Level of Service and Risk: What’s the Connection?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AASHTO Internal Audit Conference 2012 – Phoenix Daniel Fodera, CMQ/OE Program Management Improvement Team Federal Highway Administration.
Advertisements

THE DEVELOPMENT BANK OF SOUTHERN AFRICA
Own Risk & Solvency Assessment (ORSA): The heart of Risk & Capital Management John Spencer Director, Ultimate Risk Solutions.
Tax Risk Management Keeping Up with the Ever-Changing World of Corporate Tax March 27, 2007 Tax Services Bryan Slone March 27, 2007.
The Medium Term Expenditure Framework
Improving Your Business Results Six Sigma Qualtec Six Sigma Qualtec Six Sigma Qualtec – All Rights Reserved June 26, 2002 BEYOND SIX SIGMA: A HOLISTIC.
AUDIT COMMITTEE FORUM TM ACF Roundtable IT Governance – what does it mean to you as an audit committee member July 2010 The AUDIT COMMITTEE FORUM TM is.
Chapter 14 Assessing the Value of IT. Traditional Financial Approaches  ROI – Return on Investments Each area is considered an investment center ROI.
Aust. AM Collaborative Group (AAMCOG) An introduction to ISO “What to do” guide 20th October 2014.
Moving from money well accounted for to money well spent UK Information Technology Summit May 2005 Helen McDonald A/Chief Information Officer Treasury.
The Urban Infrastructure Challenge in Canada: Focusing on Housing Affordability and Choice Presentation by CHBA – [Name] to The Municipal Council of [Name]
Privileged and Confidential Strategic Approach to Asset Management Presented to October Urban Water Council Regional Seminar.
Sustainability and Total Cost of Ownership Strategies for Higher Education.
PEIP National workshop in Montenegro: developing environmental infrastructure projects in the water sector Feasibility Study Preparation Venelina Varbova.
Integrating Long Term Financial Planning and Asset Management: A CEO’s Perspective International Local Government Infrastructure and Asset Management Conference.
The Challenge of IT-Business Alignment
Jeff’s slides. Transportation Kitchener Transportation Master Plan Define and prioritize a transportation network that is supportive of all modes of.
December 14, 2011/Office of the NIH CIO Operational Analysis – What Does It Mean To The Project Manager? NIH Project Management Community of Excellence.
Module 4: Systems Development Chapter 12: (IS) Project Management.
1 Reduction to our parliamentary appropriations Our challenge doesn’t end there.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
© CT Management Group Pty Ltd 2015 Municipal Association of Victoria Rate Cap Forum 25 th November 2015 Ian Mann CT Management Group
Select Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
Organizations of all types and sizes face a range of risks that can affect the achievement of their objectives. Organization's activities Strategic initiatives.
Overview of SAP Application Services By Accely. Introduction Developed organizations in any business industry will invest in SAP programs to offer progressive.
Portfolio Management December Vision To achieve a flexible, responsive and synchronized portfolio that meets the short and long term needs of.
New Economy Breakfast Seminar – 13 July What Has Changed?
Grace McLenaghan Asset Management Reporting at the Region of Peel
Bridging Business & Buildings:
Eric Rinearson Director, Facilities Maintenance Services
JMFIP Financial Management Conference
Traditional Knowledge
Presenter: Dave Torres, Senior Product Manager, Forecast 5 Analytics
Climate Change Policy in Victoria
Strategic Information Systems Planning
Danube Water Conference 2017, Vienna
Overview of the CoJ Water & Sanitation Master Plan
City of Vaughan | Corporate Asset Management Strategy
Danube Water Conference, Vienna, May 2017
City Owned Land And Building Review
Capital Financing Strategy
Project Portfolio Management
INAC Water and Wastewater: Discussion on Current Policies and Processes Presented at: Circuit Rider Trainer Professional Association’s Annual General Meeting.
Municipal Association of Victoria Rate Cap Forum 25th November 2015
KEYNOTE STAGE SPONSOR.
Loddon Campaspe Integrated Transport Strategy
Research Program Strategic Plan
Asset Governance – Integrated Strategic Asset Management
Village of Ruidoso Water and Wastewater Systems
What is the State of Asset Management?
Department of Environmental Quality
Using Risk to Help Define Your Capital Plan
Municipal Association of Victoria Rate Cap Forum 25th November 2015
Loddon Campaspe Integrated Transport Strategy
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
CIGFARO ANNUAL CONFERENCE
BSBI 622 PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Karmen Krueger Treasurer, The Municipality of Grey Highlands
Energy performance and Carbon emissions Assessment and Monitoring tool
Developing Asset Management Capacity
Implementing Value-Driven Asset Management in a Smaller City
Template and Process for Expression of Interest by Countries
Operationalization of a Public Works AM Strategy
Linking AMPs to Short-Term and Long-Term Investment Plans
Vikki Kwan TransLink’s CAPITAL-M Program
Robin Youll Office for National Statistics
Growth and innovation Project support overview.
KEY INITIATIVE Financial Data and Analytics
1 Envision 3 Outline 4 Design
How are programmes specifically designed using collected data?
Presentation transcript:

Level of Service and Risk: What’s the Connection? Leanne Brannigan Advisor, Asset Management, Region of Peel CNAM 2014 Conference Toronto, Ontario May 20-23, 2014

Outline Peel’s Corporate Asset Management Program Risk Framework Connecting Risk and LOS Applications: a mini case study Advantages Conclusions 2

The Region of Peel • 1.3 million people • Over $19B (2012 values) in capital assets: Water & Wastewater vertical & linear assets Roads infrastructure Waste Management Processing Long Term Care Centre’s Paramedic stations Heritage museum Affordable Housing Regional administration offices Works yards Shelters Child Care Centre's Fleet

Enterprise AM Strategy Objective: Transparent reporting of asset requirements & priorities for strategic decision making Investing the right amounts in the right areas 4

Peel’s Management Framework Strategic Direction Corporate priorities Council & Executive Management Recommend asset reinvestments & priorities Capital Plan Instructions Capital & Operating Plans Service Objectives Strategic AM AM Policy & Standards Corporate Asset Management Asset Information Peel has a 2-tiered asset management structure CAM is positioned between upper management decision makers and the frontline program asset managers. CAM is not full asset management. Decision enablers The CAM team receives data and asset criteria from the programs and assesses the infrastructure on a common platform to measure the needs in a consistent fashion across the organization CAM makes recommendations on the infrastructure to senior management who then issue the capital and operating planning directions to the Programs and service areas to develop their Capital and operating budgets and forecasts. The detailed asset management remains with the programs where the expertise on asset conditions and requirements exists. Challenge the information, make recommendations Operational AM “Frontline” AM Programs & Service Areas

Role of CAM Ensure consistency of organizational AM practices Maintain AM policy Life cycle strategies Asset levels of service Asset Risk management Strategic evaluation of infrastructure needs & priorities Investment needs Infrastructure priorities & risks Reporting Corporate “challenge” function Are Programs investing in the right areas/right levels? Appropriate levels of service/risks? Appropriate asset management planning? Is the data is sufficient/accurate? In short, CAM’s role is to ensure consistent organizational practices for consistency of reporting and better, more informed and object decision making. 6

How Does It Work? Critical assets are not always the highest priority Risk to services dictates asset need & priorities Asset need & priority is measured by whether the amount of risk is present to the service in acceptable or unacceptable Risk can be defined in a number of ways: Health & safety risks eg ensuring bridges & buildings are structurally sound – usually have highest priority Loss of service risk – not having standby power for a widespread power loss or not having adequate system capacity to continue providing water during break of a major feedermain Poor service quality or efficiency – inadequate parking & signage, poor HVAC or lack of accessibility at public buildings All of these risk impact the organization’s reputation and finances Critical assets are not always the highest priority – weighted higher, but if risk OK, no action required

Corporate Asset Management Framework Projects Technology Outputs Infrastructure Investment Report Risk Management Strategy Level of Service Strategy Lifecycle Management Strategy Infrastructure Sustainability Strategy State of Reserves ODM (Optimized Decision Modeling) State of Infrastructure Strategic Asset Plan

Levels of Service Foundation for understanding the state of the assets Customer Level of Service (CLOS) How Customers expect to receive the service Non-technical Technical Level of Service (TLOS) Sets the standards for assets to meet the CLOS

The Asset Management Challenge Develop a way to ID & prioritize asset needs across the organization How to determine asset priorities?: Dissimilar asset types across Peel Serving different programs & CLOS Function to differing TLOS Differing criticalities Solution: Risk

Risk Framework Used the Australian & New Zealand frameworks (AS/NZS 4360) to start Consistent with ISO 55000 Customized impact & likelihood measurement tools to Peel business environment Triple Bottom Line risk assessment (Social, Environmental & Financial) “Other risk frameworks could be applied within the RMS developed at Peel”

What’s Missing? Gaps in current methodologies to meet all of the needs Highest Risk Score = Funding Priority Peel developed a methodology that: Determines level of additional risk that an asset class is imparting on the organization Indicates where the most cost effective risk reductions can be made ID’s the amount of risk can be mitigated

Goals of Peel’s RMS Risk is measured relative to the end services; An organizational context on the level of risk; Correlation between the asset LOS needs & risk it imparts on the services; A dynamic comparative basis for prioritization across diverse assets; A connection between comparative risk & funding.

Where Do You Start? Methodologies exist to assess current Risk Organizations can define their current LOS BUT… How do they connect? How do changes in one affect the other? It starts with assessing the assets risk profile

Key Enabler #1 Current Asset Needs & $’s Inherent (Unmitigated) Risk – Highest Estimated level of risk. No controls. Target Risk – Desired risk after implementing all practical controls. Current Risk – Estimated level of risk under present controls.

Connecting LOS and Risk Gaps

Key Enabler #2 LOS Value = % of Assets Meeting LOS + EQUALIZING LOS MEASURES To enable the plotting of the current LOS of diverse assets along the LOS range. Assessment of where the asset class as a whole falls along the LOS range. LOS Value = % of Assets Meeting LOS + % Assets Not Meeting LOS x Avg. Condition Assets Not Meeting LOS

Key Enabler #3 DEFINING LOS TO RISK RELATIONSHIP Determined the LOS Gap Determined how to Calculate LOS Value Determined the Risk Gap How does this relate to the Risk Value?

Determining Current Risk from LOS

The Complete Connection LOS to risk relationship: Key Enabler #1 – identifies the risk and LOS ranges & how they connect; Key Enabler #2 – facilitates the placement of the current LOS value along the LOS range; Key Enabler #3 – defines the LOS to risk range relationship enabling the placement of the current risk value along the risk range.

Practical Applications Enhanced Risk Reporting Organizational Prioritization Corporate Budgeting & Reserve Planning Program Decision Making Mini case study

Risk Reporting Current Asset Needs & $’s Total Risk Mitigation per 10 Year AMP Inherent (Unmitigated) Risk – Highest Estimated level of risk. No controls. Target Risk – Desired risk after implementing all practical controls. Current Risk – Estimated level of risk under present controls. Projected 10-Year Risk (No Funding) Risk per 10-Yr Capital Recommendation

Risk Profiling Lining up all of the bars together gives a perspective on the highest variances from targets and the costs to close the gaps This view also gives a perspective on where the best returns on investments are in terms of lowering the municipality’s risk profile. At the bottom of the graph we have roads that require an investment of $147 m to achieve the target risk levels. As you can see the net affect of reducing risk is very low as indicated by the sliver of grey bar. However, for $6.7 m over the same 10 year period there is a much greater potential of risk reduction in the housing portfolio. Given limited funds, an organization could defer investments in roads and redirect the financing to social housing and significantly reduce the organization’s overall risk profile

Long Term Expenditure Forecast

Program Level Decision Making Peel’s high level Corporate Asset Management application at program level: To highlight detailed asset priorities To support budget asks for program improvements To support asset Repair/Replace/Dispose decisions To assess Level of Service Changes

Example: LOS Change Review Wanted to determine if the LOS for Distribution Mains could be increased Current Target LOS: 7 Breaks per km of pipe Proposed Target LOS: 5 Breaks per km of pipe Questions: What would this cost now and into the future? How does it affect our risk and infrastructure scores? Can we handle the extra near-term workload?

The Analysis and Recommendation Workload increase 93% majority up front Costs increase 63% or nearly $300 Million over next 10 years Little Risk reduction for large infrastructure investment Recommendation: Keep LOS at 7 Breaks per km

Advantages… The establishment of a link between an asset’s current LOS and current risk, Allows dynamic and current performance monitoring of assets across the organization If you can forward model LOS, you can forward model Risk accordingly The Risk gaps can be used to prioritize asset needs across many classes. Applying cost to LOS needs enables a direct relationship between Risk and $. Dollars can be optimized for Risk Reduction.

Advantages… Performance measures can be established to track improvements in LOS and risk over time. Boundary risk scores can be adjusted at any time, as programs & the environments in which they operate change. This holistic view of the asset infrastructure enables the establishment of risk tolerances & changes to LOS. Proven beneficial at a portfolio basis as evidence to support program level decision making.

Conclusions Peel’s risk-centric approach aids strategic decision-making It optimizes funding across all asset groups i.e. How do we best “stretch” the citizens’ tax dollar? Helps prioritize asset needs Is an integral piece of Optimized Decision Modeling at Peel

Questions? Contact Me: Leanne Brannigan Advisor, Asset Management Region of Peel leanne.brannigan@peelregion.ca