Acid Rain Monitoring Update: NY’s Monitoring Program Federal Legislation EPA “Pilot” Monitoring Program DAR Management Meeting Albany, NY September 11-13,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nitrogen Deposition at Rocky Mountain National Park: the RoMANS Study Mike Barna Bill Malm Bret Schichtel Kristi Gebhart Air Resources Division National.
Advertisements

National Park Service Critical Loads:
History of Critical Loads meetings – how have we gotten to this point? Andrzej Bytnerowicz 1, Rich Fisher 2 and Al Riebau 3 USDA Forest Service 1 Pacific.
WRAP Meeting Nov 11, 2009 Ozone and Nitrogen Concerns in Western National Parks Chris Shaver Air Resources Division National Park Service.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter; Proposed Rule & 40 CFR Parts 53 and 58 Revisions to Ambient Air Monitoring Regulations;
Earth’s Changing Environment Lecture 3 Air Quality.
Photochemical Model Performance for PM2.5 Sulfate, Nitrate, Ammonium, and pre-cursor species SO2, HNO3, and NH3 at Background Monitor Locations in the.
NADP Passive Ammonia Monitoring Network (AMoN) Melissa Puchalski, US EPA, CAMD Mark Rhodes, NADP Program Office Chris Lehmann, NADP Central Analytical.
Investigation of Acid Deposition Trends in the United States March 2014.
Tonnie Cummings National Park Service, Pacific West Region National Tribal Forum on Air Quality May 14, 2014.
Update: National Ambient Air Quality Standards Association of California Airports September 15, 2010 Phil DeVita.
Perspectives in Designing and Operating a Regional Ammonia Monitoring Network Gary Lear USEPA Clean Air Markets Division.
Paul Wishinski VT DEC Presentation for: MARAMA-NESCAUM-OTC Regional Haze Workshop August 2-3, 2000 Gorham, New Hampshire LYE BROOK WILDERNESS CLASS I AREA.
PM 2.5 in the Upper Midwest Michael Koerber Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium.
FLAG Deposition Subgroup Report Ellen Porter Air Quality Branch U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Acid Rain Cooperation in Europe. The Problem  Svante Oden (1968): “The Acidification of Air and Precipitation and its Consequences.”  SOx, NOx -> transported.
The Visibility Information Exchange Web System (VIEWS): An Approach to Air Quality Data Management and Presentation In a broader sense, VIEWS facilitates.
“Acid” in the Atmosphere Pollution and Impact on Ecosystems.
IMPROVE Network Assessment Plans. IMPROVE Network Assessment Motivation: –EPA’s air quality monitoring budget is not growing, but their requirements are.
Eladio M. Knipping, Ph.D. January 16, 2014 Air Quality Applied Science Team (AQAST) Meeting Rice University, Houston, TX Air Quality Research from the.
Eighteen Years of Acid Wet Deposition at Mt. Mansfield Goals & Objectives One goal of the VMC is to understand the sources, mechanisms, and effects of.
Trends in the Wet and Dry Deposition of Nitrogen and Sulfur Species
CMAS Conference, October 16 – 18, 2006 The work presented here was performed by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation with partial.
Results of Ambient Air Analyses in Support of Transport Rule Presentation for RPO Workshop November 2003.
CAMD PROGRAM UPDATE NACAA/EPA Ambient Air Monitoring Steering Committee Clean Air Markets Division, OAP June
The Collaborative Environmental Monitoring and Research Initiative (CEMRI) A Pilot in the Delaware River Basin Peter S. Murdoch, USGS Richard Birdsey,
PM2.5 Model Performance Evaluation- Purpose and Goals PM Model Evaluation Workshop February 10, 2004 Chapel Hill, NC Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS.
The Non-tidal Water Quality Monitoring Network: past, present and future opportunities Katie Foreman Water Quality Analyst, UMCES-CBPO MASC Non-tidal Water.
Proposed Revisions to Ambient Air Monitoring Regulations, and Proposed FY2007 Air Monitoring Guidance WESTAR Spring Business Meeting March 28, 2006.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards and Implementation National Tribal Forum June 2011.
The National Ambient Air Monitoring Strategy and Network Design Westar Spring 2007 Business Meeting April 4, 2007 Bruce Louks, Idaho Department of Environmental.
Sound solutions delivered uncommonly well Understanding the Permitting Impacts of the Proposed Ozone NAAQS Pine Mountain, GA ♦ August 20, 2015 Courtney.
The Use of Source Apportionment for Air Quality Management and Health Assessments Philip K. Hopke Clarkson University Center for Air Resources Engineering.
VISTAS Data / Monitoring Overview Scott Reynolds SC DHEC- Larry Garrison KY DNREP Data Workgroup Co-Chairs RPO National Technical Workgroup Meeting – St.
Colorado Perspective on Nitrogen Oxides Paul Tourangeau Director Colorado APCD November 11, 2009.
Session 853 Extending Organizational Capacity & Capability to Evaluate Federal Environmental Research Programs Research Contributions to Outcomes & Accountability.
Focus on the Headwaters The Shenandoah Watershed Study / The Virginia Trout Stream Sensitivity Study Rick Webb Department of Environmental Sciences University.
Why do we Measure Precipitation Chemistry? Christopher Lehmann CAL Director 2007 Field Operations Training Course.
Evaluating ammonia (NH 3 ) predictions in the NOAA National Air Quality Forecast Capability (NAQFC) using in situ aircraft measurements William Battye,
Critical Loads and Target Loads: Tools for Assessing, Evaluating and Protecting Natural Resources Ellen Porter Deborah Potter, Ph.D. National Park Service.
Comments on the Research of Dr. Bob Musselman (Atmospheric Deposition Research) Allen S. Lefohn, Ph.D. A.S.L. & Associates Helena, Montana August 10, 2005.
Lead NAAQS Review: 2 nd Draft Risk Assessment NTAA/EPA Tribal Air Call August 8, 2007 Deirdre Murphy and Zachary Pekar OAQPS.
NAAQS and Criteria Pollutant Trends Update US EPA Region 10.
U S Environmental Protection Agency
Pollutant Emissions from Large Wildfires in the Western United States Shawn P. Urbanski, Matt C. Reeves, W. M. Hao US Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research.
Evaluating temporal and spatial O 3 and PM 2.5 patterns simulated during an annual CMAQ application over the continental U.S. Evaluating temporal and spatial.
WGE September 20111Brit Lisa Skjelkvåle Trends in precipitation chemistry, surface water chemistry and aquatic biota in acidified areas in Europe.
Strategies For Linking Atmospheric Deposition Networks to the National Water Quality Monitoring Network Mark Nilles Office of Water Quality U.S. Geological.
Air Quality and Seney National Wildlife Refuge Jill Webster June 14, 2007.
Status Report on the Role of Ammonia in the San Joaquin Valley December 11, 2003 Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency.
NADP-Compatible Wet Chemistry Sampler Data Analysis, Telluride, CO Mark Williams Kim Raby University of Colorado Institute of Arctic and Alpine.
Atmospheric Deposition Unit 4451 Research on Air Pollution Distribution and Effects in California Mountains Andrzej Bytnerowicz, Michael Arbaugh, Nancy.
1 Long Range Transport of Air Pollution Air pollution can travel hundreds of miles and cause multiple health and environmental problems on regional or.
Approach in developing PnET-BGC model inputs for Smoky Mountains
National Wildlife Refuge
Monitoring/Data Analysis Discussion Group June 10, 2005
Figure 1. (a) Trends in human population (USCB 1993, 2001) with projections to 2025 (Campbell 1996). (b) Trends in land cover, including forest (Smith.
Table 1. Linkages between emissions of SO2 and NOx and important environmental issues From: Acidic Deposition in the Northeastern.
CMAS Annual Conference, October 24-26, 2016, Chapel Hill, NC
Western Ozone Issues WESTAR Fall Business Meeting Salt Lake City, UT
Sunil Kumar TAC, COG July 9, 2007
Nitrogen Deposition: Measurement Techniques and Field Studies
Acid Deposition Topic: 5 A.S: N – R
Air Monitoring Trends in New Jersey
PMcoarse , Monitoring Budgets, and AQI
Continuous measurement of airborne particles and gases
Measuring Atmospheric N Inputs
Air Pollutants 200 Air pollutants are recognized and assessed by the USEPA Listed in the Clean Air Act.
A Review of Time Integrated PM2.5 Monitoring Data in the United States
Status of the PM NAAQS Review
Presentation transcript:

Acid Rain Monitoring Update: NY’s Monitoring Program Federal Legislation EPA “Pilot” Monitoring Program DAR Management Meeting Albany, NY September 11-13, 2012

SO2 Air Quality Standards State SO2 Air Quality Objective: 1964 Primary 0.1 ppm (24-Hr) and 0.25 ppm (1-Hr) State Acid Deposition Control Act (SADCA) set a Environmental Threshold Value (ETV) for sulfate deposition: 20 kilograms per hectare: 1984 National SO2 NAAQS established: 1971 Primary 0.03 ppm Annual and 0.14 ppm (1-Hr) Secondary 0.5 (3-Hr) (Revoked in 1973) Current SO2 NAAQS Primary 75 ppb (1-Hr), Secondary: proposed in first multipollutant NOx/SOx standard

NYSDEC ‘s Acid Rain Monitoring Objectives Provide a consistent, quality-assured, long-term acid deposition database. Measure acid deposition in sensitive receptor areas. Measure acid deposition in urban and upwind areas. (Architecture/Monument degradation was an important acid rain issue) Use these data to perform spatial and temporal analyses of acid deposition, its precursors, and its effects. Track the effectiveness of programs to reduce acid deposition precursor emissions.

EPA Proposed a first ever multipollutant NOx/SOx Secondary NAAQS using air quality indicators (SOx and NOy) with levels set appropriately for an ecological indicator: Acid Neutralizing Capacity ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 50 [EPA–HQ–OAR–2007–1145; FRL–9654–4] RIN 2060–AO72 Secondary National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Oxides of Nitrogen and Sulfur AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule.

Aquatic Acidification Index (AAI) Final Rule: “The intent of the AAI is to weight atmospheric concentrations of oxides of nitrogen and sulfur by their propensity to contribute to acidification through deposition, given the fundamental acidifying potential of each pollutant, and to take into account the ecological factors that govern acid sensitivity in different ecosystems.”

AAI Links ANC to Air Indicators AAI is set to protect a percentage of sensitive water bodies AAI is uniform nationally F factors are used to account for physical and environmental differences between Ecoregion 22 of the 84 unique Ecoregions are acid sensitive

F factors are Ecoregion Specific and require extensive monitoring and modeling F1 is the target ANC level plus the amount of deposition (critical load) the ecosystem can receive and still achieve the target level Accounts for buffering capacity of soils / median runoff rate Requires observations and modeling F2 is the amount of reduced nitrogen deposition within an ecoregion incl. ammonia and ammonium / median runoff rate F3 and F4 are transference ratios that convert ambient NOy and SOx to deposition of NOy and SOx F2-F4 based on CMAQ (due to lack of dry deposition measurements)

EPA “Pilot” Monitoring Objectives Evaluate measurement methods for the ambient air indicators of NOy and SOx and consider designation as FRMs Examine the variability and improve characterization of concentration and deposition patterns of NOy and SOx Develop updated ecoregion specific factors (i.e., F1 through F4) for the AAI equation based in part on new observed air quality data (relate air concentrations to water chemistry) Calculate ecoregion specific AAI values and compare to a set of alternative AAI-based standards Develop air monitoring network design criteria Assess the use of total nitrate measurements as a potential alternative indicator for NOy Evaluate modeled dry deposition algorithms Facilitate stakeholder engagement in addressing implementation issues NYSDEC: Upwind and urban are the only objectives not included in

The Pilot will use NADP’s 250+ sites for wet deposition measurements

NADP provides stable long term data necessary to detect wet deposition trends

CASTNET sites will be used in the Pilot to provide data to estimate dry deposition

CASTNET Filter Pack provides rural integrated gas and particle measurements

Ammonia Monitoring Network (AMoN) used in Pilot to measure Atmospheric Ammonia Passive, inexpensive samplers Low cost, 2 week integrated sample (ug NH3/m3) 1 EPA and 2 NYSDEC sites in Pilot (Huntington Forest, Nick’s Lake and Whiteface base)

Current acid deposition monitoring in NY and surrounding region PA30 PA21 PA29 PA18 PA52 PA90 PA98 PA72 NY01 NY08 NY20 NY29 NY52 NY98 VT01 MA08 NY96 VT99 (also an AIRMoN site) NY99 NY68 NY22 NY10 Niagara Falls Westfield Elmira Mt. Ninham Eisenhower Park Bronx (Pfizer) Belleayre Mt. Piseco Lake Nick’s Lake Wanakena E. Syracuse Camp Georgetown Whiteface Mt. Paul Smiths Rochester Grafton NY67 Current acid deposition monitoring in NY and surrounding region DEC (▲), NADP/NTN (●), event-based NADP/AIRMoN (■) DEC 16, NADP NTN: 11 in NY, 8 in northern PA, 2 in VT, 1 in central MA Existing NTN sites are rural; DEC sites a mix of rural, suburban, and urban

Gaps in EPA Pilot program The EPA plans to use one central site (Huntington Forest) to represent entire Adirondack Region The site is not near heavily impacted/monitored water bodies The NYSDEC plans to add additional monitors in the Southwest Adirondack Park near sensitive lakes with long water quality records and in the Northeast corner to provide spatial variability. The data used in the Pilot should cover areas with lakes that have a broad range of acid buffering capacity so we can evaluate proposed AAI standards The CFP should be compared to continuous SO2 measurements

Proposed changes to NYSDEC acid rain monitoring objectives Maintain data coverage across the state with focus on rural and acid-sensitive regions (less focus on urban/suburban areas) Support the secondary NOx/SOx 5-year pilot project, focus is on Adirondack Mt region Reduce redundant sampling by relying on existing NADP sites Ensure consistent comparable acid deposition collection across the region/country (transition DEC to NADP NTN)

Proposed changes to NYSDEC Acid Deposition monitoring network PA30 PA21 PA29 PA18 PA52 PA90 PA98 PA72 NY01 NY08 NY20 NY29 NY52 NY98 VT01 MA08 NY96 NY99 NY68 NY22 NY10 Amherst Bronx (Pfizer) Piseco Lake Nick’s Lake Wanakena Paul Smiths Rochester NY67 VT99 (also an AIRMoN site) Proposed changes to NYSDEC Acid Deposition monitoring network Close 10 DEC sites: Westfield, Elmira, Belleayre Mountain, Mount Ninham, Grafton, Whiteface Mountain (existing NTN), East Syracuse, Eisenhower Park, Nick’s Lake (only deposition), Camp Georgetown (no power currently) Convert 6 DEC monitors to NADP/NTN monitors Notes: Whiteface Mountain: explore seasonal wet deposition at summit Nick’s Lake and Whiteface will have CASTNET filter pack, AMon and continuous SO2 Moss Lake site (NY29) is a NADP NTN site Move Niagara Falls to Amherst

Conclusions All sites within the State meet the original Sulfate threshold set in 1984 (Westfield close) It is imperative that the Pilot accurately assess conditions in the Adirondack Region NY State will be very well covered by 18 NADP sites (only Colorado has more at 19) The continuous rural SO2 monitors will be evaluated against the integrated CFP (continuous SO2 monitors operate near detection limit in Adirondack region)

NADP NTN site operators and sponsors (as of August 2012) VT01 Bennington (city)/state of VT USGS VT99 USGS/UVM-SAES MA08 UMass-SAES NESCAUM NY01 Alfred Univ/USGS NY08 Cornell-SAES Cornell/USDA NY10 SUNY Fredonia/USGS NY20 SUNY ESF SUNY ESF/USEPA NY22 Akwesasne Mohawk Tribe USEPA CAMD NY29 NYSDEC NY52 SUNY Oswego NY68 NY96 Suffolk Co DHS Suffolk Co DHS/USEPA NY98 SUNY Albany NY99 Black Rock Forest Consortium/USGS PA18 PSU PA21 N/A PA29 Northeastern Research Station USFS PA30 PA52 PADEP PS72 Pinchot Inst for Conservation PA90 PA98 NADP is a cooperative