Quality Leadership Profile for Schools QLPS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
360 degree feedback information session
Advertisements

inspiring professional higher education Greater than the sum of the parts: using the AUA’s CPD Framework for team development SDF Spring.
Low-Cost Private Schools Knowledge Framework Research methodology template.
Performance management guidance
HM Inspectorate of Education 1 The Quality Framework for Scottish FE Colleges Angus Allan, HMIE.
Chris John Merbein P-10 College. The initial plan was to work one-on-one with the three classroom teachers. The flaws in this plan quickly became apparent:
What is FSL? FSL stands for Future School Leaders. What are the aims of the project?  Establish a long term partnership between Jarfalla and.
Overall Teacher Judgements
Why principal evaluation? Because Leadership Matters!
360 Degree Feedback Process Development Planning Session.
Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.
Human Resources Office of 1 Summary of Results College of Design Dean’s Reports.
APPRAISAL OF THE HEADTEACHER GOVERNORS’ BRIEFING.
Module 6: Coaching System
EDUCATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2016 TO 2018
The First Appraisal as a Principal
The Assessment Process: A Continuous Cycle
PebblePad Enabled Academic Appraisal
SCHOOL BASED SELF – EVALUATION
Benchmarking Excellence in Restorative Conferencing
Well Trained International
Facilitation Tool: Team Agreement
Customer Service Excellence Standard – adding value for your students
M-LANG project  Ref. n NO01-KA Interactive Exchange Workshop on how to use response systems and ICT tools for creating interactive learning.
Items in red require your input
Professional Review Process for Heads / Principals
SOESD’s Teacher Evaluation & Support System
BUMP IT UP STRATEGY in NSW Public Schools
Senior Team Briefing Implementing 360 Degree Feedback.
Continuous Improvement through Accreditation AdvancED ESA Accreditation MAISA Conference January 27, 2016.
Uniforum Service Effectiveness Survey
Jeffrey C. Wayman, Wayman Services, LLC
Accountability and Performance Management
Performance Management Workday Module
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Survey of Organizational Excellence
School Self-Evaluation 
Items in red require your input
AdvancED/SACS and Strategic Planning Update
End of Year Performance Review Meetings and objective setting for 2018/19 This briefing pack is designed to be used by line managers to brief their teams.
Professional Development Conference 2018
Items in red require your input
Employee Survey in the Foreign Service
Items in red require your input
Differentiated Supports in Special Education
Building the future Workshop 3 24 November 2017
Sustaining and building on the excellence of LCPS
What Does OPM Do? OPM is the chief human resources agency and personnel policy manager for the Federal Government. Federal HR Policy and Outreach Federal.
Changing practice to support self-management and recovery in mental illness: application of an implementation model M Harris1, P Jones2, M Heartfield1,
Mountain Park Elementary School
Workforce Engagement Survey
Mountain Park Elementary School
KVI Relationship Management
February 21-22, 2018.
Anita Smith Program Assessment Specialist South Region Chris LeMieux
Dave Scott – Middle School Principal – Kristin School
HN Business Consultation 2019
2007 Faculty & Staff Denison Organizational Culture Survey
IDEA Student Ratings of Instruction
Strategic Plan: Heards Ferry Elementary
Making Middle Grades Work
Parental engagement survey
Developing SMART Professional Development Plans
EVP Design Presentation
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Dave Scott – Middle School Principal – Kristin School
S.T.E.A.M. Focused Instruction:
Fall 2016/Spring 2017 Administrative Review Process Update
“Our goal - to promote and enhance a strong culture of recognition within the University Community or UMatter - is about working collaboratively to create.
Mountain Park Elementary School
Presentation transcript:

Quality Leadership Profile for Schools QLPS Quality Leadership Middle Management for Schools QLMMS Originally authored by Allan Shaw, and subsequently updated by Malcolm Lamb, former Principal and former National Chair of AHISA

THE ASSOCIATION OF HEADS OF INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS OF AUSTRALIA

THE ASSOCIATION OF HEADS OF INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS OF AUSTRALIA About the QLPS A ‘360 degree’ feedback survey for leadership development Originally developed by QUT; refined by Voice Project (NSW) in 2013 Used by education leaders for thirteen years Enhanced and refined by AHISA and ACEL to create the Quality Leadership Profile for Schools (QLPS) as a tool specifically focused on school leadership Benchmark scores involving >1,300 people THE ASSOCIATION OF HEADS OF INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS OF AUSTRALIA

THE ASSOCIATION OF HEADS OF INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS OF AUSTRALIA QLPS Framework Area Factor Staff Motivation and Involvement Consultative Management Staff Development Team Environment Strategic and Operational Management Change and Innovation Making Decisions Systems and Processes Community Outreach and Student and Parent Focus Community Outreach Student and Parent Focus Academic Leadership Personal, Relational and Strategic Capability in Leadership Personal Capability Relational Capability Strategic Capability Perceived Effectiveness THE ASSOCIATION OF HEADS OF INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS OF AUSTRALIA

THE ASSOCIATION OF HEADS OF INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS OF AUSTRALIA Purpose of the QLPS Gain a snapshot of the perceptions of supervisors, peers and staff in the workplace Provides an opportunity to act on the evidence gathered Affirm and acknowledge perceived strengths Model reflective practice and continuous improvement Increase synergy between ‘how we say we act’ and ‘how we act’ (Ref. Delahaye, 2000: ‘legitimate’ and‘shadow system’) Point to pathways for further professional development THE ASSOCIATION OF HEADS OF INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS OF AUSTRALIA

THE ASSOCIATION OF HEADS OF INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS OF AUSTRALIA QLPS – Features Tailored to independent school leadership Focussed on appraisal for professional developmt Independent testament on leadership & practice Mapped to ACEL Leadership Capability Framework Administration & responses are fully-automated Confidentiality assured, hard copies left with school and no further access to electronic data ‘No comment’ response available on each item Cost: $600 plus GST per QLPS candidate and reasonable travel and accommodation expenses for the debriefer THE ASSOCIATION OF HEADS OF INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS OF AUSTRALIA

QLPS – Summary information 5 point Lickert scale For each of the 12 factors: Average scores across each factor for ‘self’, ‘reports’, ‘peer’, ‘general staff’ and ‘manager’ Comparison to benchmark score Highest scoring 10 items overall Lowest scoring 10 items overall Main areas of perceived development need shown as a percentage by self or others Number of overall contributors to the survey – unlimited but about 40 recommended THE ASSOCIATION OF HEADS OF INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS OF AUSTRALIA

QLPS – What’s in it for you? Affirmation and signposts Opportunity to tailor professional development specifically to perceived needs Opportunity to adjust practice where useful ‘Gift of information’ (gathering perceptions already in existence but unquantified) Gain base line data for iterative review Evidence of the leader’s commitment to reflective practice and continuous improvement Modelling reflective practice and review THE ASSOCIATION OF HEADS OF INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS OF AUSTRALIA

QLPS – Reflective possibilities What are some of the strategies/behaviours that contribute to the high scoring items? Might these perceived ‘high points’ be further leveraged for enhanced outcomes? Is the pattern surprising? …not surprising? What are one or two actions which might be taken to improve perceptions/performance on the lower scoring items? Development of a cohesive action plan by the appraisee in consultation with supervisor THE ASSOCIATION OF HEADS OF INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS OF AUSTRALIA

THE ASSOCIATION OF HEADS OF INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS OF AUSTRALIA QLPS – Strategic Uses Increasing reciprocal understanding at the individual and corporate level of: Desired goals, values and practice Listening, reflection & continuous improvement Modelling good ‘receipt of feedback’practice Developing mutually beneficial feedback loops Alignment of development plans with strategic goals/directions Developing and monitoring an action plan so to maintain conversations THE ASSOCIATION OF HEADS OF INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS OF AUSTRALIA

QLMMS – a brief introduction A ‘360 degree’ feedback survey for leadership development at middle management level Produced in co-operation with Voice Project in 2013 Tool was launched in Australia in 2015 and used in two major schools to date Adds two new capabilities: “Aspirational Capability” and “Professional Capability” Modifies many of the QLPS items to suit middle managers in independent schools THE ASSOCIATION OF HEADS OF INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS OF AUSTRALIA