Aamodt Settlement and the Regional Water System

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Idaho Conjunctive Management Rules & Ground Water District Formation
Advertisements

Components of the Negotiated Settlement and How They Fit Together June 27, 2012.
Contract and Grant Provisions and Administration Section 105 (Page 30) Title I The Act.
Active Water Resource Management in the Lower Rio Grande TOOLS FOR A NEW ERA IN WATER MANAGEMENT presented by Peggy Barroll, Hydrologist New Mexico Office.
Environmental Law. CARCD Annual Meeting & Conference November 13, 2014 PRESENTED BY Steve Anderson Partner Key Components of California Groundwater Legislation.
Floyd County Board of Commissioners Special Town Hall Meeting Topic: Update on status of Georgetown WWTP.
Federal Budget Process Steve Kidd and Allison Boehm Budget and Program Analysis Staff April 2009.
IE 2, CHARTER, AND STATUS QUO SCHOOL SYSTEMS Flexibility Options Comparison F EBRUARY 26, 2015 Ken Thompson Chief Financial Officer.
TRE ANNUAL MEETING Grant Levi, NDDOT Director November 26,
Central Arizona Project Thomas W. McCann January 7, 2015.
THE NORTH CAROLINA AGRICULTURAL WATER RESOURCES ASSISTANCE PROGRAM NC Water Resources Congress October 30, 2014.
Water Resources Issues in the Lower Rio Grande June 3, 2005 J. Phillip King, P.E. Assc. Professor/Assc. Dept. Head Dept. of Civil Engineering, NMSU Consultant,
1 Investing in your water … investing in your future California American Water General Rate & Conservation Case Applications.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES SURFACE WATER RIGHTS UNIT.
Water and Wastewater Certification 1 Water & Wastewater Reference Manual.
Todd County, Minnesota Board of Commissioners 2013 Budget Meeting November 27, pm Todd County Board Room, Todd County Historic Courthouse.
Columbia River Water Management Program (CRWMP) Review of Year One Upper Crab Creek Planning Unit Meeting April 17, 2007.
KATHRYN E. MEOLA, CHIEF DEPUTY SAN MATEO COUNTY COUNSEL’S OFFICE SHAWN MARSHALL, DIRECTOR LEAN ENERGY PENINSULA CLEAN ENERGY.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan North Bay Watershed Association Meeting November 3, 2006 Working together to enhance sustainable water.
Title US Department of the Interior Indian Affairs 2016 Indian Affairs House/Senate Mark Presentation to Tribal/Interior Budget Council August 6, 2015.
2014 IRWM Drought Grants Sierra Water Workgroup Summit June Tracie L. Billington Department of Water Resources Financial Assistance Branch.
1 Water Right Conveyances Division of Water Rights By Randy Tarantino Title Program Specialist Telephone: (801) March.
VI. Developing a VSMP Program General Stormwater Training Workshop.
What You Need to Know about Groundwater Conservation Districts In Texas Tyler December 3,2002 Guy Fipps Professor and Extension Irrigation Engineer Dept.
Solano Habitat Conservation Plan 580,000 Acres 36 Covered Species; 4 Natural Communities 17,500 acres of Urban Development; 1,280 acres of other New Facilities.
State and Tribal Government Working Group November 12, 2008 FERNALD NATURAL RESOURCE DAMAGES SETTLEMENT.
OCFO - Financial Status of USPTO May 7, FY 2010 Status Authorized level of $1,887.0 million Mid-year Budget Execution Review currently underway.
1 The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) California Department of Public Health Safe Drinking Water State Revolving Fund.
PRESENTERS ■Rita Cortes, Fiscal Manager, San Mateo Department of Child Support Service ■Ignacio Guerrero, Deputy Director, San Mateo Department of Child.
1. FY Proposed Budget Jamie Justice, Town Manager & Piet Swart, Finance Director April 26, 2016 Fiscal Year Proposed Budget 2.
PRESENTED AND PREPARED BY CITY OF MISSOULA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT.
1 Staff Public Workshops Fall 2011 Policy for Siting, Design, Operation and Management of Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems San Luis Obispo: October.
PARK STREET/CAMPANELLI PARK SEWER EXPANSION PROJECT Public Meeting Wednesday, June 22, 2016.
1 TIF 9 (Trinity River Vision) Expanded and Updated Project and Financing Plans December 8, 2009 Presented to the City Council Jay Chapa Housing & Economic.
Second Interim Financial Report
STOCKTON DELTA WATER SUPPLY PROJECT (DWSP) Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Certification Hearing November 8, 2005 Mark J. Madison, Director Municipal.
Inaugural Extension Council Conference
Sebago Elementary School Withdrawal Committee
Western Knight Center for Specialized Journalism Seminar:
Environmental Quality Board
The Blackfeet Water Rights Settlement Act
Overview of property tax levies for Idaho Schools
Water & Wastewater Capacity Charge Work Shop
December 2016.
Tax Budget – Putting the puzzle pieces together
Community Development November 2011
Kansas Experience in Technical Negotiations for Tribal Water Right Settlements Symposium on the Settlement of Indian Reserved Water Rights Claims, Great.
Sherm Micsak Area Coordinator, Region 9 Ohio Department of Education
FY Proposed Budget and Rates
Bureau of Mining Programs Update
PROPOSED MARCH LANE / HOLMAN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
West Tisbury Board of Selectmen Cape Light Compact Update
- Public Hearing - Proposed Downtown Stockton Management District
Cobb County Nonprofit Grant Process FY 17/18
Sam Cohen, Government and Legal Specialist
Budgeting and Financial Management for Human Services
Non-Residential Customer Non- Residential - Capacity Evaluation Borough of Conshohocken Authority Customer Informational Meeting June 20, East.
2018 Kern County Water Summit
WASHINGTON COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL BUDGET PRESENTATION
San Luis Obispo County Integrated Regional Water Management (IRWM) Region Regional Water Management Group (RWMG) Meeting SLO City/County Library Community.
PLANNING DOCUMENTS 2018 New Mexico infrastructure finance conference
Delta Water Supply Project
Durham and Orange Transit Plan Funding Needs
Regional License and Permits Program
GATEWAY AREA DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CITY BUDGET WORKSHOP February 20, 2019 Guest Presenter Mr. Andy DeMoss, CPA Partner RFH, PLLC Lexington, Kentucky.
Budget office overview
How Small Developers and EPC Contractors Can Add PPA Financing to their Arsenals John Langhus, VP Business Development Midwest Solar Expo 2019 New Energy.
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS) Certification Process
Agenda FYE June 30, 2020 Operating Budget
Presentation transcript:

Aamodt Settlement and the Regional Water System By Sandra Ely, Santa Fe County Aamodt Project Manager March 28, 2017

Overview Why Santa Fe County Supports: Settlement Agreement Regional Water System Milestones Reached Milestones Remaining Questions Mr. Lee Aamodt

Pojoaque Basin and Area of Aamodt Settlement Agreement

Why Santa Fe County Supports Aamodt Settlement Agreement Protects non-Pueblo Water Rights Affords all non-Pueblo water right owners the opportunity to prove the full amount of their water rights. Creates a 0.5 afy presumptive minimum for domestic wells, not otherwise restricted, regardless of actual beneficial use. 0.5 afy ≈ 162,900 gallons/year ≈ 13,570 gallons/month. Average County utility residential customer uses approximately 0.18 afy ≈ 60,000 gallons/year ≈ 5,000 gallons/month. Average use in the Pojoaque Basin estimated to be 0.289 afy ≈ 94,000 gallons/year ≈7,850 gallons/month Allows domestic well right owners to elect to continue using their well or connect to the regional water system. Provides priority-call protection for non-Pueblo water rights.

Why Santa Fe County Supports Aamodt Settlement Agreement Protects traditional agriculture and acequias. Quantifies Pueblos’ senior water rights. Promotes surface flows and ecosystem health for Rios de Nambe, Pojoaque, and Tesuque. Clearly superior to the alternative: a water rights adjudication that determines the size of each water right owner’s slice of a fixed pie.

Why Santa Fe County Supports the Regional Water System Provides a safe, reliable source of potable water for both Pueblo and non-Pueblo users in the Pojoaque Basin and Santa Fe County. 2,500 afy for Pueblos. Up to 1,500 afy for the County Water Utility. Brings in water from the Rio Grande for both Pueblo and non-Pueblo residents. Protects customers from groundwater contamination.

Water Quality in the Basin

Why Santa Fe County Supports the Regional Water System Promotes economic development, both from construction and operation of the Regional Water System. construction costs are estimated at $261.2 million (2024). federal share is ≈ 65%. construction, operations/maintenance will create jobs and bring new money into the local economy. Recharges aquifer by importing surface water and reducing well water usage.

Regional Water System Service Area (projected)

9/21/2016

Estimated Construction Cost Share (excluding connection costs) Party 2006 Dollars (in Millions) Future Value (Indexed through 2024) Remaining to be Appropriated Federal $106.4 $177.5 $93.4 State* $45.5 $72 $57 County** $7.4 $11.7 Total*** $159.3 $261.2 $162.1 *Does not include $4M for connection fee fund or $0.5 M for impairment fund. Remaining funds needed in Federal FY 2018-24 at approx. $9 M annually. ** Does not include up to $9 M for other County connection costs (thru 2024). *** Does not include tribal in-kind contributions for land and planning.

Settlement Agreement Milestones Reached 2010 - Congress enacts Aamodt Litigation Act. 2013 - Cost Sharing and Systems Integration Agreement signed; Revised Settlement Agreement signed. 2014 - U.S. and State, through the Interstate Stream Commission, enter into Funding Agreement for the State’s Share of Costs for the Regional Water System. State’s estimated share of costs, indexed, is about $72 million. State’s obligations are contingent upon appropriations. 2015 - Water rights transfer application filed with OSE. 2016 - Federal court enters Partial Final Decree, overruling objections to Settlement Agreement and formally declaring the Settlement Agreement in effect.

Milestones and Deadlines Remaining (statutory, contractual, or projected) December 13, 2016 Board of County Commissioners of Santa Fe County approved the Pojoaque Basin Regional Water Authority Joint Powers Agreement (JPA). Before becoming affective, the JPA must also be approved by the four Pueblos and the Department of Finance and Administration.

Regional Water Authority Board Regional Water Authority Organizational Structure Tesuque Pojoaque SF County Nambe San Ildefonso Regional Water Authority Board System Operator Agreement Fiscal Services Agreement General Manager Hired by and supervised by the Board A RWA employee Oversees RWA’s day to day affairs including managing contracts (Fiscal Services Agreement; System Operator Agreement) and supervising RWA employees Coordinates with the Board Fiscal Agent Initial Agreement may be with the County Provides procurement, payroll, financial and accounting and other fiscal and administrative services as directed by the Board System Operator Initial Agreement may be with the County Responsible for the operations, maintenance, and repair of the RWS Bills customers Other Employees Employees of the RWA

Milestones and Deadlines Remaining (statutory, contractual, or projected) 2017 Inter se Proceedings are in the final stages. Water Rights Lookup: http://www.ose.state.nm.us/WRAB/index.php Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) released for public review in January. The comment period has closed. https://sites.google.com/site/pbwatereis/documents/project-reports Bureau of Reclamation awards contract to CDM Smith for $91.9 million dollars for the design-build portion of the Regional Water System.

Milestones and Deadlines Remaining (statutory, contractual, or projected) 2017 The Water Master Rules to govern the administration of the Settlement Agreement by the Office of the State Engineer (OSE) will be available for review and comment this Spring. Well Election (Court has yet to set a deadline)- Domestic well owners elect one of three options regarding the use of their well and connection to the County Water Utility: Discontinue use of their well and connect to CWU. Continue using their well and limit the amount of use in accordance with the Settlement Agreement. Continue using well and limit use until their property is transferred to a new owner.

Milestones and Deadlines Remaining, cont. September 15, 2017 All water rights acquired. Congress fully appropriates all authorized funds required under the Settlement Act (other than funding for the RWS). Office of State Engineer issues permits changing the point of diversion of water rights acquired by the U.S. for the Pueblos. State appropriates $0.5 M for Impairment Fund to mitigate impairment to Non-Pueblo groundwater rights as a result of new Pueblo water use. Final decree issued by the U.S. District Court that sets forth the water rights for all parties to the Aamodt Case.

Milestones and Deadlines Remaining, cont. November, 2017 Funding Agreement between U.S. and Santa Fe County for Santa Fe County’s Cost Share of RWS executed. January, 2018 EIS/ROD complete. April, 2018 Final RWS design complete. Construction of the RWS begins. Federal Fiscal Year 2018 through RWS Completion State and County provide their share of funding for RWS. State provides $4 million in funding for Pojoaque Valley Water Utility Connection Fund to pay for water service connections for non-Pueblo Members.

Milestones and Deadlines Remaining, cont. May 15, 2018 Operating Agreement executed and submitted to the Secretary of Interior. June 30, 2021 Bureau of Reclamation (BOR) verifies that RWS is complete or will be by June 30, 2024. June 30, 2024 RWS construction substantially complete.

Questions? Conclusion Sandra Ely Santa Fe Aamodt Project Manager 9/21/2016 Sandra Ely Santa Fe Aamodt Project Manager sely@santafecountynm.gov (505)986-2426

Extra Slides

New Mexico Upper Rio Grande Basin SJC Project New Mexico Upper Rio Grande Basin Top of the World Pivots Questa Taos San Ildefonso Pueblo

Relationship of RWA Governing Documents Aamodt Litigation Settlement Act Settlement Agreement Cost Sharing and System Integration Agreement Require the RWS, the RWA, and the Operating Agreement and establish provisions for operations, maintenance, repair & replacement of the system. RWA JPA Creates the Board along with duties, powers and operations. Operating Agreement Has provisions for distribution of water and costs in the RWS and O & M before and after conveyance from Feds System Operator Agreement Fiscal Services Agreement

Settlement: Pueblo Water Rights Summary Quantifies First Priority Rights (acre-feet/year (afy)) Divides into Existing Use and Future Use Pueblo Existing Use (afy) Future Use (afy) Total (afy) San Ildefonso 288 958 1246 Pojoaque 236 Nambe 522 937 1459 Tesuque 345 374 719 Total 1391 2269 3,660