REGIONAL RESEARCH FUND INITIATIVE

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Roles, Responsibilities and Tasks
Advertisements

OMT RETREAT (WORK PLANNING). The UNDG Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of Common Services were developed in 2000 by an inter-agency.
Office of University Partnerships Office of Policy Development and Research U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of University Partnerships.
SYSTEM OF EVALUATION AND MANAGEMENT CONTROL RESULTS-BASED BUDGETING THE CHILEAN EXPERIENCE Heidi Berner H Head of Management Control Division Budget Office,
Prepared by the Office of Grants and Contracts1 COST SHARING.
Office of University Partnerships Madlyn Wohlman-Rodriguez Hispanic-Serving Institutions Assisting Communities (HSIAC) 2006 Grant Terms and Conditions.
Vers national spatial data infrastructure training program How to Implement Your NSDI CAP Project NSDI Cooperative Agreements Program Steps to.
Sustainable Energy Systems Overview of contractual obligations, procedures and practical matters KICK-OFF MEETING.
Columbia University IRB IRB 101 September 21, 2005 George Gasparis, Executive Director, CU IRB Asst. V.P. and Sr. Asst. Dean for Research Ethics.
A SOUND INVESTMENT IN SUCCESSFUL VR OUTCOMES FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT.
WCI LEA UPDATE MAY 2, 2014 RI Department Of Education Wireless Classroom Initiative Cynthia Brown, Director Office of Statewide Efficiencies Craig Hockenbrough,
TEMPUS IV- THIRD CALL FOR PROPOSALS Recommendation on how to make a good proposal TEMPUS INFORMATION DAYS Podgorica, MONTENEGRO 18 th December 2009.
APRE Agency for the Promotion of European Research Lifecycle of an FP 7 project Caterina Buonocore Riga, 13th September, 2007.
PILOT PROJECT: External audit of quality assurance system on HEIs Agency for Science and Higher Education Zagreb, October 2007.
PUBLIC PROCUREMENT OPERATIONS Dr. Fred Mugambi Mwirigi JKUAT 1.
FUNDING A PROJECT STEPS IN DEVELOPING A PROPOSAL.
Session 13 CPIP Formulation Process Project for Capacity Development for Implementing the Organic Law at the Capital and Provincial Level (PILAC 2)
Draft Model Community Development Agreement Rationale.
10/16/2015 Roles and Responsibilities of Principal Investigators/ Program Directors/ Project Directors.
REPORTING, MONITORING AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROVISIONS ON NON-FINANCIALS – 2013/14 1 MIG Quarterly Workshop 3 – 4 September 2013.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
GRANT MANAGEMENT SEMINARS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING.
Introduction to The Grant Center Fitchburg State University.
ITS Contract An Overview of the Instructional Telecommunications Services Contract.
Gulana Hajiyeva Environmental Specialist World Bank Moscow Safeguards Training, May 30 – June 1, 2012.
REVISED GUIDELINES ON THE EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PRESCHOOL SERVICE CONTRATING PROGRAMS.
African Centre for Statistics United Nations Economic Commission for Africa Conclusions and Recommendations of the Friends of the Chair of the CSC Secretariat.
Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.
Office of Sponsored Projects The Funding Life Cycle.
Prepared by the Office of Grants and Contracts1 INDIRECTS vs. REDIRECTS.
Ministry of Education, Research and Religious Affairs General Secretariat for Research and Technology EEA Financial Mechanism GR07 Research within.
1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Overview Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health Institute.
Office of Sponsored Projects The Funding Life Cycle.
UNIVERSITY OF DAR ES SALAAM t Selection and Employment of Consultants Negotiations with Consultants; Monitoring Performance of Consultants; Resolving Disputes.
M. Hafeeza Ahmed (Hafy)- Main tasks in WHO related to the Government Financial/Administrative and Human Resource Matters: Preparing obligation documents.
MTCP 2 PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION MANUAL: Overview of Project Planning, Budgeting, Monitoring & Evaluation (PBME) and Governance.
Welcome. Contents: 1.Organization’s Policies & Procedure 2.Internal Controls 3.Manager’s Financial Role 4.Procurement Process 5.Monthly Financial Report.
Support National Social Protection Strategy (NSPS) CARD/SPCU 1.
UPV RESEARCHERS’ MENTORING INITIATIVE (07 March 2012) By: Dr. Ricardo Babaran Dr. Rosalie Arcala Hall Dr. Wilfredo Campos.
The statistical act, its application and challenges BY ABERASH TARIKU ABAYE NATIONAL STATISTICAL DATA QUALITY AND STANDARDS COORDINATION DIRECTORATE DIRECTOR.
EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)1 II. Scoping. EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)2 Scoping Definition: is a process of interaction between the interested public,
HEALTH RESOURCES & SERVICES ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF FINANCE AND MANAGEMENT DIVISION OF GRANTS MANAGEMENT OPERATIONS LaToya Ferguson.
Implementing TAACCCT Round 2 Consortium Grants Management September 27, 2013.
PILOT SCHOOL PRINCIPAL EVALUATION
5 CERF BUDGET AND ADMINISTRATION REQUIREMENTS TRAINING SESSION
Rationale: The program assists Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) to attain higher productivity through the identification and installation of.
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FUND IIB– Slovak Republic
Agency Performance: A New Agenda
Objectives of WHO's collaboration with NGOs
Chisinau, Republic of Moldova 2017
Objectives of the Training
Proposal Routing Overview
PUBLIC PROCUREMENT SYSTEM IN UZBEKISTAN
Fiscal Agent Role and process for SwP
SCD Grants & Contracts Policy & Procedure 670.
Funding Opportunity Announcement Number: HRSA
Kick-off meeting of the project UMBRELLA
CAO NO. 3, S. 2014: Revised Guidelines in the Operation of Regional Quality Assessment Teams (RQATs) Date of issuance: September 10, 2014.
Applicants’ Orientation Meeting
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
Russell Center Small Research Grants Program
Home Affairs Programme in Bulgaria: From Development to Actual Implementation Cooperation Committee Meeting 28 November
United Nations Voluntary Fund on Disability (UNVFD)
Inclusive Excellence Grants for Faculty and Graduate Students
Roles and Responsibilities
TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
Community Investment Grant
Slovak Republic - International Investment Bank Technical Assistance Fund
Roles and Responsibilities
Presentation transcript:

REGIONAL RESEARCH FUND INITIATIVE 2011

Outline Rationale Institutional Responsibilities vis-à-vis RRF II. Institutional Responsibilities vis-à-vis RRF III. Proposed Mechanism for the Regional Research Funds IV. Suggested Timetable for RRF Evaluation

Rationale The RHRDC is expected to serve as the regional arm of the Philippine National Health Research System (PNHRS) and assist DOST-PCHRD in promoting health research culture, establishing mechanisms to strengthen health research capabilities, encourage collaboration and resource sharing between institutions, and promote the dissemination of regional/national health research agenda and utilization of health research results in the region.

Rationale RRF is viewed as a way to encourage beginning researchers to be actively involved in health research activities without having to compete with more experienced researchers.

Rationale Once the researcher has been able to develop a track record, and given the availability of facilities, the researcher will be encouraged to apply for the larger scale research project/program grant initiative also available in PCHRD (through its Research and Development Management Division), DOST, DOH, CHED, as well as other national and international funding agencies.

Institutional Responsibilities vis-à-vis RRF RHRDC 1. Promote the culture of research in health in the region; 2. Formulate and disseminate regional health research priorities; 3. Encourage member-institutions to develop health researches attuned to identified regional health research priorities; 4. Screen/review research proposals based on set criteria; 5. Endorse research proposals for RRF funding to appropriate funding agencies; 6. Monitor and evaluate the technical and financial progress of approved research projects. 7. Facilitate collaborative arrangements between the project proponents and other RHRDC member-institutions as well as other regional / national stakeholders, whenever necessary. 8. Review final technical reports of projects prior to their presentation in research fora; and 9. Promote utilization of research results to appropriate end-users.

Institutional Responsibilities vis-à-vis RRF Regional Offices of the Department of Science and Technology 1. Administer funds of approved RRF projects; 2. Release funds to projects approved by the RHRDC based on schedules mutually agreed upon by RHRDC and the proponent; 3. Submit to PCHRD financial and progress reports of projects based on agreed schedules as indicated in the MOA (Cost and Terms of Payment); 4. Regularly inform PCHRD regarding the status of ongoing projects, proposals being considered for RRF assistance, and schedules of proposal review/evaluation; and 5. Provide support in monitoring progress (technical and financial) of approved research projects.

Institutional Responsibilities vis-à-vis RRF PCHRD Provide funds for approved regional research projects, and release the same to concerned RHRDCs thru the respective DOST regional offices. PCHRD shall determine the manner of fund release in order to maximize utilization of resources; and 2. Assist the RHRDC in evaluating proposals, and monitoring the progress (technical and financial) of approved research projects

Proposed Mechanism for the Regional Research Funds The mechanism herein proposed cover the following areas of concern: 1. Call for research proposals 2. Evaluation of new project proposals 3. Administration of research projects 4. Monitoring of projects 5. Submission of final reports 6. Evaluation of completed projects

1. Call for research proposals What proposals may qualify Research proposals that will be reviewed by the RHRDC and PCHRD are those which address priority health problems/issues identified in the Regional Unified Health Research Agenda (RUHRA) and/or National Unified Health Research Agenda (NUHRA) of the Philipine National Health Research System (PNHRS). The proposals should also have a budgetary requirement not exceeding TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND PESOS (P200,000.00), and have a duration of six months to one-year.

1. Call for research proposals Each proposal should contain the following information: 1. Title 2. Rationale 3. Review of Related Literature 4. Objectives 5. Methodology 6. Expected Output 7. Potential Users of Research Findings 8. Time Frame 9. Budget

1. Call for research proposals Who may apply Regular staff and faculty members of research institutes, medical and paramedical schools, hospitals and other health related agencies may submit proposals to the RHRDC, properly endorsed by the head of the agency. Likewise, medical residents of hospitals may submit proposals provided that he or she will be working under the supervision of a more experienced researcher affiliated in the same institution.

1. Call for research proposals These proposals should be addressed to: The Regional Health Research and Development Consortium c/o DOST Regional Office Suggested deadline for submission of proposals: June of each year

2. Evaluation of new project proposal 1. Technical Review 2. Ethical Review 3. Ranking of Research Proposals

3. Administration of research projects Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) In consultation with PCHRD, DOST Regional Office shall prepare the MOA of projects approved by the RHRDC. The contracting parties are the DOST Regional Director, the RHRDC Chair, the project leader and the head of the recipient institution. In cases where there are collaborators, the co-proponents of the project and the head/s of their institutions shall serve as witness to the MOA. The MOA shall specify the obligations of the proponent and a clear definition of outputs expected from the project.

3. Administration of research projects Grant release Upon execution of the Memorandum of Agreement (MOA), the project’s grant shall be administered by the DOST Regional Office and released to the proponent in tranches. Fifty (50%) of the funds shall be released upon signing of the MOA. Succeeding releases shall be made upon submission of required deliverables, as agreed in the MOA.

3. Administration of research projects Deposit of Funds The proponent shall deposit the grant in a checking account in any bank (preferably in Landbank) in the locality in the name of the project. Disbursement of the grant shall be in accordance with the approved line-item budget and subject to existing government accounting and auditing laws, rules and procedures (DOST AO 004, Series of 2008).

3. Administration of research projects Project Staff The RHRDC should encourage development of project proposals that could be done by a project leader without the assistance of a research personnel/aide. However, if the implementation of the project’s activities would need the assistance of a support staff, the project leader can: The rates of honoraria for hired personnel and/or project staff shall conform with the DOST’s Memorandum Circular No. 001 (Series of 2009). 3. Administration of research projects 1. use the existing personnel of his/her institution 2. hire other personnel on a piece-meal basis

4. Monitoring of projects Monitoring of projects shall be undertaken to check whether the implementation of projects is in accordance with the scheduled activities and budget. Requirements: RRF Progress Report Form Final Report Financial Report Form (using DOST Form No. 4)

5. Submission of final reports One month after the completion of the project, two (2) copies of the final report including write-up in publishable form shall be submitted by the proponent to the RHRDC. The RDC shall review the submitted final reports and recommend revisions, if needed, to improve presentation of project outputs. The RHRDC shall furnish copies of the revised final reports to PCHRD.

6. Evaluation of completed projects Completed projects will be presented in an inter-regional forum consisting of project implementers, members of the RHRDC, end-users, and PCHRD consultants. The presentation shall highlight the results, discussions and recommendations of the study. 6. Evaluation of completed projects

Proposed Schedule of RRF Evaluation ACTIVITY SCHEDULE 1. Dissemination/Call for Proposals April-May 2. Submission of June 3. Evaluation of Proposals July 4. Endorsement of approved Proposals to PCHRD/PNHRS and other funding agencies September 5. Release of financial grant October

THANK YOU

Ranking of the Research Proposals

RRF Progress Report Form (Period covered) Project Title: Implementing Agency: Project Duration: Project Brief: V. Accomplishments: Target Activities for the Period Expected Output Actual Accomplishments % Work Output VI. Problems Encountered: (Please state in narrative form. Describe problem encountered and explain solution/plan to resolve the problem) VII. Ongoing Activities: (Please state in narrative form) Submitted by: Name of principal investigator (please use separate sheet if necessary)

The report should contain the following: 1. acknowledgement: source of data, donors, colleges 2. abstracts (not more than one page) 3. introduction (include objectives) 4. review of literature 5. methodology: design, materials, procedures 6. results (with figures/tables as necessary) 7. discussions/conclusions 8. references 9. appendices, if any tables, charts, publications arising from the research, others 10. plans to promote the results of the R & D project