SCALE Quality Indicator System

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Assessment
Advertisements

Response to Intervention (RtI) in Primary Grades
South Dakota Accountability System – Year 2 School Performance Index Guyla Ness September 10, 2013.
Goals-Based Evaluation (GBE)
Writing Assessment Plans for Secondary Education / Foundations of Educations Department 9 th Annual Assessment Presentation December 3, 2013 Junko Yamamoto.
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
Determining Validity For Oklahoma’s Educational Accountability System Prepared for the American Educational Research Association (AERA) Oklahoma State.
Measuring Large-Scale Program Impact on K-12 Mathematics and Science Learning Norman L. Webb Robert H. Meyer Paula A. White Adding Value to the Mathematics.
A few of the Achievement Outcomes for San Francisco Unified School District’s California Math and Science Partnership Grant- Working together to Improve.
1 Daily Planning for Today’s Mathematics Classroom Math 413 Professor Mitchell Concepts taken from Daily Planning for Today’s Classroom by Kay M. Price.
Technology’s Edge: The Educational Benefits of Computer-Aided Instruction Lisa Barrow Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Lisa Markman Princeton University.
Catherine Cross Maple, Ph.D. Deputy Secretary Learning and Accountability
Introduction to the MSP Management Information System Molly Hershey-Arista December 16, 2013.
WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT TITLE I PARENT MEETING PRESENTATION.
Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership Sharing in Leadership for Student Success Lead Partner:University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee (UWM) Core Partners:Milwaukee.
The Presidential Awards for Excellence in Mathematics and Science Teaching (PAEMST) Program was established in 1983 by The White House and is sponsored.
Professional Development Activity Log: Comparing Teacher Log and Survey Approaches to Evaluating Professional Development AERA Annual Meeting Montreal,
Montgomery County Public Schools, Maryland Middle School Reform in Montgomery County Public Schools Linda Ferrell Director Director Middle School Instruction.
GTEP Resource Manual Training 2 The Education Trust Study (1998) Katie Haycock “However important demographic variables may appear in their association.
Specific Learning Disability: Accurate, Defensible, & Compliant Identification Mississippi Department of Education.
The Impact of the Maine Learning Technology Initiative on Teachers, Students, and Learning Maine’s Middle School 1-to-1 Laptop Program Dr. David L. Silvernail.
Timberlane Regional School District
Assessment Practices That Lead to Student Learning Core Academy, Summer 2012.
Mathematics and Science Education U.S. Department of Education.
Welcome to the State of the STEM School Address National Inventor’s Hall of Fame ® School Center for Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM)
1 Historical Perspective... Historical Perspective... Science Education Reform Efforts Leading to Standards-based Science Education.
NOAA Education Presentation to the 50th AAS Robert H. Goddard Memorial Symposium Louisa Koch NOAA Director of Education March 29, 2012
2005 NAEP Results Mathematics San Diego City Schools Board of Education Workshop January 17, 2006 S D CS.
No Child Left Behind Tecumseh Local Schools. No Child Left Behind OR... 4 No Educator Left Unconfused 4 No Lawyer Left Unemployed 4 No Child Left Untested.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
Research and Evaluation Team Lines of Work Andy Porter, Director Building a Partnership – Susan Millar District Case Studies – William Clune Targeted Studies.
The PLC Team Learning Process Review Step One: Identify essential (key) learning standards that all students must learn in each content area during each.
Rochester Area Math Science Partnership Our Mission: To support high student achievement through world class standards in math and science Continuous.
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Principal – Adriene Stephenson. Enrollment – 371 General Education – 83% SPED – 17% LEP – Less than 1% African American – 75% White – 22% Asian, Hispanic,
Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.
Performance Monitoring COURTNEY MILLS SCPCSD DIRECTOR OF ACADEMIC PROGRAMS.
Violet Kulo, Alec Bodzin, Tamara Peffer Lehigh University Support provided by the Toyota USA Foundation NARST 2011 Orlando, FL.
Aligning Assessments to Monitor Growth in Math Achievement: A Validity Study Jack B. Monpas-Huber, Ph.D. Director of Assessment & Student Information Washington.
Office of Service Quality
University of Colorado at Boulder National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing Challenges for States and Schools in the No.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Loretta L. Radulic, Assistant Superintendent Roxbury Township Public Schools October State Assessment Results and Analysis.
Construct Validity of the Culturally Engaging Campus Environments Scale for White Students and Students of Color Samuel D. Museus University of Denver.
Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]
Q2 Benchmark Report1 Lodi Unified School District Benchmark Assessment Results (Mid-Year Student Achievement Monitoring) Prepared by.
Accountability: What Does it Mean and How is it Influencing Research in Mathematics Education Norman L. Webb Wisconsin Center for Education Research University.
Evaluation Requirements for MSP and Characteristics of Designs to Estimate Impacts with Confidence Ellen Bobronnikov March 23, 2011.
Administrative Conference, September 2013
Gloria Ladson-Billings University of Wisconsin
What you need to know About Title I
Evaluation of An Urban Natural Science Initiative
Using NAEP Results to Examine State Trends in Mathematics Achievement
Smarter Balanced Assessment Results
Courtney Mills Principal, Midlands Middle College
Online Data Workshop SIP Office of Curriculum and Instruction Office of School Improvement.
Student Assessment and Evaluation
PHILLIPS PREPARATORY SCHOOL
2009 California Standards Test (CST) Results
Analysis and Reporting, Accountability Services
MEAP Results.
Norman L Webb.
Student Assessment and Evaluation
School Improvement Process
What Every Family Needs to Know! Date
Presentation transcript:

SCALE Quality Indicator System Norman L. Webb Wisconsin Center for Education Research Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association Montreal, April 11, 2005

Purposes for the Indicator System monitor the progress of the four partner school districts to judge the degree SCALE attains specified benchmarks; and report information to NSF to comply with the MIS requirements.

SCALE Evaluation Indicator System Capacity Action Student Outcomes Input Student Achievement Context Opportunity To Learn District School Teacher Student Disposition To Learn Project SCALE Student Participation University

SCALE Main Goals Drive the Development of the SQIS Goal 1 Students experience deep, conceptually based instruction Teachers Schools Student achievement and participation Goal 2 Students annually engage in an extended scientific investigation Goal 3 Teachers participate in STEM-IHE professional learning Goal 4 Education of all students becomes more equitable

Main components of the SQIS Student Achievement Student Participation Instructional Activities Teachers (Background and Knowledge) Teacher Professional Learning School

Sample Indicator Rate of Change in Percent Proficient by Grade Baseline—1999, 2000, 2001, 2002 Madison Metropolitan School District Mathematics Science Grade 4 -2.80 -5.10 Grade 8 -0.10 -1.60 Grade 10 -0.20 -0.80

Sample Indicator Rate of Change in Percent Proficient Grade 4 by Ethnicity Baseline—1999, 2000, 2001, 2002 Madison Metropolitan School District Grade 4 Am Indian Asian 3.30 Black Hispanic -2.00 White

Sample Indicator Inquiry-Based Learning Scale Scale Points Rarely/Never (1) At Least Once a Month (2) At Least Once a Week (3) 2-3 Times a Week (4) Almost Daily (5) Denver (N=68) Mean 2.74 S.D. .607 r .84

Sample item on the Inquiry-based Learning Scale 2. How often did students in a typical class last year explain their reasoning, whether written or verbal? Denver (N=68) 3.41 .909 Rank 2 of 15 Madison (N=333) 3.42 .990 Rank 1 of 14

Challenges Development of Reliable and Valid Instruments Aggregation of data in a meaningful way Have district buy-in