Charlotte Region Fast Lanes Study

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
I-66 Corridor Improvements Outside the Beltway CTB Briefing
Advertisements

Managed Lanes Development Strategy Phase I District Four October 17, 2012.
Expanding the Potential of Tolling: A 21 st Century Look AASHTO November 18, Brian Peters Florida DOT, Assistant Secretary of Finance and Administration.
Getting Started with Congestion Pricing A Workshop for Local Partners Federal Highway Administration Office of Operations.
City of Omak Central Avenue Bridge Replacement Project Prepared by Highlands Associates Photos by FlyBy Photos.
Kenneth R. Buckeye, AICP Minnesota Department of Transportation.
I-15 MANAGED LANES Building on Success Institute of Transportation Studies’ Center for Urban Infrastructure March 7, 2003.
How can we relieve congestion in the I-95 corridor? I-95 Congestion Relief Study.
I-15 Managed Lanes: Building on Success And Lessons Learned I-15 Managed Lanes: Building on Success And Lessons Learned.
SR520 Urban Partnership Project 2008 ITS Washington Annual Meeting November 12th, 2008 – Seattle Jennifer Charlebois, P.E. Tolling and Systems Project.
TRB Lianyu Chu *, K S Nesamani +, Hamed Benouar* Priority Based High Occupancy Vehicle Lanes Operation * California Center for Innovative Transportation.
Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator for Operations Federal Highway Administration Department of Transportation Enabling Congestion Pricing in the.
21 st Century Committee Report Recommendations NC 73 Council of Planning Annual Meeting January 22, 2009.
Developing a Regional Express Lane Network Hercules City Council Meeting April 28, 2009 Doug Kimsey MTC Planning Director.
Less Stop More Go EXPRESS LANES Travel Choices and Strategies to Relieve Congestion Presentation to FDOT’s Annual ITS Working Group Meeting March 2008.
Presentation to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit and the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure Peggy Catlin, Deputy Executive Director.
Tolling and Congestion Pricing Patrick DeCorla-Souza Office of Innovative Program Delivery Federal Highway Administration Presentation to Transportation.
National Road Pricing Conference June 4, 2010 Jennifer Tsien, PBS&J Angela Jacobs, Federal Highway Administration.
National Road Pricing Conference June 4, 2010 Mark Burris, Texas Transportation Institute Jessie Yung, Federal Highway Administration.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.
Performance Analysis Presentation to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board (NCR-TPB) November 28, 2012 Adopted: July 18, 2012 Item.
I-680 Value Pricing: A “Smart Carpool “ Lane Demonstration Project June 2004.
Pat Bursaw, Minnesota DOT International Partnership Meeting Washington D.C. January 26, 2012.
What are Managed Lanes What are Express Lanes What are HOT Lanes Regional Express Lanes Network I-95 Express I-595 Express I-75 Express.
Presentation to ***(group) on ***(date) 1.  Cities - 11  Highway districts – 3  Ada and Canyon Counties  School districts – 2  Valley Regional Transit.
Center on Tolling Research Technology for Managed Lanes Christopher Poe, Ph.D., P.E. Assistant Agency Director Director, Center on Tolling Research Texas.
Portland North Small Starts Alternatives Analysis Coordination Meeting June 16, 2009.
Urban Road Pricing: US DOT Congestion Initiative and Urban Partnerships 14 th World Congress on ITS IBEC Special Session October 10, 2007 Beijing Exhibition.
North Central Texas Council of Governments Transportation Department Summary Presentation January 2004 MOBILITY 2025: THE METROPOLITAN.
Managed Lanes CE 550: Advanced Highway Design Damion Pregitzer.
Interstate 95 Corridor Improvement Program June 20, 2012.
High-Occupancy Toll (HOT) Lanes Recent Developments Planning and Operations Committee September 9, 2005.
Overview of PPI’s in Georgia April 26, 2006 Earl Mahfuz, Treasurer.
Regional HOT Lanes Study Preliminary Findings An Informational Hearing of the Senate Transportation and Housing Committee Toll Roads and Managed Lanes.
US DOT Congestion Initiative Urban Partnership Agreements I-95 Corridor Coalition EPS Summit September 19, 2007 Boston, Massachusetts Jeffrey F. Paniati.
MnPASS I-394 High Occupancy Toll (HOT) Lanes Case Study 7 group: Brendon Slotterback Chris Romansky Feng Xie Gabe Gubash
Analysis of the IH 35 Corridor Through the Austin Metropolitan Area TRB Planning Applications Conference Jeff Shelton Karen Lorenzini Alex Valdez Tom Williams.
THE EL MONTE HOV / BUSWAY: A Policy Driven Experiment in Congestion Management Frank Quon Division of Operations Deputy District Director HOV LANES IN.
Estimating Volumes for I-95 HOT Lanes in Virginia Prepared for: 2009 Planning Applications Conference Houston, TX May 18, 2009 Prepared by: Kenneth D.
Minnesota’s Urban Partnership Agreement UPA Timeline The UPA agreement with the US DOT requires that the project be operational by September 30, 2009,
I-680 Value Pricing: A HOT Lane Demonstration Project of “Smart Carpool Lanes” Sponsor: Alameda County Congestion Management Agency 2003 Sponsor: Alameda.
A Sketch Planning Assessment of Managed-Lane Options for the I-5 Freeway Corridor Master Plan William R. Loudon, DKS Associates.
Company LOGO Georgia Truck Lane Needs Identification Study Talking Freight Seminar March 19, 2008 Matthew Fowler, P.T.P Assistant State Planning Administrator.
IH-10 Managed Lanes Project: A “Public-Public” Partnership ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates Presented at the Value Pricing Conference.
Gastonia Transit Expansion Study City Council/Planning Commission Joint Transportation Workshop September 13, 2007.
Garden State Parkway HOT Lanes By Matt Lawson October 14, 2010.
Virginia House Bill 2 – Funding the Right Projects Intelligent Transportation System Activities May 19, 2016.
Beyond Oil Transforming Transportation: A National Demonstration Project Breakout Session: A New Paradigm - Future of Transportation, Funding, and Climate.
I-66 OUTSIDE THE BELTWAY Shrevecrest HOA JUNE 21, Susan Shaw, P. E
Using Public-Private Partnerships to Move More People The Story of HOT Lanes in Northern Virginia January 30, 2017 Morteza Farajian, Ph.D.
Evaluation of a New Approach to Address Metropolitan Congestion
Integrating Transit and Highway Solutions In High Volume Corridors
Macro / Meso / Micro Framework on I-395 HOT Lane Conversion
A Presentation to: River to Sea TPO Board October 26, 2016.
Presented by: Fred Kessler Nossaman LLP
I-77 High-Occupancy Toll Lanes
A Presentation to: River to Sea TPO BPAC November 9, 2016.
Regional Roads Committee
River to Sea TPO - CAC/TCC
21st Century Transportation Committee Finance Subcommittee
Progress Report Implementing the Interregional Transportation Strategic Plan May 22, 2003 in Sacramento Brian Smith, Deputy Director, Planning and.
Nick Wood, P.E. Texas A&M Transportation Institute
PROJECT LOCATION Project begins at Garden Lane (East of I-4)
CDOT North I-25 Express Lanes Update April 28, 2016
Slugging in the I-395 Corridor
Alternative Solutions to Shrinking Tax Revenues
MODULE 2: TSMO Strategies
I-81 Corridor Improvement Plan
North-South Corridor Bus Rapid Transit Project
MODULE 2: TSMO Strategies
Presentation transcript:

Charlotte Region Fast Lanes Study Presentation at 6th Annual Transportation Summit Charlotte Chamber December 18, 2008

AGENDA Managed Lanes: National and Charlotte Region Perspectives Review of Fast Lanes Study Background and Status Phase 1 Results & Phase 2 Status

Managed Lanes: National and Charlotte Region Perspectives

What Are Managed or Fast Lanes? Dedicated lane system for one or more user groups Proactively managed to provide reliability and unimpeded travel during peak demand periods So that future operating capacity is preserved After Before Orange County, SR-91

Managed Lane Benefits System Benefits Greater throughput Opens up mainline capacity Encourages transit & carpool use Preserves options in corridor Decreased fuel consumption Improved air quality Revenue generation Transit Lane, NJ Truck Lanes, NJ User Benefits Reliable travel time Reduced delay More Choices

Managed Lane Strategies Eligibility/Occupancy Access Control Variable Pricing Active Traffic Management

Managing Throughput means more efficiency LOS F=1400 vph/lane at 25 mph LOS C=1600 vph/lane at 60 mph

Types of HOV/ Managed Lane Designs Not separated I-5, Portland Buffer separated I-405, Orange Co, CA Barrier separated US- 59, Houston Pylon separation, SR- 91, Orange Co. CA

What are HOT Lanes? Managed priced lanes giving preference to HOVs. I-394 Minneapolis Managed priced lanes giving preference to HOVs. Highest HOVs are typically free. Offers unimpeded travel and reliability benefits during peak periods SR 91, Orange County

HOT Lane Tolling Applications Cashless operation: most accepted means of implementing HOT Lanes Roadside or overhead radio frequency devices, interoperable throughout the East Coast

HOT Lane Tolling Applications On-board vehicle identification units in passing vehicles Vehicle ID is combined with other real-time transaction data (current toll rate) and processed against toll account

HOT Lane Tolling Applications Tolls could be determined by traffic conditions by time-of-day Tolls may change in real-time or according to a fixed schedule

Where Freeway HOV Lanes Are Located This map shows where most HOV projects are currently located. High concentrations of these treatments exist in the most congested urban areas, primarily on the East and West coasts. Only six projects have been terminated for a number of reasons since 1976. The projects in red represent project terminations. The projects in orange are the first value pricing demonstrations to be tested on HOV lanes.

Where HOT Lanes Are Located/Being Planned HOV lanes HOT lanes Proposed This map shows where most HOV projects are currently located. High concentrations of these treatments exist in the most congested urban areas, primarily on the East and West coasts. Only six projects have been terminated for a number of reasons since 1976. The projects in red represent project terminations. The projects in orange are the first value pricing demonstrations to be tested on HOV lanes.

Where Truck Lanes Are Located/Proposed HOV lanes HOT lanes Truck lanes Proposed Proposed This map shows where most HOV projects are currently located. High concentrations of these treatments exist in the most congested urban areas, primarily on the East and West coasts. Only six projects have been terminated for a number of reasons since 1976. The projects in red represent project terminations. The projects in orange are the first value pricing demonstrations to be tested on HOV lanes.

Where Other Types Of Managed Lanes Are Proposed HOV lanes HOT lanes Truck lanes Toll/express Multiple lanes and concepts Proposed Proposed This map shows where most HOV projects are currently located. High concentrations of these treatments exist in the most congested urban areas, primarily on the East and West coasts. Only six projects have been terminated for a number of reasons since 1976. The projects in red represent project terminations. The projects in orange are the first value pricing demonstrations to be tested on HOV lanes.

Lessons Learned Be realistic with expectations Don’t take anything away that will be missed Toll demand on managed lanes is highly discretionary Capital cost recovery through tolling typically requires more than one lane and restricting free use Agency partnering is critical

Existing I-77 HOV Lanes, Charlotte State’s first HOV Facility and only HOV lanes in the Carolinas, opened in 2004 Restricted to vehicles with 2+ occupants, buses & motorcycles at all times (24/7) HOV lane carries 1000 persons in peak direction in AM peak hour in 300 vehicles Average general purpose lane carries 1700 persons in 1600 vehicles during same period

Existing I-77 HOV Lanes, Charlotte Access Prohibited Double white solid lines Continuous Access Wide single white skip line

Review of Fast Lanes Study: Background and Status

Study Background Began in June 2007 Co-managed by N.C. Department of Transportation and City of Charlotte Analyzing 12 corridors in nine-county region for managed lanes feasibility Organizations throughout the region are helping to fund the study

Study Corridors (340 Miles)

Study Partners Cabarrus-Rowan MPO Gaston Urban Area MPO Lake Norman Rural Planning Organization Mecklenburg-Union MPO North Carolina Department of Transportation Rock Hill-Fort Mill Area Transportation Study Rocky River Rural Planning Organization South Carolina Department of Transportation Town of Mooresville

Why Consider Fast Lanes in This Region? Travel demand is growing faster than population Rush-hour congestion is expanding into more hours Travel patterns are diverse Travel distances are increasing $65 billion gap between projected needs and future revenues in North Carolina alone to the year 2030 $41 billion gap identified in South Carolina in 2005

Feasibility Study Purpose Are there any potential corridors where HOV, HOT or Truck-Only Toll (TOT) Lanes are viable Where and how these facilities might be connected to form a regional Fast Lanes system

Fast Lanes Study: Review of Phase 1 Results And Phase 2 Status

Two-Phase Study Process Phase 1 screening designed to quickly identify most promising corridors Phase 2 involves detailed evaluation of most promising roadways

Phase 1 Screening Criteria Presence of Congestion HOV Demand HOT/TOT Demand Physical Attributes

Phase 1 Screening Results About 167 miles (49%) advanced to Phase 2 HOV and HOT options appear most feasible Primary corridors moving to second phase: I-85 North and South I-77 North and South US-74 East I-485 South, West & Northeast NC-16 West

Phase 1 Screening Results

Phase 2 Answers… Type of lane treatment Type of operation strategy HOV and HOT policy Truck potential Revenue potential (based on toll optimization model and different pricing strategies) Access Connectivity Packaging/Phasing

Study Schedule

I-77 North Feasibility Studies Address congestion along I-77 North in short and long-term periods Financed with Federal and State funds Analysis of HOV lane extension to Exit 30 in Davidson Assessment of converting HOV lanes to HOT facility Feasibility of operating traffic on shoulders until freeway is widened Studies begin in January 2009

http://www.fastlanes.org/