PCWG 2016 Roadmap & Meeting Overview

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WP3 - Energy yield estimation of wind farm clusters DANIEL CABEZÓN CFD Wind Engineer CENER (National Renewable Energy Center of Spain) Support by.
Advertisements

PCWG 9 th Meeting: 12 December Glasgow Introduction, Agenda and Review of Actions.
2 nd September 2014 Inner/Outer Range Warranty: SSE’s experience.
Challenge the future Delft University of Technology Blade Load Estimations by a Load Database for an Implementation in SCADA Systems Master Thesis.
PCWG 9 th Meeting: 12 December Glasgow Road Map Exercise: Adaptive Problems.
Parameterised turbine performance Power Curve Working Group – Glasgow, 16 December 2014 Stuart Baylis, Matthew Colls, Przemek Marek, Alex Head.
NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable.
Potential measurement strategy with lidar and sonics: Opportunity and issues R.J. Barthelmie 1 and S.C. Pryor 2 1 Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace.
Chris Slinger, John Medley, Rhys Evans Use of nacelle lidar data to explore impact of non-linear averaging
Power Curve Working Group Overview
1 PCWG Peter Stuart 02 September Agenda (1) 2 Morning Session: 10am-1pm – “Welcome” Peter Stuart (RES) – “Review of Actions.
PCWG 9 th Meeting December Glasgow PCWG 2015 Roadmap: Detailed Survey Results.
PCWG 9 th Meeting: 12 December Glasgow Round Robin 4 Results: Conditions Specific Power Curves.
LiDAR analysis at a site with simple terrain Alex Clerc, Lee Cameron Tuesday 2 nd September
Uncertainty in Wind Energy
2-D data discussion Raymond Byrne DKiT, Ireland Maeva Sabre CSTB, France.
IEC TC 88 PT IEC Ed.1: Wind Turbines – Part 5: Rotor Blades
3D Power Deviation Matrix PCWG Meeting – New Orleans, LA. September 14, 2015 Alex Head.
Power Curve Working Group Update New Orleans 15 th September 2015.
1 Performance contracts and construction quality Lena Borg Dep. of Real Estate & Construction Management.
Extrapolation of Extreme Response for Wind Turbines based on Field Measurements Authors: Henrik Stensgaard Toft, Aalborg University, Denmark John Dalsgaard.
Problems related to the use of the existing noise measurement standards when predicting noise from wind turbines and wind farms. Erik Sloth Vestas Niels.
EWEC2007 Milano, 8 May 2007 Extrapolation of extreme loads acc. to IEC Ed.3 in comparison with the physics of real turbine response Dirk Steudel,
Colorado School of Mines Adventure Engineering Physical Science Workshop for Teachers Wind Resource References: NREL (Tony Jimenez, Neil Kelley)
AWS Truewind Methodology Timeline of AWS Truewind participation Key points Wind resource modeling Estimation of plant output Validation and adjustment.
ES Model development Dr. Ahmed Elfaig The ES attempts to predict results from available information, data and knowledge The model should be able to infer.
Power Curve Working Group Update Roskilde 26 th June 2015.
Far Shore Wind Climate Modelling Background Far shore wind conditions are expected to be favorable for wind energy power production due to increased mean.
UPWIND, Aerodynamics and aero-elasticity
A New Theoretical Basis for Describing Low Turbulence Wind Turbine Performance Peter Stuart PCWG Meeting – 26 June 2015.
1 National Wind Technology Center Wind Turbine Design According to IEC (Onshore) and -3 (Offshore) Standards Overview for NWTC November 8, 2005.
WIND TURBINE CONTROL DESIGN TO REDUCE CAPITAL COSTS P. Jeff Darrow(Colorado School of Mines) Alan Wright(National Renewable Energy Laboratory) Kathryn.
PCWG 15 th Meeting December 2015 – Kings Langley PCWG 2016 Roadmap: Detailed Survey Results.
PCWG-Share-01 Initial Results PCWG Meeting Kings Langley 9 th December 2015 Peter Stuart (RES), Lee Cameron (RES), Alex Clerc (RES) & Andy Clifton (NREL),
Wind Turbine Power Plant. Sources ●
PCWG 15 th Meeting: 9 th December 2015 – Kings Langley Road Map Exercise: Revisiting the Adaptive Problem Space.
Understanding the Power Curve Interpolation Issue Power Curve Working Group, , Hamburg Axel Albers.
PCWG-Share-01 Current Status PCWG Meeting Hamburg 10 th March 2016 Peter Stuart (RES) and Andy Clifton (NREL), on behalf of the Power Curve Working Group.
PCWG Intelligence Sharing Initiative 10 August 2016 NREL, Colorado, US.
IEC Ed 2 Collaboration IEA Task 32 Round Robin & PCWG Worked Examples NREL, Colorado, US 10 th August 2016 IEC Task 32: Luke J Simmons (DNV GL)
PCWG 2016 Update 20th May 2016 Peter Stuart.
IEC FDIS 2016 Worked Example Industrial Project
IEC FDIS 2016 Consensus Analysis Project
Performance verification
PCWG 2016 Update Wednesday, 13 December 2016 Glasgow, Scotland
IEC FDIS 2016 Worked Examples Ellie Weyer, AWS True Power
PCWG Intelligence Sharing Initiative Update
PCWG Intelligence Sharing Initiative Update 13 December 2016
IEA Task 32 Power Performance Uncertainty Round Robin
Evolutionary Programming
Alternative Turbulence Correction Methods
PCWG Intelligence Sharing Initiative
Turbulence and Heterogeneous Wind
Power curve loss adjustments at AWS Truepower: a 2016 update
UPWIND, Aerodynamics and aero-elasticity
Power Curve Interpolation, What We’ve Learnt?
Evaluation of ice detection systems for wind turbines
High Resolution Turbine-Specific Matrix
WIND TURBINE GENERATORS.
TI measurement techniques for pulsed Lidars – the Current Status
Identifying Confusion from Eye-Tracking Data
Evolutionary Programming
IEEE Task Group G Report
Notes Over 8.3 Simplifying Natural Base Expressions
Status report of the cycle and gearshift issues task force (GSTF)
Proposed actions for gtr development
Marine Strategy Framework Directive reporting: progress and next steps
IEEE Task Group G Report to the IEEE WG
Dzmitry Kliazovich University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg
CFARS - Science Working Group Update
Presentation transcript:

PCWG 2016 Roadmap & Meeting Overview Thursday, September 29 2016 PCWG, Minneapolis Jason Fields (NREL)

Reflecting the Real World… Categories of Turbine Performance Corrections Inner Range Performance Adjustments to reflect the fact that even under warranted/ideal conditions performance may not be 100% Outer Range Inner Range Outer Range Performance Adjustments to reflect the fact that turbine performance may deviate from Inner Range behaviour in Outer Range Conditions e.g. Low/High TI, Low/High Shear etc. Note: The PCWG Inner-Outer Range Proposal is Conceptual Decomposition, and does infer specific parameter ranges. + Other Performance Corrections Icing, Blade Degradation, Sub-optimal performance etc.

Reflecting the Real World: Inner Range Performance Historic Performance Under Inner Range Conditions The PCWG is seeking to design an adjustment framework to define how to make best use of historic power performance tests when predicting future turbine performance. Extract from ‘High Resolution Turbine-Specific Matrix’, Carl Ostridge DNV GL, Colorado PCWG Meeting, 10 August 2016, download from www.pcwg.org.

Reflecting the Real World: Outer Range Performance Inner Range Performance Outer Range Deviations (Observed – Base) Turbulence Intensity [%] Wind Speed [m/s] Colour = % Observed Power Deviation (Observed - Base) Power (P) Wind Speed (v) High TI & Low V Positive Deviation High TI & High V Negative Deviation P=P(v, ρ) Low TI & Low V Negative Deviation The PCWG is attempting to evaluate methods for predicting Outer Range performance via the PCWG Intelligence Sharing Initiative (PCWG-Share-X)

PCWG 2016 Roadmap

Priority Actions (what we are working on right now) Note: as IEA Task 32 also planned a IEC61400-12 Round Robin the PCWG has focused on worked examples (more later).

Meeting Overview

Meeting Overview Introduction (Erik Hale and Jason Fields) PCWG-Share-X, Intelligence Sharing Initiative (Andy Clifton) Preparing for 61400-12-1 Ed 2 (Ellie Weyer & Vineet Parkhe): IEA Task 32 Round Robin PCWG Worked Examples Inner Range Performance (Erik Hale & Dan Bernadette) Technical Presentations and Q&A (Yu Ding & Gil Lizcano) Further Discussion (chaired by Jason Fields)

Join the Power Curve Working Group at: www.pcwg.org