Collaborative Time of Arrival (CToA)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Direction Finding Positioning for
Advertisements

Client Positioning using Timing Measurements between Access Points
Cross-Layer Scheduling for Power Efficiency in Wireless Sensor Networks Mihail L. Sichitiu Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering North Carolina.
IEEE 802.1AS REV D5.0 Review Comments
PHY Security FRD and SRD Text
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 July 2013
IEEE 802.1AS REV D5.0 Review Comments
802.11az Negotiation Date: Authors: Jan 2017 Month Year
Scalable Location Performance
2200 Mission College Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95054, USA
Location Measurement Protocol for Unassociated STAs
FRD Requirements for Scalable Location
Efficient Positioning Method using Beacon Frames
802.11az Negotiation Date: Authors: May 2017 Month Year
IEEE 802.1AS REV D5.0 Review Comments
PHY Security FRD and SRD Text
Passive Location Date: Authors: March 2017
Locationing Protocol for 11az
Submission Title: [Beacon design of BAN superframe]
Polling for MU Measurements
The Network Beacon Announcement scanning method
Further Scalable Location Performance Analysis
Protected LTF Using PMF in SU and MU Modes
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 July 2015
<month year> doc.: IEEE < e>
2200 Mission College Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95054, USA
Resource Allocation for Unassociated STAs – Follow Up
Two-sided LMR Feedback between AP and STA
Two-sided LMR Feedback between AP and STA
Secure Ranging Measurement
Constrained Distributed MU-MIMO
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 July 2015
HEz RTT Location Using Anchor Stations and Client Cooperation
HEz RTT Location Using Anchor Stations and Client Cooperation
Beacon Protection Date: Authors: July 2018 July 2018
An unified az Protocol Date: Authors: Nov 2016
Intel Secured Location Threat Model
2200 Mission College Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95054, USA
Low Latency and Low Medium Utilization
2200 Mission College Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95054, USA
Multi hop connections using
Replay Attack to Secured TB Ranging
Group Block Acknowledgements for Multicast Traffic
Replay Attack to Secured TB Ranging
Month Year doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 September 2009
Multi hop connections using
MDA Enhancements Date: Authors: May 2008 Month Year
Beacon Protection Date: Authors: July 2018 July 2018
Locationing Protocol for 11az
Wireless Location Date: Authors: July 2007 Month Year
Overview: Chapter 4 Infrastructure Establishment
EHT Multi-link Operation
Resolutions of the Remaining Power Management Comments
Aug Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Explanation and Revision of Previous Time.
Measurement Report Feedback in 11az
Cooperative AP Discovery
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Date:
Phase Shift Based TOA Reporting in Passive Location Ranging
Intel Secured Location Threat Model
Secure SU and MU Ranging Measurement Procedure
AoD in Passive Ranging Date: Authors: Name Affiliations
Client Positioning using Timing Measurements between Access Points
LMR and LCI Reporting For Passive Location
Location Measurement Protocol for 11ax
Aug Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Explanation and Revision of Previous Time.
CToA Protocol Analysis
11az Negotiation Protocol (update)
Intel Secured Location Threat Model
Consideration on Joint Transmission
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Mar. 2010
Presentation transcript:

Collaborative Time of Arrival (CToA) Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 Collaborative Time of Arrival (CToA) Date: 2017-09-10 Jonathan Segev, Intel

Presentation Outline What is CToA? The CToA Basics Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 Presentation Outline What is CToA? The CToA Basics Position estimation using CToA CToA Simulation Performance Summary & Conclusions Jonathan Segev, Intel

WHAT IS CToA?

What is Collaborative Time of Arrival (CToA)? July 30, 2013 Presentation Title What is Collaborative Time of Arrival (CToA)? Scalable geolocation method that leverages on Wi-Fi fine timing measurement (FTM) capabilities. Two concurrent modes of operation: Client mode – “GPS-like”, client self positioning Unlimited number of clients, navigating indoors/outdoors simultaneously. Client only receives => ensures client privacy Client initiated, centric & terminated. Network mode – large scale asset tracking, analytics Server can track a large number of clients simultaneously limited only by the server’s computational capacity Client only transmits sporadically to enable the NW to estimate its position Designed for “thin client” (e.g. smart tag/e-Tag) => low power, minimal HW resources Network initiated, centric & terminated Copyright © 2013 Intel. All rights reserved.

What is Collaborative Time of Arrival (CToA)? – cont’d Broadcast-based transmission of timing measurement messages. No retransmissions => robust, simple interop. An unmanaged network => no scheduling protocol is required. Designed to work with units with cheap/low-quality crystal oscillators (XO) The material included in this presentation is also described in a whitepaper available online

THE CTOA basics

CToA Network Entities Client-Mode July 30, 2013 Presentation Title CToA Network Entities Client-Mode CToA Broadcasting Station = bSTA TX + RX of meas. messages CToA client Station = cSTA RX – only of meas. messages Copyright © 2013 Intel. All rights reserved.

CToA bSTA Operation Principles Each bSTA is an independent, network detached unit. Could also be implemented as part of a standard 802.11 AP. The bSTAs are unsynchronized. Each bSTA periodically broadcasts CToA measurement message, and measures and announces the ToD of that message. Each bSTA receives the CToA measurement message transmitted by its neighbor bSTA and measures the ToA of that message. Each bSTA publishes its ToA & ToD measurements of its neighbor bSTAs measurement messages.

CToA cSTA Operation Principles Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 CToA cSTA Operation Principles CToA cSTA – only receive, and do not need to transmit Similar to bSTA, each cSTA listens to the measurement messages and measures their ToA. The cSTA collects the ToA & ToD measured & published by the bSTAs. The cSTA uses all the information to calculate its own position. Jonathan Segev, Intel

CToA Proposed Protocol LCI = location configuration information NDPA is used for announcing on NDP arrival, payload is used for ToD, LMR and LCI. NDP is used for ToA estimation. CToA measurement message reuses the VHTz NDPA-SIFS--NDP sequence. Similar to SU ranging frame format, only without the response Frames supported by legacy 802.11ac/VHT STAs.

CToA Messaging Sequence: Client-Mode Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 CToA Messaging Sequence: Client-Mode Jonathan Segev, Intel

CToA Network Entities Network-Centric Mode July 30, 2013 Presentation Title CToA Network Entities Network-Centric Mode TAG CToA Broadcasting Station = bSTA TX + RX of meas. messages cSTA/e-Tag TX – only of meas. messages Copyright © 2013 Intel. All rights reserved.

CToA cSTA/e-Tag Operation Principles Simple 802.11 STA: Low cost; low computation and memory requirements. Power-conscious device; minimized OTA activity. Supports only a limited subset of waveforms and frame formats (e.g., NDPA, NDP, discovery frames). Transmissions are infrequent Large variance in client position refresh rate (second/s to minutes) Only broadcasts CToA measurement messages (incl. ToD) Does not need to receive bSTA (or other) broadcasts Does not need to make any timing measurements

CToA Messaging Sequence: Network-Mode Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 CToA Messaging Sequence: Network-Mode Jonathan Segev, Intel

CLIENT Position estimation USING CToA

The Data a cSTA Needs for Estimating its Location For every CToA message broadcast by bSTA#n there is: 1 × ToD Up to (M-1) × ToA by bSTA Up to 1 × ToA by cSTA The bSTA LCI is broadcast periodically by the bSTA The cSTA collects multiple sets of broadcast timing measurements (1 × ToD & M × ToA) Each measurement is provided in local timing of either bSTA or cSTA. Using this data the cSTA estimates its position

CToA Protocol Example bSTA#1 MAC 10:01 bSTA#3 bSTA#2 MAC 10:03 Network of unsynchronized bSTAs, placed at locations known to clients. cSTA MAC 55:55

CToA Protocol Example PID = Packet ID TXMAC = MAC address of the transmitter RXMAC = MAC address of the receiver ToD = Time of Departure (transmission) ToA = Time of Arrival (reception) PID TXMAC ToD RXMAC ToA bSTA#1 MAC 10:01 PID TXMAC ToD RXMAC ToA bSTA#3 MAC 10:03 bSTA#2 MAC 10:02 PID TXMAC ToD RXMAC ToA The protocol is based on timing measurements of broadcast transmissions. The measurements are logged in tables independently managed by each unit. cSTA MAC 55:55 PID TXMAC ToD RXMAC ToA

CToA Broadcast from bSTA#1 PID TXMAC ToD RXMAC ToA 1551 10:01 199678 bSTA#1 MAC 10:01 bSTA#3 MAC 10:03 bSTA#2 MAC 10:02 cSTA MAC 55:55

CToA Broadcast from bSTA#1 MAC 10:01 PID TXMAC ToD RXMAC ToA 1551 10:01 199678 10:02 329673 bSTA#3 MAC 10:03 bSTA#2 MAC 10:02 PID TXMAC ToD RXMAC ToA 1551 10:01 199678 10:03 341006 cSTA MAC 55:55 PID TXMAC ToD RXMAC ToA 1551 10:01 199678 55:55 128679

CToA Broadcast from bSTA#2 MAC 10:01 PID TXMAC ToD RXMAC ToA 2322 10:02 392609 1551 10:01 199678 329673 bSTA#3 MAC 10:03 bSTA#2 MAC 10:02 cSTA MAC 55:55

CToA Broadcast from bSTA#2 PID TXMAC ToD RXMAC ToA 2322 10:02 392609 10:01 243455 1551 199678 bSTA#1 MAC 10:01 bSTA#3 MAC 10:03 bSTA#2 MAC 10:02 cSTA MAC 55:55 PID TXMAC ToD RXMAC ToA 2322 10:02 392609 55:55 175670 1551 10:01 199678 329673 128679

CToA Broadcast from bSTA#3 MAC 10:01 bSTA#3 MAC 10:03 bSTA#2 MAC 10:02 PID TXMAC ToD RXMAC ToA 3356 10:03 426709 1551 10:01 199678 341006 cSTA MAC 55:55

CToA Broadcast from bSTA#3 PID TXMAC ToD RXMAC ToA 3356 10:03 426709 10:01 310478 2322 10:02 392609 243455 1551 199678 bSTA#1 MAC 10:01 bSTA#3 MAC 10:03 bSTA#2 MAC 10:02 cSTA MAC 55:55 PID TXMAC ToD RXMAC ToA 3356 10:03 426709 55:55 210998 1551 10:01 199678 341006 2322 10:02 392609 175670 329673 128679

CToA Broadcast from bSTA#1 PID TXMAC ToD RXMAC ToA 1552 10:01 332566 3356 10:03 426709 310478 2322 10:02 392609 243455 1551 199678 bSTA#1 MAC 10:01 bSTA#3 MAC 10:03 bSTA#2 MAC 10:02 cSTA MAC 55:55

CToA Broadcast from bSTA#1 MAC 10:01 PID TXMAC ToD RXMAC ToA 1552 10:01 332566 10:02 439578 2322 392609 1551 199678 329673 bSTA#3 MAC 10:03 bSTA#2 MAC 10:02 PID TXMAC ToD RXMAC ToA 1552 10:01 332566 10:03 341006 3356 426709 1551 199678 cSTA MAC 55:55 PID TXMAC ToD RXMAC ToA 1552 10:01 332566 55:55 266578 3356 10:03 426709 310478 2322 10:02 392609 243455 210998 1551 199678 341006 175670 329673 128679

How Does the cSTA Solves it Position? 5 unknown parameters: x, y, ν1, ν2, ν3 (clock offsets) bSTA#1 MAC 10:01 bSTA#3 MAC 10:03 bSTA#2 MAC 10:02 indirect measurements: Dependent on: ν1, ν2, ν3 cSTA direct measurements: Dependent on: x, y, ν1, ν2, ν3 cSTA MAC 55:55 PID TXMAC ToD RXMAC ToA 1552 10:01 332566 55:55 266578 3356 10:03 426709 310478 2322 10:02 392609 243455 210998 1551 199678 341006 175670 329673 128679 PID TXMAC ToD RXMAC ToA 1552 10:01 332566 55:55 266578 3356 10:03 426709 310478 2322 10:02 392609 243455 210998 1551 199678 341006 175670 329673 128679

Ideal Case: No Clock Drift between Measurements (1) Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 Ideal Case: No Clock Drift between Measurements (1) Assuming there is no clock drift between measurements, then the cSTA may estimate its position via trilateration. The following derivation is a GNSS-like solution, with the distinction that for M bSTAs there are M unknown clock offsets In GNSS, as the entire network is synchronized, there is only 1 unknown clock offset. We shall assume a simplistic, noise (error)-free case of 3 bSTA and 1 cSTA. Jonathan Segev, Intel

Ideal Case: No Clock Drift between Measurements (2) Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 Ideal Case: No Clock Drift between Measurements (2) The solution to the position coordinates is embedded in a set of nonlinear equations. This can be solved either via grid-search methods (see ref. [1]), or via gradient search methods – as described in the following example. Jonathan Segev, Intel

Ideal Case: No Clock Drift between Measurements (3) Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 Ideal Case: No Clock Drift between Measurements (3) Jonathan Segev, Intel

Ideal Case: No Clock Drift between Measurements (4) Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 Ideal Case: No Clock Drift between Measurements (4) Obviously, if there are more measurements (equations) than unknowns, the solution is obtained via LS. Jonathan Segev, Intel

The Reality: Coping with Clock Drifts Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 The Reality: Coping with Clock Drifts In practice, since bSTAs use cheap XTALs, it should be assumed that there is substantial clock drift between the measurement events: Clock drift of 1ppm translates to into a timing error of 1ns every 1ms. Two CToA meas. messages, which were transmitted by the same bSTA, 3ms apart, will introduce an accumulated error of 1m, or ~1500m if 25ppm XOs are used and messages are broadcast @ 5Hz periodicity! To solve this, the cSTA also tracks the clock drift of each bSTA using a Kalman Filter (KF). Typically, 2-3 broadcasts/sec per bSTA are sufficient in XO-based platforms for tracking the clock drifts. Jonathan Segev, Intel

Client Position Estimation July 30, 2013 Presentation Title Client Position Estimation The client executes a Kalman Filter (KF) for estimating and tracking its position coordinates. Since the bSTAs are unsynchronized, the KF also tracks: The offsets between the client’s clock and the clock of each bSTA: 𝜈i(𝑡). The drift of each bSTA clock: 𝜈 i Total KF states: 3+2×NbSTA (= [x(t), y(t), z(t)]+[𝜈i(𝑡), 𝜈 i]×NbSTA) The client “implicitly” synchronizes the network Copyright © 2013 Intel. All rights reserved.

CToA – System Performance Example Typical floor office 95% bSTA Est. Act. ~1.0m Simulation is based on skewed-clock generation (no channel model is assumed) Clocks were generated with an accuracy of ±10ppm with Gaussian-distributed clock noise with zero mean and standard deviation of 1e-9 (1 ppb) Real trajectory estimated using light detection and ranging (LIDAR) system.

SUMMARY & conclusions

Summary & Conclusions Two concurrent modes of operation: Client mode – “GPS-like”, client self positioning Unlimited number of clients Maintains clients’ privacy Network mode – large scale asset tracking, analytics Simple 802.11 STA-based e-Tag clients Based on broadcasting of timing measurement messages. No retransmissions => robust, simple interop. Designed to work with units with cheap/low-quality crystal oscillators (XO) Accuracy is equivalent to REVmc-based FTM.

References IEEE 802.11-17-1387R0 CToA Whitepaper

Thank you for your attention!