Current Transformers (CT) Ratings Methodology

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Summary of Second Draft of the NERC Standard PRC Disturbance Monitoring and Reporting JSIS Meeting August 10, 2010 Salt Lake City, UT.
Advertisements

A New Hysteretic Reactor Model for Transformer Energization Applications Title: By : Afshin Rezaei-Zare & Reza Iravani University of Toronto June 2011.
BEX 100 – Basic Electricity Alternating Current (AC) Unit 15.
System Voltage Planning Brian Moss PD / Transmission Planning Transmission Planning Overview October 30, 2007.
Today’s Topics 1- The per unit system 2-Transformer Voltage Regulation
ERCOT Load Forecast and Reserve Margin Update June 2, ERCOT Load Forecast and Reserve Margin Update June 2, 2005.
Transformer Voltage Regulation Fact: As the load current is increased, the voltage (usually) drops. Transformer voltage regulation is defined as:
1 Econometric Load Forecasting Peak and Energy Forecast 06/14/2005 Econometric Load Forecasting Peak and Energy Forecast 06/14/2005.
Borah Mitigators Remedial Action Scheme for the Borah West Path Sponsored by: IDAHO POWER Team Members: Kyle Jones Mark Magee Jason Rippee.
Chapter 3Transmission Lines Why use high-voltage transmission lines? The best answer to that question is that high-voltage transmission lines transport.
Standardization Aspects in UHV Networks New Delhi, January 2009 Denis Dufournet Chairman IEC TC17 Member CIGRE WG A3-22.
Substations. Substations Chapter 4 Substations Major types of equipment found in most transmission and distribution substations with their purpose,
Single Phase IEC and EATS Distribution Transformers
METHODOLOGY FOR THE CALCULATION OF DISCOUNTED NET REVENUES Expert Group Meeting, 12 December 2013.
Costs of Ancillary Services & Congestion Management Fedor Opadchiy Deputy Chairman of the Board.
Farmers Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by: East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis Department.
Incident Energy Study Christian Brothers University MAESC CONFERENCE Jermichael Beaver, Bruce Luong, David Temple, and John Ventura.
Experimental determination of motor model parameters ETEC6419.
NW Resource Adequacy Forum Steering Committee Conference Call November 4, 2010.
2015 RTP – Study Scope of Short Circuit Analysis RPG Meeting May 19,
Grayson Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by: East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis Department.
ERCOT Long-Term Demand and Energy Forecasting February 20, 2007 Bill Bojorquez.
Basic Probability Permutations and Combinations: -Combinations: -The number of different packages of data taken r at time from a data set containing n.
Project funded by the Future and Emerging Technologies arm of the IST Programme Analytical Insights into Immune Search Niloy Ganguly Center for High Performance.
Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field Random Vibration Testing of Hardware Tutorial 1 Fatigue Life Assessment William O. Hughes/7735 Mark E. McNelis/7735.
Power Plant Construction and QA/QC Section 4.4 – In-Plant Electrical Distribution Engineering Technology Division.
Self-consistent non-stationary theory of multipactor in DLA structures O. V. Sinitsyn, G. S. Nusinovich, T. M. Antonsen, Jr. and R. Kishek 13 th Advanced.
Big Stone II – Delivery Study Phase 6 and Supplemental #2 For Northern MAPP SPG Meeting 4/3/07 Elk River Richard Dahl Missouri River Energy Services.
Logarithmic Functions
Blue Grass Energy Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by: East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis Department.
Licking Valley Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by : East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis.
09/17/2006 Ken Donohoo ERCOT Peak Day August Initial Settlement Data by Fuel Type.
Hybrid Load Forecasting Method With Analysis of Temperature Sensitivities Authors: Kyung-Bin Song, Seong-Kwan Ha, Jung-Wook Park, Dong-Jin Kweon, Kyu-Ho.
A SUMMER TRANNING PRESENTATION ON 400 KV GRID SUB STATION BIKANER
Objective Provide an analysis of the existing Waltz-Mill system. Provide an analysis of the existing Waltz-Mill system. Determine the affect on the system.
2005/06 Safety Monitors Presentation to Gas Transmission Workstream, 5 January 2006.
Methodology for Demand Forecasts for Bandera Electric Cooperative, Inc. Brian D. Bartos, P.E. Manager, Engineering Presented to ERCOT Reliability & Operations.
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1.
Local Area Planning Update – TRANSAC Base Case Status Base case study models representing the base scenarios will be completed as follows for.
Current Transformer Testing
Reliability Must Run Workshop RMR Study Process May 24, 2016.
PE Systems Pvt. Ltd. Bangalore
PPI Quality Assessment Framework
Introduction High Voltage!!.
Recall Lecture 7 Voltage Regulator using Zener Diode
Cen TC350 Overview.
Student Learning Outcomes Documentation
Protection of Power Systems
Nacogdoches to Lufkin SS 345 kV Line Project
Part 3 LABTQ /LABNET. Technical experience with testing ECO design parameters Hot water production, what accuracy to expect? (DGC)
Team Members: Kyle Jones Mark Magee Jason Rippee
Climate.
Kurt Uhlir President Standby Power System Consultants, Inc.
ECEN 460 Power System Operation and Control
Removal of Fraser RAS from RAS Databse
Design of Electric Power Systems and Utilities
A Simulation Model for Crowbarring Thyristor Devices
DEC System Voltage Planning - June 2018
Oil-tight MV fuse CEF-OT with TPC bushings
City of Lebanon, Missouri Electric Department
Scientific Methods.
Sizing Methodologies • Sizing Calculations
LOAD BEHAVIOUR DURING VOLTAGE DIPS
Notes Over 7.4 Finding an Inverse Relation

Removal of Fraser RAS from RAS Databse
Palo Verde-COI RAS Retirement
Table (2.1): Water Consumption for Various Purposes:
Palo Verde-COI RAS Retirement
CHAPTER – 45 RATING AND SERVICE CAPACITY
Presentation transcript:

Current Transformers (CT) Ratings Methodology Rating methodologies exist for Normal Summer Peak and Normal Winter Peak ratings without accelerated loss of life (defined in part by IEEE C57.13-1993) Free-standing current transformers (CTs) and other non-bushing type CTs 24-hr ambient temperature cycle, constant load, and no accelerated loss of life. Methodologies Needed for: Emergency ratings for all types of CTs (particularly 4-hr ratings) Normal ratings for all types of breaker bushing and transformer bushing CTs Both rating methodologies should be tested and include the effects of an ambient temperature cycle, rating factor (RF), and chosen CT tap position Different types of non-bushing, breaker bushing and transformer bushing CTs should be surveyed for various existing and projected types of CTs Industrial Advisory Board Meeting July 31 – August 3, 2005

Purp0se and Scope Develop a technically-based, practical, simple method to calculate the rating of free-standing and bushing CTs and the condition of these CTs in terms of remaining life or loss of life. Review of normal and emergency ratings for different possible types of free-standing, breaker bushing and transformer bushing CTs Survey of different types of free-standing, breaker bushing and transformer bushing CTs Include ambient temperature cycle, tap position, and RF Load cycle is desired but not required for normal ratings For emergency ratings, a constant pre-emergency normal loading for a defined time period followed by an emergency loading for a defined period taken into account, as well as accelerated loss of life For the 4-hr emergency ratings, consider 20 hrs at the normal rating followed by 4 hrs at the emergency rating. CT voltage ratings should include 115, 161, 230, and 500 kV. Develop a methodology for normal ratings for bushing CTs, and emergency ratings for non-bushing, breaker bushing and transformer bushing CTs. Test (benchmark) at least one type of free-standing, one type of breaker bushing, and one type of transformer bushing CT at both 161 and 500 kV by experimentally exposing the CTs to lab tests. This is a minimum of six types of CTs. Both normal and emergency ratings must be lab tested for these six CTs.

Desired Outcome Normal ratings equations developed for breaker bushing and transformer bushing CTs similar to Normal Summer and Winter Peak ratings methodologies for relevant-types of free-standing CTs Verified equations by lab tests on representative CTs. Emergency ratings equations for free-standing, breaker bushing and transformer bushing CTs for relevant types with a method to determine a quantified loss of life. Verified equations by lab tests on representative CTs of the same type as those described above in item 1.