly Clear Very Clear Slight Slight

Any question on I and E? ISTJ ISFJ INFJ INTJ ISTP ISFP INFP INTP ESTP “Take your time and do it right” ISFJ “On my honor, to do my duty…” INFJ “Catalyst for positive change” INTJ “Competence + Independenct = Perfection” ISTP “Doing the best I can with what I’ve got” ISFP “It’s the thought that counts” INFP “Still waters run deep” INTP “Ingenious problem solvers” ESTP “Let’s get busy!” ESFP “Don’t worry, Be Happy” ENFP “Anything’s possible” ENTP “Life’s Entrepreneurs” ENTJ “Everything’s fine – I’m in charge” ENFJ “The public relations specialist” ESFJ “What can I do for you?” ESTJ “Taking care of business” Any question on I and E?

Sensing OR Intuition

Information: Do you prefer to focus on the basic information you take in or do you prefer to interpret and add meaning? This is called Sensing (S) or Intuition (N).

People who prefer Sensing See and collect facts and details Are practical and realistic Start at the beginning and take one step at a time Are specific and literal when speaking, writing, and listening Live in the present, dealing with the here and now Prefer reality to fantasy

People who prefer Intuition See patterns, possibilities, connections, and meanings in information Are conceptual and abstract Start anywhere and may leap over basic steps Speak and write in general, metaphorical terms Live in the future – the possibilities Prefer imagination and ingenuity to reality

Sensors (S) vs. iNtuitives (N) Good S/N Words Sensors (S) vs. iNtuitives (N) Sensors Literal Present Tangible Perspiration Actual Down-to-earth Fact Practicality Specific iNtuitives Random Future Conceptual Inspirational Theoretical Head-in-the-clouds Fantasy Ingenuity General

S N Self-Assessment ? ? Very Clear Fairly Clear Fairly Clear Very Given the choice, which do you prefer: Sensing or Intuition? How clear are you about your preference? ? S N ? Very Clear Fairly Clear Fairly Clear Very Clear Slight Slight

Any question on S and N? ISTJ ISFJ INFJ INTJ ISTP ISFP INFP INTP ESTP “Take your time and do it right” ISFJ “On my honor, to do my duty…” INFJ “Catalyst for positive change” INTJ “Competence + Independenct = Perfection” ISTP “Doing the best I can with what I’ve got” ISFP “It’s the thought that counts” INFP “Still waters run deep” INTP “Ingenious problem solvers” ESTP “Let’s get busy!” ESFP “Don’t worry, Be Happy” ENFP “Anything’s possible” ENTP “Life’s Entrepreneurs” ENTJ “Everything’s fine – I’m in charge” ENFJ “The public relations specialist” ESFJ “What can I do for you?” ESTJ “Taking care of business” Any question on S and N?

Thinking OR Feeling

Decisions: When making decisions, do you prefer to first look at logic and consistency or first look at the people and special circumstances? This is called Thinking (T) or Feeling (F).

People who prefer Thinking Use logic to analyze the problem, assess pros and cons Focus on the facts and the principles Are good at analyzing a situation Focus on problems and tasks – not relationships May not include the impacts on people or people’s emotions in their decision making

People who prefer Feeling Use their personal values to understand the situation Focus on the values of the group or organization Are good at understanding people and their viewpoints Concentrate on relationships and harmony May overlook logical consequences of individual decisions

Thinkers (T) vs. Feelers (F) Good T/F Words Thinkers (T) vs. Feelers (F) Thinkers Non-personal Objective Principles Laws Firmness Just Clarity Critique Policy Detached Head Feelers Interpersonal Subjective Principals Circumstances Persuasion Humane Harmony Appreciate Social Values Involved Heart

T F Self-Assessment ? ? Very Clear Fairly Clear Fairly Clear Very Given the choice, which do you prefer: Thinking or Feeling? How clear are you about your preference? ? T F ? Very Clear Fairly Clear Fairly Clear Very Clear Slight Slight

Any question on T and F? ISTJ ISFJ INFJ INTJ ISTP ISFP INFP INTP ESTP “Take your time and do it right” ISFJ “On my honor, to do my duty…” INFJ “Catalyst for positive change” INTJ “Competence + Independenct = Perfection” ISTP “Doing the best I can with what I’ve got” ISFP “It’s the thought that counts” INFP “Still waters run deep” INTP “Ingenious problem solvers” ESTP “Let’s get busy!” ESFP “Don’t worry, Be Happy” ENFP “Anything’s possible” ENTP “Life’s Entrepreneurs” ENTJ “Everything’s fine – I’m in charge” ENFJ “The public relations specialist” ESFJ “What can I do for you?” ESTJ “Taking care of business”

Judging OR Perceiving

Structure: In dealing with the outside world, do you prefer to get things decided or do you prefer to stay open to new information and options? This is called Judging (J) or Perceiving (P).

People who prefer Judging Like to make plans and follow them Like to get things settled and finished Like environments with structure and clear limits Enjoy being decisive and organizing others Handle deadlines and time limits comfortably Plan ahead to avoid last minute rushes

People who prefer Perceiving Like to respond resourcefully to changing situations Like to leave things open, gather more information Like environments that are flexible; dislike rules and limits May not like making decisions, even when pressed Tend to think there is plenty of time to do things Often have to rush to complete things at the last minute

Judgers (J) vs. Perceivers (P) Good J/P Words Judgers (J) vs. Perceivers (P) Judgers Resolved Decided Fixed Control Closure Planned Structure Definite Scheduled Product Perceivers Pending Wait and See Flexible Adapt Openness Open-ended Alternatives Tentative Spontaneous Process

J P Self-Assessment ? ? Very Clear Fairly Clear Fairly Clear Very Given the choice, which do you prefer: Judging or Perceiving? How clear are you about your preference? ? J P ? Very Clear Fairly Clear Fairly Clear Very Clear Slight Slight

Any question on J and P? ISTJ ISFJ INFJ INTJ ISTP ISFP INFP INTP ESTP “Take your time and do it right” ISFJ “On my honor, to do my duty…” INFJ “Catalyst for positive change” INTJ “Competence + Independenct = Perfection” ISTP “Doing the best I can with what I’ve got” ISFP “It’s the thought that counts” INFP “Still waters run deep” INTP “Ingenious problem solvers” ESTP “Let’s get busy!” ESFP “Don’t worry, Be Happy” ENFP “Anything’s possible” ENTP “Life’s Entrepreneurs” ENTJ “Everything’s Fine – I’m in charge” ENFJ “The public relations specialist” ESFJ “What can I do for you?” ESTJ “Taking care of business”

When combined, your preferences indicate your personality type. or S N or T F or J P or

16 Personality Types ISTJ ISFJ INFJ INTJ ISTP ISFP INFP INTP ESTP ESFP “Take your time and do it right” ISFJ “On my honor, to do my duty…” INFJ “Catalyst for positive change” INTJ “Competence + Independenct = Perfection” ISTP “Doing the best I can with what I’ve got” ISFP “It’s the thought that counts” INFP “Still waters run deep” INTP “Ingenious problem solvers” ESTP “Let’s get busy!” ESFP “Don’t worry, Be Happy” ENFP “Anything’s possible” ENTP “Life’s Entrepreneurs” ENTJ “Everything’s fine – I’m in charge” ENFJ “The public relations specialist” ESFJ “What can I do for you?” ESTJ “Taking care of business” 16 Personality Types

Estimated Frequencies Frequencies of the types in the United States Population ISTJ 11-14% ISFJ 9-14% INFJ 1-3% INTJ 2-4% Total I 47-55% S 66-74% T 40-50% J 54-60% E 45-53% N 26-34% F 50-60% P 40-46% ISTP 4-6% ISFP 5-9% INFP 4-5% INTP 3-5% ESTP 4-5% ESFP 4-9% ENFP 6-8% ENTP 2-5% ESTJ 8-12% ESFJ 9-13% ENFJ 2-5% ENTJ 2-5% Center for Applications of Psychological Type, Inc.

Estimated Frequencies Frequencies of the types in the United States Population ISTJ 7-10% ISFJ 15-20% INFJ 2-4% INTJ 1-3% Females I 45-55% S 70-75% T 24-35% J 55-60% E 45-55% N 25-30% F 65-76% P 40-45% ISTP 2-3% ISFP 6-10% INFP 4-7% INTP 1-3% ESTP 2-4% ESFP 7-10% ENFP 8-10% ENTP 2-4% ESTJ 6-8% ESFJ 12-17% ENFJ 3-6% ENTJ 1-4% Center for Applications of Psychological Type, Inc.

Estimated Frequencies Frequencies of the types in the United States Population ISTJ 14-19% ISFJ 6-8% INFJ 1-2% INTJ 2-6% Males I 50-55% S 65-72% T 55-67% J 52-58% E 45-50% N 28-35% F 33-45% P 42-48% ISTP 6-9% ISFP 4-8% INFP 3-5% INTP 4-7% ESTP 5-6% ESFP 3-7% ENFP 5-7% ENTP 3-7% ESTJ 10-12% ESFJ 5-8% ENFJ 1-3% ENTJ 3-6% Center for Applications of Psychological Type, Inc.

MyersBriggsTypes CC BY-SA 3.0 Jake Beech - Own work

Jung Typology Test™ http://www.humanmetrics.com/ Take the test

Introverts communicating with Extraverts should: Focus on actions to be taken Focus on results Communicate verbally with enthusiasm Emphasize action over deliberation

Extraverts communicating with Introverts should: Communicate a well-thought-through idea or plan Build in time for Introverts to reflect before deciding Communicate in written form rather than orally Allow airtime for Introverts who wait for silence to speak

Sensors communicating with Intuitives should: Start with an overarching description of the issue or challenge rather than the relevant details Allow room for creative exploration before moving to facts Describe the overall goal and strategies before moving to tactics Explain the desired outcomes and related challenges of a project

Intuitives communicating with Sensors should: Clearly identify the problem they are trying to solve Share relevant facts and details Reduce risk factors or required changes Describe successful applications of the desired strategies

Thinkers communicating with Feelers should: Be descriptive rather than judgmental Use empathy by imagining the other’s perspective Start with a concern for what is important to people Consider a decision’s impact on the people who carry it out Start with the positives rather than the negatives

Feelers communicating with Thinkers should: Discuss the costs and benefits of the issues Identify the issue clearly, the principles involved, and potential solutions, as well as their strengths and weaknesses Take a stand and make their case succinctly Be willing to engage in debate without taking it personally

Judgers communicating with Perceivers should: Allow Perceivers flexibility around “how” they meet their goals Allow sufficient time for brainstorming Realize there are often far more “right” solutions than their own Consider multiple options before pressing for closure Understand that over-directing Perceivers will lead to their resistance

Perceivers communicating with Judgers should: Understand that frequent or last-minute changes adversely affect Judgers Take Judgers’ deadlines seriously and “to the minute” Balance brainstorming with analysis and decision-making Reopen decisions only when new data significantly impacts the decision Take a clear stand

?

References Krikau, Paul. “The Myers-Briggs Typology Indicator” The Myers & Briggs Foundation. “MBTI Basics” Berney, Liz. “Using the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator to Enhance Workplace Communication”