MSD P13038 Hearing Aid Design

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project leader: Benjamin Danziger, EE Todd Bentley, ISE Jim Corcoran, CE Jay Radhakrishnan, EE Peter Drexel, EE Vianna Mullar, EE.
Advertisements

Kyle Desrosiers (ME)- Team Lead Brad Fiedler (EE) Greg Wodzicki (EE) Chris VanWagenen (EE) George Slack- Faculty Guide P ACTIVE NOISE CANCELLATION.
1 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Advisor: Professor Zink Team Acoustic Beamformer Midway Design Review 11/25/2013.
P10041: TEAK - Sound and Music Sheryl Gillow Heather Godlewski Bryan Lozano Jeremy Schuh Mechanical Engineering Electrical Engineering Sponsors: The National.
Christian Seemayer Rob Proetti Tim DeBellis Tim Giguere Will Kelly.
P10057: Delivery and Scale-Up of a Monitoring Device for Human Smoking Behavior Ryan Miller – Project Manager Chris Oxley – Lead Engineer Ryan Enyeart.
1 Electrical and Computer Engineering Cam Proctor Ramsey Khudairi Tom Gilbert Chad Young Project Orion TekBand.
P08009 Audible Memo Board Phase II Friday, February 22, 2008 P08009: Audible Memo Board Phase II Sponsor: Dr. Hopkins Advisor: Professor Slack Jon GosligaElectrical.
ANSI Overview Hearing Aid Testing and Verification What is ANSI?
EDGE™ Project Review P Automation/Improvement of Wegmans Cookie Line Packaging Project Team: Stephanie Rager (IE), Bruno Coelho (ME), Mark Voss (ME),
P08009 Audible Memo Board Phase II Monday, October 22, 2007 P08009: Audible Memo Board Phase II Sponsor: Tala Hopkins Jon GosligaAudio Output Lead Loic.
Precision Variable Frequency Drive Group May07-13 Jason Kilzer Nick Nation Dave Reinhardt Matt Shriver Client: Jim Walker Faculty Advisor: Professor Ajjarapu.
COMPUTER DEVICES Input Devices Output Devices Storage Devices
Fulton-Montgomery Community College TEPP Technological Education Pathways PartnershipNSF DUE Clock Radio.
1 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Advisor: Professor Zink Team Acoustic Beamformer Preliminary Design Review 10/18/2013.
HEARING AID HEURISTICS ANALYSIS. Objective: To conduct usability and human factors testing on hearing aid device to assess if the required specifications.
Bicycle Harvesting Waste Energy: Bicycle Power Generation MSD-I RIT-Systems Design Review Winter/Spring P12414 January 13, 2012 Group # P12414.
MSD P13038 Hearing Aid Design System Design Review January 11, 2012.
Communication Device for Handicapped Kids Dec Client Heartland Area Agency Sue Young Advisor Yao Ma Advisor Yao Ma Alex Leith Brian Grove Steve Peters.
MSD P13038 Hearing Aid Design Detailed Design Review February 8, 2012.
ⓒ 2013 Zalman Tech Co., Ltd. ZM-HPS10BT ZM-HPS10BT Bluetooth Headset Sales Guide.
Free Space Optical Communications Senior Design Project Fall 2011 TEAM AWESOME.
Noise Canceling Headphones Team Members Doan Thanh Khiet Tran Jasmine Khadem Kalina Guentcheva.
Alternative Lower Cost Hearing Aid Dec03-10 Client: Herb Harmison Advisor: Edwin Jones Jr. Team Members: Hassan Qureshi Hamdan Al-Mehrezi Trong Do Nathan.
Input Devices Ali El-Achmar Matt Leclair TEJ20. What Are Input Devices? ● Input Devices are data going into the computer from the user.
Introductory Client: Herb Harmison 2692 Meadow Glen Road Ames, IA Faculty Advisor: Edwin Jones Jr. Team Members: Hassan Qureshi CprE Hamdan Al-Mehrezi.
HEARING AID HEURISTICS ANALYSIS. Objective: To conduct usability and human factors testing on hearing aid device to assess if the required specifications.
Headphone Amplifier, Equalizer, and Sound Stage Abstract Some portable media devices, such as mp3 players, have insufficient power to drive top-of-the-line.
Ian Frank Matt Walter Jesse Steiner Luke Spencer Mike Celentano Nick Balducci Team Lead Chief Engineer Electrical Engineer Industrial Engineer Electrical.
Trey Herrington Electrical Engineer - Backup Power Supply - Backup Power Supply - PCB Design - PCB Design Samantha Prine Electrical Engineer -Enclosure.
Path The purpose of this project is to design a universal data recording device to monitor the health of a Dresser-Rand compressor during operation. In.
Midterm Presentation Senior Design II February 28, 2012.
Smoke Notification System (SNS) Final Presentation Senior Design II November 19, 2013.
Smoke Notification System (SNS) Final Presentation Senior Design 1 April 18, 2013.
Marketing Requirements Engineering RequirementsJustification 10 A. User interface will consist of a single on/off switch. The system does not.
Team Theremin1 Analog Theremin Using Vacuum Tubes and Frequency Detection via Band-pass Filters Ryan Adams, Matt Britt, Yuri Yelizarov, William Findley.
PDS. Contents  Introduction  Definitions  1) Performance 1.0 Function 2.0 Appearance 3.0 Reliability 4.0 Environment 5.0 Ergonomics 6.0 Quality 7.0.
ECE 477 Final Design Review
P07122: Autonomous Quadcopter Jason Enslin – EE: Team Leader, Circuit Design/Testing Glenn Kitchell – CE: Programming, Software Design Richard Nichols.
Project: P08371 Portable Command Post Rick Chadwick ME Harith Wijetungage IE Scott Pudlewski EE Sponsors: Technet Global Services DiLorenzo Electronics.
Ultra Trace Cargo Monitoring Final Report Kevin Kurtz - ECE Jacob Klapheke - ECE Nick Searcy - ECE Nick Wood - ME Jason Guelda - ME.
Island 3 pc wireless light audio system & Maui Features
Engineering Projects in Community Service Ongo -04 December 9, 1999
Computer Science.
Therapeutic equipment I
Bluetooth Headset ZM-HPS10BT Sales Guide
P07307: Controls for Dynamic Suspension
Block Diagram Transmitter Receiver × 2 Transmitter Power Supply ADC
P07203 Dynamometry Laboratory Infrastructure
Advised by Professor Baird Soules
Senior Design Project with RLE Technologies: Automated PCB
Garage Parking Indicator
Right Move, Right Place, Right Time
P13323: Opto-Electric Guitar Pickup
HEMODYNAMIC SIMULATOR II P09026
P15311: PCB Router Phase 5 System Pass Off with Customer
P17001: Wearable Interface Design Iterations Team Intro & Background
Duy Dang, Robert Kern, Esteban Kleckner
Stationary Balance Training Bicycle - P08001
Team P15441 Mini Air Sub-System Design Review
ECE 477 DESIGN REVIEW TEAM 14  SPRING 2010
Touch Sensitive Piano Keys
Wireless Electrocardiogram System Senior Project
P11017 Tactile Navigation Interface
Low-Cost, Portable, Pneumonia Diagnostic Device
Detailed Design Review (Phase 4)
Wearable Interface 3.
Detailed Design Review: P18001
Therapeutic equipment I
Top Cat Phase II P12352 Team Members: Faculty Guide: Mahdi Massey – EE
Presentation transcript:

MSD P13038 Hearing Aid Design Final Review May 10, 2013

Agenda 5.10.13 Project Overview (2) Mechanical Needs & Spec Review (10) Electrical & Computer Needs & Spec Review (10) Budget Review (2) Schedule Review (2) Lessons Learned (2) Opportunities for Future Work (2)

Team Members 5.10.13 Alissa Anderson (ME) Team Manager Conor Murphy (EE) System Integration Engineer Ronald Dries (CE) Lead Electrical Kelly Murosky (ME) Lead Mechanical Paula Garcia (ID) Secretary Eric Lew (EE) Budget Master Marbella Vidals (ISE) Customer Relations Sarah Brownell Guide Effective Technologies Grant Sponsor

Project Goals 5.10.13 Overall Goals: - To de-stigmatize hearing aids as medical devices - To provide the hard-of-hearing market with an alternative hearing aid device - Project is to serve as an initial proof of concept for future MSD projects Deliverables: - Device Amplifies Sound - Device allows for rechargeable power - Device is ergonomic and aesthetically appealing

outlet for wires to BTE enclosure Concept Summary 5.10.13 battery enclosure outlet for wires to BTE enclosure microphone sound capture 5 way button up = volume up down = volume down right = profile up left = profile down in = power on/off round enclosure micro USB connection transfer module

Focus Group & Imagine RIT Survey 5.10.13 - User comfort (fits users between the 15th and 90th percentile) - Device perception (91% recognized the device as a Bluetooth device) - Physical Satisfaction (texture, shape, color rated as satisfactory) - Overall satisfaction (91.86% would recommend this device to a friend)

Ergonomic Model 5.10.13

Mechanical Specifications 5.10.13 Source Specification Direction Units of measure Marginal Ideal Actual Satisfied? S8 CN11, CN12 Maximum temperature at outside surface of device min oF 98 110 Not Tested S9 CN2, CN4, CN11 Range of adult ear size accommodated max percentile 25th to 75th 10th to 90th 15th to 90th Pass S10 CN4, CN6, CN10, CN11 Weight of earpiece g <15 <12 15 S18 CN9 Attaches to a standard ear tube and ear mold yes/no yes S19 CN14 Manufactured cost (estimated) $ <2000 <1000 $415

Percent of surveyed people who feel the device is comfortable to wear IMAGINE RIT Specifications 5.10.13 Spec Source Specification Direction Units of measure Marginal Ideal Actual Satisfied? S14 CN3 Percent of surveyed people who identify a picture of the device as something other than a hearing aid. max percent >60 >80 92.06 Pass S15 Percent of surveyed hard of hearing people who prefer the form of the new device to standard behind the ear hearing aids >50 >75 33 Fail S16 Percent of surveyed hearing people who would use the device for Bluetooth or music listening >70 91.8 S17 CN11 Percent of surveyed people who feel the device is comfortable to wear

Electrical Specifications, Round PCB 5.10.13 Source Specification Direction Units of measure Marginal Ideal Actual Satisfied? S1 CN1 Lowest level of sound detected min dB <60 <30 not recorded Fail S2 Frequencies amplified max Hz 300-7000 85-8000 200-8000 Pass S3 CN1, CN6 Maximum amplification target 85-95 90 22 S4 CN5 Levels of volume adjustment levels 5 20

Round PCB 5.10.13 Microphones Pre-Amplification

Electrical Specifications, Battery PCB 5.10.13 Source Specification Direction Units of measure Marginal Ideal Actual Satisfied? S5 CN7 Time to charge earpiece min minutes <60 <30 Circuit Incomplete Fail S7 Connects to standard USB 2.0 computer port target yes/no yes Pass S12 CN8 Earpiece battery life at maximum amplification max hours >16 >48 3.5

Battery Charger PCB 5.10.13 Battery Charger Chip

CE Slide 5.10.13 Code Functionality - Switch Monitoring - Sample signals and convert to the digital domain - Amplify the signals samples - Output the modified signal to the DAC

High Customer Needs 5.10.13 Rank Description Need Satisfied? CN1 9 The device amplifies sound Yes CN2 The device fits most adult ears ages 15-25years CN3 The device does not draw attention to the user as a hard of hearing individual CN4 The device supports an active lifestyle (stays on the ear during everyday activities and light activities) No CN5 The device includes a way for the user to adjust the volume while on the ear CN6 The device is safe to use CN7 The device is rechargeable by computer USB port Feasible

Budget Review 5.10.13 Item MSD1 Budget Remaining Budget Notes Evaluation Boards 600 501 Received Free Eval Boards Microphones 450 Received Free Microphones Microprocessor 50 17.80 Amplifier IC 120 33.21 Speaker Received Free Speakers USB Interface 20 3.06 Rechargeable Battery 160 25.41 PCB 375 200 Budgeted for multiple PCB iterations Acoustic Test Stand 3D Printing Costs 1125 700.74 Focus Groups 70 Miscellaneous 1500 569.43 TOTAL 4600 2611

Schedule Review 5.10.13 Date Event DRI MET? Jan 29 order proto 1 enclosure Ali YES February 15 Printed Circuit Board (PCB) 1.0 Ordered  Conor February 18 order proto 2 enclosure NO March 10 order final PCB March 18 Order final enclosures for integration April 1 Start integration and debug ALL April 26 WORKING PROTOTYPE DUE May 4 Imagine RIT May 10 Final MSD Review (Week 10)

Objective Project Evaluation 5.10.13 Objectives Satisfied To de-stigmatize hearing aids as medical devices Yes! To provide the hard-of-hearing market with an alternative hearing aid device Project is to serve as an initial proof of concept for future MSD projects Deliverables Device Amplifies Sound Device allows for rechargeable power Device is ergonomic and aesthetically appealing

Lessons Learned 5.10.13 Optimism is key Product design is a game of compromise & communication Liberal use of break out boards for testing components Always test circuits prior to ordering Printed Circuit Boards Isolate financial purchases from other projects

Opportunities for Future Work 5.10.13 On Semi RHYTHM R3910 DSP Integration (CE) Bluetooth Integrations (ME, EE, CE) Ergonomic Model (ME, ID) Rechargeable Battery performance and Battery Capacity (EE, ME)

BACKUP 5.10.13

Customer Needs 5.1.13 Rank Description Need Satisfied? CN1 9 The device amplifies sound yes CN2 The device fits most adult ears ages 15-25years CN3 The device does not draw attention to the user as a hard of hearing individual CN4 The device supports an active lifestyle (stays on the ear during everyday activities and light activities) no CN5 The device includes a way for the user to adjust the volume while on the ear Yes CN6 The device is safe to use CN7 The device is rechargeable by computer USB port Feasible CN8 3 The power in the earpiece should lasts at least 48 non-continuous hours CN9 The device interfaces with a standard tube and ear mold CN10 The weight of the device is similar to existing earpieces CN11 The device is comfortable to wear No (ergonomic) CN12 The device does not generate excessive heat during use or charging No noticeable heat on bench; not measured CN13 1 The device includes an additional method for toggling between functions (for later use to switch between programs or turn on Bluetooth, etc.) CN14 The device has a cost similar to current devices when in production