Francesco Cerutti, Andrea Tsinganis WP10 Energy deposition & R2E

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Recap of heat loads and peak doses from HL-LHC Q1 to Q7 L.S. Esposito, F. Cerutti HL-LHC WP3 meeting, 22 May 2014.
Advertisements

24/01/08Energy deposition, LIUWG, Elena Wildner1 Upgrade phase 1: Energy deposition in the triplet Elena Wildner Francesco Cerutti Marco Mauri.
ENERGY DEPOSITION IN HYBRID NbTi/Nb 3 Sn TRIPLET CONFIGURATIONS OF THE LHC PHASE I UPGRADE FermilabAccelerator Physics Center Nikolai Mokhov, Fermilab.
Crab Cavities in IR1 and IR5 Some considerations on tunnel integration What will be the situation in the tunnel after the LHC IR Phase-1 Upgrade. What.
Impact of synchrotron radiation in LEPTON COLLIDER arcs
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
E. Todesco PROPOSAL OF APERTURE FOR THE INNER TRIPLET E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland With relevant inputs from colleagues F. Cerutti, S. Fartoukh,
IDS120j WITH GAPS SC#3 AZIMUTHAL DPD DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS WITH MAX GAPS SC#3, SC#4 AZIMUTHAL DPD DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS, DP AND SC TOTAL DP WITH VARYING.
Beam Background Simulations for HL-LHC at IR1 Regina Kwee-Hinzmann, R.Bruce, A.Lechner, N.V.Shetty, L.S.Esposito, F.Cerutti, G.Bregliozzi, R.Kersevan,
DS Heat Load Scenarios in Collision Points and Cleaning Insertions. Prepared by F. Cerutti, A.Lechner and G. Steele on behalf of the FLUKA team (EN-STI)
Review of Quench Limits FermilabAccelerator Physics Center Nikolai Mokhov Fermilab 1 st HiLumi LHC / LARP Collaboration Meeting CERN November 16-18, 2011.
IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS: NEW Hg MODULE mars1510 ( DESKTOP ) vs. mars1512 ( PRINCETON CLUSTER ) Nicholas Souchlas, PBL (3/28/2012) 1.
Heat Deposition Pre-Evaluation In the context of the new cryo-collimator and 11-T dipole projects we present a review of the power deposition studies on.
IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS MODIFYING Hg MODULE Nicholas Souchlas, PBL (11/1/2012) 1.
TAS-Q1 Status & what if exercise Etude [HL-LHC] TAS-Q1.
Shielding the 140 mm option F. Cerutti, L.S. Esposito on behalf of CERN FLUKA team.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
AT-VAC SPC Nicolaas KOS Beam Screens for Inner Triplet Magnets LHC Upgrade Phase 1 Nicolaas KOS  LHC Upgrade phase 1  Inner triplet BS Requirements.
Francesco Cerutti ENERGY DEPOSITION ASPECTS FOR LHCb REQUEST 5th Joint HiLumi LHC - LARP Annual Meeting Oct 29, 2015 through L.S. Esposito’s work and essential.
E. Todesco LAYOUT FOR INTERACTION REGIONS IN HI LUMI LHC E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland Acknowledgements: B. Dalena, M. Giovannozzi, R. De Maria,
08/11/2007M. Giovannozzi – CARE-HHH-APD IR’071 Optics issues for Phase 1 and Phase 2 upgrades Massimo Giovannozzi, CERN Outline: –Option for Phase 1 and.
Energy Deposition Issues in LHC IR Upgrades LHC IR Upgrades Workshop Pheasant Run, St. Charles, IL October 3-4, 2005 Fermilab LHC IR 2005 Nikolai Mokhov,
A liner in the Corrector package A Cu liner has been inserted in the gap between the CBT and the coil aperture of all the corrector package elements (see.
31/07/08Review new IRs: Energy Deposition1 Energy Deposition in the New IRs Francesco Cerutti, Marco Mauri, Alessio Mereghetti, Ezio Todesco, Elena Wildner.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
ENERGY DEPOSITION AND TAS DIAMETER
First evaluation of Dynamic Aperture at injection for FCC-hh
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
CERN, 11th November 2011 Hi-lumi meeting
C. Bracco, R. Bruce, B. Goddard, C. Wiesner, A. Lechner, M. Frankl
Operating IP8 at high luminosity in the HL-LHC era
Beam Energy & Intensity: One bunch during full cycle
Hervé Allain, R. van Weelderen (CERN)
On behalf of the FLUKA team
Task 2. 5: Beam-beam studies D. Banfi, J. Barranco, T. Pieloni, A
HL-LHC Aperture Update
A. Rossi on behalf of the whole team:
Update on HL-LHC triplet fingers
IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS: NEW Hg MODULE
R. Kersevan, TE-VSC-VSM 30/06/2016
Cedric Garion, TE-VSC-DLM, WP12
Follow-up of HL-LHC Annual meeting
Main magnets for PERLE Test Facility
Status and evolution of radiation dose on 60A power converters
Asynchronous free ATS optics for LHC & HL-LHC S. Fartoukh, BE-ABP
Machine lay-out September 2015
Energy deposition studies in IR7 for HL-LHC
DEBRIS IMPACT IN THE TAS-TRIPLET-D1 REGION
WP3 meeting Aug 21, 2015 V1.1 RECAP Francesco Cerutti.
Status of energy deposition studies in IR3
Beam-Induced Energy Deposition Studies in IR Magnets
Alternative design of the matching section for crab-cavity operation
Update on beam screen issues
Upgrade phase 1: Energy deposition in the triplet
PROGRESS TOWARDS AN OPEN MIDPLANE SEPARATION DIPOLE
Cooling aspects for Nb3Sn Inner Triplet quadrupoles and D1
1st HiLumi LHC / LARP Collaboration Meeting 2011 Nov 17th
Collimation margins and *
PROPOSAL OF APERTURE FOR THE INNER TRIPLET
Revised estimates of heat loads and radiation damage in the IT and D1
HL-LHC operations with LHCb at high luminosity
Beam Loss Simulations LHC
Pushing the LHC nominal luminosity with flat beams
FLUKA Energy deposition simulations for quench tests
A. Tsinganis, F. Cerutti (EN/STI/FDA)
Review of Quench Limits
HL-LHCV1.4 (BI) R. De Maria WP13 meeting 3/9/2018.
HL-LHCV1.4 (BI) R. De Maria WP13 meeting 3/9/2018.
L. Gentini, M. Giovannozzi, M. Gonzalez, M. Krupa, H. Mainaud Durand,
Presentation transcript:

Francesco Cerutti, Andrea Tsinganis WP10 Energy deposition & R2E V1.2 reevaluation of collision debris impact on the IT region - and matching section -. The role of IT interconnections and BPM. Francesco Cerutti, Andrea Tsinganis WP10 Energy deposition & R2E 5th HL-LHC TCC Mar 31, 2016

OUTLINE Updated impact on the IT-D1 region for vertical (IR1) and horizontal (IR5) crossing Effect of optics variations Interconnection optimization Updated impact on the MS for vertical (IR1) and horizontal (IR5) crossing F. Cerutti Mar 31, 2016 5th HL-LHC TCC

(IR1) IT REGION F. Cerutti Mar 31, 2016 5th HL-LHC TCC

THE SHIELDING BACKBONE 1.5mm clearance from cold bore dmax = 16mm dmax = 6mm 50% filling factor Q1 Q2 and beyond 99.8mm 119.8mm 112.4mm later reduction to 20%, with explicit alternation of 2cm inermet pieces with 8cm gaps F. Cerutti Mar 31, 2016 5th HL-LHC TCC

Design provided by R. Fernandez-Gomez, T. Lefevre THE WEAK POINT BS shielding gap 70.8cm Q1Q2 Q2 and beyond Inermet circular BPM Design provided by R. Fernandez-Gomez, T. Lefevre F. Cerutti Mar 31, 2016 5th HL-LHC TCC

DEPOSITED POWER @ 7.5L0 Round vertical Round horizontal Round vertical V1.1 Magnet cold mass Beam screen Power [W] Q1A + Q1B 167 251 176 257 140 210 Q2A + corr. 139 115 127 101 150 90 Q2B + corr. 170 147 178 153 165 100 Q3A + Q3B 186 160 125 220 105 CP 85 106 58 73 D1 113 107 92 84 135 80 TOTAL 860 879 791 793 915 675 Extension of BS shielding towards poles (with a 50% filling factor!) re-balances loads between CM and BS Loads in horizontal crossing ~10% lower with respect to vertical crossing F. Cerutti Mar 31, 2016 5th HL-LHC TCC

COIL PEAK POWER DENSITY @ 7.5L0 Peak power density well below design values overall There is an important effect on the IP-faces due to shielding gap in the interconnect, especially for horizontal crossing F. Cerutti Mar 31, 2016 5th HL-LHC TCC

to be reevaluated for 20% filling factor outside mid planes COIL PEAK DOSE FOR 4ab-1 Vertical crossing Horizontal crossing to be reevaluated for 20% filling factor outside mid planes 50 MGy F. Cerutti Mar 31, 2016 5th HL-LHC TCC

FLAT OPTICS BENEFITS Vertical crossing Horizontal crossing Two flat optics scenarios were also studied for both vertical and horizontal crossing 150μrad half-crossing angle, β*x / β*y = 40 / 10 cm 210μrad half-crossing angle, β*x / β*y = 40 / 10 cm Sensitivity of results to changes in bunch length and beam divergence is limited On the contrary, the crossing angle plays an important role Lower dose for lower crossing angle 150μrad 210μrad 295μrad Vertical crossing Horizontal crossing F. Cerutti Mar 31, 2016 5th HL-LHC TCC

PEAK DOSE MINIMISATION SCENARIOS with S. Fartoukh (BE-ABP) Regular vertical crossing angle polarity inversion in IR1, as endorsed for the present LHC, is not a solution: 50 MGy are left in IR5 with horizontal crossing Allowing for regular crossing plane exchange or even same crossing plane in both IRs: F. Cerutti Mar 31, 2016 5th HL-LHC TCC

IC SHIELDING IMPROVEMENT with R. Fernandez-Gomez, C. Garion, R. Kersevan (TE-VSC) BPM shielding at larger radius would have no significant effect 7cm extension F. Cerutti Mar 31, 2016 5th HL-LHC TCC

A GOOD GAIN 15-20% reduction F. Cerutti Mar 31, 2016 5th HL-LHC TCC

SHIELDING DEGRADATION? with C. Garion, M. Morrone (TE-VSC), M. Calviani (EN-STI) In the tungsten absorbers, a neutron fluence of 1017cm-2 and a DPA value of 10-4 are reached over 4ab-1. H and He gas production is of the order of 0.01-0.1 ppm. This is not expected to induce a significant alteration of relevant material properties. F. Cerutti Mar 31, 2016 5th HL-LHC TCC

ANNUAL DOSE IN THE TUNNEL Relevant for vacuum and survey equipment, cabling etc. Averaged over ±20cm from the beam height ~1kGy in the tunnel, except in the TAS-Q1 region a few tens of kGy at the interconnects 10kGy 1kGy F. Cerutti Mar 31, 2016 5th HL-LHC TCC

(IR5) MATCHING SECTION All collimators in place: TCLX.4R5.B1 TCL.5R5.B1/6R5.B1 TCTP.4R5.B2 (V&H) TCT.6R5.B2 (V&H) no tank for the horizontal ones (missing space) Settings (R. Bruce): TCLs @ 12σ TCTs @ 10.9σ Q5 and Q6 masks TAXN 85mm ID aperture and 3.33m length F. Cerutti Mar 31, 2016 5th HL-LHC TCC

DEPOSITED POWER @ 7.5L0 Round vertical Round horizontal Magnet cold mass Beam screen (b1/b2) Magnet Power [W] D2 24 1.3 / 0.1 50 2.5 / 0.1 D2c H 1.8 0.2 / 0.005 2.2 D2c V 1.6 1.4 0.2 / 0.004 Q4 H 10 1.4 / 0.06 11 1.3 / 0.03 Q4c V 5.4 0.6 / 0.07 4.6 0.8 / 0.03 Q4c 7.3 0.8 / 0.1 1.4 / 0.1 Q5 + 3 Q5c 8.5 Q6 + Q6c 3 Larger leakage from TAXN for horizontal crossing Crab cavities: 140-170 mW (b1), ~35-45mW (b2) but significant dependence on the upstream vacuum chamber profile details, not yet defined F. Cerutti Mar 31, 2016 5th HL-LHC TCC

COIL PEAK POWER DENSITY @ 7.5L0 Vertical crossing Horizontal crossing F. Cerutti Mar 31, 2016 5th HL-LHC TCC

COIL PEAK DOSE FOR 4ab-1 Vertical crossing Horizontal crossing Q4c H not evaluated 30 MGy expected The envisaged Q4 corrector aperture of 105mm (here 90mm) would cure this hot spot allowing in addition to prevent its displacement to the Q4 front face by filling the 90-105mm aperture gap F. Cerutti Mar 31, 2016 5th HL-LHC TCC

ANNUAL DOSE IN THE TUNNEL 100kGy 10kGy 100Gy No shielding included RR Averaged over ±20cm from the beam height F. Cerutti Mar 31, 2016 5th HL-LHC TCC

CONCLUSIONS A consistent picture of the collision debris impact up to Q7 has been given for V1.2. The shielding extension in [on the non-IP side of] the interconnections is recommended, while a BPM design embedding absorbers at a larger distance from the axis is not worthwhile. Dose mitigation could be provided by optics flexibility (flat i.e. crossing angle reduction, crossing plane exchange, polarity inversion, unique crossing plane). A coil aperture of 105mm for Q4 correctors is helpful, implying to use the aperture gap for Q4 shielding. Possible removal of TCT4 (which are there for other purposes, namely triplet/experiment protection from incoming beam losses) has to be evaluated with respect to the implied internal bore exposure to TAXN leakage. F. Cerutti Mar 31, 2016 5th HL-LHC TCC

F. Cerutti Mar 31, 2016 5th HL-LHC TCC